Short-term outcomes following laparoscopic resection for colon cancer

Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Laparoscopic Resection of Colorectal Cancers: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopy is one of the major advances in surgery in the last 30 years and has many benefits. Although laparoscopy was initially used for resection of benign colon lesions, it is now widely used for colorectal cancer resections after strong evidence has confirmed its safety and efficacy. We aim to report both the surgical and oncological outcomes of our first series of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resections.

METHODS

In 2013, a laparoscopic colorectal resection service was established in northern Iraq at Zheen Hospital, Erbil. Data from all consecutive colorectal cancers were collected. Patients with locally advanced diseases and those who required emergency operations for bowel obstruction or perforation were excluded. We analyzed demographic, operative, postoperative, and histopathological data for all patients who were included in the study.

RESULTS

A total of 124 patients with colorectal cancers presented to our unit between January 2013 and January 2023. Only 112 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and underwent laparoscopic resections. The median age of the patients was 54.5 years. The majority of patients were men (n=62; 55.4%). In 39 patients (35%), the cancer was located in the sigmoid; in 33 patients (29.5%) the cancer was in the rectum. Laparoscopic anterior resection was the most common procedure (n=50; 45%), followed by right hemicolectomy in 17 cases (15.1%). The conversion rate to open surgery was 8% (nine cases). The most common causes of conversion to open surgery were dilated bowel loops and tumour adherence to other structures. The mean operative time was 190 minutes and the mean hospital stay was three days. No complications were reported in 94 patients (84%). Among the complications, wound infection was seen in seven patients (7.8%). There were six anastomotic leaks (6.7%). The mean number of lymph nodes harvested was 13. In 70 patients (62.5%), the lymph node count was ≥12 with a median of 13. The mean distal resection margin was 6 cm and 2.5 cm for colon and rectal resections, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study reveals that laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancers is surgically practicable and safe with the benefits of a short hospital stay, adequate resection margins, and adequate lymph node yield.

Development and validation of a low-cost laparoscopic simulation box

INTRODUCTION

The acquisition of laparoscopic technique skills in an operating room is conditioned by the expertise of the tutor and the number of training interventions by the trainee. For students and surgeons to use a laparoscopic simulator to train their skills, it must be validated beforehand.

METHODS

A laparoscopic simulator box was designed, along with 6 interchangeable training games. The simulator was validated by a group of 19 experts, physicians with an experience from at least 100 laparoscopic surgeries, and 20 students of 4^th to 6^th grades of medical school (non-experts). To evaluate its construct validity, time-to-completion and the number of successfully completed games were assessed. We used 11 and 9-item questionnaires to gather information on content and face validity respectively. In both questionnaires, answers were collected through Likert-type scales, scored from 1 to 5.

RESULTS

The group of experts required less time and successfully completed more games than the group of non-experts (p < 0.01). The group of non-experts gave a score ≥ 4 points on each of the questions regarding the content validity of the tool, however, the experts rated with a significant lower mean score the need for the simulator to learn the surgical technique (3.68 points; p < 0.01). Regarding the face validity, all items were graded with a score ≥ 4 points except for the question relating to the spatial realism (3.82 points).

CONCLUSION

The laparoscopy simulation box and the games were valid means for training surgeons and medical students to develop the skills required for the laparoscopic technique.

Development and validation of a low-cost laparoscopic simulation box

INTRODUCTION

The acquisition of laparoscopic technique skills in an operating room is conditioned by the expertise of the tutor and the number of training interventions by the trainee. For students and surgeons to use a laparoscopic simulator to train their skills, it must be validated beforehand.

METHODS

A laparoscopic simulator box was designed, along with 6 interchangeable training games. The simulator was validated by a group of 19 experts, physicians with an experience from at least 100 laparoscopic surgeries, and 20 students of 4th to 6th grades of medical school (non-experts). To evaluate its construct validity, time-to-completion and the number of successfully completed games were assessed. We used 11 and 9-item questionnaires to gather information on content and face validity respectively. In both questionnaires, answers were collected through Likert-type scales, scored from 1 to 5.

RESULTS

The group of experts required less time and successfully completed more games than the group of non-experts (p < 0.01). The group of non-experts gave a score ≥4 points on each of the questions regarding the content validity of the tool, however, the experts rated with a significant lower mean score the need for the simulator to learn the surgical technique (3.68 points; p < 0.01). Regarding the face validity, all items were graded with a score ≥4 points except for the question relating to the spatial realism (3.82 points).

CONCLUSION

The laparoscopy simulation box and the games were valid means for training surgeons and medical students to develop the skills required for the laparoscopic technique.

Development and Validation of a Homemade, Low-Cost Laparoscopic Simulator for Resident Surgeons (LABOT)

Several studies have demonstrated that training with a laparoscopic simulator improves laparoscopic technical skills. We describe how to build a homemade, low-cost laparoscopic training simulator (LABOT) and its validation as a training instrument. First, sixty surgeons filled out a survey characterized by 12 closed-answer questions about realism, ergonomics, and usefulness for surgical training (global scores ranged from 1-very insufficient to 5-very good). The results of the questionnaires showed a mean (±SD) rating score of 4.18 ± 0.65 for all users. Then, 15 students (group S) and 15 residents (group R) completed 3 different tasks (T1, T2, T3), which were repeated twice to evaluate the execution time and the number of users' procedural errors. For T1, the R group had a lower mean execution time and a lower rate of procedural errors than the S group; for T2, the R and S groups had a similar mean execution time, but the R group had a lower rate of errors; and for T3, the R and S groups had a similar mean execution time and rate of errors. On a second attempt, all the participants tended to improve their results in doing these surgical tasks; nevertheless, after subgroup analysis of the T1 results, the S group had a better improvement of both parameters. Our laparoscopic simulator is simple to build, low-cost, easy to use, and seems to be a suitable resource for improving laparoscopic skills. In the future, further studies should evaluate the potential of this laparoscopic box on long-term surgical training with more complex tasks and simulation attempts.

C-reactive protein in predicting major postoperative complications are there differences in open and minimally invasive colorectal surgery? Substudy from a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

In search of improvement of patient assessment in the postoperative phase, C-reactive protein (CRP) is increasingly being studied as an early marker for postoperative complications following major abdominal surgery. Several studies reported an attenuated immune response in minimally invasive surgery, which might affect interpretation of postoperative CRP levels. The aim of the present study was to compare the value of CRP as a predictor for major postoperative complications in patients undergoing open versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

METHODS

A subgroup analysis from a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-trial) was performed, including all patients with non-metastasized colorectal cancer. In the LAFA trial, patients were randomized to open or laparoscopic segmental colectomy. In a subgroup of 79 patients of the LAFA trial, postoperative assessment of CRP levels was conducted routinely preoperatively and 1, 2, 24 and 72 h after surgery.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients were randomized to the open group and 42 patients to the laparoscopic group. Major complications occurred in 19% of laparoscopic procedures and 13.5% of open procedures (p = 0.776). CRP levels rise following surgical procedures. In uncomplicated cases, the rise in CRP levels was significantly lower at 24 and 72 h following laparoscopic resection in comparison to open resection. No differences in CRP levels were observed when comparing open and laparoscopic resection in patients with major complications.

CONCLUSION

In patients with an uncomplicated postoperative course, CRP levels were lower following minimally invasive resection, possibly due to decreased operative trauma. No differences in CRP were observed stratified for surgical technique in patients with major complications. These results suggest that CRP may be applied as a marker for major postoperative complications in both open and minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Future research should aim to assess the role of standardized postoperative CRP measurements.

Total laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with 3-step stapled intracorporeal isoperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis for colon cancer: An evaluation of short-term outcomes

Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with extracorporeal anastomosis is a widely used procedure; several authors have published their approach to intracorporeal anastomosis. In this paper, we present an approach developed by us and compare short-term outcomes with those of extracorporeal anastomosis in colon cancer patients.Retrospective review of colon cancer patients treated with laparoscopic right hemicolectomy either with intracorporeal anastomosis (TLG group) or extracorporeal anastomosis (LG group) at the Zhangjiagang Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University between January 2011 and October 2015. Operative and postoperative data are compared.Around 85 patients underwent laparoscopic hemicolectomy (56 TLG and 29 LG) during the reference period for this study. Age, gender, body mass index (BMI), stage of cancer, operation time, number of lymph nodes harvested, and length of hospital stay were comparable between the 2 groups. In the TLG group, the ileocolic anastomosis time was significantly shorter (9.9-15.5 minutes vs 13.5-18.2 minutes in LG; P < 0.001), the mean intraoperative blood loss was lower (83.2 mL [range, 56.5-100.5 mL] vs 93.3 mL [range, 75.8 - 110.3 mL]; P < 0.001), the recovery of bowel function was faster (P < 0.001), and the postoperative pain score was lower (P < 0.001) as compared to that in the LG group. Complications in the LG group included wound infection (4 patients), obstruction (1), and postoperative bleeding complications (1); however, only 1 patient developed complication (wound infection) in the TLG group.Total laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with 3-step stapled intracorporeal anastomosis for colon cancer is a safe and reliable procedure. Its advantages include short anastomosis time, less intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative pain, and early bowel function recovery.

Intraoperative localization of occult colorectal tumors during laparoscopic surgery by magnetic ring markers-a pilot study

PURPOSE

Intraoperative localization of small tumors or malignant polyps has been an important issue in laparoscopic colon surgery. We have developed a new method for preoperative endoscopic tumor marking using a ring-shaped magnetic marker.

METHODS

In a pilot study, 28 patients with small colonic (n = 23) or rectal tumors (n = 5) underwent endoscopic magnetic clipping prior to laparoscopic resection. A cap carrying a high-power neodymium ring magnet was mounted on the tip of a colonoscope. Near the lesion, the ring magnet was released and clipped to the colorectal wall. Standard laparoscopic instruments were used to find the magnet intraoperatively.

RESULTS

Endoscopic fixation of a ring magnet next to the tumor by clipping was technically feasible in all 28 patients. Intraoperative localization of the marked lesions was successful in 27 of 28 patients (96 %). All patients underwent magnet-guided radical laparoscopic resection of the tumor with an average proximal and distal resection margin of 101 and 63 mm, respectively. In one case, the magnet could not be found due to preoperative migration. Surgical complications related to magnetic clip application or intraoperative tumor localization were not observed. However, there was one case with an intraoperative perforation of the colon by the magnet, which was obviously caused by unchecked action with a laparoscopic instrument.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative endoscopic labeling of colonic lesions with on-the-scope magnetic markers is simple and safe. Intraoperative tumor localization during laparoscopic colorectal surgery can be achieved reliably without additional equipment such as ultrasound or fluoroscopy.

Surgical treatment for colorectal cancer

The rapid in development of surgical technology has had a major effect in surgical treatment of colorectal cancer. Laparoscopic colon cancer surgery has been proven to provide better short-term clinical and oncologic outcomes. However this quickly accepted surgical approach is still performed by a minority of colorectal surgeons. The more technically challenging procedure of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery is also on its way to demonstrating perhaps similar short-term benefits. This article reviews current evidences of both short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery, including the overall costs comparison between laparoscopic surgery and conventional open surgery. In addition, different surgical techniques for laparoscopic colon and rectal cancer are compared. Also the relevant future challenge of colorectal cancer robotic surgery is reviewed.

Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a single-centre experience of 120 cases

INTRODUCTION

For colorectal surgeons, laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery poses a new challenge. The defence of the questionable oncological safety tempered by the impracticality of the long learning curve is rapidly fading. As a unit specialising in minimally invasive surgery, we have routinely undertaken rectal cancer surgery laparoscopically since 2005.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer between June 2005 and February 2010 were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively maintained colorectal cancer database.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty patients underwent surgery for rectal cancer during the study period. One hundred and twenty patients had a laparoscopic resection, six were converted to open (conversion rate 5%) and 10 had a planned primary open procedure. Fifty four were low rectal tumours and 76 were upper rectal tumours. One hundred and thirteen patients had an anterior resection (87%), 17 patients an abdomino-perineal resection (13%) and 62 of the 130 patients (47.6%) had neoadjuvant radiotherapy. The median lymph node retrieval rate was 12 (9-14), five patients (3.8%) had a positive circumferential margin and the clinical anastomotic leak rate was 3.8% (n = 5 patients). There was no significant difference in the stated parameters for neoadjuvant versus non-neoadjuvant patients and for upper versus lower rectal tumours. Ninety three percent of mesorectal excision specimens were complete on pathological assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

During the study period, 92% of rectal cancers underwent a laparoscopic resection with low rates of morbidity and acceptable short-term oncological outcomes. This data supports the view that laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer can be safely delivered in mid-volume centres by surgeons who have completed the learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Reducing preoperative fasting in elective adult surgical patients: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

The practice of fasting from midnight prior to surgery is an outdated one.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of an evidence-based protocol for reduced preoperative fasting on fasting times, patient safety, and comfort.

METHODS

A non-randomised case-control study of preoperative fasting times among adult surgical patients undergoing elective procedures was conducted. Consecutive patients were allocated to a reduced preoperative fasting protocol allowing fluids and solids up to 2 and 6 h prior to anaesthesia, respectively (n = 21). These were compared to control patients identified from an historic study of preoperative fasting times who followed the traditional fast from midnight (n = 29). Fasting times and details of patients' subjective comfort were collected using an interview-assisted questionnaire. Incidence of intraoperative aspirations was obtained from anaesthetic records.

RESULTS

Significant reductions in fasting times for fluids (p = 0.000) and solids (p = 0.000) were achieved following implementation of the fasting protocol. Less preoperative thirst (0.000), headache (0.012) and nausea (0.015) were reported by those who had a shorter fast. Intraoperative aspiration did not occur in either group.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of this protocol for reduced preoperative fasting achieved an appreciable reduction in fasting times and enhanced patient comfort. Patient safety was not compromised. Further modifications of our protocols are necessary to meet the international best practice. We recommend its implementation across all surgical groups in our institution.