Long-term outcomes of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in elderly patients

Prognostic factors and long-term outcomes with endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors in patients aged 75 years or older

Background

Studies regarding the long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) performed in older patients with colorectal tumors are limited. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to analyze the long-term outcomes of older patients with colorectal tumors who underwent ESD and identify prognostic factors.

Methods

The data of patients aged ≥ 75 years who underwent ESD for colorectal tumors (adenoma and Tis/T1 colorectal cancer) at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. Prognostic factors for overall survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazard model.

Results

Of the 156 patients included, 51 patients died during the follow-up period, among whom two deaths were due to colorectal cancer. The univariate analysis revealed that an age ≥83 years, Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2, prognostic nutritional index <46, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥3 were associated with poor overall survival. The multivariate analysis identified Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 (hazard ratio: 2.26; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.24-4.13; p = 0.0008) and NLR ≥3 (hazard ratio, 1.98; 95% CI: 1.02-3.81; p = 0.042) as independent prognostic factors.

Conclusions

CCI and NLR may be useful parameters for decision-making in older patients undergoing colorectal ESD.

The Old: Is There Any Role for Screening Colonoscopy after the Age of 75? The Surgeon's Perspective

Guidelines recommend individualized decision making for screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer (CRC) in patients after the age of 75 years due to low additional benefits. That should be taken with a grain of salt, as these recommendations are based on expert opinion and simulation models which do not consider (1) the differences in pathogenesis and cancer biology of CRC in elderly; (2) the risks of colonoscopy in this patient population; (3) and the impact of new surgical and nonsurgical therapies for CRC. In this review, our goal is to bring a surgeon's perspective to understand the role of screening colonoscopy in patients older than 75 years.

Risk of Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Older Adults: A Nationwide Study in Japan

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the risks of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in older adult patients, given the increasing number of ESD in an aging population.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Japanese nationwide database from 2012 to 2023. Patients aged 60 years or older who underwent colorectal ESD were included. The primary outcome was overall adverse events (AEs), including in-hospital mortality, procedure-related perforation, abdominal surgery, aspiration pneumonia, and significant postoperative bleeding and thromboembolic events. We first examined the association between age and AEs using multivariable regression adjusting for patient characteristics. Next, to explore the factors associated with overall AEs in those aged 85 years or older, we fit a multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

The study included 143,925 cases. Age distribution was as follows: 60-64 (13.5%), 65-74 (44.9%), 75-84 (35.8%), and ≥85 (5.8%) years. The prevalence of overall AEs increased with age: 5.3% for ages 60-64 years, 7.9% for ages 85-89 years, and 9.2% for ages 90 years or older. Patients aged 85 years or older had a higher prevalence of overall AEs compared with patients aged 60-64 years, with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.19 (95% confidence interval: 1.07-1.33, P < 0.01) for those aged 85-89 years and an adjusted odds ratio of 1.45 (95% confidence interval: 1.16-1.80, P < 0.01) for those aged 90 years or older. Most AEs in patients aged 85 years or older were due to significant postoperative bleeding, with anticoagulant use and body mass index ≥30 identified as key risk factors.

DISCUSSION

The risks of AEs during colorectal ESD increase with age, particularly in patients aged 85 years or older.

Recent Advances in Gastrointestinal Cancer Endoscopic Diagnosis and Treatment: Focusing on Older Adults

Recent advances in endoscopic equipment have improved the diagnosis of gastrointestinal tumors. Image-enhanced endoscopy, including narrow-band imaging, blue light imaging, and linked color imaging, has unified magnifying observation classification methods and significantly improved the qualitative and quantitative diagnostic performance of gastrointestinal epithelial tumors. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), a minimally invasive treatment for early-stage gastrointestinal cancer, is widely used. The aging population in Japan has been gradually increasing. Despite this, ESD has shown good outcomes in older adults. However, long-term prognostic analyses should take into account the high mortality rate from other illnesses. Prognostic indicators such as the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the Prognostic Nutrition Index (PNI) should be used to determine whether ESD should be performed. Even in cases of noncurative resection, follow-up without additional surgical resection is an option if there are other comorbidities that affect the prognosis.

Clinical outcome and long‑term prognosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors in patients aged 75 years or older: a retrospective observational study

PURPOSE

To determine the clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal tumors in older patients and predictors of mortality.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 207 lesions in 195 consecutive older patients aged ≥ 75 years who underwent ESD for colorectal tumors between January 2007 and December 2018. Outcomes of ESD were evaluated, and the prognosis was assessed in terms of both curability and the patient's baseline physical condition as determined by several indices. Cox regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with reduced overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Treatment outcomes included a median procedure time of 55 min, en bloc resection rate of 97%, histological en bloc resection rate of 92%, postoperative bleeding rate of 2.4%, and intraoperative perforation rate of 3.4%. Postoperative bleeding and intraoperative perforation could be treated conservatively. Delayed perforation occurred in one patient and required emergency surgery. Three-year OS was 99.4% and 5-year OS was 95.8%. Overall, three patients experienced recurrence (one local, two distant metastasis), and one patient died of primary cancer. Multivariate analysis identified the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score ≥ 3 as the only independent predictor of reduced OS (hazard ratio 4.26; 95% confidence interval 1.60-11.38; P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that colorectal ESD is safe and effective in older patients aged ≥ 75 years. There was a significant independent association of reduced OS with high CCI score, but not with curability by ESD. The CCI score should be considered when determining the indications for ESD in older patients.

Risk factors for unsuccessful colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Despite its growing popularity, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal neoplasms is still technically challenging. The factors contributing to the failure of ESD are not yet comprehensively elucidated. Therefore, this systematic review was conducted to explore the potential risk factors associated with unsuccessful colorectal ESD.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of Medline and Embase databases was conducted to identify relevant publications from inception until March 14, 2023. Unsuccessful ESD was defined as cases involving incomplete resection or the occurrence of adverse events, such as perforation and delayed bleeding.

RESULTS

Among the 2067 citations initially identified, a total of 23 cohort studies and 16 case-control studies met the inclusion criteria. Following meta-analyses, several significant risk factors for incomplete resection were identified, including lesion diameter ≥40 or 50 mm, right-side colonic location, deeper submucosal invasion, and severe fibrosis. Similarly, lesion diameter ≥40 or 50 mm and severe fibrosis emerged as risk factors for perforation. However, no individual factor was found to be statistically associated with delayed bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis identified risk factors correlated with incomplete resection and adverse events following ESD. The findings provide valuable insights that can guide clinical decision-making, aiding gastroenterologists in accurately identifying high-risk individuals.

Clinical Significance of Sarcopenia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

As global life expectancy rises and gastrointestinal tumor incidence increases, more elderly patients are undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for tumor treatment. The current situation highlights the importance of sarcopenia assessment before ESD. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess sarcopenia's role in predicting post-ESD adverse outcomes in the elderly.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the impact of sarcopenia on the prognosis of elderly patients undergoing ESD treatment. A comprehensive search was conducted across three databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science). We were using NEWCASTLE-OTTAWA ASSESSMENT SCALE for risk of bias assessment. The data were synthesized using Review Manager 5.3.

RESULTS

A total of 9 reports were identified, analyzing 7 indicators, with a combined sample size of 6044. Through a series of analyses, we have derived several highly credible research findings: the overall OR and 95% CI for gastric and colorectal post-ESD perforation between sarcopenia and nonsarcopenia groups were 1.34 [0.92, 1.97], for CTCAE grade > 2 was 2.65 [1.45, 4.82], for upper gastrointestinal post-ESD pneumonia were 1.97 [1.30, 2.99], and for gastric post-ESD mortality within 5 years were 2.96 [1.33, 6.58].

CONCLUSIONS

Sarcopenia is a risk factor for increased incidence of complications (CTCAE > 2) after undergoing gastric and colorectal ESD, increased pneumonia rates, and higher mortality rates within five years following gastric ESD treatment in elderly patients. However, sarcopenia does not lead to an increased perforation rate in elderly patients undergoing gastric and colorectal ESD treatments. Registration and protocol: The protocol for this study was registered on the Open Science Framework in 2024 https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7B2CZ . We also conducted pre-registration on PROSPERO (CRD42024532547).

Outcomes of Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Elderly Patients: A Multicenter Study by the Honam Association for the Study of Intestinal Disease (HASID)

BACKGROUND/AIM

The aging population has been growing gradually; therefore, the proportion of elderly patients undergoing colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has also been increasing. However, there is a lack of large-scale studies on the efficacy and safety of colorectal ESD in elderly patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective analysis evaluated colorectal ESDs performed at five tertiary medical institutions between January 2015 and December 2020. Patients were categorized into the following four age groups: Middle-aged (<65 years), young-elderly (≥65 to <75 years), mid-elderly (≥75 to <85 years), and very elderly (≥85 years). Of the 1,446 patients included, 668 (46.2%), 466 (32.2%), 293 (20.3%), and 19 (1.3%) were in the middle-aged, young-elderly, mid-elderly, and very-elderly groups, respectively.

RESULTS

Compared to younger patients, more older patients used aspirin, clopidogrel, and anti-thrombotic agents. Additionally, the Charlson comorbidity index increased significantly with increasing age. However, no significant differences were observed in the complete resection rates nor the rates of complications, such as perforation, bleeding, and post-ESD coagulation syndrome, among the different age groups. A restricted cubic spline curve was used to construct predictive models for complete resection and major complications based on age and showed that the need for complete resection did not decrease with increasing age. Furthermore, major complications did not significantly differ with age progression.

CONCLUSION

Colorectal ESD should be actively considered as a relatively safe and effective treatment method for elderly patients.

Feasibility of Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Elderly Patients: The Impact of Sarcopenia

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer is a public health concern associated with high incidence rates. Sarcopenia is a known risk factor for postoperative complications, although an association between increased complications after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and sarcopenia remains undocumented. Herein, we aimed to explore the feasibility of colorectal ESD in patients with sarcopenia.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 499 patients (69 with and 430 without sarcopenia). We evaluated the short- and long-term outcomes of colorectal ESD.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding en bloc, R0, or curative resection rates. However, poor bowel preparation was significantly more common in the sarcopenia group. Moreover, patients with sarcopenia exhibited a significant increase in complications (37.7% vs. 10.5%). Multivariate analysis revealed that sarcopenia (odds ratio [OR]: 3.78, 95% confidence interval [Cl]: 1.85-7.73, p < 0.001), anticoagulation therapy (OR: 3.59, 95% Cl: 1.86-6.92, p < 0.001), procedure time (OR: 1.28, 95% Cl: 1.11-1.47, p < 0.001), and resection size (OR: 1.25, 95% Cl: 1.03-1.52, p = 0.02) were significantly correlated with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) ≥ grade 2. The correlation between sarcopenia and CTCAE ≥ grade 2 was maintained after matching, resulting in more extended hospital stays in patients with sarcopenia. However, we detected no association between sarcopenia and overall survival and ESD-related death.

CONCLUSION

Sarcopenia is a risk factor for complications in colorectal ESD, suggesting that colorectal ESD could be performed for patients with sarcopenia, although much caution should be taken.

The feasibility of endoscopic resection for colorectal laterally spreading tumors

The present study aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of endoscopic resection for colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) in different size groups. This retrospective study included 2699 patients with LSTs who underwent endoscopic treatment at the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from May 2012 to February 2022. The patient baseline and procedure outcomes were compared between the < 5 cm group, 5-10 cm group, and ≥ 10 cm group. Meanwhile, lesions larger than 5 cm in diameter were longitudinally compared for endoscopic safety using ESD with surgical operation outcomes. There were 2105 patients in the < 5 cm group, 547 patients in the 5-10 cm group, and 47 patients in the ≥ 10 cm group. En bloc resection and R0 resection rates, the incidence of adverse events, length of stay (LOS), and medical costs significantly differed between the groups (P < 0.01). Comorbidity of diabetes or hypertension, history of antithrombotic drug use, lesion size, location, gross type, endoscopic procedures selection, and circumferential extent of the mucosal defect were independent risk factors for delayed bleeding (P < 0.05). En bloc resection, R0 resection, and lesion canceration were associated with local recurrence. For lesions larger than 5 cm in diameter, ESD had similar R0 resection and local recurrence rates compared with a surgical operation but a lower en bloc rate, LOS, and medical costs. Expert endoscopists can significantly increase en bloc and R0 resection rates and reduce the incidence of adverse events. Endoscopic resection results distinguish in different size groups of colorectal LSTs, yet its safety and feasibility are not inferior to a surgical operation.

Long-term outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms in patients with severe comorbidities

Background and Aim

Long-term outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal epithelial neoplasms (CENs) in patients with severe comorbidities have not been clarified; the current study aimed to examine these long-term outcomes and compared them with those in patients with non-severe comorbidities.

Methods

We included 231 patients with CENs who underwent ESD between April 2005 and March 2023. Patients with comorbidities were categorized according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS). We conducted a propensity score-matched analysis and compared long-term outcomes of the two groups after ESD for CENs.

Results

Of the 156 patients enrolled in the study, 43 and 113 had severe (ASA-PS III) and non-severe (ASA-PS I/II) comorbidities, respectively. The 1:1 propensity score analysis matched 36 patients with severe comorbidities to 36 patients with non-severe comorbidities. After matching, there was no difference in the procedural outcomes of ESD between both groups. Regarding long-term outcomes, the 5-year overall survival rates after matching in the ASA-PS I/II and III groups were 100% and 73.5%, respectively, and patients in the ASA-PS III group exhibited significantly shorter overall survival than those in the ASA-PS I/II group (hazard ratio 7.209; 95% confidence interval 1.592-32.646; P = 0.010). No colorectal cancer-related deaths were noted in either group.

Conclusion

Overall survival after ESD for CENs was shorter in patients with severe comorbidities than in those with non-severe comorbidities. Clinicians should carefully determine whether the benefits of CEN resection with ESD outweigh the procedural risks in patients with severe comorbidities.

Effectiveness and Safety of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Neoplasm in Patients with High Charlson Comorbidity Index Score: A HASID Multicenter Study

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective method for removing early colorectal lesions. However, research on the safety and efficacy of ESD in patients with various underlying conditions remains limited. This study retrospectively examined ESD outcomes in colorectal neoplasm patients from five tertiary medical centers. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and age-adjusted CCI (ACCI) were analyzed, and the differences in complete resection and complication rates were analyzed. The CCI, ACCI, and complication rates tended to gradually increase proportionally, and the complication resection rate increased from CCI 2 to ACCI 4 as the starting point, followed by a decreasing trend. Of these, 140 patients (9.7%) had a CCI score of 3 or higher. The high CCI group was older (70.6% vs. 64.7%, p < 0.01) and had a higher proportion of men (70.7% vs. 58.7%, p < 0.01) than the low CCI group. The high CCI group had a higher incidence of cancer than the low CCI group (77.9% vs. 65.2%, p < 0.01). The en bloc resection rate (90.0% vs. 89.3%, p = 0.79) and complete resection rate (75.7% vs. 81.2%, p = 0.12) were not significantly different between the two groups. Colorectal ESD can be safely and effectively performed in patients with various underlying medical conditions.

Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Epithelial Neoplasms: A Systematic Review

In this review, we summarize up-to-date reports with five-year observation after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Five-year cause-specific survival rates ranged from 98.6 to 100%. The local recurrence rates ranged from 1.1 to 2.2% in complete resection and 7.5 to 25.0% in incomplete resection. Incomplete resection was a risk factor for local recurrence. In non-curative ESD, five-year cause-specific survival rates ranged from 93.8 to 100% with additional surgery, and 92.7 to 99.1% without surgery. The choice of additional surgery should be based on the individual patient's age, concomitant diseases, wishes, life expectancy, and the risk of lymph node metastasis. The metachronous cancer rates ranged from 0.22 to 1.1%. Both local recurrence and metachronous tumors should be checked with a follow-up colonoscopy after ESD.

Geriatric nutritional risk index as a prognostic indicator in elderly patients with early colorectal cancer undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection

OBJECTIVES

Data on the long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) performed in elderly patients with early colorectal cancer (CRC) are limited. We analyzed the prognosis of elderly CRC patients, not only from the viewpoint of treatment curability but also from the patients' baseline physical condition assessed by several indexes.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 729 patients aged ≥75 years who underwent ESD for Tis/T1 CRC in 16 institutions was conducted. The patients were classified into three groups based on curability: curative ESD (Group A, n = 582), non-curative ESD with additional surgery (Group B, n = 60), and non-curative ESD without additional surgery (Group C, n = 87). Overall survival (OS) was compared among the groups, and factors associated with reduced OS were investigated.

RESULTS

The median follow-up periods in Groups A, B, and C were 41, 49, and 46 months, respectively (P = 0.62), during which 92 patients died. Two patients (0.3%) in Group A, none (0%) in Group B, and three (3.4%) in Group C died of CRC. Three-year OS rates in Groups A, B, and C were 93.9%, 96.1%, and 90.1%, respectively, without a significant difference (P = 0.07). Multivariate analysis indicated low (<96.3) geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) as the sole independent predictor for reduced OS (hazard ratio 3.37; 95% confidence interval 2.18-5.22; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Low GNRI, but not the curability attained by ESD, was independently associated with reduced OS in patients with early CRC aged ≥75 years.

Endoscopic resection for gastrointestinal tumors (esophageal, gastric, colorectal tumors): Japanese standard and future prospects

Endoscopic resection (ER) techniques such as polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are widely accepted as a less invasive treatment for gastrointestinal (GI) tumors. Since there is a limit to the size that can be resected by EMR and it is often divided, it is not possible to accurately evaluate the degree of cancer progression, and the cancer remains or causes recurrence. ESD is a technology that overcomes these weaknesses. ER techniques are considered for tumors that have a very low possibility of lymph node metastasis and are suitable for en-bloc resection. As ESD became more widespread, the difficulty of treating ESD was gradually resolved by the development of technology and equipment, the curative resection rate increased, and the complication rate decreased. ER techniques have become the standard treatment for early cancer and precancerous lesions in Japan, and the therapeutic indications are expanding day by day. The indications for whether endoscopic treatment can be performed are defined by the guidelines for each organ such as the esophagus, stomach, and colorectum. In the coming aging society, it is also necessary to evaluate the indications for endoscopic treatment and invasive treatment. In addition, recent advances in endoscopic technology are making it possible to remove submucosal tumors that previously required surgery. In this review, we summarize the recent Japanese standard indications of ER for each GI location and future prospects of ER.

Long-term prognosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors in patients aged over 80 years

Background

In Japan, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is standardized for large colorectal tumors. However, its validity in the elderly population is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ESD for colorectal tumors in elderly patients aged over 80 years.

Methods

ESD was performed on 178 tumors in 165 consecutive patients aged over 80 years between December 2008 and December 2018. We retrospectively evaluated the clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes of ESD. We also assessed the prognosis of 160 patients followed up for more than 12 months.

Results

The mean patient age was 83.7 ± 3.1 years. The number of patients with comorbidities was 100 (62.5%). Among all patients, 106 (64.2%) were categorized as class 1 or 2 according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of physical status (ASA-PS), and 59 (35.8%) were classified as class 3. The mean procedure time was 97.7 ± 79.3 min. The rate of histological en bloc resection was 93.8% (167/178). Delayed bleeding in 11 cases (6.2%) and perforation in 7 cases (3.9%) were treated conservatively. The 5-year survival rate was 89.9%. No deaths from primary disease (mean follow-up time: 35.3 ± 27.5 months) were observed. Overall survival rates were significantly lower in the non-curative resection group that did not undergo additional surgery than in the curative resection group (P = 0.0152) and non-curative group that underwent additional surgery (P = 0.0259). Overall survival rates were higher for ASA-PS class 1 or 2 patients than class 3 patients (P = 0.0105). Metachronous tumors (> 5 mm) developed in 9.4% of patients.

Conclusions

ESD for colorectal tumors in patients aged over 80 years is safe. Colorectal cancer-associated deaths were prevented although comorbidities pose a high risk of poor prognosis.

What Should We Recommend for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Adults Aged 75 and Older?

The current recommendation to stop colorectal cancer screening for older adults is based on a lack of evidence due to systematic exclusion of this population from trials. Older adults are a heterogenous population with many available strategies for patient-centered assessment and decision-making. Evolutions in management strategies for colorectal cancer have made safe and effective options available to older adults, and the rationale to screen for treatable disease more reasonably, especially given the aging Canadian population. In this commentary, we review the current screening guidelines and the evidence upon which they were built, the unique considerations for screening older adults, new treatment options, the risks and benefits of increased screening and potential considerations for the new guidelines.

Snare Tip Is an Alternative Tool for Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

BACKGROUND

Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection is typically performed by specialized knife, such as a dual knife. However, it is not covered by Taiwan's National Health Insurance. In the literature review, using a traditional snare tip for endoscopic submucosal dissection has been reported for stomach lesions only.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection using a snare tip.

DESIGN

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical using of a snare tip compared with a dual knife for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Postoperative short- and long-term outcomes were investigated after the procedure.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at a single tertiary care institution.

PATIENTS

Patients who could not afford the expense of a specialized knife were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Dissection time, dissection speed, and perioperative complications were used for short-term outcome measurement. Recurrence-free rate was used for long-term outcome measurement.

RESULTS

Twenty-one lesions were in the snare tip group and 57 lesions in the dual knife group. The outcomes, including rate of en bloc resection, complication, local recurrence, and recurrence-free interval, between the 2 groups were similar. The mean resected specimen diameter in the dual knife group is larger than the snare tip group (p = 0.041). The dissection time of the snare tip group was shorter than the dual knife group (p = 0.025). However, the dissection speed was significantly slower in the snare tip group than in the dual knife group (p = 0.008).

LIMITATIONS

This study was a retrospective and single doctor chart review in nature with a limited patient number.

CONCLUSIONS

The snare tip is an alternative tool for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in a selected population without the support of specialized knives, such as the dual knife. Although the dissection speed is slower using a snare tip, it is still a recommended technique for developing country or low-income patients.

Treatment of Elderly Patients with Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. As society ages, the number of elderly patients with CRC will increase. The percentage of patients with right-sided colon cancer and the incidence of microsatellite instability are higher in elderly than in younger patients with CRC. Moreover, the higher incidence of comorbid diseases in elderly patients indicates the need for less invasive treatment strategies. For example, care should be taken in performing additional surgery after endoscopic submucosal dissection for elderly patients with high-risk T1 CRC. Minimally invasive surgery, such as laparoscopic colectomy, would be preferable for elderly patients with CRC. Chemotherapy for elderly patients requires careful monitoring for adverse events. The aim of this review is to summarize the clinicopathological features of CRC in elderly patients, optical surgical strategies, including endoscopic and laparoscopic resection, and chemotherapeutic strategies, including postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and systemic chemotherapy for unresectable CRC.