Redo surgery for biliary atresia

Optimizing Post-Kasai Management in Biliary Atresia: Balancing Native Liver Survival and Transplant Timing

BACKGROUND

 Kasai procedure (KPE) is a palliative intervention in infants with biliary atresia (BA) aiming to restore biliary drainage. While the measure of success in BA is the post-Kasai native liver survival (NLS), BA remains the most frequent indication for liver transplantation in children. While a considerable amount of children fail to clear their jaundice following KPE, resulting in early liver failure and transplantation, some children become jaundice-free after "successful" KPE. However, sequelae of chronic liver disease might affect those children, becoming a later risk for NLS. While liver transplantation is inevitable in the majority of children, various salvage procedures have been recently described to maintain NLS. This article provides a comprehensive overview of procedures performed after KPE to prolong NLS in BA patients from early childhood to late adulthood and discusses their indications and limitations.

METHODS

 A literature-based search for surgical and radiological interventions performed in BA patients after KPE to prolong NLS (salvage procedures) was performed using PubMed. Data from case reports, retrospective studies, and registries were included.

RESULTS

 Fifteen studies included 794 patients who underwent post-KPE salvage procedures. The Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine levels were IIc to IV.Interventions included redo-Kasai's (n = 710) for cessation of bile flow post-KPE, surgical and radiological procedures (n = 14) for bile lakes, and recurrent cholangitis, shunt surgery (n = 49), and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (n = 21) for portal hypertension in BA patients. Age at the time of salvage interventions varied considerably, including redo-Kasai's at 27 days of life and percutaneous biliary interventions in a 35-year-old.

CONCLUSION

 Salvage procedures can maintain NLS after KPE in BA patients with disease sequelae. However, indications remain scarce and liver transplantation is ultimately unavoidable in the majority of patients. While redo-Kasai numbers are globally decreasing with the advances in liver transplantation, procedures for bile lakes and portal hypertension can be viable options for patients with complications but otherwise stable liver function. Discussion on those procedures should be held by multidisciplinary expert teams, involving pediatric hepatologists, pediatric surgeons, and transplant surgeons to elaborate on the potential of maintaining NLS or proceeding with transplantation.

Revision Kasai portoenterostomy: A review of indications and outcomes

The Kasai portoenterostomy (KPE) can provide a surgical cure for children with biliary atresia (BA), without the need for a liver transplant (OLTxp). Revision KPE can be attempted following a failed initial KPE where biliary clearance is not achieved. The most common indications for revision KPE are recurrent jaundice or recurrent cholangitis, although it has also been performed for persistent jaundice or bile lakes. Outcomes are heterogenous but the best results appear to be with recurrent jaundice or limited episodes of recurrent cholangitis. In the setting of a failed KPE, providers must make a patient-specific decision about whether to attempt revision KPE versus proceed with OLTxp. While the choice is multifactorial, patients who undergo revision KPE likely do not have worse long-term outcomes than patients who undergo a single KPE.

Prednisolone administration monitored by postoperative stool color achieves high jaundice clearance after laparoscopic portoenterostomy for biliary atresia

PURPOSE

Stool color (SC) for monitoring prednisolone use in biliary atresia (BA) patients after laparoscopic portoenterostomy (LPE) was reviewed.

METHODS

Subjects were 47 post-LPE BA patients given a reducing dose course of intravenous prednisolone. The course started at 4 mg/kg/day and gradually reduced, ultimately reaching a final total dose (TD) of 31.5 mg/kg. Normal SC indicated a course could progress until finished and was repeated until jaundice clearance (JC) was achieved. Abnormal SC persisting for two consecutive courses was the absolute indication for redo or liver transplantation (LTx).

RESULTS

JC was achieved in 38/47 (80.9%) LPE cases and 4/6 redos to give an overall JC rate (JCR) of 42/47 (89.4%). Outcomes after one course (n = 5; JCR: 80.0%; median TD: 30.0 mg/kg, interquartile range [IQR: 26.0-31.5]), two courses (n = 10; JCR: 90.0%; median TD: 62.5 mg/kg [IQR: 60.8-66.0]), three courses (n = 13; JCR: 92.3%; median TD: 90.0 mg/kg [IQR: 86.0-90.0]), four courses (n = 10; JCR: 80.0%; median TD: 120.0 mg/kg [IQR: 116.7-123.3]), five courses (n = 7; JCR: 100%; median TD: 156.0 mg/kg [IQR: 154.3-157.5]), six courses (n = 1; JCR: 100%; TD: 189.0 mg/kg), ten courses (n = 1; JCR: 100%; TD: 308 mg/kg).

CONCLUSION

Indications for repeat prednisolone and timing of redo/LTx based on SC monitoring appeared effective based on high JCR and successful redo/LTx.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

III.

Laparoscopic revision of Kasai portoenterostomy after initial laparoscopic portoenterostomy in patients with biliary atresia: a limited but positive effect on native liver survival

PURPOSE

It is important for patients with biliary atresia (BA) to retain the native liver after Kasai portoenterostomy (PE). Laparoscopic PE (Lap-PE) is standard, whereas laparoscopic revision of PE (Lap-revision) is performed as needed. We report the medium-term outcomes of Lap-revision.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the demographics and outcomes of 63 patients who underwent Lap-PE between 2013 and 2021. Indications for revision included recurrent jaundice, repeat cholangitis, and persistent jaundice with temporary biliary excretion following the initial PE. We compared liver transplantation (LT) data of patients who underwent Lap-revision with those of patients who did not.

RESULTS

Lap-revision was performed in 20 patients. Of those 17 (excluding the two who were jaundice-free before the age of 1, and the one who underwent open conversion for bleeding), 11 (65%) were jaundice-free 1 year after Lap-revision. The surgical parameters of LT did not differ between patients who underwent Lap-revision and those who did not.

CONCLUSION

Lap-revision for patients with BA had a limited but positive effect on native liver survival and did not adversely affect subsequent LT. Therefore, Lap-revision could be second-line standard therapy in patients with BA who have demonstrated biliary drainage at least once after initial PE.

Biochemical Evaluation of Laparoscopic Portoenterostomy for Treating Biliary Atresia and Redo for Failed Portoenterostomy

Background: Postoperative outcomes of portoenterostomy (PE) and redo-PE were evaluated using selected biochemical markers (SBM) and biochemical status categories (BSC). Methods: Subjects were 70 consecutive PE performed for biliary atresia. SBM were aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT), cholinesterase (ChE), and platelet count (PLT) assessed at 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months, and thence, annually for a maximum of 10 years. BSC were as follows: all SBM normal (N-SBM), normal AST/ALT (N-SLT), normal ChE (N-ChE), normal PC (N-PLT), all abnormal (A-SBM), abnormal AST/ALT (A-SLT), abnormal ChE (A-ChE), and abnormal PC (A-PLT). Subjects achieving jaundice clearance (JC) and surviving with native livers (SNL) also had gamma glutamyl transpeptidase assessed. Redo-PE indicated for failed PE was assessed postoperatively using the same SBM/BSC protocol. Results: PE were laparoscopic (LPE; n = 40) or open (OPE; n = 30). Mean age/weight at PE and duration of follow-up were similar. For JC, LPE = 34/40 (85.0%) and OPE = 22/30 (73.3%); P = .23. For SNL, LPE = 29/40 (72.5%) and OPE = 16/30 (53.3%); P = .10. LPE and OPE were similar for SBM/BSC, except for a single significant increase in ALT in OPE at 6 months. Redo-PE was performed 17-180 days (mean 67.1 days) after primary PE. AST was significantly increased at the last preredo assessment 3 months after primary PE; P < .05. After redo, AST decreased and SBM/BSC results were equivalent to nonredo subjects. Conclusion: Postoperative biochemical data for all PE cases were comparable; redo-PE would appear to be viable for restoring SBM, and AST could be valuable as a single marker of deterioration in redo cases.

Medium-term outcomes after laparoscopic revision of laparoscopic Kasai portoenterostomy in patients with biliary atresia

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether revision laparoscopic Kasai portoenterostomy (RLKPE) is a viable treatment option for patients with biliary atresia (BA) who had undergone initially successful laparoscopic Kasai portoenterostomy (ILKPE).

METHODS

The medical records of 312 patients with nonsyndromic BA who had undergone ILKPE between May 2009 and May 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into three groups according to their outcomes after ILKPE: group A: 25 patients who had undergone RLKPE; group B: 203 patients who had undergone ILKPE and required no further surgical intervention; group C: 84 patients with failed ILKPE who had either died or required liver transplantation for survival. The 3-year and 5-year survival with native liver (SNL) rates were compared between groups A and B and between groups A and C. Among the 25 patients in group A, the perioperative data of RLKPE were compared with those of ILKPE.

RESULTS

Of the 312 patients who had undergone ILKPE, 228 reached the normal bilirubin concentration range within 6 months postoperatively. Among them, 25 patients with a sudden cessation of bile flow had undergone RLKPE. Adequate biliary drainage, as evidenced by normalized conjugated bilirubin levels, was achieved in 80% of patients who had undergone RLKPE. The perioperative variables, including the operative time, blood loss, rate of conversion to open surgery and complications of RLKPE, were not significantly different between RLKPE and ILKPE. The 3-year and 5-year SNL rates in patients after RLKPE were 64.0% and 52.0%, respectively, which were not significantly different from the corresponding rates of 86.2% and 73.9%, respectively, in patients after unrevised ILKPE (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrated that RPLKE is a viable and effective treatment option in patients with sudden cessation of bile drainage after ILKPE. RPLKE can delay the need for liver transplantation, yielding encouraging medium-term patient outcomes.

Laparoscopic Kasai portoenterostomy is advantageous over open Kasai portoenterostomy in subsequent liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Native liver survival after laparoscopic Kasai portoenterostomy (Lap-PE) for biliary atresia (BA) is controversial. We examined whether a jaundice-free native liver survival rate is comparable between conventional Kasai portoenterostomy (Open-PE) and Lap-PE. Then, the impact of the two types of PE on subsequent living-donor liver transplantation (LTx) was addressed in this study.

METHODS

The jaundice-free rate in 1- and 2-year-old patients who underwent Open-PE and Lap-PE from January 2006 to December 2017 was investigated. Additionally, perioperative data (duration from the start of surgery to the completion of hepatectomy and others) of patients aged 2 years or younger who underwent LTx after either Open-PE or Lap-PE from 2006 to 2017 were evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirty-one (67%) out of 46 Open-PE patients and 23 (77%) out of 30 Lap-PE patients showed native liver survival with jaundice-free status at 1 year of age (p = 0.384); 29 (63%) out of 46 Open-PE patients and 19 (70%) out of 27 Lap-PE patients showed native liver survival with jaundice-free status at 2 years of age (p = 0.524); there were no significant differences. Additionally, there were 37 LTx cases after PE within 2 years of birth, including 29 Open-PE and 8 Lap-PE cases. The patients in the Lap-PE group had fewer adhesions and significantly shorter durations of surgery up to the completion of the recipient's hepatectomy and durations of post-LTx hospital stay compared to the Open-PE group. There were no differences in blood loss or duration of stay in intensive care unit between the Lap-PE and Open-PE groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Jaundice-free native liver survival rate has been comparable between Open-PE and Lap-PE. Lap-PE resulted in fewer adhesions, contributing to better outcomes of subsequent LTx compared to Open-PE.

Oral administration of eicosapentaenoic acid suppresses liver fibrosis in postoperative patients with biliary atresia

PURPOSE

Biliary atresia (BA) is characterized by progressive inflammation of the biliary system. This inflammation persists and causes liver fibrosis, although jaundice disappears after Kasai portoenterostomy (KP). We aimed to confirm whether the oral administration of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) suppresses liver fibrosis in postoperative patients with BA.

METHODS

We reviewed patients who underwent laparoscopic KP (lapKP) between January 2014 and September 2017. From December 2016, 30 mg/kg/day of EPA was orally administered to patients who opted to take medicine (EPA group). Patients who did not receive EPA were assigned to the non-EPA group. Mac-2 binding protein sugar chain modified isomer (M2BPGi) and hyaluronic acid (HA) levels were compared between the two groups in patients showing disappearance of jaundice at 6 months after the first lapKP.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients in the non-EPA group and 11 in the EPA group were enrolled. At 6 months after the first lapKP, 10 patients in the non-EPA group and six in the EPA group were without jaundice. M2BPGi and HA levels were significantly lower in the EPA group.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver fibrosis was suppressed in patients without jaundice 6 months after lapKP, who were administered EPA. We believe that periductular inflammation was alleviated by EPA supplementation.

Significance and indications for reoperative portoenterostomy in biliary atresia in light of long-term outcome

BACKGROUND

Among biliary atresia (BA) patients undergoing revision following failed portoenterostomy, long-term native liver survival (NLS), physical condition, and indications for revision were explored.

METHODS

From 1977-2015, 33 of 95 BA patients (35%) at our institution underwent revision. Ten- and 20-year NLS rates (NLSRs) and biochemical statuses of 20-year-old native liver survivors were compared between post-portoenterostomy BA patients with and without history of revision. Factors associated with 10-year NLS following revision and optimal cut-offs for potential predictors were analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall 10- and 20-year NLSRs were 57% and 54%, respectively. Ten- and 20-year NLSRs were 49% and 45% in the revision group and 63% and 61% in the non-revision group, respectively. Among 20-year-old native liver survivors, differences in admission rates between ages 10-20 years were not significant for cholangitis (revision, 46%; non-revision, 40%; P = 0.30) or portal hypertension (revision, 38%; non-revision, 15%; P = 0.21). Differences in hepatobiliary function-associated blood tests between these groups at 20 years old were only significant for aspartate aminotransferase (P = 0.02) and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (P = 0.047). Among potential predictors of 10-year NLS that we investigated, rate of change in total bilirubin (TB) over the first month post-portoenterostomy was best (P = 0.0019), and the receiver operating characteristic curve revealed an optimal cut-off for this first-month change in TB of -3.7 mg/dl (area under the curve, 0.85; sensitivity, 0.79; specificity, 0.83).

CONCLUSIONS

In approximately half of the patients, revision provided 10- and 20-year NLS, and biochemical status at 20 years old was comparable across revision and non-revision patients. Rate of change in TB during the first month post-portoenterostomy offers a sensitive predictor of revision.

Review of redo-Kasai portoenterostomy for biliary atresia in the transition to the liver transplantation era

Portoenterostomy (PE) is the standard therapy for biliary atresia (BA). PE offers the chance of survival to children with BA. PE was the ultimate therapeutic modality for BA before liver transplantation (LT) was available. Failure of biliary drainage with PE was almost invariably fatal in children with BA. In such cases, redo-PE was performed to salvage patients following PE failure. PE remains the standard first treatment for BA despite the availability of LT. Further, redo-PE is also performed in a limited number of cases despite the development of LT as an alternative means of PE. However, there is concern that redo-PE increases morbidity at the time of subsequent LT. Laparoscopic redo-PE has recently been described. Laparoscopic redo-PE is expected to reduce complications of LT by preventing abdominal adhesion associated with repetitive surgery. In the present article, the future utility of redo-PE and the history of its changing roles are reviewed.

Biliary atresia: Indications and timing of liver transplantation and optimization of pretransplant care

Biliary atresia (BA) is a progressive, fibro-obliterative disorder of the intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts in infancy. The majority of affected children will eventually develop end-stage liver disease and require liver transplantation (LT). Indications for LT in BA include failed Kasai portoenterostomy, significant and recalcitrant malnutrition, recurrent cholangitis, and the progressive manifestations of portal hypertension. Extrahepatic complications of this disease, such as hepatopulmonary syndrome and portopulmonary hypertension, are also indications for LT. Optimal pretransplant management of these potentially life-threatening complications and maximizing nutrition and growth require the expertise of a multidisciplinary team with experience caring for BA. The timing of transplant for BA requires careful consideration of the potential risk of transplant versus the survival benefit at any given stage of disease. Children with BA often experience long wait times for transplant unless exception points are granted to reflect severity of disease. Family preparedness for this arduous process is therefore critical. Liver Transplantation 23:96-109 2017 AASLD.

Technical standardization of Kasai portoenterostomy for biliary atresia

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical outcome of patients treated with the current technique of Kasai procedure compared with that of those treated with previous procedures.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed the outcomes of 256 patients with biliary atresia who underwent Kasai portoenterostomy at our hospital between 1972 and 2014. Patients were divided into four groups: group 1 (1972-1981, double Roux-en Y, n=91), group 2 (1982-1991, Suruga II, n=80), group 3 (1992-2000, double-valve Roux-en Y, n=46), and group 4 (2001-2014, total removal of the extrahepatic biliary remnants at hepatic capsule and Roux-en Y reconstruction with a spur valve, n=39). Clinical outcomes were compared between the four groups.

RESULTS

In groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, the rate of jaundice clearance was 65.9%, 77.5%, 63.0%, and 87.2%, respectively; incidence of early cholangitis was 60.4%, 53.8%, 37.0%, and 23.1%, respectively; requirement for redo Kasai surgery was 15.4%, 37.5%, 17.4%, and 5.1%, respectively; 10-year native liver survival rate was 53.8%, 60.1%, 44.1%, and 73.7%, respectively; and 10-year overall survival rate was 55.0%, 72.3%, 86.7%, and 97.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The standardized Kasai procedure was associated with favorable outcomes. Long-term outcomes remain to be evaluated.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case-control/treatment study, level III.

Long-term follow-up for anicteric survival with native liver after redo Kasai: a first report

PURPOSE

We present a first report of the long-term follow-up of biliary atresia (BA) patients who became anicteric with the native liver (ANL; total bilirubin <1.5mg/dL) after redo-Kasai.

METHODS

Forty-six redo-Kasai cases (1984-2015) were the subjects for this study. ANL ratios were determined using the Kaplan-Meier estimate.

RESULTS

BA type was I (n=3), II (n=1), and III (n=42). Mean ages (initial/redo) at Kasai were 60.3/231.9days, respectively. Jaundice persisted after the initial Kasai in 24/46 cases while 22 had recurrence of jaundice after initially becoming anicteric. After redo, 5/24 of the persistent jaundice cases and 14/22 of the initially anicteric cases became anicteric (p<.05). Of these 19, 7 (one type I, six type III) are currently ANL while the remaining 12 had LTx or died. Morbidity/Complications documented in the 7 post-redo ANL cases after a mean follow-up of 16.7years (range: 10.0-31.1) included 4 episodes of cholangitis, 3 episodes of portal hypertension, 4 episodes of esophageal varices, 3 episodes of splenomegaly, one splenectomy, and 4 episodes of thrombocytopenia.

CONCLUSIONS

Ours is the first long-term follow-up study of redo-Kasai cases. We found that the ANL ratio after redo-Kasai was low at 7/46 (15.2%) and that ANL were prone to multiple morbidity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective comparative study, level III.

Long‐term outcomes after revision of Kasai portoenterostomy for biliary atresia

Background

The indications for and efficacy of revision of portoenterostomy (PE) for biliary atresia (BA) needs to be reassessed in an era of liver transplantation. We therefore reviewed the long‐term outcomes following revision of PE.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of the medical records of patients with BA who underwent PE and revision of PE. We investigated the role of revision on outcomes of jaundice‐free native liver survival (approval number: 2015–0094).

Results

Portoenterostomy was performed in 76 patients, among whom 22 underwent revision. Revision for recurrent jaundice was performed for four of 51 patients, who were transiently jaundice free after initial PE, but only one achieved native liver survival. Revision for repeated cholangitis in two patients achieved native liver survival over 10 years. Revision was performed in 16 of the 25 patients in whom initial PE failed; of these, four survived with their native liver (ages 3, 12, 12, and 14 years). The PE revision did not significantly affect liver transplantation duration and survival outcome.

Conclusions

Revision of PE was suitable for repeated cholangitis. Revision for recurrent jaundice, regardless of whether the initial PE was successful, could have a limited but positive effect in preventing long‐term progressive liver failure.

A New Era of Laparoscopic Revision of Kasai Portoenterostomy for the Treatment of Biliary Atresia

PURPOSE

Kasai portoenterostomy is the standard therapy for biliary atresia (BA). If Kasai is unsuccessful, there is controversy over whether revision of Kasai restores adequate biliary drainage. Although there are several reports of laparoscopic Kasai (Lap-Kasai), none has described laparoscopic revision (Lap-revision). The purposes of this study were to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of Lap-revision.

METHODS

65 patients underwent open Kasai between November 2001 and November 2013, and 12 patients underwent Lap-Kasai between December 2013 to January 2015. The indications for revision included bile flow cessation and recurrent cholangitis. Clinical data were compared between open and laparoscopic revisions of Kasai.

RESULTS

Open revision of Kasai was performed in 20 patients after open Kasai, and Lap-revision was performed in 4 patients after Lap-Kasai. Lap-revision was completed without conversion or major complication in any patient. The bilirubin level was normalized by Lap-revision in all four patients, and three of them were alive with their native liver. Open and laparoscopic revisions of Kasai were comparable in terms of the operation time, blood loss, and surgical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Lap-revision is a feasible and effective method for the treatment of BA and might herald a new era for the treatment of this disease.

Effects of age at Kasai portoenterostomy on the surgical outcome: a review of the literature

The efficacy of early Kasai portoenterostomy has been repeatedly reported. However, the optimal age for performing this procedure remains controversial. This article reviews the literature on the age of patients at the time of Kasai portoenterostomy and its utility as a prognostic indicator. The age at the time of surgery is a known predictor of outcome; however, its exact predictive value in this context is unclear. Multicenter studies involving large volumes of data have tended to show advantages of early Kasai portoenterostomy, and there is no clear evidence to recommend any delay in the timing of surgery. At present, a reasonable strategy would be to perform a Kasai portoenterostomy as early as possible. The stool color card system has recently been implemented in Japan as part of a nationwide screening program, and it is expected to work well based on the early reports. However, efforts to identify an optimal screening system for ensuring the earliest diagnosis of biliary atresia should continue. An early diagnosis of biliary atresia is difficult, and global efforts are required to improve the early diagnosis rates.