Improving the rigour of VACTERL screening for neonates with anorectal malformations

A Population-Based Cohort Study on Diagnosis and Early Management of Anorectal Malformation in the UK and Ireland

BACKGROUND

This study describes the presentation and initial management of anorectal malformation (ARM); evaluating the frequency, causes and consequences of late diagnosis.

METHODS

A prospective, population cohort study was undertaken for newly diagnosed ARMs in the UK and Ireland from 01/10/2015 and 30/09/2016. Follow-up was completed at one year. Data are presented as n (%), appropriate statistical methods used. Factors associated with late diagnosis; defined as: detection of ARM either following discharge or more than 72 h after birth were assessed with univariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Twenty six centres reported on 174 cases, 158 of which were classified according to the type of malformation and 154 had completed surgical data. Overall, perineal fistula was the most commonly detected anomaly 43/158 (27%); of the 41 of these children undergoing surgery, 15 (37%) had a stoma formed. 21/154 (14%, CI95{9-20}) patients undergoing surgery experienced post-operative complications. Thirty-nine (22%) were diagnosed late and 12 (7%) were detected >30 days after birth. Factors associated with late diagnosis included female sex (OR 2.06; 1.0-4.26), having a visible perineal opening (OR 2.63; 1.21-5.67) and anomalies leading to visible meconium on the perineum (OR 18.74; 2.47-141.73). 56/174 (32%) had a diagnosis of VACTERL association (vertebral, anorectal, cardiac, tracheal, oesophageal, renal and limb); however, not all infants were investigated for commonly associated anomalies. 51/140 (36%) had a cardiac anomaly detected on echocardiogram.

CONCLUSION

There is room for improvement within the care for infants born with ARM in the UK and Ireland. Upskilling those performing neonatal examination to allow timely diagnosis, instruction of universal screening for associated anomalies and further analysis of the factors leading to clinically unnecessary stoma formation are warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II (Prospective Cohort Study <80% follow-up).

Development of a Standardized Algorithm for Management of Newly Diagnosed Anorectal Malformations

Neonates with a new diagnosis of anorectal malformation (ARM) present a unique challenge to the clinical team. ARM is strongly associated with additional midline malformations, such as those observed in the VACTERL sequence, including vertebral, cardiac, and renal malformations. Timely assessment is necessary to identify anomalies requiring intervention and to prevent undue stress and delayed treatment. We utilized a multidisciplinary team to develop an algorithm guiding the midline workup of patients newly diagnosed with ARM. Patients were included if born in or transferred to our neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), or if seen in clinic within one month of life. Complete imaging was defined as an echocardiogram, renal ultrasound, and spinal magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasound within the first month of life. We compared three periods: prior to implementation (2010-2014), adoption period (2015), and delayed implementation (2022); p ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. Rates of complete imaging significantly improved from pre-implementation to delayed implementation (65.2% vs. 50.0% vs. 97.0%, p = 0.0003); the most growth was observed in spinal imaging (71.0% vs. 90.0% vs. 100.0%, p = 0.001). While there were no differences in the rates of identified anomalies, there were fewer missed diagnoses with the algorithm (10.0% vs. 47.6%, p = 0.05). We demonstrate that the implementation of a standardized algorithm can significantly increase appropriate screening for anomalies associated with a new diagnosis of ARM and can decrease delayed diagnosis. Further qualitative studies will help to refine and optimize the algorithm moving forward.

Missed or delayed diagnosis of anorectal malformations: a review of the literature, current training and practice in the UK in relation to detection via the NIPE programme

Anorectal malformations (ARMs) are a spectrum of congenital anomalies where there is abnormal development of the anus and rectum. With an incidence of 1:5000 live births and affecting both males and females, these anomalies vary in their appearance and presentation, lack features enabling antenatal detection and should be detected at birth by the examining midwife or within 72 hours through the newborn and infant physical examination (NIPE) screening programme. However, it is recognised that the diagnosis of ARMs can be missed or delayed leading to morbidity and mortality. In the UK, despite the existence of the NIPE screening programme and NICE guidelines, published literature shows that nearly a quarter of ARMs are not diagnosed at birth. This review takes a critical look at the frequency of missed/delayed diagnosis of ARMs at birth, the implications of delayed diagnosis, and the possible reasons for this related to education and training of healthcare professionals involved in newborn examination, focusing on the UK national screening programme for NIPE. We propose a strategy for enhancing detection of ARMs in a timely manner through the existing framework of the NIPE screening programme.

Screening for VACTERL anomalies in children with anorectal malformations: Outcomes of a standardized approach

PURPOSE

The majority of patients with an anorectal malformation (ARM) have associated congenital anomalies. It is well established that all patients diagnosed with an ARM should undergo systematic screening, including renal, spinal, and cardiac imaging. This study aimed to evaluate the findings and completeness of screening, following local implementation of standardized protocols.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed assessing all patients with an ARM managed at our tertiary pediatric surgical center, following a standardized protocol implementation for VACTERL screening (January 2016-December 2021). Cohort demographics, medical characteristics, and screening investigations were analyzed. Findings were compared with our previously published data (2000-2015), conducted prior to protocol implementation.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-seven (64 male, 50.4%) children were eligible for inclusion. Complete screening was performed in 107/127 (84.3%) children. Of these, one or more associated anomalies were diagnosed in 85/107 (79.4%), whilst the VACTERL association was demonstrated in 57/107 (53.3%). The proportion of children that underwent complete screening increased significantly in comparison with those assessed prior to protocol implementation (RR 0.43 [CI 0.27-0.66]; p < 0.001). Children with less complex ARM types were significantly less likely to receive complete screening (p = 0.028). Neither presence of an associated anomaly, nor prevalence of the VACTERL association, differed significantly by ARM type complexity.

CONCLUSION

Screening for associated VACTERL anomalies in children with ARM was significantly improved following standardized protocol implementation. The prevalence of associated anomalies in our cohort supports the value of routine VACTERL screening in all children with ARM, regardless of malformation type.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Routine evaluation of vesico-ureteric reflux in children with anorectal malformation does not reduce the rate of urinary tract infection

OBJECTIVE

Children with anorectal malformations (ARM) have a high rate of renal anomalies and increased risk of urinary tract infection (UTI). We aimed to determine whether using routine Micturating Cystourethrogram (MCUG) to detect VUR is effective in reducing the incidence of UTI or renal scarring in children with ARM.

METHODS

A retrospective study of consecutive children diagnosed with ARM in two centres with a minimum of 3 years follow-up was performed, excluding those with cloaca or an MCUG prior to ARM repair. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine variables which were associated with VUR, UTI and renal scarring. Associations are described as Odd's Ratio (OR), 95% Confidence Interval. Significance was taken as p<0.05.

RESULTS

344 children were included with a median age of 8 years (IQR 5-11 years). 150 (44%) were female. 89 (26%) had renal anomalies and 101 (29%) had spine anomalies. 148 patients had routine MCUG and VUR was found in 62 (42%) of these children. Univariate analysis did not correlate any of the assessed variables with VUR or renal scarring. However, abnormal renal ultrasound - OR 6.18 (95% CI 2.99-13.07, p 0.0001) was associated with UTI whilst abnormal spine - OR 0.27 (95% CI 0.10-0.62, p 0.009), low ARM - OR 0.30 (CI 0.14-0.63, p 0.006) and intermediate ARM - OR 0.35 (CI 0.17-0.70, p 0.01) were associated with a reduced risk of UTI. On multivariate analysis, only abnormal renal USS retained a significant association with UTI (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

VUR is common in patients with ARM. Children with an abnormal R-USS are at increased risk of UTI. Performing routine MCUG does not reduce the risk of UTI in children with ARM.

Risk factors for anorectal and associated malformations in German children: A 10-year analysis

BACKGROUND

Incidences of anorectal malformations (ARM) occur in 1 of 2000-5000 live births and up to 64% have associated malformations (ARMa). The aim of the study was to evaluate possible prenatal risk factors for ARM in a tertiary hospital.

METHODS

A case-control design was used to compare risk factors in ARM (n = 44) to a control group (CG; n = 26). We used modified prenatal questionnaires, analyzed mothers' prenatal records and participants completed a structured interview. Endpoints were medical history, drug consumption, occupational risk factors, and time point of diagnosis, associated malformations and sensitivity of radiological imaging.

RESULTS

Our results showed that ARM couples had a significantly higher age difference (p = 0.028) compared to CG. ARM mothers had more abnormalities during pregnancy (p = 0.002), more positive vaginal smears of group B streptococci (p = 0.024), urogenital infections (p = 0.005), gestosis (p = 0.03), emesis (p = 0.025) and higher numbers of chronic diseases (p = 0.018). ARM mothers took less medication during pregnancy (p = 0.013) than CG mothers including folic acid (p = 0.041); their intake of iodine tablets was significantly higher (p = 0.035) and they continued smoking for longer (p = 0.036) than CG mothers, and they had more stillbirths (p = 0.035). In using illegal drug and alcohol use, the groups did not show significant differences. ARMa was present in 68.1% (n = 30), of which 45.5% were of urogenital origin (n = 20). ARM diagnosis was made on the first day of life in 72.7% (n = 32), while diagnosis was delayed in 12 patients (27.3%).

CONCLUSION

A combination of different risk factors seem to be associated with the development of ARM, which takes place at an early stage (<7th week) of pregnancy. Therefore, risk factors influencing fetal development must be critically considered. We advocate an interdisciplinary assessment in unclear clinical findings on first day of life to optimize the therapy and positively influence the outcome.

Spinal cord anomalies in children with anorectal malformations: Ultrasound is a good screening test

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to correlate spinal ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in patients with anorectal malformations (ARMs).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of records was performed for children with ARM presenting to two major pediatric hospitals between 2009 and 2017. The primary outcome analyzed was detection of spinal cord anomalies. Spinal US was performed up to 4 months and MRI within the first year of life. The conus medullaris was considered normal if it had a tapering contour and terminated at or above the Lumbar 2-3 disk space.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-three patients with ARM presented during the study period with a slight male preponderance (108, 56%). Spinal imaging was performed in 157(82%) - 137(87%) had US, 64(41%) had MRI and 44 (28%) had both. Of the 44 who had both; US was abnormal in 25 children-confirmed by MRI in 20 (80%). US was normal in 17 children- MRI showed a filum cyst in 1 and a lipoma in 2 children and was inconclusive in 2 children (p<0.001). All who required surgery except one child, were reported on spinal US to have a low lying cord, borderline low cord or tethered cord (p<.05). No child who was reported to have a normal spinal US required de-tethering at a later stage. Spinal US had an overall sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 75% compared to MRI for detecting spinal cord anomalies in children with ARM CONCLUSIONS: Spinal US performed in a tertiary pediatric imaging department was a good screening test for spinal cord anomalies in children with ARM. The finding of a low, borderline low or tethered cord on US mandates an MRI to confirm the findings and correlates with the need for operative correction of spinal cord tethering.

STUDY TYPE

Clinical research paper.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

Comparative effectiveness of imaging modalities for preoperative assessment of anorectal malformation in the pediatric population

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of MRI, colostography/fistulography, and X-ray imaging modalities for preoperative diagnosis of anorectal malformations (ARMs) in pediatric patients.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included a total of 84 pediatric patients with ARMs. Preoperative imaging findings were assessed by 2 radiologists and compared to surgical findings.

RESULTS

MRI identified anomalies of the spine in 25 of 84 patients (29.8%), anomalies of the genital system in 7 of 84 patients (8.3%), anomalies of the urinary system in 22 of 84 patients (26.2%), and underdeveloped sphincter muscle complex in 34 of 84 patients (40.5%). In the 44 subjects receiving both MRI and X-ray, MRI was more sensitive in detecting anomalies of spine (18/44 vs. 8/44; P = 0.002), and both correctly identified the distal end of the rectum in 77.3% (34/44) of the cases. In the 24 subjects receiving both MRI and colostography/fistulography, MRI was more accurate in identifying Pena's classification (22/24 vs. 15/24; P = 0.039). Distal end of the rectum was correctly identified in 75.0% (18/24) and 58.3% (14/24) of the cases (P = 0.125).

CONCLUSIONS

MRI could clearly reveal fistula anatomy and associated anomalies of ARMs and should be routinely used for preoperative evaluation of ARMs.

TYPE OF STUDY

Study of diagnostic test.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Lack of disparities in screening for associated anomalies in children with anorectal malformations

INTRODUCTION

Patients with anorectal malformations (ARM) often have associated congenital anomalies and should undergo several screening exams in the first year of life. We hypothesized that racial and socioeconomic disparities exist in the screening processes for these patients.

METHODS

After IRB approval, a retrospective review of patients with ARM born between 2005 and 2016 was performed at a quaternary care children's hospital. Demographics including gender, race, insurance, and zip code were collected. Zip code was used as a surrogate for median income. Chart review was performed to identify anomaly type and whether Vertebral defects, Anorectal malformations, Cardiac defects, Tracheo-Esophageal fistula, Renal anomalies, and Limb abnormalities screening was performed within 1 y of age. Descriptive statistics and chi square analyses were performed.

RESULTS

One hundred patients (59% male, 68% low malformation) were identified. African American and Caucasian subjects represented 41% and 40% of the population, respectively. Overall, 68 of 100 patients had at least one screening test for each of the Vertebral defects, Anorectal malformations, Cardiac defects, Tracheo-Esophageal fistula, Renal anomalies, and Limb abnormalities associations. Although some minor differences were noted (more African Americans received skeletal survey than Caucasians, 80.5% versus 60%, P = 0.00335), no pattern of systematic bias in the receipt or timing of screening was evident based on race, insurance, or income.

CONCLUSIONS

There do not appear to be racial or socioeconomic disparities in screening for associated anomalies in patients with ARM. However, overall gaps in screening still exist, and work must be carried out to appropriately screen all patients for associated anomalies.