Impact of intraoperative temperature and humidity on healing of intestinal anastomoses

Revisiting the value of dynamic assessment of postoperative C-reactive protein for early diagnosis of anastomotic fistulas in colorectal surgery with ileostomy

INTRODUCTION

Anastomotic fistula is the most feared complication in colorectal surgery. It requires early diagnosis followed by urgent treatment. In this study, we analyzed the dynamics of C-reactive protein (CRP) as a marker for early detection of anastomotic fistula.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted among 83 patients who underwent colorectal resection with anastomosis at the First Surgical Department, County Emergency University Clinical Hospital, Cluj Napoca, Romania. The CRP and leukocyte values were recorded at admission and on postoperative days 3, 5, 7, and 9. Total serum protein values were measured on postoperative days 3, 5, and 7, and albumin values were measured on postoperative day 3.

RESULTS

Only CRP values showed substantial postoperative variations. At postoperative days 3, 5, and 7, serum CRP levels in patients with anastomotic fistula were higher than those in patients without anastomotic fistula, with differences at postoperative days 5 (P <.001) and 7 (P <.001) being statistically significant.

DISCUSSION

A steady decrease in CRP values after postoperative day 3 is a strong sign that the development of anastomotic fistula is unlikely. An increase or a flat decrease in CRP value at postoperative days 5 and 7 with a serum value at or close to 100 mg/L suggests an increased probability for development of anastomotic fistula.

Comparison of hyperspectral imaging and fluorescence angiography for the determination of the transection margin in colorectal resections-a comparative study

PURPOSE

One relevant aspect for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery is blood perfusion of both ends of the anastomosis. The clinical evaluation of this issue is limited, but new methods like fluorescence angiography with indocyanine green or non-invasive and contactless hyperspectral imaging have evolved as objective parameters for perfusion evaluation.

METHODS

In this prospective, non-randomized, open-label and two-arm study, fluorescence angiography and hyperspectral imaging were compared in 32 consecutive patients with each other and with the clinical assessment by the surgeon. After preparation of the bowel and determination of the surgical resection line, the tissue was evaluated with hyperspectral imaging for 5 min before and after cutting the marginal artery and assessed by 6 hyperspectral pictures followed by fluorescence angiography with indocyanine green.

RESULTS

In 30 of 32 patients, the image data could be evaluated and compared. Both methods provided a comparable borderline between well-perfused and poorly perfused tissue (p = 0.704). In 15 cases, the surgical resection line was shifted to the central position due to the imaging. The border zone was sharper in fluorescence angiography and best assessed 31 s after injection. With hyperspectral imaging, the border zone was visualized wider and with more differences between proximal and distal border.

CONCLUSION

Hyperspectral imaging and fluorescence angiography provide similar results in determining the perfusion border. Both methods allow a good and safe visualization of the blood perfusion at the central resection margin to create a well-perfused anastomosis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT04226781 ) on January 13, 2020.

[Hyperspectral imaging of gastrointestinal anastomoses]

INTRODUCTION

Anastomotic insufficiency (AI) remains the most feared surgical complication in gastrointestinal surgery, which is closely associated with a prolonged inpatient hospital stay and significant postoperative mortality. Hyperspectral imaging (HSI) is a relatively new medical imaging procedure which has proven to be promising in tissue identification as well as in the analysis of tissue oxygenation and water content. Until now, no data exist on the in vivo HSI analysis of gastrointestinal anastomoses.

METHODS

Intraoperative images were obtained using the TIVITA™ tissue system HSI camera from Diaspective Vision GmbH (Pepelow, Germany). In 47 patients who underwent gastrointestinal surgery with esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, small bowel or colorectal anastomoses, 97 assessable recordings were generated. Parameters obtained at the sites of the anastomoses included tissue oxygenation (StO₂), the tissue hemoglobin index (THI), near-infrared (NIR) perfusion index, and tissue water index (TWI).

RESULTS

Obtaining and analyzing the intraoperative images with this non-invasive imaging system proved practicable and delivered good results on a consistent basis. A NIR gradient along and across the anastomosis was observed and, furthermore, analysis of the tissue water and oxygenation content showed specific changes at the site of anastomosis.

CONCLUSION

The HSI method provides a non-contact, non-invasive, intraoperative imaging procedure without the use of a contrast medium, which enables a real-time analysis of physiological anastomotic parameters, which may contribute to determine the "ideal" anastomotic region. In light of this, the establishment of this methodology in the field of visceral surgery, enabling the generation of normal or cut off values for different gastrointestinal anastomotic types, is an obvious necessity.

Intraoperative modifiable risk factors of colorectal anastomotic leakage: Why surgeons and anesthesiologists should act together

BACKGROUND

Colorectal anastomotic leakage (CAL) is a major surgical complication in intestinal surgery. Despite many optimizations in patient care, the incidence of CAL is stable (3-19%) [1]. Previous research mainly focused on determining patient and surgery related risk factors. Intraoperative non-surgery related risk factors for anastomotic healing also contribute to surgical outcome. This review offers an overview of potential modifiable risk factors that may play a role during the operation.

METHODS

Two independent literature searches were performed using EMBASE, Pubmed and Cochrane databases. Both clinical and experimental studies published in English from 1985 to August 2015 were included. The main outcome measure was the risk of anastomotic leakage and other postoperative complications during colorectal surgery. Determined risk factors of CAL were stated as strong evidence (level I and II high quality studies), and potential risk factors as either moderate evidence (experimental studies level III), or weak evidence (level IV or V studies).

RESULTS

The final analysis included 117 articles. Independent factors of CAL are diabetes mellitus, hyperglycemia and a high HbA1c, anemia, blood loss, blood transfusions, prolonged operating time, intraoperative events and contamination and a lack of antibiotics. Unequivocal are data on blood pressure, the use of inotropes/vasopressors, oxygen suppletion, type of analgesia and goal directed fluid therapy. No studies could be found identifying the impact of body core temperature or mean arterial pressure on CAL. Subjective factors such as the surgeons' own assessment of local perfusion and visibility of the operating field have not been the subject of relevant studies for occurrence in patients with CAL.

CONCLUSION

Both surgery related and non-surgery related risk factors that can be modified must be identified to improve colorectal care. Surgeons and anesthesiologists should cooperate on these items in their continuous effort to reduce the number of CAL. A registration study determining individual intraoperative risk factors of CAL is currently performed as a multicenter cohort study in the Netherlands.

The degree of local inflammatory response after colonic resection depends on the surgical approach: an observational study in 61 patients

Background

Clinical data indicate that laparoscopic surgery reduces postoperative inflammatory response and benefits patient recovery. Little is known about the mechanisms involved in reduced systemic and local inflammation and the contribution of reduced trauma to the abdominal wall and the parietal peritoneum.

Methods

Included were 61 patients, who underwent elective colorectal resection without intraabdominal complications; 17 received a completely laparoscopic, 13 a laparoscopically- assisted procedure and 31 open surgery. Local inflammatory response was quantified by measurement of intraperitoneal leukocytes and IL-6 levels during the first 4 days after surgery.

Results

There was no statistical difference between the groups in systemic inflammatory parameters and intraperitoneal leukocytes. Intraperitoneal interleukin-6 was significantly lower in the laparoscopic group than in the laparoscopically-assisted and open group on postoperative day 1 (26.16 versus 43.25 versus 40.83 ng/ml; p = 0.001). No difference between the groups was recorded on POD 2–4. Intraperitoneal interleukin-6 showed a correlation with duration of hospital stay on POD 1 (0.233, p = 0.036), but not on POD 2–4.

Patients who developed a surgical wound infection showed higher levels of intraperitoneal interleukin-6 on postoperative day 2–4 (POD 2: 42.56 versus 30.02 ng/ml, p = 0.03), POD 3: 36.52 versus 23.62 ng/ml, p = 0.06 and POD 4: 34.43 versus 19.99 ng/ml, p = 0.046). Extraabdominal infections had no impact.

Conclusion

The analysis shows an attenuated intraperitoneal inflammatory response on POD 1 in completely laparoscopically-operated patients, associated with a quicker recovery. This effect cannot be observed in patients, who underwent a laparoscopically-assisted or open procedure. Factors inflicting additional trauma to the abdominal wall and parietal peritoneum promote the intraperitoneal inflammation process.

A Clinical Parameters-Based Model Predicts Anastomotic Leakage After a Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision: A Large Study With Data From China

Anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery is a major and life-threatening complication that occurs more frequently than expected. Intraoperative judgment in predicting potential leakage has shown extremely low sensitivity and specificity. The lack of a model for predicting anastomotic leakage might explain this insufficient judgment. We aimed to propose a clinical parameters-based model to predict anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME).This study was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively designed colorectal cancer dataset. In total, 1968 patients with a laparoscopic TME were enrolled from November 1, 2010, to March 20, 2014. The independent risk factors for anastomotic leakage were identified, from which the parameters-based model for leakage was developed.Anastomotic leakage was noted in 63 patients (3.2%). Male sex, a low level of anastomosis, intraoperative blood loss, diabetes, the duration time of the surgery, and low temperature were significantly associated by the bivariate analysis and the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test with an increased risk. From these factors, the logistic regression model identified the following 4 independent predictors: male sex (risk ratio [RR] = 1.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-4.87), diabetes (RR = 2.08, 95% CI: 1.19-5.8), a lower anastomosis level (RR = 3.41, 95% CI: 1.17-6.71), and a high volume of blood loss (RR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05). The locally weighted scatterplot smoothing regression showed an anastomosis within 5 cm from the anus and intraoperative blood loss of >100 mL as the cutoff values for a significantly increased risk of leakage. Based on these independent factors, a parameters-based model was established by the regression coefficients. The high and low-risk groups were classified according to scores of 3-5 and 0-2, with leakage rates of 8.57% and 1.66%, respectively (P < 0.001).This parameters-based model could predict the risk of anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic rectal cancer. After further validation, this model might facilitate the intraoperative recognition of high-risk patients to perform defunctional stomas.