A modified Foker's technique for long gap esophageal atresia

Favorable Outcome of Electively Delayed Elongation Procedure in Long-Gap Esophageal Atresia

The ideal approach to long gap esophageal atresia is still controversial. On one hand, preserving a patient's native esophagus may require several steps and can be fraught with complications. On the other hand, most replacement procedures are irreversible and disrupt gastrointestinal physiology. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short- and medium-term outcome of electively delayed esophageal elongation procedures before esophageal reconstruction in patients with long-gap esophageal atresia. Since the neonatal esophagus grows over-proportionally and can increase its wall thickness in the first few months of life, we hypothesized that postponing the elongation steps until 3 months of age would lead to a lower complication rate. We thus retrospectively recorded complications such as mediastinitis, anastomotic leakage, stricture formation, or gastroesophageal reflux requiring surgery, and compared it to reported outcomes. In our treatment protocol, patients born with long-gap esophageal atresia underwent gastrostomy placement and were sham fed until 3 months of age. We then assessed the gap between the esophageal ends and started serial elongation procedures. We only proceeded to the reconstruction of the esophagus when its length allowed a tension-free anastomosis. From April 2013 to April 2019, we treated 13 Patients with long-gap esophageal atresia. Nine patients without prior surgical procedures underwent Foker procedures. Four patients arrived with a pre-existing cervical esophagostomy and thus underwent Kimura's procedure, two of them with a concomitant Foker elongation of the lower pouch. Esophageal reconstruction was feasible in all patients, while none of them developed mediastinitis at any point in their treatment. We managed the only anastomotic leak conservatively. Almost half of the patients did not require any further intervention following reconstruction, while three patients required multiple (≥5) anastomotic dilatations. All but one patient achieved full oral nutrition. Only one child required a fundoplication to manage gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. Electively delayed esophageal elongation procedures in patients with long-gap esophageal atresia allowed preservation of the native esophagus in all patients. The approach had low peri-procedural morbidity, and patients enjoy favorable functional outcomes. Therefore, we suggest considering this method in the management of patients with long-gap esophageal atresia.

Management of long gap esophageal atresia: A systematic review and evidence-based guidelines from the APSA Outcomes and Evidence Based Practice Committee

BACKGROUND

Treatment of the neonate with long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) is one of the most challenging scenarios facing pediatric surgeons today. Contributing to this challenge is the variability in case definition, multiple approaches to management, and heterogeneity of the reported outcomes. This necessitates a clear summary of existing evidence and delineation of treatment controversies.

METHODS

The American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence Based Practice Committee drafted four consensus-based questions regarding LGEA. These questions concerned the definition and determination of LGEA, the optimal method of surgical management, expected long-term outcomes, and novel therapeutic techniques. A comprehensive search strategy was crafted and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were utilized to identify, review and report salient articles.

RESULTS

More than 3000 publications were reviewed, with 178 influencing final recommendations. In total, 18 recommendations are provided, primarily based on level 4-5 evidence. These recommendations provide detailed descriptions of the definition of LGEA, treatment techniques, outcomes and future directions of research.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence supporting best practices for LGEA is currently low quality. This review provides best recommendations based on a critical evaluation of the available literature. Based on the lack of strong evidence, prospective and comparative research is clearly needed.

TYPE OF STUDY

Treatment study, prognosis study and study of diagnostic test.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II-V.

Elongation of esophageal segments by bougienage stretching technique for long gap esophageal atresia to achieve delayed primary anastomosis by thoracotomy or thoracoscopic repair: A first experience from China

OBJECTIVES

The treatment of long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) is one of the most challenging congenital malformations in neonatal surgery. A preoperative bougienage stretching technique for elongation of the two segments of esophagus is applied to achieve utilizing the native esophagus to establish esophageal continuity by open or thoracoscopic approach.

METHODS

From January 2015 to May 2017, 12 neonates who suffered from LGEA were admitted to our department. They were divided into 2 groups (A and B) according to their admission time. They all accepted bougienage stretching technique before esophageal anastomosis.

RESULTS

Initially the lengths of esophageal gap in 12 infants ranged from 4 to 7.5 vertebral bodies (M=5.8±1.1). The gap lengths became -1 to 2.5 vertebral bodies after bougienage stretching technique and tension-free anastomosis were performed successfully for all 12 cases: Group A (n=5) by thoracotomy and group B (n=7) by thoracoscopic approach. 12 cases have been followed up for 1-25 months (M=12.4±8.5) after definitive surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Bougienage stretching technique for LGEA is feasible with satisfactory clinical results. Thoracoscopic approach is a good choice for primary anastomosis in LGEA.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Treatment Study Level IV.

Esophagoesophagopexy technique for assisted fistulization of esophageal atresia

PURPOSE

We describe our experience using a modified suture fistula technique for addressing tension in longer gap esophageal atresia (EA). Esophagoesophagopexy (EEP) is the tacking of the proximal and distal ends of esophageal pouches without formal anastomosis. In this retrospective cohort, we review the outcomes of patients with EA after EEP.

METHODS

We reviewed the operative reports of EA cases treated at our institution from 1997 to 2016 and identified all patients described as having EEP.

RESULTS

Of 129 EA cases, five patients underwent EEP. Formal anastomosis was not done due to patient's instability, prematurity, or long gap. Median birth weight was 1.4 kg (0.6-2.2 kg), and median gestational age at birth was 29 weeks (25-34 weeks). Age at time of EEP ranged 0-5 months. Esophagoesophageal fistula was confirmed in three patients. All three had strictures requiring weekly dilations. One of these patients died. The two surviving patients underwent fundoplication.

CONCLUSION

We describe an alternative technique for esophageal anastomosis in patients for whom a standard anastomosis is not possible. EEP can lead to a functional anastomosis through fistulization and avoid the morbidity of multiple thoracotomies and lengthening procedures. Families should be educated on the potential need for dilations and antireflux procedures.

Is fundoplication required after the Foker procedure for long gap esophageal atresia?

BACKGROUND

Fundoplication has been performed almost universally in children treated with the Foker procedure (FP) for long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA). We report our experience with pharmacological management and endoscopic surveillance rather than early routine fundoplication in infants treated with the FP.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed of all children treated with the Foker procedure at our institution.

RESULTS

Nine children have undergone the FP since 2007. Median time between FP and definitive anastomoses was 22days. All nine children kept their native esophagus. There were three minor anastomotic leaks, all treated nonoperatively. All children required dilatation of anastomotic strictures (range 2-15). All have been treated with proton pump inhibitors. Three children had eosinophilic esophagitis and one had Barrett's esophagus. Only two children in this series have undergone fundoplication, which was performed for symptomatic and persistent erosive esophagitis.

CONCLUSION

The question of early versus delayed fundoplication in LGEA patients managed with the FP remains unanswered. Our series demonstrates that it is possible to achieve good long-term outcomes when the operation is reserved for children with gastroesophageal reflux disease resistant to maximal medical therapy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Impact of an external lengthening procedure on the outcome of long-gap esophageal atresia at our hospitals

PURPOSE

To demonstrate the outcome of external lengthening for long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) at our hospitals.

METHODS

Five patients with LGEA underwent external lengthening between 2010 and 2014 (group A), and 11 patients with LGEA underwent other lengthening techniques between 1990 and 2011 (group B). We compared the procedure and outcome between these two groups.

RESULTS

The mean birth weight was 2001 g in group A and 2485 g in group B (p = 0.06). The mean age at esophageal reconstruction was 28 days in group A and 227 days in group B (p = 0.03). Although primary esophageal anastomosis without myotomy was feasible in all patients in group A, a myotomy was needed for primary esophageal anastomosis in half of the patients in group B. Anastomotic leakage occurred in none in group A and in six patients in group B (p = 0.03). The mean age at the establishment of full oral feeding was 76 days in group A and 686 days in group B (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

External traction for LGEA can effectively lengthen the esophagus to enable primary anastomosis at an earlier age. This may facilitate oral intake.

Immediate primary anastomosis for isolated oesophageal atresia: A single-centre experience

BACKGROUND

Isolated oesophageal atresia without tracheo-oesophageal fistula represents a major challenge for most paediatric surgeons. Here, we present our experience with six neonates with isolated oesophageal atresia who successfully underwent immediate primary anastomosis using multiple Livaditis circular myotomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All six neonates were gross type A isolated oesophageal atresia (6%), from among 102 neonates with oesophageal atresia, treated between January 2009 and December 2013. Five neonates were female; one was male. The mean birth weight was 2300 (range 1700-3100) g.

RESULTS

All six neonates successfully underwent immediate primary anastomosis using multiple myotomies (mean 3; range 2-4) within 10 (median 3) days after birth. The gap under traction ranged from 6 to 7 cm. One neonate died of a major cardiac anomaly. Another neonate was lost to follow-up after being well for 3 months. Three anastomotic strictures were treated with balloon dilatation, and four anastomotic leaks were treated conservatively. The mean duration of follow-up was 33 months.

CONCLUSIONS

To treat isolated oesophageal atresia, an immediate primary anastomosis can be achieved using multiple myotomies. Although, this approach is associated with high complication rates, as are other similar approaches, these complications can be overcome.

Histological study of the elongated esophagus in a rat model

BACKGROUND

Esophageal elongation by traction suture is used in pediatric patients to manage long-gap esophageal atresia (EA). There was no histological evidence of the esophageal elongation. Here, we sought to clarify the histologic effects of traction on the esophagus by using a rat EA model simulating Foker's method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Rats were randomly assigned into three groups (n = 5 each). The traction group underwent daily stretching of the distal segment of the esophagus. The nontraction group underwent a sham operation, and the normal group served as controls. Seven days after the operation, the distal segments of the esophagus were removed. The length and thickness were measured, and samples were stained with Ki-67, nNOS, and S-100.

RESULTS

The whole length of the esophagus in the traction group was significantly longer than that in the nontraction group (P < 0.01). The thickness of esophageal mucosa and muscle tended to become thin by traction, but not significantly. The Ki-67-positive ratio of mucosa and muscle was significantly higher in the traction group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in Ki-67 between two segments (cardia-middle and middle-stump) in any group. Auerbach's plexus was identified at all sites of elongated esophagus by nNOS and S-100 staining.

CONCLUSIONS

By traction, the esophagus was elongated uniformly and cell proliferation activity was promoted in all parts of the elongated esophagus in the rat EA model.