Risk factors for vertical incomplete resection in endoscopic submucosal dissection as total excisional biopsy for submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma

Clinical usefulness of hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection for T1b colorectal carcinomas ≤20 mm to ensure adequate vertical margins

Objective

To evaluate endoscopic resection strategies for cT1b colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) ≤20 mm to determine strategies that enable adequate vertical margins (VMs).

Methods

We enrolled 128 consecutive patients with cT1b colorectal carcinomas ≤20 mm resected by endoscopic mucosal resection or hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Tumor lifting conditions after submucosal injection were classified into type A (lifting, soft dome-like), type B (lifting, hard trapezoid-like), and non-lifting (positive non-lifting sign). Predictors of positive VMs (VM 1) and adequate VMs were identified.

Results

All non-lifting tumors were resected by hybrid ESD and VMs were ≥500 µm. Vertical margin 1 tumors were only found in the endoscopic mucosal resection group, in which, the proportion of type B tumors with VM 1 was significantly higher than that of tumors with negative VMs (p < 0.01). Type A tumors showed no significant between-group differences. Among type B tumors, the proportion of VMs ≥500 µm was significantly higher (p < 0.01) and the VM distance was significantly longer (p < 0.01) in the hybrid ESD group than in the endoscopic mucosal resection group.

Conclusions

Hybrid ESD can be selected for type B tumors to ensure adequate VMs.

Predictors of residual neoplasia after noncurative (R1) endoscopic submucosal dissection of lesions in the gastrointestinal tract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive resection technique that enables the en bloc resection of gastrointestinal lesions. Despite en bloc resection, pathological evaluation of lesions can reveal positive vertical or horizontal margins, which is referred to as R1 resection. Not all R1 lesions referred for surgical resection or endoscopic surveillance show evidence of residual tumor. We aimed to identify the predictors of residual neoplasia in patients with an R1 resection following ESD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All lesions resected via ESD between June 2016 and September 2021 at a tertiary referral center were retrospectively identified. Lesions with an R1 resection and adequate follow-up were eligible for inclusion. Patient, lesion, and procedural characteristics were analyzed to identify predictors of residual neoplasia.

RESULTS

Of 614 lesions, 163 (28%) had R1 resection. Of these, 56 lesions in 51 patients had complete follow-up and were included. Thirteen patients (25.5%) underwent surgical resection and the remainder underwent endoscopic surveillance. Seven (12.5%) patients had residual disease. All patients with residual disease had esophageal carcinoma. Positive deep and lateral margins, severe submucosal fibrosis, and moderate/poorly differentiated tumors were identified as significant predictors of residual neoplasia.

CONCLUSION

Most R1 lesions (87.5%) resected by ESD did not have residual disease on follow-up. Those without identified risk factors for residual disease, such as esophageal carcinoma, severe submucosal fibrosis, or both histological margin positivity, may benefit from a strategy of close endoscopic surveillance rather than referral for surgical resection.

Vertical margin distance in T1 colorectal carcinoma resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection affects prognosis after additional surgery

PURPOSE : A vertical margin (VM) distance of < 500 µm is a risk factor for recurrence in patients with T1 colorectal carcinoma (CRC) resected by endoscopy. We aimed to determine the effects of the VM distance on the recurrence and prognosis of T1 CRC.

METHODS

We enrolled 168 patients with T1 CRC who underwent additional surgery after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) at multiple centers between 2008 and 2016. None of the patients were followed up for < 5 years. The enrolled 168 patients were classified into patients with VM distance of < 500 µm including positive VM (n = 72 [43%], VM distance < 500 µm group) and patients with VM distance of ≥ 500 µm (n = 96 [57%], VM distance ≥ 500 µm group). The clinicopathological features, recurrence rates, and prognoses were compared between the groups using propensity-score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

Tumors recurred in eight of the 168 patients (5%) with VM distance < 500 µm. After PSM, the rate of overall recurrence and local recurrence in the VM distance < 500 µm group were significantly higher than those in the VM distance ≥ 500 µm group. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was significantly higher in the VM distance ≥ 500 µm group than that in VM distance < 500 µm group after PSM (100% vs. 89%, p < 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Complete en bloc resection of T1 CRC via ESD must include a sufficient amount of SM to reduce the risk of metastasis and recurrence after additional surgery.

Investigation of vertical margin involvement in endoscopic resection for T1 colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVES

The resection of vertical margin-negative submucosally invasive colorectal cancer (CRC) relies on the pathological risk assessment of lymph node metastasis. However, no large-scale study has clarified the endoscopic resection (ER) outcome for submucosally invasive CRC, focusing on the vertical margin status. This retrospective study aimed to examine vertical margin involvement in ER for submucosally invasive CRC and explore the treatment consequences associated with vertical margin status.

METHODS

We analyzed 395 submucosally invasive CRC cases in 389 patients who underwent ER at our hospital between 2008 and 2020. The presence of residual tumors and simultaneous lymph node metastasis in patients who underwent additional surgery was assessed and compared between the vertical incomplete ER and the vertical margin-negative groups.

RESULTS

Among the patients, 270 were men, with a median age of 69 years. The vertical incomplete ER rate was 21.5%, with positive vertical margins and unclear vertical margins identified in 12.2% and 9.3% of the cases, respectively. Among 154 patients who underwent additional surgery after ER, the vertical incomplete ER group had a significantly higher residual tumor rate than the vertical margin-negative group (P = 0.001). The vertical incomplete ER group had a significantly higher lymph node metastasis rate than the vertical margin-negative group (P = 0.029).

CONCLUSION

This study clarified the substantial risk of vertical incomplete ER in submucosally invasive CRC and revealed the high risk of residual tumor and lymph node metastasis in vertical incomplete ER for submucosal CRC.

Novel endoscopic ultrasonography classification for assured vertical resection margin (≥500 μm) in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The risk of local recurrence might be low in pT1 colorectal carcinoma with a tumor vertical margin (VM) ≥500 μm. We investigated the relationship between endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) findings and VM in cases with colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) categorized as Type 2B according to the Japan NBI Expert Team (JNET) classification.

METHODS

We analyzed 179 JNET Type 2B colorectal tumors resected by ESD at Hiroshima University Hospital from January 2010 to May 2021. The distance from the tumor invasive front to the muscle layer on EUS was defined as the tumor-free distance (EUS-TFD) and classified as Type I (EUS-TFD ≥1 mm) and II (<1 mm). We investigated the relationship between EUS-TFD and VM and analyzed the predictive factors for VM ≥500 μm.

RESULTS

EUS-TFD Type I was diagnosed in 133 (74.3%) lesions: VM ≥500 μm (114, 85.7%); VM <500 μm (19, 14.3%); and VM positive (VM1) (0, 0%). Type II was diagnosed in 46 (25.7%) lesions: VM ≥500 μm (14, 30.5%); VM <500 μm (22, 47.8%); and VM1 (10, 21.7%). In the EUS-TFD Type I cases, 84.5% and 87.8% were protruded and superficial types; whereas for Type II cases, these were 38.9% and 25%, respectively. EUS-TFD classification (Type I), scope operability (good), submucosal invasion depth (<2000 μm), histology at the deepest invasive portion (favorable), and degree of fibrosis (F0/F1) were significant predictors of VM ≥500 μm.

CONCLUSIONS

In JNET Type 2B lesions, EUS-TFD classification is a novel diagnostic indicator to predict VM ≥500 μm in ESD preoperatively.

Risk factors for vertical incomplete resection in endoscopic submucosal dissection of deep invasive submucosal colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

It has been recently reported that deep invasive submucosal (T1b) colorectal cancer (CRC) without other pathological risk factors for lymph node metastasis has a low rate of lymph node metastasis, increasing the possibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the future. However, ESD for T1b CRC is technically difficult, and some lesions cannot be resected en bloc. This study aimed to identify the risk factors associated with vertical incomplete ESD in T1b CRC.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 140 pathological T1b CRC lesions that underwent initial ESD at our institution between January 2011 and October 2020, and categorized them into positive vertical margin (PVM) and negative vertical margin (NVM) groups. The risk factors for PVM were examined using univariate and multivariate analyses, and a subgroup analysis for T1b CRC with an obvious depressed surface was performed.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis revealed obvious depression (hazard ratio [HR]: 7.4; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.47-22.5) and severe fibrosis (HR: 11.4; 95% CI: 3.95-33.0) as significant risk factors for PVM. Length of depressed surface ≥12 mm (HR: 6.19; 95% CI: 1.56 -24.6) was identified as an independent predictor of PVM for T1b CRC with an obvious depression.

CONCLUSION

Pathological T1b CRC cases with an obvious depression and severe fibrosis are at a high risk of vertical incomplete ESD.

Depth diagnosis of early colorectal cancer: Magnifying chromoendoscopy or image enhanced endoscopy with magnification?

Depth diagnosis is extremely crucial in making a treatment choice between endoscopic resection and surgery in the early stages of cancers. Among several imaging modalities, we use magnifying endoscopy to diagnose lesions by close observation of the findings at mucosal surface layer. In combination with topical staining, magnifying endoscopy enables us to assess the definite pit structure, which referred to as magnifying chromoendoscopy (MCE). The pit pattern classification by MCE was proposed and is now widely accepted as the standard diagnostic criteria for colorectal lesions. Meanwhile, image enhanced endoscopy (IEE) represented by narrow-band imaging was developed to improve the visibility of surface and vascular findings without dyeing. Recent collaborative work performed by endoscopic experts in Japan yielded the unified diagnostic criteria, the Japan NBI Expert Team (JNET) classification, based on the findings of IEE with magnification. In this review, focusing on MCE and IEE with magnification, we aimed to give an outline of the pit pattern classification and the JNET classification, and further discuss their accuracy rate of depth diagnosis of early colorectal lesions by performing a review of the related literature. Both modalities have a high accuracy rate of nearly 90% for depth diagnosis. IEE with magnification is an ideal modality because it helps observe lesions without dye spraying; however, lesions with JNET type 2B have an inadequate diagnostic ability, which should be complemented by MCE. We conclude that accurate diagnosis is possible by examining lesions using both modalities properly to overcome the limitations of each modality.

Clinical significance of immunohistochemical lymphovascular evaluation to determine additional surgery after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal T1 carcinoma

PURPOSE

The Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines indicate lymphovascular invasion-evaluated by hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining-as a surgical requirement after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in T1 colorectal carcinoma (CRC) patients; however, immunohistochemical evaluation may be superior. This study aimed to clarify the significance of immunohistochemical lymphovascular evaluation as an indicator for additional surgery of T1 CRC after ESD, and assessed the guidelines' adequacy, even when evaluating through immunostaining.

METHODS

Patients with T1 CRC who underwent ESD were enrolled across three institutions between January 2012 and December 2017. Immunohistochemical lymphovascular evaluation was performed. Clinicopathological features, pathological evaluations, and surgery indications were recorded. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression identified risk factors for lymph node (LN) metastasis of T1 CRC after ESD.

RESULTS

Among 370 patients with T1 CRC, recurrence, 5-year overall survival, and 5-year disease specific survival rates were 1.6%, 94.6%, and 99.5%, respectively. Six patients (1.6%) experienced recurrence, five of whom underwent additional surgery. Those with no risk factors did not exhibit recurrence. A total of 215 (58.1%) patients underwent additional surgery after ESD, 21 (9.7%) of whom exhibited LN metastasis. Among 16 patients who underwent additional surgery due to lymphovascular invasion, three (18.8%) had LN metastasis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified lymphatic invasion as a significant risk factor for LN metastasis (odds ratio 3.9, 95% confidence interval 1.0-14.6, P = 0.0421).

CONCLUSIONS

The JSCCR guidelines have clinical validity, and immunohistochemical lymphatic evaluation findings potentially predict LN metastasis for T1 CRC after ESD.

Additional surgery after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal cancer: a review of 53 cases

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows the en bloc resection of tumors and is particularly indicated for T1 colorectal cancer. The number of patients undergoing additional surgery after colorectal ESD is increasing. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and long-term outcomes in patients with additional surgery.

METHODS

Of 1018 patients who underwent colorectal ESD in our hospital between February 2010 and July 2018, 53 patients who underwent additional surgery in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed and investigated for their clinicopathological characteristics. The need for additional surgery was determined by a pathological examination according to the guideline [1].

RESULTS

In total, 53 patients (24 men, 29 women; mean age, 68.2 years; mean tumor diameter, 30.5 mm) were included. Laparoscopic surgery was performed in 47 (88.7%) patients. Liver metastases were preoperatively observed in one patient, for whom hepatectomy was simultaneously performed. All procedures included pathological R0 resection. Postoperative complications occurred in 9 (17.0%) patients. There were no complications requiring reoperation. Fifteen (28.3%) patients had a positive vertical margin; of these patients, residual tumor was observed in the resected specimens of two (13.3%) patients. Eight patients (15.1%) had lymph node metastasis (LNM): four (25.0%) and four (10.8%) of 16 and 37 patients with and without vascular invasion, respectively. Eleven patients (20.8%) had grade 2 or 3 tumor budding, and four (36.4%) of these had LNM. Postoperative recurrence was observed in two (3.8%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Additional surgery after ESD for T1 colorectal cancer was effective and had good long-term outcomes.

Preceding endoscopic submucosal dissection for T1 colorectal carcinoma does not affect the prognosis of patients who underwent additional surgery: a large multicenter propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

We analyzed the influence of preceding endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) on the prognosis of patients with T1 colorectal carcinoma (CRC) after additional surgery using propensity-score matching.

METHODS

1638 consecutive patients with T1 CRC were retrospectively identified between January 1998 and December 2016 at the Hiroshima GI Endoscopy Research Group. We assessed 602 patients with 602 T1 CRC who underwent additional surgery after ESD (n = 216) or surgery alone (n = 386). The enrolled patients were treated according to the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2016, and were defined as non-endoscopically curable (non-e-curable) when they did not satisfy its curative criteria. We analyzed the pathological characteristics and the prognosis of non-e-curable patients using propensity-score matching between the additional surgery after ESD and surgery alone groups.

RESULTS

There were no cases of recurrence and lymph node metastasis among the e-curable patients. The rate of lymph node metastasis and recurrences in the non-e-curable patients were 10.8% and 2.6%, respectively. After propensity-score matching, there were no significant differences in the 5-year overall survival rates (96.9% vs. 92.0%), 5-year disease-free survival rates (96.7% vs. 96.7%) and 5-year disease-specific survival rates (100% vs. 98.6%) after treatment of T1 CRCs between the 2 groups in non-e-curable patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Preceding ESD with histological en bloc resection for patients with T1 CRC did not affect their oncologic behavior adversely after additional surgery.

Preoperative endoscopic predictors of severe submucosal fibrosis in colorectal tumors undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection

Background and study aims  Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables en bloc removal of colorectal neoplasms regardless of size. Submucosal fibrosis is a significant factor for technical difficulty and poor outcomes. We assessed the predictive factors for severe submucosal fibrosis and the ESD outcomes. Patients and methods  Patients undergoing ESD from January 2006 to September 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The degree of submucosal fibrosis was classified into three types: no fibrosis (F0), mild fibrosis (F1), and severe fibrosis (F2). F0 and F1 cases were grouped as non-severe fibrosis for comparison with the severe fibrosis group. Predictors of severe submucosal fibrosis and ESD outcomes were evaluated. Results  ESD was performed in 524 lesions (60 % male; mean age, 67.8 years). Eighty lesions with severe fibrosis (15.3 %) were observed. The overall en bloc resection rate and curative resection rate were 94.3 % and 77.7 %, respectively. Rates of en bloc resection (91.2 % vs. 94.8 %, P  = 0.2) and perforation (7.5 % vs. 5.6 %, P  = 0.45) were no different between severe fibrosis and non-severe fibrosis groups. However, incidences of non-curative resection and low resection speed were significantly higher in the severe fibrosis group. Among protruding lesions, tumor height and volume were significantly greater in the severe counterparts. A diameter ≥ 40 mm, endoscopic finding of the tumor beyond fold, and fold convergence were independent risk factors for severe fibrosis. Conclusions  Severe submucosal fibrosis is a significant risk factor for non-curative resection and a long procedural time. Tumor size and morphology might help to predict the severity of fibrosis.

Cost Analysis of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for the Treatment of Colorectal Lesions in China

AIM

The aim of the study was to evaluate costs associated with colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for treatment of colorectal cancer.

METHODS

The study is a retrospective analysis of data on 395 patients treated by colonic ESD.

RESULTS

The operation, consumable items, and medication accounted for 71% of the total costs for colonic ESD treatment. Medication and consumable items' costs were higher if lesions occurred in the transverse colon and right hemicolon compared to the left hemicolon. Medication, consumable items, and total costs were higher for larger lesions. Lesion numbers and carcinoma were associated with higher medication, consumable items, operation, and total costs. Positive surgical margins and complications of hemorrhage or perforation were positively correlated with higher costs for medication, consumable items, and total costs.

CONCLUSION

Labor costs for doctors and nurses remain low in China. Costs for medication and consumable items were higher for treatment involving the transverse colon or right hemicolon (vs. the left hemicolon), larger lesions, carcinoma, and a positive surgical margin. A benchmark cost estimate for ESD treatment including 4 days of postoperative hospitalization was determined to be approximately 5400 USD.

Clinicopathological features of T1 colorectal carcinomas with skip lymphovascular invasion

With recent advances in endoscopic treatment, many T1 colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) are resected endoscopically with a negative margin. However, some lesions exhibit skip lymphovascular invasion (SLVI), which is defined as the discontinuous foci of the tumor cells within the colon wall. The aim of the present study was to reveal the clinicopathological features of T1 CRCs with SLVI and validate the Japanese guidelines regarding SLVI. A total of 741 patients with T1 CRCs that were resected surgically between April 2001 and October 2016 in our hospital were divided into two groups: With SLVI and without SLVI. Clinicopathological features compared between the two groups were patient's gender, age, tumor size, location, morphology, lymphovascular invasion, tumor differentiation, tumor budding and lymph node metastasis. The incidence of T1 CRCs with SLVI was 0.9% (7/741). All cases with SLVI were found in the sigmoid colon or rectum. T1 CRCs with SLVI showed significantly higher rates of lymphovascular invasion than those without SLVI (P<0.01). In conclusion, lymphovascular invasion was a significant risk factor for SLVI in T1 CRCs, and for which surgical colectomy was necessary. The Japanese guidelines are appropriate regarding SLVI. Registered in the University Hospital Medical Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000027097).

Long-term outcomes after treatment for T1 colorectal carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective cohort study of Hiroshima GI Endoscopy Research Group

BACKGROUND

We aimed to clarify the long-term outcomes of patients with T1 colorectal carcinoma (CRC) after endoscopic resection (ER) and surgical resection.

METHODS

We examined T1 CRC patients treated during 1992-2008 and who had ≥5 years of follow-up. Patients who did not meet the curative criteria after ER according to the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines were defined as "non-endoscopically curable" and classified into three groups: ER alone (Group A: 121 patients), additional surgery after ER (Group B: 238 patients), and surgical resection alone (Group C: 342 patients). Long-term outcomes and predictors of recurrence were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 882 patients with T1 CRC, 701 were non-endoscopically curable. Among these patients, recurrence and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 0.6 and 91.1%, respectively. In Groups A, B, and C, recurrence rates were 5.0, 5.5, and 3.8%, OS rates were 79.3, 92.4, and 91.5% (p < 0.01), and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 98.1, 97.9, and 98.5%, respectively. Thirty-two patients experienced local recurrence or distant/lymph node metastasis (Group A: 6; Group B: 13; Group C: 13) and 14 patients died of primary CRC (Group A: 3; Group B: 7; Group C: 4). Age ≥65 years, protruded gross type, positive lymphatic invasion, and high budding grade were significant predictors of recurrence in non-endoscopically curable patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings supported the JSCCR criteria for endoscopically curable T1 CRC. ER for T1 CRC did not worsen the clinical outcomes of patients who required additional surgical resection.

Diagnostic performance of Japan NBI Expert Team classification for differentiation among noninvasive, superficially invasive, and deeply invasive colorectal neoplasia

BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS

The Japan NBI Expert Team (JNET) classification is the first universal narrow-band imaging magnifying endoscopic classification of colorectal tumors. Considering each type in this classification, the diagnostic ability of Type 2B is the weakest. Generally, clinical behavior is believed to be different in each gross type of colorectal tumor. We evaluated the differences in the diagnostic performance of JNET classification for each gross type (polypoid and superficial) and examined whether the diagnostic performance of Type 2B could be improved by subtyping.

METHODS

We analyzed 2933 consecutive cases of colorectal lesions, including 136 hyperplastic polyps/sessile serrated polyps, 1926 low-grade dysplasias (LGDs), 571 high-grade dysplasias (HGDs), and 300 submucosal (SM) carcinomas. We classified lesions as polypoid and superficial type and compared the diagnostic performance of the classification system in each type. Additionally, we subtyped Type 2B into 2B-low and 2B-high based on the level of irregularity in surface and vessel patterns, and we evaluated the relationship between the subtypes and histology, as analyzed separately for polypoid and superficial types. We also estimated interobserver and intraobserver variability.

RESULTS

The diagnostic performance of JNET classification did not differ significantly between polypoid and superficial lesions. Ninety-nine percent of Type 2B-low lesions were LGDs, HGDs, or superficial submucosal invasive (SM-s) carcinomas. In contrast, 60% of Type 2B-high lesions were deep submucosal invasive (SM-d) carcinomas. The results were not different between each gross type. Interobserver and intraobserver agreements for Type 2B subtyping were good, with kappa values of .743 and .786, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Type 2B subtyping may be useful for identifying lesions that are appropriate for endoscopic resection. JNET classification and Type 2B sub classification are useful criteria, regardless of gross type.

Expert opinions and scientific evidence for colonoscopy key performance indicators

Colonoscopy is a widely performed procedure with procedural volumes increasing annually throughout the world. Many procedures are now performed as part of colorectal cancer screening programmes. Colonoscopy should be of high quality and measures of this quality should be evidence based. New UK key performance indicators and quality assurance standards have been developed by a working group with consensus agreement on each standard reached. This paper reviews the scientific basis for each of the quality measures published in the UK standards.

Management of colorectal T1 carcinoma treated by endoscopic resection

As a result of recent advances in endoscopic therapeutic technology, the number of endoscopic resections carried out in the treatment of early colorectal carcinomas with little risk of lymph node metastasis has increased. There are no reports of lymph node metastasis in intramucosal (Tis) carcinomas, whereas lymph node metastasis occurs in 6.8-17.8% of submucosal (T1) carcinomas. Three clinical guidelines have been published in Japan and the management strategy for early colorectal tumors has been demonstrated. According to the 2014 Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) Guidelines for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer, additional surgery should be done in cases of endoscopically resected T1 carcinoma with a histologically diagnosed positive vertical margin. Additional surgery may also be considered when one of the following histological findings is detected: (i) SM invasion depth ≥1000 µm; (ii) histological type por., sig., or muc.; (iii) grade 2-3 tumor budding; and (iv) positive vascular permeation. A resected lesion that is histologically diagnosed as a T1 carcinoma without any of the above-mentioned findings can be followed up without additional surgery. As for the prognosis of endoscopically resected T1 carcinomas, the relapse ratio of approximately 3.4% (44/1312) is relatively low. However, relapse is associated with a poor prognosis, with 72 cancer-related deaths reported out of 134 relapsed cases (54%). A more detailed stratification of the lymph node metastasis risk after endoscopic resection for T1 carcinomas and the prognosis of relapsed cases will be elucidated through prospective studies. Thereafter, the appropriate indications and safe and secure endoscopic resection for T1 carcinomas will be established.

Long-term outcomes after treatment for T1 colorectal carcinoma

PURPOSE

Long-term outcomes of patients with T1 colorectal carcinoma (CRC) treated by endoscopic resection (ER) or surgical resection are unclear in relation to the curative criteria in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines. The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare the long-term outcomes among patients with T1 CRC in relation to the treatment methods.

METHODS

We examined 322 T1 CRC cases treated between January 1992 and August 2008 at Hiroshima University Hospital. Patients who did not meet the curative criteria in the JSCCR guidelines were defined as "non-endoscopically curable" and classified into three groups: underwent ER alone (group A: 45 patients), underwent additional surgery after ER (group B: 106 patients), and underwent surgical resection alone (group C: 92 patients).

RESULTS

Of the 322 T1 CRC patients, 79 were categorized as endoscopically curable and 243 as non-endoscopically curable. Among the endoscopically curable T1 CRC patients, recurrence and 5-year OS rates were 0 and 94.2%, respectively. In groups A, B, and C, recurrence rates were 4.4, 6.6, and 4.3%, and OS rates were 85.6, 95.1, and 96.3%, respectively (p < 0.05). Local recurrence or distant/lymph node metastasis was observed in 13 patients (group A: 2; group B: 7; group C: 4). Death due to primary CRC occurred in six patients (group B: 4; group C: 2).

CONCLUSION

Long-term outcomes support the curative criteria according to the JSCCR guidelines. ER for T1 CRC did not worsen clinical outcomes in cases that required additional surgical resection.

Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Past, Present, and Factors Impacting Future Dissemination

First performed in the stomach for removal of localized gastric tumors, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has evolved into a technique that is increasingly being employed to resect colorectal lesions. As opposed to endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), ESD allows the endoscopist to remove large specimens en bloc to provide accurate pathologic evaluation and lower local recurrence rates. ESD is an ideal technique for resection of lesions without lymph node metastases and is becoming the standard of care in Japan as outcomes data has proven it to be equally efficacious, less invasive, and inexpensive as compared with surgery; however, potential risk for complications is high and the procedure is currently not widely available in the Western world. As more interest, endoscopist training, and data supporting the technique's use mount, ESD will also likely become the standard of care in the Western world for resection of localized colorectal lesions.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection as total excisional biopsy for clinical T1 colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Only the depth of submucosal invasion can be estimated prior to determining the indications for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as a curative treatment for colorectal carcinoma (CRC). Here we evaluated the outcomes of ESD for clinical T1 CRCs.

METHODS

Of 660 patients who underwent ESD for CRC at the Hiroshima University Hospital between June 2003 and December 2013, we examined the outcomes of 37 (6%; 26 men, 11 women; mean age ± SD, 68 ± 12 years) who underwent ESD as total excisional biopsy for various reasons, in spite of an endoscopic diagnosis of T1 CRC.

RESULTS

The mean lesion size was 25 ± 14 mm; 14 lesions were protruding and 23 were superficial. The en bloc resection rate was 100% (37/37). The histological en bloc resection rate was 92% (34/37). ESD resulted in a positive vertical margin in 3 cases. Deep submucosal invasion was seen in 3 cases, 2 of which had severe submucosal fibrosis. Although severe submucosal fibrosis was not found in other cases, pathologic examination of the deepest invasive portion of the tumor revealed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. The rates of post-ESD bleeding and perforation were 8% (3/37) and 5% (2/37), respectively. All patients recovered under conservative therapy. No cases of recurrence were noted in patients without additional surgical resection when the lesions satisfied the curative conditions listed in the 2014 Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum guidelines.

CONCLUSION

En bloc resection by ESD as total excisional biopsy for clinical T1 CRC is a highly effective treatment and establishes a precise histological diagnosis.

Towards safer and appropriate application of endoscopic submucosal dissection for T1 colorectal carcinoma as total excisional biopsy: future perspectives

According to the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Guidelines 2014 for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer, cases with T1 colorectal carcinoma should be considered for additional colectomy with lymph node dissection when histologically complete en bloc resection is endoscopically carried out and when one of the four risk factors listed below is present. These four risk factors are: (i) submucosal (SM) invasion depth ≥1000 μm; (ii) positive vascular invasion; (iii) poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, signet ring cell carcinoma, or mucinous carcinoma; and (iv) grade 2/3 budding at the deepest part of SM invasion. However, the probability of lymph node metastasis is extremely low if none of these risk factors are present, with the exception of SM invasion depth ≥1000 μm. Consequently, it is assumed that there will be an increasing number of cases where no additional surgery is done, or cases of moderate invasive carcinoma in which endoscopic treatment is carried out to achieve an excisional biopsy, for which complete resection is applicable. In these cases, the preoperative diagnosis, resection techniques such as endoscopic submucosal dissection, features of resected specimens, and the accuracy of pathological diagnosis are all extremely important.

Risk factors for delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms

PURPOSE

Although delayed bleeding is a major complication of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal neoplasms, few reports have assessed the risk factors for delayed bleeding after colorectal ESD.

METHODS

This study included 363 consecutive patients in whom 377 colorectal neoplasms were resected using ESD between April 2006 and August 2012. We classified patients and lesions into two groups on the basis of presence or absence of delayed bleeding and retrospectively compared the clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes of ESD between the two groups.

RESULTS

Delayed bleeding occurred in 25 (6.6 %) of 377 lesions, and all cases of delayed bleeding were successfully controlled by endoscopic procedures. With respect to patient-related factors, there was no significant difference between the groups in mean age, sex ratio, and current use of antithrombotic agents. With respect to lesion-related factors, there was no significant difference between the groups in mean lesion size, growth pattern, and mean procedure time (p = 0.6). Lesions located in the rectum (vs colon, p = 0.0005) and lesions with severe submucosal fibrosis (vs no or mild fibrosis, p = 0.022) were significantly related to delayed bleeding. Upon multivariate analysis, lesions located in the rectum (vs colon, odds ratio 4.19; p = 0.0009) were significantly related to delayed bleeding after colorectal ESD.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that location of lesions in the rectum was a significant independent risk factor for delayed bleeding after ESD for colorectal neoplasms.