Anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection: results of a standardized diagnostic and therapeutic approach

Defunctioning Ileostomy After Low Anterior Resection of Rectum: Morbidity Related to Fashioning and Closure

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess any predisposing factors to the morbidity of fashioning and reversal of diverting ileostomy in a prospective cohort of patients who have undergone TME and low colo-rectal or colo-anal anastomosis for rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients with rectal cancer undergoing low anterior resection and a defunctioning loop ileostomy in three surgical units from 2016 to 2020 were included in the study and retrospectively analyzed. Results: One hundred eighty-two patients from three centres were included. Ileostomy-related mortality was 0.5%, attributed to renal failure.. Ileostomy-related morbidity was 46%. Postoperative ileus was seen in 37.4%, and dehydration in 18.8% of the patients. The readmission rate for ileostomy-related reasons was 15.4%. Stoma care was problematic in 15.7% or poor in 7% of the cases. Advanced age, male gender and obesity were independent risk factors for ileostomy-related morbidity. Ileostomy was reversed in 165 patients. The morbidity in 165 patients was 16%. Ileus was seen in 10.3%, anastomotic leak in 4.8% and wound infection in 12.7% of the cases. One patient died because of an anastomotic leak. No predisposing factors that affect the outcomes of ileostomy closure were identified. Conclusions: Diverting ileostomy-related morbidity is high. Life threatening dehydration and renal failure from ileus is more commonly seen in elderly, male and obese patients and should be anticipated. Ileostomy closure-related morbidity is low.

An Institutional Shift from Routine to Selective Diversion of Low Anastomosis in Robotic TME Surgery for Rectal Cancer Patients Using the KHANS Technique: A Single-Centre Cohort Study

(1) Background: In recent years, there has been a change in practice for diverting stomas in rectal cancer surgery, shifting from routine diverting stomas to a more selective approach. Studies suggest that the benefits of temporary ileostomies do not live up to their risks, such as high-output stomas, stoma dysfunction, and reoperation. (2) Methods: All rectal cancer patients treated with a robotic resection in a single tertiary colorectal centre in the UK from 2013 to 2021 were analysed. In 2015, our unit made a shift to a more selective approach to temporary diverting ileostomies. The cohort was divided into a routine diversion group treated before 2015 and a selective diversion group treated after 2015. Both groups were analysed and compared for short-term outcomes and morbidities. (3) Results: In group A, 63/70 patients (90%) had a diverting stoma compared to 98/135 patients (72.6%) in group B (p = 0.004). There were no significant differences between the groups in anastomotic leakages (11.8% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.312) or other complications (p = 0.117). There were also no significant differences in readmission (3.8% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.312) or reoperation (3.8% vs. 2.6%, p = 1.000) after stoma closure. After 1 year, 71.6% and 71.9% (p = 1.000) of patients were stoma-free. One major reason for the delay in stoma reversal was the COVID-19 pandemic, which only occurred in group B (0% vs. 22%, p = 0.054). (4) Conclusions: A more selective approach to diverting stomas for robotic rectal cancer patients does not lead to more complications or leaks and can be considered in the treatment of rectal cancer tumours.

Impact of ileostomy on postoperative wound complications in patients after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis

To prevent anastomotic leakage and other postoperative complications after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery, a protective ileostomy is often used. However, the necessity of performing ileostomy after laparoscopic rectal cancer remains controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the benefit of ileostomy on wound infection after laparoscopic rectal cancer. The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, and PubMed were used to retrieve all related documents up to September 2023. Completion of the trial literature was submitted once the eligibility and exclusion criteria were met and the literature quality assessment was evaluated. This study compared the post-operative post-operative complications of an ileostomy with that of non-ileostomy in a laparoscope. We used Reman 5.3 to analyse meta-data. Controlled studies were evaluated with ROBINS-I. The meta-analyses included 525 studies, and 5 publications were chosen to statistically analyse the data according to the classification criteria. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of postoperative wound infections among ostomate and nonostomate (odds ratio [OR], 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66, 4.84; p = 0.25). In 5 trials, the incidence of anastomotic leak was increased after surgery in nonostomate patients (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.12, 0.57; p = 0.0009). Two studies reported no significant difference in the length of operation time when nonstomal compared to stomal operations in patients with rectal cancer (mean difference, 0.87; 95% CI, -2.99, 4.74; p = 0.66). No significant difference was found in the rate of wound infection and operation time after operation among the two groups, but the incidence of anastomosis leak increased after operation. Protective ileostomy after laparoscopic rectal cancer was effective in reducing the risk of anastomotic leakage in patients, and we found no additional risk of infection. We cautiously conclude that protective ileostomy is active and necessary for patients with a high risk of anastomotic leakage after surgery, which needs to be further confirmed by high-quality studies with larger samples.

High-output stoma is a risk factor for stoma outlet obstruction in defunctioning loop ileostomies after rectal cancer surgery

PURPOSE

Defunctioning loop ileostomy has been reported to reduce symptomatic anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery; however, stoma outlet obstruction (SOO) is a serious postileostomy complication. We, therefore, explored novel risk factors for SOO in defunctioning loop ileostomy after rectal cancer surgery.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study that included 92 patients who underwent defunctioning loop ileostomy with rectal cancer surgery at our institution. Among them, 77 and 15 ileostomies were created at the right lower abdominal and umbilical sites, respectively. We defined the output volumeMAX as the maximum output volume the day before the onset of SOO or-for those without SOO-that was observed during hospitalization. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate risk factors for SOO.

RESULTS

SOO was observed in 24 cases, and the median onset was 6 days postoperatively. The stoma output volume in the SOO group was consistently higher than that in the non-SOO group. In the multivariate analysis, the rectus abdominis thickness (p < 0.01) and output volumeMAX (p < 0.01) were independent risk factors for SOO.

CONCLUSION

A high-output stoma may predict SOO in patients with defunctioning loop ileostomy for rectal cancer. Considering that SOO occurs even at umbilical sites with no rectus abdominis, a high-output stoma may trigger SOO primarily.

Retroperitonealization of the pancreatic stump in distal pancreatectomy: a novel technique to reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of retroperitonealization of the pancreatic stump in distal pancreatectomy.

METHODS

Clinical data from the Tongji Hospital pancreatic database were retrospectively reviewed in this study. The data of 68 patients who underwent retroperitonealized distal pancreatectomy from January, 2019, to April, 2021, were collected and analyzed. Sixty-four patients who underwent conventional distal pancreatectomy during the same period were matched. We compared and analyzed the operative outcomes and postoperative complications between the patients in the two groups before and after propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

Before PSM, the operative outcomes and postoperative complications were comparable between the two groups. After PSM, the retroperitonealized group had a lower incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) (10.53% vs 31.58%, P = 0.047) and shorter time until drainage removal (10.00, 8.00-13.00 days vs 13.00, 10.00-18.00 days, P = 0.005). In the univariate and multivariate regression analyses, non-retroperitonealization and intra-abdominal infection were found to be independent risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF).

CONCLUSION

Retroperitonealization of the pancreatic stump can reduce the incidence of POPF after distal pancreatectomy.

Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery for Marsupialization of Chronic Abscess Cavity After Colorectal Anastomosis

Anastomotic leaks are one of the most feared and morbid complications after colorectal anastomosis. Management of leaks depends on the severity of the leak and focuses on controlling sepsis and saving the anastomosis. The lower the anastomosis, the more amenable it is to transanal approaches for salvage. However, when a complication exists higher up in the rectum, the surgeon is more limited in the ability to visualize and intervene. With the advent of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) and the advancement of endoscopic procedures, there are now more options for surgeons to visualize and intervene in anastomotic colorectal leaks. Prior reports have described the use of TAMIS for the management of anastomotic leaks in the acute phase. However, this same approach can be useful in the management of chronic leaks. This report highlights the benefit of TAMIS to allow visualization and marsupialization of a chronic abscess cavity following an anastomotic leak.

Routine postoperative CT to detect anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer has a low sensitivity and specificity and a poor interobserver agreement

AIM

To compare the accuracy and interobserver variation of routine computed tomography (CT) on postoperative day 6-8 to detect anastomotic leakage (AL) verified by re-operation and/or endoscopy. A secondary objective was to identify the predictive values of different CT findings as an indicator for AL.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The material for this study originates from two previous prospective multicentre studies including 277 patients who were scheduled for routine abdominal CT postoperative day 6-8. Inclusion criteria for the present study were routine CT without contrast medium followed by CT with rectal contrast medium. Two independent senior radiologists blinded to the clinical outcome reviewed the CT examinations for specific findings according to a predefined scheme.

RESULTS

A total of 52 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. AL occurred in 14 patients of which nine were clinical and five subclinical. The two radiologists diagnosed AL at unenhanced CT with sensitivities of 71.4% and 50%, respectively, and of 57.1% and 35.7% with rectal contrast medium. The corresponding specificities were 55.3% and 81.6%, and 94.7% and 92.1%. Peri-anastomotic free air and contrast medium leakage had the highest odds ratios for AL.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of routine postoperative CT to detect AL after low anterior resection for rectal cancer is low and with considerable interobserver variation.

In-hospital economic burden of anastomotic leakage after colorectal anastomosis surgery: a real-world cost analysis in Italy

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a severe complication of colorectal surgery. We aimed to quantify inpatient costs and key cost contributors associated with AL in a single Italian center.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Electronic records for adults who had undergone colorectal surgery with anastomosis (January 2015 - December 2016), were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with AL were identified using clinical signs and/or imaging findings and/or intraoperative findings. Available data included patient, clinical, and procedural characteristics, healthcare resource utilization, and inpatient costs. Multivariate models were used to adjust for potential confounders.

RESULTS

AL occurred in 12.3% of patients (N = 317). Mean adjusted inpatient cost was 108% higher (p < 0.001) for patients with AL versus no AL (€14,711; 95% CI: 12,113; 17,866 versus €7,089; 95% CI: 6,623; 7,587). Key cost contributors were ward stay, disposables, operating room, and hospital consultations. Mean losses (reimbursement minus costs) were €2,041/patient with AL. AL extended mean length of stay by 9 days and increased odds of reoperation and ICU stay (all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with AL place considerable economic and resource burden on healthcare systems and hospital reimbursement rates do not cover treatment costs. This study highlights an unmet need for novel techniques to reduce the burden of AL.

Protective ostomies in ovarian cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the benefit of protective ostomies on anastomotic leak rate, urgent re-operations, and mortality due to anastomotic leak complications in ovarian cancer surgery.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for all studies on anastomotic leak and ostomy formation related to ovarian cancer surgery. Non-controlled studies, case series, abstracts, case reports, study protocols, and letters to the editor were excluded. Meta-analysis was performed on the primary endpoint of anastomotic leak rate. Subgroup analysis was carried out based on type of bowel resection and bevacizumab use. Secondary endpoints were urgent re-operations and mortality associated with anastomotic leak, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, 30-day readmission rate, adjuvant chemotherapy, survival, and reversal surgery in ostomy and non-ostomy patients.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies (2,719 patients) were included: 16 retrospective cohort studies, and 1 case-control study. Meta-analysis of 17 studies did not show a decrease in anastomotic leak rate in ostomy patients (odds ratio [OR]=1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.60-1.70; p=0.980). Meta-analysis of ten studies (1,452 women) did not find a decrease in urgent re-operations in the ostomy group (OR=0.72; 95% CI=0.35-1.46; p=0.360). Other outcomes were not considered for meta-analysis due to the lack of data in included studies.

CONCLUSION

Protective ostomies did not decrease anastomotic leak rates, and urgent re-operations in ovarian cancer surgery. This evidence supports the use of ostomies in very select cases.

Retrospective study of active drainage in the management of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer

Objective

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is the most serious postoperative complication following anterior resection for rectal cancer. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of active drainage for the management of AL.

Methods

This was a retrospective study using information from a database of patients who underwent colorectal resection without a defunctioning ileostomy at our center between September 2013 and January 2021. We identified 122 cases with definitive AL who did not require revision emergent laparotomy. Among these patients, we evaluated those who received active drainage to replace the original passive drainage.

Results

There were 62 cases in the active drainage group and 60 cases in the passive drainage group. The active drainage group had a shorter mean AL spontaneous resolution time (26.9 ± 3.3 vs. 32.2 ± 4.8 days) and lower average hospitalization costs (82,680.6 vs. 92,299.3 renminbi (RMB)) compared with the passive drainage group, respectively. Moreover, seven patients in the passive drainage group subsequently underwent diverting stoma to resolve the Al, while all ALs resolved spontaneously after replacing the passive drainage with active drainage.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that active drainage may accelerate the spontaneous resolution of AL.

Defining Anastomotic Leak and the Clinical Relevance of Leaks

Surgeons universally dread gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks, yet the precise definition is not widely agreed on despite international consensus guidelines. Likewise, leaks are not uniformly reported which makes comparisons across studies flawed. Leak rates range from 1 to 3% for ileocolonic, 0.5 to 18% for colorectal, and 5 to 19% for coloanal anastomoses. The sequelae of an anastomotic leak vary but generally correlate with the need for a change in clinical management, from minimal changes to the need for reoperation. Short- and long-term outcomes can be life-altering or life-threatening. Temporary or permanent stomas may be necessary and low pelvic anastomotic leaks may affect bowel function. For cancer patients, leaks can delay treatment and negatively affect oncologic outcomes. In Crohn's patients, leaks are associated with higher recurrence rates. In essence, the lack of agreement on the definition of an anastomotic leak inhibits meaningful understand of its epidemiology, prevention, and treatment.

Anastomotic leak in patients with acute complicated diverticulitis undergoing primary anastomosis: risk factors and the role of diverting loop ileostomy

BACKGROUND

Recent data has suggested that primary anastomosis (PA), with or without a diverting loop ileostomy (DLI), is a safe option for the treatment of acute complicated diverticulitis. This study aimed to evaluate risk factors associated with anastomotic leak in patients who underwent a sigmoid colectomy with PA and to determine whether a DLI was protective against a clinically significant anastomotic leak.

METHODS

Patients with acute complicated diverticulitis who underwent a laparoscopic or open sigmoid colectomy with PA, with or without a DLI, were identified in the NSQIP PUF(2016-2017). The rates of anastomotic leak, receipt of DLI, and type of leak management were compared. Multivariate logistic regression was performed.

RESULTS

There were 497 patients identified. Seventy-nine(15.9%) patients had a DLI, while 418 (84.1%) did not. Twenty-six anastomotic leaks were identified (5.2%). On multivariate analysis, current smoking (OR 4.02; 95% CI 1.44-11.26) and chronic steroid use (OR 3.84; 95% CI 1.16-12.69) were significantly associated with an increased risk of leak. Of the 26 patients with anastomotic leaks, 5 (19.2%) had a DLI. There was no significant difference in the rate of leak between those with a DLI(5; 6.3%) and those without(21; 5.3%; p = 0.59). Patients who had a DLI were significantly less likely to experience an anastomotic leak requiring re-operation (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of the presence of a DLI, chronic steroid use and smoking are associated with an increased risk of anastomotic leak in patients with acute complicated diverticulitis undergoing colectomy with PA. The presence of a diverting loop ileostomy is protective against re-operation.

Healing of colonic anastomosis in rats under obstructive ileus conditions

BACKGROUND

The anastomosis leak in colon resections is a crucial post-operative complication with significant morbidity and mortality.  Methods: Forty (40) Wistar rats were allocated in two groups. In SHAM group only anastomosis was performed. In ILEUS group anastomosis was performed following one day of ileus. Animals in both groups were subdivided in two groups according to the day they were sacrificed, 4th or 8th post-operative day. A number of variables between the groups were estimated.

RESULTS

Body weight loss was higher following obstructive ileus on both days. Adhesion score in 4th and 8th post-operative day was higher in ILEUS1, ILEUS2 groups compared to SHAM1, SHAM2 groups respectively (p<0.001 for both). Neovascularization decreased following obstructive ileus compared to control on the 4th day (ILEUS1 vs. SHAM1, p=0.038). Bursting pressure was lower in ILEUS2 group than SHAM2 group (p<0.001). The number of fibroblasts decreased following obstructive ileus compared to control on the 4th and 8th day (ILEUS1 vs. SHAM1, p=0.001, ILEUS2 vs SHAM2, p=0.016). Hydroxyproline concentration was decreased in ILEUS2 group compared to SHAM2 group (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The balance of collagenolysis and collagenogenesis plays a decisive role in the healing of anastomoses following bowel obstruction. Under those circumstances, anastomosis' bursting pressure is reduced owning to decreased neovascularization, reduced fibroblast presence and lower hydroxyproline concertation. In our study, local inflammation, neocollagen concentration and collagenase activity were not associated with this adverse effect. However, further research should delineate the mechanisms of healing of colonic anastomoses and identify those factors that can improve our outcomes.

Computed tomography in suspected anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery: evaluating mortality rates after false-negative imaging

PURPOSES

We sought to investigate the accuracy of abdominal CT scanning for anastomotic leakage and the effect of false-negative scans on the delay in therapeutic intervention and clinical outcome.

METHOD

Data from a prospectively bi-institutionally maintained database of all patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery with primary anastomosis for malignant or benign disease between 2010 and 2017 were reviewed. Patients with confirmed anastomotic dehiscence at reintervention who underwent a postoperative CT scan for suspected leakage were identified and radiological reports were retrieved.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients with anastomotic dehiscence were included in the study. American Society of Anesthesiologists score, sex, type of surgical procedure, malignancy, and type of anastomosis do not correlate with postoperative false-negative CT imaging. Postoperative false-negative CT scan, however, led to delayed reintervention (3 vs. 6 h, p = 0.023) and increased mortality (five deaths vs. no deaths, p = 0.043). Free abdominal air (p = 0.001) and extraluminal contrast extravasation (p = 0.001) were found to be predictive of accuracy in anastomotic leakage diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

The suboptimal specificity of a postoperative CT scan in suspected anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery can delay reintervention and increase mortality.

Infected versus sterile abdominal fluid collections in postoperative CT: a scoring system based on clinical and imaging findings

PURPOSE

Characterization of intraabdominal fluid collections as postoperative complication is a challenging task. The aim was to develop and validate a new score to differentiate infected from sterile postoperative abdominal fluid collections and to compare it with a published score.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From May to November 2015, all patients with postoperative CT and C-reactive protein (CRP) 24 hours before CT-guided drainage were retrospectively included (Group A). HU, gas entrapment and wall enhancement of fluid collections were evaluated in the CT. All parameters were correlated with microbiology. To validate the score and to compare it with a published score, a second patient cohort was retrospectively recruited (Group B; January 2013-April 2015; December 2015-September 2016).

RESULTS

In Group A (50 patients), univariate analysis confirmed that the four parameters were significantly associated with infected fluid collections. Based on binary logistic regression analysis, a score from 0 to 11 was developed (CRP </≥ 150 mg/l: 0/4 points; HU </≥ 20: 0/2 points; wall enhancement no/yes: 0/2 points; gas entrapment no/yes: 0/3 points). The best cutoff to diagnose infected fluid collections was ≥ 5 points (sensitivity 85%, specificity 79%, PPV 82%, NPV 79%). In Group B (425 patients), this score yielded sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 93%, 80%, 90% and 86%, respectively. For the published score, values were in the same range (93%, 44%, 77%, 77%).

CONCLUSION

The score provides good discrimination between infected and sterile postoperative abdominal fluid collections. It yields comparable accuracy as the published score.

Malnutrition-Related Factors Increased the Risk of Anastomotic Leak for Rectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgery

Objective

To study the possible risk factors and related prediction indexes of anastomotic leakage (AL) in patients with rectal cancer during the perioperative period and to provide effective indexes for predicting whether AL will occur in postoperative patients with rectal cancer and whether early nutritional support is needed.

Background

AL after rectal cancer surgery is a common and serious complication. Many of the risk factors for AL have been confirmed. Nevertheless, the evidence of the effect of perioperative malnutrition on AL is still insufficient. This article will make a further study on this point.

Methods

We collected perioperative clinical data from 382 patients with rectal cancer who underwent surgery from September 2015 to May 2017. After 1 month of follow-up, relevant risk factor data were collected and analyzed.

Results

Data analysis showed that the incidence of AL was 14.65%. In single factor analysis, patients with high score of NRS-2002, high score of PG-SGA, diabetes, perioperative blood transfusion, postoperative diarrhea, later tumor stage, high score of ASA, low postoperative albumin, and rectal cancer patients with tumor close to the anus may led to AL. Multivariate analysis revealed that low postoperative albumin (p = 0.044), tumor close to the anus (p = 0.004), diabetes (p = 0.003), perioperative blood transfusion (p < 0.001), diarrhea (p = 0.005), later tumor stage, and high score of PG-SGA (p < 0.001) were the independent risk factors for postoperative AL.

Conclusions

AL in rectal cancer operation is a common postoperative complication. Patients with diabetes or high PG-SGA score or low perioperative albumin will have increased risk factors of AL, which should be paid enough attention in the perioperative period and nutritional support should be provided as soon as possible. Patients who have incomplete intestinal obstruction but can make effective intestinal preparation or who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy have no increased risk of AL.

Evaluation of Anastomotic Leakages Grading System Following Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer

Introduction

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is generally accepted as a major complication of rectal resection surgery. However, there is still debate about the definition and evaluation of AL. The International Study Group of Rectal Cancer (ISREC) raised a definition of and grading system for AL in 2010.

Aim

In our study, we aimed to validate AL's present definition and grading system, which were proposed by ISREC in 2010.

Methods

Patients who underwent rectal anterior resection in 2 colorectal surgery centers from January 2012 to December 2014 were included and categorized into different groups according to the ISREC criteria; further, the rate, severity and clinical outcomes of their ALs were analyzed and compared.

Results

During a median follow-up period of 38.9 months, 984 patients were included in total. The overall AL rate was 5.0% (49/984), including 7 grade A patients (14%), 21 grade B patients (43%), and 21 grade C patients (43%). The rate of grade C AL in the protective diverting stoma group was significantly lower than that in the nonstoma group (0.6% versus 2.8%, P = 0.029). Patients with grade B or grade C AL had much longer hospital stays than grade A AL patients (P = 0.016). The overall 3-year survival rates of grades A, B, and C groups were 83.3%, 66.7% and 55.6% respectively, without statistical significance.

Conclusions

Patients who were divided into different groups according to the grading system proposed by the ISREC criteria had significantly different symptoms, clinical outcomes, management, and duration of hospitalization. Our study supported that the ISREC criteria are a simple but valid classification to evaluate the surgical performance of the rectal cancer resection.

Simultaneous Drainage of the Abscess Cavity and Intestinal Tract for an Intra-abdominal Abscess Secondary to Major Leakage: A Case Report

This case report describes a 72-year-old man who developed an intra-abdominal abscess and major postoperative anastomotic leakage. He reported a history of pancreaticoduodenectomy, partial hepatectomy, and segmental colectomy for hepatic and colonic invasion of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Three catheters, (one in the transverse colon and two in the abscess cavity) were placed simultaneously through the drainage tract formed by the intraoperatively placed Pleats drain. The intra-abdominal abscess resolved following this intervention and has not recurred since. Postoperative drainage and starvation were continued for 52 and 84 days, respectively. This case report describes a novel technique of catheter insertion from the abscess cavity into the intestine through the site of rupture to reduce intestinal pressure and partially block the enteric fistula.

Prophylactic intra-abdominal drainage following colorectal anastomoses. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Clinically evident Anastomotic Leakage (AL) remains one of the most feared complications after colorectal resections with primary anastomosis. The primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine whether Prophylactic Drainage (PD) after colorectal anastomoses confers any advantage in the prevention and management of AL.

METHODS

Systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE databases for randomized studies comparing clinical outcomes of patients with Drained (D) or Undrained (UD) colorectal anastomoses performed for any cause.

RESULTS

Four randomized controlled trials comparing D and UD patients undergoing colorectal resections with primary anastomosis were included for quantitative synthesis. In total, 1120 patients were allocated to group D (n = 566) or group UD (n = 554). The clinical AL rate was 8.5% in the D group and 7.6% in the UD group, with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.57). Rates of radiological AL (D: 4.2% versus UD: 5.6%; P = 0.42), mortality (D: 3.6% versus UD: 4.4%; P = 0.63), overall morbidity (D: 16.6% versus UD: 18.6%, P = 0.38), wound infection (D: 5.4% versus UD: 5.3%, P = 0.95), pelvic sepsis (D: 9.7% versus UD: 10.5%, P = 0.75), postoperative bowel obstruction (D: 9.9% versus UD: 6.9%, P = 0.07), and reintervention for abdominal complication (D: 9.1% versus UD: 7.9%, P = 0.48) were equivalent between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The present meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials investigating the value of PD following colorectal anastomoses does not support the routine use of prophylactic drains.

Detection of early anastomotic leakage by intraperitoneal microdialysis after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective cohort study

AIM

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a common and serious complication following sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Early detection and intervention can improve clinical outcomes. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to compare intraperitoneal microdialysis with a clinical scoring system for early detection of AL.

METHOD

A microdialysis catheter was anchored near the anastomosis at low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer. Peritoneal fluid samples were analysed (lactate, pyruvate, glucose and glycerol concentration) 4-hourly and compared with a daily clinical leak score (DULK = Dutch leakage). At day 7 a pelvic CT with rectal contrast enema was performed to establish if there had been a radiological leak.

RESULTS

In this two-centre study, 129 patients [median age 65 (26-82) years; 60.5% male] underwent LAR. The leak rate was 27% (grade A, n = 11; grade B, n = 12; grade C, n = 12). Receiver operator characteristic analysis demonstrated a lactate cut-off value of 9.8 mm and had 77% sensitivity, 82% specificity, 78% accuracy, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 58, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 88 (CI 79-94) and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9 for AL. This compared with a clinical score ≥ 4, which had 57% sensitivity, 79% specificity, 71% accuracy, a PPV of 46, a NPV of 82 and an AUC of 0.7 for AL. The mean day for a positive test when using delta lactate ≥ 6.3 mm was 1.6 days and for leak score ≥ 4 it was 3.3 days (NS).

CONCLUSION

When AL occurs, intraperitoneal lactate concentration increases over time, and at a certain cut-off has a higher sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV than a clinical scoring system.

Application of the cuff rectum drainage tube in total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer: A retrospective case-controlled study

To investigate therapeutic effect of cuff rectum drainage tube (CDT) in preventing the postoperative complications of total mesorectal excision (TME) and promoting the recovery of the patients.The clinical data of 84 cases of low rectal cancer performed TME from June 2015 to June 2017 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University were analyzed retrospectively. All the cases were performed anus-retained operation without preventive colostomy. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the material of the anorectal drainage tube placed in the colonic cavity. Group I (CDT group) was transanal cuff rectal drainage tube placement (Patent No. ZL 201320384337.8) (n = 48), and group II (conventional group) was transanal clinical conventional drainage tube placement (n = 36). Anastomotic fistula incidence, the time of anal exsufflation, postoperative first ambulation time, intestinal function recovery time, the incidence of interrelated complications of drainage tube and postoperative hospital stay between 2 groups were analyzed retrospectively.Both postoperative first ambulation and anal exhaust time in CDT group were shorter than those in the conventional group ([2.3 ± 0.4] d vs [3.0 ± 0.2] d, P < .05; [3.3 ± 0.3] d vs [3.9 ± 0.5] d, P < .05). Meanwhile, the postoperative hospital stay of CDT group was significantly decreased than that in the conventional group ([10.3 ± 1.6] d vs [11.8 ± 1.1] d, P < .05). Significant different occurrence of complications existed in anastomotic fistula (2.1% [1/48] vs 16.7% [6/36], P < .05), frequent defecation (8.3% [4/48] vs 27.8% [10/36], P < .05), defecating unfinished feeling (12.5% [6/48] vs 30.6% [11/36], P < .05), drainage tube complication (4.2% [2/48] vs 22.2% [8/36], P < .05).The cuff rectum drainage tube may reduce incidence of anastomotic fistula after TME, shorten postoperative first ambulation and anal exsufflation time, enable faster recovery with good toleration and decrease postoperative hospital stay.

Novel technique for anastomotic salvage using transanal minimally invasive surgery: A case report

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leak (AL) after low anterior resection (LAR) can be a highly morbid complication. The incidence of AL ranges from 5% to 20% depending on patient characteristics and the distance of the anastomosis from the anal verge. Low anastomoses and leaks pose technical challenges for endoscopic treatment. The aim of this report was to describe the use of a commercially available laparoscopic energy device through a transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) port for the management of a symptomatic leak not requiring relaparotomy (grade B) after a LAR with diverting loop ileostomy.

CASE SUMMARY

A TAMIS GelPOINT Path port was inserted into the anus to access the distal rectum. Pneumorectum was achieved with AirSeal insufflation and a 30 degree laparoscope was introduced through a trocar. A LigaSure^TM Retractable L-Hook device was then used to perform a septotomy of the chronic sinus tract identified posterior to the coloproctostomy. The procedure was then repeated twice in three weeks intervals with ultimate resolution of the chronic leak cavity. Several months after serial TAMIS septotomies, barium enema demonstrated a patent anastomosis with no evidence of persistent leak or stricture. The patient subsequently underwent ileostomy reversal and has had no significant post-operative issues.

CONCLUSION

TAMIS septotomy with the LigaSure^TM Retractable L-Hook is a feasible and effective, minimally invasive salvage technique for the treatment of grade B ALs. Larger studies are needed to assess the generalizability and long-term results of this technique.

A New Perspective on Vacuum-Assisted Closure for the Treatment of Anastomotic Leak Following Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer, Is It Worthy?

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic dehiscence is a common complication of anterior resection. In this work, we evaluate the management of the pelvic cavity after low rectal resection using vacuum closure (VAC) with a gastroscope, and we establish factors that determine the success of closure and analyzed the rate of ileostomy closure after leakage was resolved.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a descriptive case series analysis conducted at a tertiary hospital. Twenty-two patients with low colorectal anastomosis leakage or opening of the rectal stump after anterior resection for rectal cancer were included. They were treated with VAC therapy.

RESULTS

The total number of endoscopic sessions was 3.1 ± 1.9 in the anterior resection with anastomosis group and 3.2 ± 1.8 in the Hartmann group. In 11 patients the therapy was administered in an ambulatory setting. The mean time to healing was 22.3 ± 14.7 days. Full resolution was achieved in 19 patients (followed-up 1 year). Ileostomy closure was carried out in 5 patients (38.46%) during follow-up. None of these patients showed leakage signs. Statistically significant differences were obtained depending on the onset of therapy, with better results in patients who underwent earlier vacuum-assisted therapy (before the sixth week after initial surgery), P = .041.

CONCLUSIONS

VAC therapy is an alternative to surgery that can be safely administered in an ambulatory setting. Early administration in the 6 weeks following surgery is an independent predictive factor for successful closure; however, colonic transit was only recovered in a small percentage of patients.

An updated meta-analysis of transanal drainage tube for prevention of anastomotic leak in anterior resection for rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most serious complications after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Transanal drainage tube (TDT) placement is widely used to reduce AL, but its efficacy remains controversial. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of TDT for prevention of AL, using updated evidence.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies evaluating the effectiveness of TDT for prevention of AL after anterior resection for rectal cancer were identified by using a predefined search strategy. Meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled rates of AL, reoperation, anastomotic bleeding and mortality separately.

RESULTS

One RCT and ten cohort studies which including 1170 cases with TDT and 1262 cases without TDT were considered eligible for inclusion. Meta-analysis showed that the TDT group was associated with a significant lower rates of AL (RR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.31-0.58, P < 0.00001) and reoperation (RR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.19-0.45, P < 0.00001). There was no significant difference in anastomotic bleeding rate and mortality between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

TDT placement is associated with significant lower rates of AL and reoperation, hence it is likely to be an effective method of preventing and reducing AL after rectal cancer surgery.

Impact of an institutional change from routine to highly selective diversion of a low anastomosis after TME for rectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

The need for routine diverting ileostomy following restorative total mesorectal excision (TME) is increasingly debated as the benefits might not outweigh the disadvantages. This study evaluated an institutional shift from routine (RD) to highly selective diversion (HSD) after TME surgery for rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients having TME with primary anastomosis and HSD for low or mid rectal cancer between December 2014 and March 2017 were compared with a historical control group with RD in the preceding period since January 2011. HSD was introduced in conjunction with uptake of transanal TME.

RESULTS

In the RD group, 45/50 patients (90%) had a primary diverting stoma, and 3/40 patients (8%) in the HSD group. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 10 (20%) and three (8%) cases after a median follow-up of 36 and 19 months after RD and HSD, respectively. There was no postoperative mortality. An unintentional stoma beyond 1 year postoperative was present in six and two patients, respectively. One-year stoma-related readmission and reoperation rate (including reversal) after RD were 84% and 86%, respectively. Corresponding percentages were significantly lower after HSD (17% and 17%; P < 0.001). Total hospital stay within one year was median 11 days (IQR 8-19) versus 5 days (IQR 4-11), respectively (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This single institutional comparative cohort study shows that highly selective defunctioning of a low anastomosis in rectal cancer patients did not adversely affect incidence or consequences of anastomotic leakage with a substantial decrease in 1-year readmission and reintervention rate, leading to an overall significantly reduced hospital stay.

Routine Drainage of Colorectal Anastomoses: An Evidence-Based Review of the Current Literature

BACKGROUND

The use of prophylactic drainage after colorectal anastomoses has been long debated. This report aimed to review the current literature discussing routine drainage of colorectal anastomoses highlighting two opposite perspectives (prodrainage and antidrainage) to demonstrate the clinical utility of prophylactic drainage and its proper indications.

METHODS

An organized literature search was conducted querying electronic databases and Google Scholar. Articles evaluating the role of routine prophylactic drainage after colorectal anastomosis were included and divided into two categories: articles supporting the use of drains (prodrainage) and articles disputing routine drainage (antidrainage).

RESULTS

There were seven systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses, one Cochrane review, one randomized controlled trial, and six prospective or retrospective cohort studies. Six studies supported prophylactic drainage of colorectal anastomoses; the quality of these studies ranged between grade II and IV. Nine studies recommended against the use of prophylactic drainage, six studies were grade I, one was grade II, and two were grade IV.

CONCLUSION

Since level I evidence studies including well-designed randomized trials and meta-analyses recommended against the use of pelvic drainage as a routine practice after colorectal anastomoses, we conclude no significant impact of routine drainage on the risk of anastomotic leakage after colorectal anastomoses.

Examination of a CRP first approach for the detection of postoperative complications in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer: A pragmatic study

The aim of the present study was to examine whether a C-reactive protein (CRP) first approach would improve the detection rate of postoperative complications by CT.CRP is a useful biomarker to identify major complications following surgery for colorectal cancer.Patients with histologically confirmed colorectal cancer, who underwent elective surgery between 2008 and 2015 at a single centre were included. Exceeding the established CRP threshold of 150 mg/L on postoperative day (POD) 4 was recorded. Results of CT performed between postoperative days 4 and 14 were recorded.Four hundred ninety-five patients were included. The majority were male (58%), over 65 (68%), with node-negative disease (66%) and underwent open surgery (70%). Those patients who underwent a CT scan (n = 93), versus those who did not (n = 402), were more likely to have a postoperative complication (84% vs 35%, P < 0.001), infective complication (67% vs 21%, P < 0.001), and anastomotic leak (17% vs 2%, P < 0.001). In patients who did not undergo a CT scan (n = 402) exceeding the CRP threshold (n = 117) on POD 4 was associated with a higher rate of postoperative complication (50% vs 29%, P < 0.001), infective complications (36% vs 15%, P < 0.001), and anastomotic leak (4% vs 0.5%, P = 0.009). In patients who did undergo a CT scan (n = 93) exceeding the CRP threshold (n = 53) on POD 4 was associated with earlier CT (median POD 6 vs 8, P = 0.001) but not postoperative complications.A CRP first approach resulted in earlier and improved detection of complications by CT following surgery for colorectal cancer.

[Characteristics of postoperative peritonitis]

Postoperative peritonitis is still a life-threatening complication after abdominal surgery and approximately 10,000 patients annually develop postoperative peritonitis in Germany. Early recognition and diagnosis before the onset of sepsis has remained a clinical challenge as no single specific screening test is available. The aim of therapy is a rapid and effective control of the source of infection and antimicrobial therapy. After diagnosis of diffuse postoperative peritonitis surgical revision is usually inevitable after intestinal interventions. Peritonitis after liver, biliary or pancreatic surgery is managed as a rule by means of differentiated therapy approaches depending on the severity.

Protection of low rectal anastomosis with a new tube ileostomy using a biofragmentable anastomosis ring: A retrospective study

A temporarily defunctioning stoma, while effective at reducing symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection (LAR) of rectal cancer, and its subsequent closure, is associated with significant morbidity. Here, we devised a new tube ileostomy using a biofragmentable anastomosis ring (TIB) with no need for reversal.This is a retrospective cohort study. From June 2011 to March 2015, TIBs were performed on 31 consecutive patients with mid- or low-rectal cancer who underwent elective laparoscopic LARs. From January 2008 to May 2011, 25 similarly diseased patients underwent elective laparoscopic LARs and conventional loop ileostomy (LI) and were included as controls. All of the anastomotic sites were within 6 cm of the anal verge. Demographic, clinical feature, and operative data were recorded.The demographic features of both groups were similar. The TIB mean surgical duration was significantly lower than in the LI group (215 ± 28 vs 245 ± 54 min, P = 0.010). Because of readmission for stoma closure, the total hospital stay of the LI group was longer than that of the TIB group (38.1 ± 26.5 vs 19.1 ± 7.9 days, respectively, P = 0.002). Ileal content was completely diverted by TIB for 13.7 ± 2.1 (range, 10-19) days postoperatively. The drainage tube was removed on postoperative day 27.8 ± 6.9 (range, 20-44), and the mean continued duration of the discharge tract, before fistula healing, was 4.5 ± 1.9 (range, 2-10) days. Postoperative complications of the 2 modalities were not significant. In the TIB group, 1 rectovaginal fistula occurred 30 days postsurgery. In the LI group, 1 rectovaginal fistula occurred 3 months after stoma closure. Both complications were treated with transverse colostomy. No major TIB associated complications were observed in the present study.TIB is a safe, feasible, effective, but time-limited diversion technique, which may reduce symptomatic anastomosis leakage after LAR for rectal cancer.

Efficacy of transanal tube placement after anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leakage is a serious complication that can occur after anterior resection of the rectum. There is a question regarding whether the placement of a transanal tube can decrease the rate of anastomotic leakage. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of transanal tube placement after anterior resection.

METHODS

We searched three major databases (PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) up until January 2015 for studies evaluating the benefit of transanal tubes after anterior resection for rectal cancer. The primary outcome measure was the rate of clinical anastomotic leakage. Secondary outcome was the rate of reoperation. Pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were obtained using random effects models.

RESULTS

One randomized controlled trial and three observational studies involving 909 patients met inclusion criteria. Clinical anastomotic leakage occurred in 3.49% (14 of 401) of patients with transanal tubes and 12.01% (61 of 508) of patients without transanal tubes. Meta-analysis of the studies showed a lower risk of anastomotic leakage (RR, 0.32; 95% CI 0.18-0.58) and reoperation related to leakage (RR, 0.19; 95% CI 0.08-0.46) when the transanal tube was placed.

CONCLUSIONS

While studies are few and mostly observational, the data to date indicate that placement of a transanal tube decreases the rate of clinical anastomotic leakage and reoperation related to leakage. More studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Cytokines as Early Markers of Colorectal Anastomotic Leakage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose. Colorectal anastomotic leakage (CAL) is one of the most severe complications after colorectal surgery. This meta-analysis evaluates whether systemic or peritoneal inflammatory cytokines may contribute to early detection of CAL. Methods. Systematic literature search was performed in the acknowledged medical databases according to the PRISMA guidelines to identify studies evaluating systemic and peritoneal levels of TNF, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-10 for early detection of CAL. Means and standard deviations of systemic and peritoneal cytokine levels were extracted, respectively, for patients with and without CAL. The meta-analysis of the mean differences was carried out for each postoperative day using Review Manager. Results. Seven articles were included. The meta-analysis was performed with 5 articles evaluating peritoneal cytokine levels. Peritoneal levels of IL-6 were significantly higher in patients with CAL compared to patients without CAL on postoperative days 1, 2, and 3 (P < 0.05). Similar results were found for peritoneal levels of TNF but on postoperative days 3, 4, and 5 (P < 0.05). The articles regarding systemic cytokine levels did not report any significant difference accordingly. Conclusion. Increased postoperative levels of peritoneal IL-6 and TNF are significantly associated with CAL and may contribute to its early detection.

Early Diagnosis of Colonic Anastomotic Leak With Peritoneal Endoscopy

Background and Objectives:

At present, we do not have a reliable method for the early diagnosis of colorectal anastomotic leakage (AL). We tested peritoneal flexible endoscopy through a port placed in the abdominal wall in the early postoperative course, as a new diagnostic method for detection of this complication and evaluated the suggested method for safety, feasibility, and accuracy.

Methods:

Ten swine were randomized into 2 groups: group A, colorectal anastomosis without leakage; and group B, colorectal anastomosis with leakage. A button gastrostomy feeding tube was inserted percutaneously into the peritoneal cavity. Colorectal anastomosis (with or without defect) was created 48 hours after the first operation. The swine were examined by peritoneal flexible endoscopy 8 and 24 hours after the colonic operation, by a consultant surgeon who was blinded to both the presence and the allocated location of the of the anastomotic defect.

Results:

None of the animals showed signs of illness 48 hours after the intraperitoneal gastrostomy tube placement. More than half of the anastomosis circumference was identified in 60 and 10% of the animals at endoscopy 8 and 24 hours, respectively, after the anastomosis was created. Excessive adhesion formation was observed in all animals, irrespective of AL. The sensitivity and specificity of endoscopy in detecting peritonitis 24 hours after AL were both 60%.

Conclusions:

Peritoneal endoscopy is a safe and simple procedure. Visualization of the peritoneal cavity in the early postoperative course was limited due to adhesion formation. Further studies are needed to clarify the accuracy of the procedure and to address additional methodological concerns.

Risk Factors of Anastomotic Leakage and Long-Term Survival After Colorectal Surgery

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most serious complications of colorectal surgery. It can affect long-term oncologic outcomes, but the impact on long-term survival remains uncertain. The aim of this study is to evaluate the operative characteristics of leakage and no leakage groups and to analyze long-term oncologic outcomes.We prospectively enrolled 10,477 patients from 2000 to 2011 and retrospectively reviewed the data.Male sex (odds ratio [OR], 3.90; P < 0.001), intraoperative transfusion (OR, 2.31; P = 0.042), and operative time (OR, 1.73; P = 0.032) were independent risk factors of AL in the colon. In the rectum, male sex (OR, 2.37; P < 0.001), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (OR, 2.26; P < 0.001), and regional lymph node metastasis (OR, 1.43; P = 0.012) were independent risk factors of AL, and diverting stoma (OR, 0.24; P < 0.001) was associated with a deceased risk of AL. AL in the rectum without a diverting stoma was associated with disease-free survival (DFS, OR, 1.47; P = 0.037). Colonic leakage was not associated with 5-year DFS (leakage group vs nonleakage group, 72.4% vs 80.9%, P = 0.084); however, in patients undergoing rectal resection, there was a significant difference in 5-year DFS (67.0% vs 76.6%, P = 0.005, respectively).AL in the rectum is associated with worse long-term DFS and overall survival. A diverting stoma was shown to protect against this effect and was associated with long-term survival in rectal surgery. Therefore, creating a diverting stoma should be considered in high-risk patients undergoing rectal surgery.

Anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: are 75 % preventable?

INTRODUCTION

Anastomotic leak (AL) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality associated with complications of colorectal surgery. Furthermore, AL results in prolonged hospital stays and significant increase in costs of medical resources.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, we investigated the impact of anastomosis technique on the rate of anastomotic leak. The rate of leak was compared between two groups performing end-to-end (E-E) vs. side-to-end (S-E) anastomosis. The impact of various risk factors was also compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were 382 E-E and 363 S-E anastomoses after left colectomy or rectal resections. The anastomotic leak rate was 8.64 % using E-E compared to 1.93 % using S-E anastomosis technique (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that the rate of anastomotic leak after left colon and rectum resections could be significantly reduced utilizing S-E anastomosis technique.

Endoscopic Management of Gastrointestinal Leaks and Fistulae

Gastrointestinal leaks and fistulae can be serious acute complications or chronic morbid conditions resulting from inflammatory, malignant, or postsurgical states. Endoscopic closure of gastrointestinal leaks and fistulae represents major progress in the treatment of patients with these complex presentations. The main goal of endoscopic therapy is the interruption of the flow of luminal contents across a gastrointestinal defect. In consideration of the proper endoscopic approach to luminal closure, several basic principles must be considered. Undrained cavities and fluid collections must often first be drained percutaneously, and the percutaneous drain provides an important measure of safety for subsequent endoscopic luminal manipulations. The size and exact location of the leak/fistula, as well as the viability of the surrounding tissue, must be defined. Almost all complex leaks and fistulae must be approached in a multidisciplinary manner, collaborating with colleagues in nutrition, radiology, and surgery. Currently, gastrointestinal leaks and fistulae may be managed endoscopically by using 1 or more of the following modalities: stent placement, clip closure (including through-the-scope clips and over-the-scope devices), endoscopic suturing, and the injection of tissue sealants. In this article, we discuss these modalities and review the published outcomes data regarding each approach as well as practical considerations for successful closure of luminal defects.

The PRECious trial PREdiction of Complications, a step-up approach, CRP first followed by CT-scan imaging to ensure quality control after major abdominal surgery: study protocol for a stepped-wedge trial

Background

After major abdominal surgery (MAS), 20 % of patients endure major complications, which require invasive treatment and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. A quality control algorithm after major abdominal surgery aimed at early identification of patients at risk of developing major complications can decrease associated morbidity and mortality. Literature studies show promising results for C-reactive protein (CRP) as an early marker for postoperative complications, however clinical significance has yet to be determined.

Methods

A multicenter, stepped wedge, prospective clinical trial including all adult patients planned to undergo elective MAS. The first period consists of standard postoperative monitoring, which entails on demand additional examinations. This is followed by a period with implementation of postoperative control according to the PRECious protocol, which implicates standardized measurement of CRP levels. If CRP levels exceed 140 mg/L on postoperative day 3,4 or 5, an enhanced CT-scan is performed.

Primary outcome in this study is a combined primary outcome, entailing all morbidity and mortality due to postoperative complications. Complications are graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Secondary outcomes are hospital length of stay, patients reported outcome measures (PROMs) and cost-effectiveness. Data will be collected during admission, three months and one year postoperatively. Approval by the medical ethics committee of the VU University Medical Center was obtained (ID 2015.114).

Discussion

the PRECious trial is a stepped-wedge, multicenter, open label, prospective clinical trial to determine the effect of a standardized postoperative quality control algorithm on postoperative morbidity and mortality, and cost-effectiveness.

Trial registration

www.ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02102217. Registered 5 February 2015.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0903-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Predictive Value of C-Reactive Protein for Major Complications after Major Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Pooled-Analysis

Background

Early diagnosis and treatment of complications after major abdominal surgery can decrease associated morbidity and mortality. Postoperative CRP levels have shown a strong correlation with complications. Aim of this systematic review and pooled-analysis was to assess postoperative values of CRP as a marker for major complications and construct a prediction model.

Study design

A systematic review was performed for CRP levels as a predictor for complications after major abdominal surgery (MAS). Raw data was obtained from seven studies, including 1427 patients. A logit regression model assessed the probability of major complications as a function of CRP levels on the third postoperative day. Two practical cut-offs are proposed: an optimal cut-off for safe discharge in a fast track protocol and another for early identification of patients with increased risk for major complications.

Results

A prediction model was calculated for major complications as a function of CRP levels on the third postoperative day. Based on the model several cut-offs for CRP are proposed. For instance, a two cut-off system may be applied, consisting of a safe discharge criterion with CRP levels below 75 mg/L, with a negative predictive value of 97.2%. A second cut-off is set at 215 mg/L (probability 20%) and serves as a predictor of complications, indicating additional CT-scan imaging.

Conclusions

The present study provides insight in the interpretation of CRP levels after major abdominal surgery, proposing a prediction model for major complications as a function of CRP on postoperative day 3. Cut-offs for CRP may be implemented for safe early-discharge in a fast-track protocol and, secondly as a threshold for additional examinations, such as CT-scan imaging, even in absence of clinical signs, to confirm or exclude major complications. The prediction model allows for setting a cut-off at the discretion of individual surgeons or surgical departments.

Effectiveness of a transanal tube for the prevention of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery

AIM

We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of a transanal tube placed for the prevention of anastomotic leakage after rectal surgery.

METHODS

Between 2007 and 2011, a total of 243 patients underwent anterior resection using the double stapling technique for rectal cancer at our institution. We excluded 67 patients with diverting stoma and divided the remaining patients into two groups: patients who did not receive a transanal tube and diverting stoma (n = 140; control group) and those who received a transanal tube (n = 36). We compared the rate of anastomotic leakage, evaluated the complications associated with the transanal tube, and analyzed the risk factors for anastomotic leakage.

RESULTS

The following perioperative parameters were significantly different between the two groups as follows (control group vs. transanal tube group): diabetes mellitus (8 [22 %] vs. 12 [8.5 %] patients, respectively; p = 0.03), surgical duration (262 ± 54.1 min [171-457] vs. 233 ± 61.7 min [126-430], respectively; p < 0.01). The postoperative anastomosis leakage appeared significantly different between the two groups (1 [2.7 %] vs. 22 [15.7 %] patients, respectively; p = 0.04). Anastomotic leakage was significantly associated with the distance between the anastomosis line and the anal verge (odds ratio [OR] 8.58; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.53-48.0; p = 0.01) and non-use of a transanal tube (OR 11.1; 95 % CI 1.04-118; p = 0.04) in both univariate and multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Placement of a transanal tube is effective in decreasing the rate of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection using the double stapling technique. However, complications associated with a transanal tube should be carefully considered.

Clostridium difficile infection after ileostomy closure mimicking anastomotic leak

Clostridium difficile infection is linked to antibiotic exposure, with elderly and immunocompromised hospitalised patients being particularly at risk. The symptoms range from mild diarrhoea to life-threatening fulminant colitis. We describe an unusual presentation of C. difficile infection after closure of ileostomy in a healthy 60-year-old man with a history of low anterior resection and defunctioning ileostomy for rectal tumour. On the third day postoperatively, the patient developed left lower abdominal pain and profuse diarrhoea. With worsening symptoms and steadily increasing inflammatory markers over the following few days, concerns were raised about an anastomotic leak with pelvic abscess. CT of the abdomen/pelvis on day 7 surprisingly showed colitis in the neorectum/sigmoid colon. A stool test confirmed C. difficile infection.

Morphologic change of rectosigmoid colon using belly board and distended bladder protocol

Purpose

This study investigates morphologic change of the rectosigmoid colon using a belly board in prone position and distended bladder in patients with rectal cancer. We evaluate the possibility of excluding the proximal margin of anastomosis from the radiation field by straightening the rectosigmoid colon.

Materials and Methods

Nineteen patients who received preoperative radiotherapy between 2006 and 2009 underwent simulation in a prone position (group A). These patients were compared to 19 patients treated using a belly board in prone position and a distended bladder protocol (group B). Rectosigmoid colon in the pelvic cavity was delineated on planning computed tomography (CT) images. A total dose of 45 Gy was planned for the whole pelvic field with superior margin of the sacral promontory. The volume and redundancy of rectosigmoid colon was assessed.

Results

Patients in group B had straighter rectosigmoid colons than those in group A (no redundancy; group A vs. group B, 10% vs. 42%; p = 0.03). The volume of rectosigmoid colon in the radiation field was significantly larger in group A (56.7 vs. 49.1 mL; p = 0.009). In dose volume histogram analysis, the mean irradiated volume was lower in patients in group B (V45 27.2 vs. 18.2 mL; p = 0.004). In Pearson correlation coefficient analysis, the in-field volume of rectosigmoid colon was significantly correlated with the bladder volume (R = 0.86, p = 0.003).

Conclusion

Use of a belly board and distended bladder protocol could contribute to exclusion of the proximal margin of anastomosis from the radiation field.

Incidence and mortality of anastomotic dehiscence requiring reoperation after rectal carcinoma resection

Anastomotic dehiscence (AD) requiring reoperation is the most severe complication following anterior rectal resection. We performed a systematic review on studies that describe AD requiring reoperation and its subsequent mortality after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. A systematic search was performed on published literature. Data on the definition and rate of AD, the number of ADs requiring reoperation, the mortality caused by AD, and the overall postoperative mortality were pooled and analyzed. A total of 39 studies with 24,232 patients were analyzed. The studies varied in incidence and definition of AD. Systematic review of the data showed that the overall rate of AD was 8.6%, and the rate of AD requiring reoperation was 5.4%. The postoperative mortality caused by AD was 0.4%, and the overall postoperative mortality was 1.3%. We found considerable risk and mortality for AD requiring reoperation, which largely contributed to the overall postoperative mortality.

Contrast medium at the site of the anastomosis is crucial in detecting anastomotic leakage with CT imaging after colorectal surgery

PURPOSE

The use of computed tomography (CT) to detect anastomotic leakage (AL) is becoming the standard of care. Accurate detection of AL is crucial. The aim of this study was to define CT criteria that are most predictive for AL.

METHODS

From January 2006 to December 2012, all consecutive patients who had undergone CT imaging because of clinical suspicion of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery were analysed. All CT scans were re-evaluated by two independent abdominal radiologists blinded for clinical outcome. The images were scored with a set of criteria and a conclusion whether or not AL was present was drawn. Each separate criterion was analysed for its value in predicting AL by uni- and multivariable logistic regression

RESULTS

Of 668 patients with colorectal surgery, 108 had undergone CT imaging within 16 days postoperatively. According to our standard of reference, 34 (31%) of the patients had AL. Univariable analysis showed that "fluid near anastomosis" (radiologist 1 (rad 1), p < 0.001; radiologist 2 (rad 2), p < 0.001) and "air near anastomosis" (rad 1, p < 0.001; rad 2, p < 0.001), "air intra-abdominally" (rad 1, p = 0.019; rad 2, p = 0.004) and "contrast leakage" (rad 1, p < 0.001; rad 2, p < 0.001) were associated with AL. Contrast leakage was the only independent predictor for AL in multivariable analysis for both radiologists (rad 1, OR 5.43 (95% CI 1.18-25.02); rad 2, OR 8.51 (95% CI 2.21-32.83)).

CONCLUSION

The only independent variable predicting AL is leakage of contrast medium. To improve the accuracy of CT imaging, optimal contrast administration near the anastomosis appears to be crucial.

Anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery: diagnostic accuracy of CT

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CT in postoperative colorectal anastomotic leakage (AL).

METHODS

Two independent blinded radiologists reviewed 153 CTs performed for suspected AL within 60 days after surgery in 131 consecutive patients, with (n = 58) or without (n = 95) retrograde contrast enema (RCE). Results were compared to original interpretations. The reference standard was reoperation or consensus (a radiologist and a surgeon) regarding clinical, laboratory, radiological, and follow-up data after medical treatment.

RESULTS

AL was confirmed in 34/131 patients. For the two reviewers and original interpretation, sensitivity of CT was 82 %, 87 %, and 71 %, respectively; specificity was 84 %, 84 %, and 92 %. RCE significantly increased the positive predictive value (from 40 % to 88 %, P = 0.0009; 41 % to 92 %, P = 0.0016; and 40 % to 100 %, P = 0.0006). Contrast extravasation was the most sensitive (reviewers, 83 % and 83 %) and specific (97 % and 97 %) sign and was significantly associated with AL by univariate analysis (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001). By multivariate analysis with recursive partitioning, CT with RCE was accurate to confirm or rule out AL with contrast extravasation.

CONCLUSIONS

CT with RCE is accurate for diagnosing postoperative colorectal AL. Contrast extravasation is the most reliable sign. RCE should be performed during CT for suspected AL.

KEY POINTS

• CT accurately diagnosed clinically suspected colorectal AL and showed good interobserver agreement • Contrast extravasation was the most sensitive and specific CT sign • Retrograde contrast enema during CT improved positive predictive value • Retrograde contrast enema decreased false-negative or indeterminate original CT interpretations.

Management of Complications Following Emergency and Elective Surgery for Diverticulitis

BACKGROUND

The clinical spectrum of sigmoid diverticulitis (SD) varies from asymptomatic diverticulosis to symptomatic disease with potentially fatal complications. Sigmoid colectomy with restoration of continuity has been the prevailing modality for treating acute and recurrent SD, and is often performed as a laparoscopy-assisted procedure. For elective sigmoid colectomy, the postoperative morbidity rate is 15-20% whereas morbidity rates reach up to 30% in patients who undergo emergency surgery for perforated SD. Some of the more common and serious surgical complications after sigmoid colectomy are anastomotic leaks and peritonitis, wound infections, small bowel obstruction, postoperative bleeding, and injuries to the urinary tract structures. Regarding the management of complications, it makes no difference whether the complication is a result of an emergency or an elective procedure.

METHODS

The present work gives an overview of the management of complications in the surgical treatment of SD based on the current literature.

RESULTS

To achieve successful management, early diagnosis is mandatory in cases of deviation from the normal postoperative course. If diagnostic procedures fail to deliver a correlate for the clinical situation of the patient, re-laparotomy or re-laparoscopy still remain among the most important diagnostic and/or therapeutic principles in visceral surgery when a patient's clinical status deteriorates.

CONCLUSION

The ability to recognize and successfully manage complications is a crucial part of the surgical treatment of diverticular disease and should be mastered by any surgeon qualified in this field.

Risk factors for acquisition of multidrug-resistant bacteria in patients with anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery

PURPOSE

The risk factors for acquiring an infection with multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria in patients with anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery are poorly understood. We evaluated the risk factors associated with the initial acquisition of MDR pathogens in patients with anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data at a university affiliated-tertiary referral hospital in South Korea. From January 2009 to April 2013, a total of 6767 consecutive patients with colorectal cancer who underwent surgery were registered. Of these patients, 190 (2.8%) were diagnosed with anastomotic leakage. Finally, 143 (2.1%) patients with culture test results were included in this study.

RESULTS

Of the 143 enrolled patients, 46 (32.2%) were classified in the MDR group. The use of antibiotics for more than 5 days before diagnosis of anastomosis site leakage (p = 0.016) and diabetes mellitus (p = 0.028) was identified as independent risk factors for MDR acquisition by multivariate analysis. The rate of adequate initial empirical antibiotic therapy in the MDR group was lower than in the non-MDR group (35 vs. 75%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the duration of antibiotic administration after the leak was longer in the MDR group (p = 0.013). Patients in the MDR group also had a longer hospital stay (p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

The length of antibiotic administration before the diagnosis of anastomotic leakage and diabetes mellitus were risk factors associated with the acquisition of MDR bacteria in patients with anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery.

CT scan-based modelling of anastomotic leak risk after colorectal surgery

AIM

Prolonged ileus, low-grade fever and abdominal discomfort are common during the first week after colonic resection. Undiagnosed anastomotic leak carries a poor outcome and computed tomography (CT) scan is the best imaging tool for assessing postoperative abdominal complications. We used a CT scan-based model to quantify the risk of anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery.

METHOD

A case-control analysis of 74 patients who underwent clinico-radiological evaluation after colorectal surgery for suspicion of anastomotic leak was undertaken and a multivariable analysis of risk factors for leak was performed. A logistic regression model was used to identify determinant variables and construct a predictive score.

RESULTS

Out of 74 patients with a clinical suspicion of anastomotic leak, 17 (23%) had this complication confirmed following repeat laparotomy. In multivariate analysis, three variables were associated with anastomotic leak: (1) white blood cells count > 9 × 10(9) /l (OR = 14.8); (2) presence of ≥ 500 cm(3) of intra- abdominal fluid (OR = 13.4); and (3) pneumoperitoneum at the site of anastomosis (OR = 9.9). Each of these three parameters contributed one point to the risk score. The observed risk of leak was 0, 6, 31 and 100%, respectively, for patients with scores of 0, 1, 2 and 3. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the score was 0.83 (0.72-0.94).

CONCLUSION

This CT scan-based model seems clinically promising for objective quantification of the risk of a leak after colorectal surgery.

Is ileostomy always necessary following rectal resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis?

OBJECTIVE

To verify the hypothesis that in most patients bowel segmental resection to treat endometriosis can be safely performed without creation of a stoma and to discuss the limitations of this statement.

DESIGN

Retrospective study (Canadian Task Force classification III).

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Forty-one women with sigmoid and rectal endometriotic lesions who underwent segmental resection.

INTERVENTION

Segmental resection procedures performed between 2004 and 2011. Patient demographic, operative, and postoperative data were compared.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Sigmoid resection was performed in 6 patients (15%), and rectal anterior resection in 35 patients (high in 21 patients [51%], and low, i.e., <10 cm from the anal verge, in 14 [34%]). In 4 patients a temporary ileostomy was created. There was 1 anastomotic leak (2.4%), in a patient with an unprotected anastomosis, which was treated via laparoscopic surgery and creation of a temporary ileostomy. Other postoperative complications included hemoperitoneum, pelvic abscess, pelvic collection, and a ureteral vaginal fistula, in 1 patient each (all 2.4%).

CONCLUSION

A protective stoma may be averted in low anastomosis if it is >5 cm from the anal verge and there are no adverse intraoperative events.

Beware of false-negative CT scan for anastomotic leakage after colonic surgery

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leakage is one of the most life-threatening complications after colonic surgery. Correct diagnosis and treatment is important to reduce morbidity and mortality. An abdominal CT scan is one of the main diagnostic tools in diagnosing anastomotic leaks. The aim of this study was to examine the accuracy of abdominal CT scanning to detect anastomotic leakage and to evaluate the consequences of a false-negative CT outcome.

METHODS

All consecutive patients who underwent colonic resection for malignant disease between 2009 and 2011 or for benign disease in 2010 were reviewed. Patients in whom a postoperative abdominal CT scan was performed to detect anastomotic leakage were included.

RESULTS

In 97 of 524 patients who underwent colonic surgery, an abdominal CT scan was performed for the suspicion of anastomotic leakage. Overall leakage rate was 10.9 % (n = 57). Mortality rate after leakage was 21.1 % (n = 12). Results from all abdominal CT scans revealed an overall sensitivity of 0.59 (95 % CI 0.43-0.73), a specificity of 0.88 (95 % CI 0.75-0.95), positive predictive value 0.82 (95 % CI 0.64-0.92), negative predictive value 0.70 (95 % CI 0.57-0.81), and an accuracy of 74 %. Delayed reintervention for anastomotic leakage due to a false-negative CT outcome resulted in death in 62.5 % (n = 5).

CONCLUSION

The sensitivity of abdominal CT scanning after colonic surgery is relatively low. A negative CT scan does not rule out anastomotic leakage. Even with a negative CT scan, we should remain equally alert at clinical deterioration as an argument for timely intervention.

Bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement in restorative proctectomy and anterior resection: a randomized study

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic complications, including leaks, strictures/stenoses, and bleeding, cause considerable mortality and morbidity after colorectal surgery.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess whether the use of a synthetic, bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement material with circular staplers would reduce postoperative anastomotic leakage in patients with a colorectal, coloanal, or ileoanal anastomosis.

DESIGN

This was a randomized study that compared outcomes in patients in whom the reinforcement material was used with those in patients who were not given the material.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at several centers in the United States.

PATIENTS

The 258 patients (123 in the reinforcement group and 135 control subjects) underwent surgery for a variety of conditions, but most (n = 200) were treated for rectal cancer.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measures were occurrence of anastomotic leaks and other complications according to the study protocol.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the 2 study groups with respect to age, BMI, ASA physical status, operating time, diagnosis, previous chemoradiotherapy, surgical technique, or 30-day complications, except for a higher rate of small-bowel obstruction (p = 0.03) and anastomotic stricture (p = 0.006) in the control group. The overall anastomotic leak rate was 12% (bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement, 11.4%; no bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement, 12.6%).

LIMITATIONS

The study was nonblinded and was terminated at the first planned interim analysis because of insufficient power to detect an intergroup difference in anastomotic leak rate in the time allotted for the investigation.

CONCLUSIONS

Reinforcing the circular staple line in colorectal anastomoses with bioabsorbable material did not significantly affect the anastomotic leak rate but may have reduced anastomotic strictures. Most strictures did not require an anastomotic revision or delay in stoma closure. The bioabsorbable material may positively affect some aspects of the healing of circular stapled colorectal anastomoses; however, additional research on factors associated with anastomotic leakage is needed.