Fistulectomy with primary sphincter reconstruction

Sphincter-preserving total fistulectomy with resection of the anoderm and skin and intersphincteric space closure for anal fistula

Non-cure, recurrence and faecal incontinence have often been a major challenge in patients after surgical treatment for anal fistula. To overcome these problems, we have developed a sphincter-preserving total fistulectomy procedure involving resection of the anoderm and skin with intersphincteric space closure (TFRAS). The purpose of the present study was to evaluate this TFRAS technique. TFRAS was performed in 618 patients. The method involved excision of the anoderm and skin, including the internal opening, total removal of the fistula tract while preserving the sphincter, closure of the resulting intersphincteric space and open wound. The Parks classification was used, and subcutaneous, supralevatoric, and unclassifiable fistulas not included in this classification were newly defined and evaluated. The postoperative cure rate was 97.7% and the recurrence rate was 0.7%. The non-cure rate was significantly higher for supralevatoric fistulas and the recurrence rate was significantly higher for unclassifiable fistulas. No cases of postoperative solid faecal incontinence were observed, and the faecal incontinence rate was 0.7%. The mean postoperative Cleveland Clinic Faecal Incontinence (CCFI) score was 0.9, and the highest value of 8 was observed in only one case. No significant differences were found between the classifications based on faecal incontinence rates and the CCFI score. There was no significant difference in CCFI score between patients who underwent TFRAS at only one site and those who did so at two or more sites. TFRAS is considered a useful technique for anal fistulas, offering a high cure rate, a low recurrence rate, and no severe postoperative faecal incontinence.

Fistulectomy and primary sphincter reconstruction for high cryptoglandular anal fistula: a retrospective cohort study with long-term results

BACKGROUND

Surgical repair for high anal fistulas is challenging and can be associated with impaired functional outcomes. This study evaluated the long-term results of transsphincteric fistulectomy with primary sphincter repair for high anal fistulas in terms of recurrence, wound healing, fecal incontinence, and quality of life.

METHOD

This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent surgical repair for high anal fistulas between 2006 and 2015. Data were collected by reviewing patients' electronic hospital records, including demographic characteristics, medical conditions, surgical findings, performed procedures, and follow-up data until the last recorded visit. Functional outcomes were assessed using self-reported online questionnaires for quality of life (RAND SF-36) and fecal incontinence (Wexner score).

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients were included. Primary healing was achieved in 42 (76%) patients, while 13 (24%) experienced recurrence. Following reoperations for recurrence, an additional 12 patients achieved healing, resulting in an overall healing rate of 98%. The median Wexner score was significantly higher in reoperated patients, and the median scores across all eight parameters of the RAND SF-36 were lower. None of the patients required proctectomy, and two ended with permanent stomas.

CONCLUSION

Surgery for high anal fistulas is associated with a high success rate, but reoperations for recurrence are linked to considerable impairment in functional outcomes.

Evaluation of the outcomes of fistulotomy with primary sphincter reconstruction in the management of high trans-sphincteric fistula and supra-sphincteric fistula-in-ano : A single-center prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Supra-sphincteric and high trans-sphincteric fistula are very challenging procedures for both the patient and the surgeon. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of anal sphincter repair in the management of supra-sphincteric and high trans-sphincteric fistula-in-ano in terms of postoperative wound infection, bleeding, incontinence to flatus or stool, and recurrence within 1 year.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This single-center prospective cohort trial conducted from June 2020 to December 2023 at the Ain Shams University Hospitals included 20 patients who presented with supra-sphincteric or high trans-sphincteric fistula. There were nine (45%) male and 11 (55%) female patients, with a mean age of 41.5 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

The mean duration of the procedure was 90.3 min (SD ± 11.9). During the first 2 weeks, ten (50%) patients scored their postoperative pain as mild, eight (40%) as moderate, and two (10%) as severe. Wound infection occurred in two (10%) patients and postoperative bleeding in three (15%) patients in the form of spotting after defecation. There were no cases of incontinence to stool. However, there were three (15%) cases of incontinence to gases. There were two cases (10%) of recurrence at the 1‑year follow-up. Postoperative patient satisfaction was assessed on a 5‑point Likert scale after 2 weeks: One patient (5%) was very dissatisfied, three (15%) patients were dissatisfied, and two (10%) patients were unsure, while five (25%) patients were satisfied and nine (45%) were very satisfied.

CONCLUSION

Immediate sphincter repair in supra-sphincteric and high trans-sphincteric fistula through a lay-open procedure was determined to be safe, easier than classic operations, and associated with a low incidence of recurrence at the 1‑year follow-up and a high quality of life.

Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of complex anal fistula

Anal fistula can be a challenging condition to manage, with complex fistulas presenting even greater difficulties. The primary concerns in treating this condition are a risk of damage to the anal sphincters, which can compromise fecal continence, and refractoriness to treatment, as evidenced by a high recurrence rate. Furthermore, the treatment of complex anal fistula involves several additional challenges. Satisfactory solutions to many of these obstacles remain elusive, and no consensus has been established regarding the available treatment options. In summary, complex anal fistula has no established gold-standard treatment, and the quest for effective therapies continues. This review discusses and highlights groundbreaking advances in the management of complex anal fistula over the past decade.

Tsay A, Abbass M. Immediate sphincter repair following fistulotomy for anal fistula: does it impact the healing rate and septic complications?

PURPOSE

Fistulotomy is considered the most effective treatment for anal fistula; however, it carries a risk of incontinence. Sphincteroplasty in the setting of fistulotomy is not standard practice due to concerns regarding healing and potential infectious complications. We aimed to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent fistulotomy with primary sphincteroplasty to those who did not undergo repair.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent fistulotomy for cryptoglandular anal fistula. All operations were performed by one colorectal surgeon. Sphincteroplasty was performed for patients perceived to be at higher risk for continence disturbance. The main outcome measures were the healing rate and postoperative septic complications.

RESULTS

In total, 152 patients were analyzed. Group A (fistulotomy with sphincteroplasty) consisted of 45 patients and group B (fistulotomy alone) included 107 patients. Both groups were similar in age (P=0.16) and sex (P=0.20). Group A had higher proportions of multiple fistulas (26.7% vs. 6.5%, P<0.01) and complex fistulas (mid to high transsphincteric, 37.8% vs. 10.3%; P<0.01) than group B. The median follow-up time was 8 weeks. The overall healing rate was similar in both groups (93.3% vs. 90.6%, P=0.76). No significant difference between the 2 groups was noted in septic complications (6.7% vs. 3.7%, P=0.42).

CONCLUSION

Fistulotomy with primary sphincter repair demonstrated a comparable healing rate to fistulotomy alone, without an increased risk of postoperative septic complications. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings and to explore the functional outcomes of patients who undergo sphincteroplasty.

Characteristics and post-operative outcomes of surgery for fistula-in-ano managed at a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

Management of fistula-in-ano is associated with recurrence and, occasionally, with anal incontinence. We investigated the clinical characteristics and outcomes of fistula-in-ano.

METHODS

We included patients with fistula-in-ano managed at a tertiary care center (2016-2021). We collected clinical characteristics and 1-year outcomes using questionnaires. The chi-square test was used in statistical analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 284 patients (231 men, 81.3%; median age 39.5 [range: 7-73] years) were included. Most patients had simple fistulae (n = 191, 67.3%). Transphincteric (n = 110, 38.7%) fistulae were the most common type, followed by intersphinteric fistulae (n = 103, 36.6%). Fistulotomy (n = 157, 55.3%) was the most common procedure. Follow-up details were traceable in 157 (55.3%) patients. At 1 year, the overall healing rate was 88.5% (n = 136). There was no association between type of surgical procedure and incontinence. The mean Vaizey score, used to assess anal incontinence, was 0.84 (range: 0-14). Incontinence was observed in 32 patients (20.9%), and flatus incontinence was the most common type (n = 17, 53.1%). Complex fistulae were associated with higher recurrence rates than simple fistulae (32.6% vs. 2.8%).

CONCLUSION

The healing rate in surgical treatment of fistula-in-ano was 88.5%, with acceptable complication rates. There was no association between surgical procedure type and incontinence.

The potential roles of gut microbiome in anal fistula

Anal fistula is a common proctological disease, but the thorough mechanisms of the anal fistula formation are still unclear. An increasing number of studies have revealed the crucial role of gut microbiota in intestinal diseases. We used 16S rRNA gene sequencing to analyze the intestinal microbiome in order to determine whether there are differences in the microbiome between anal fistula patients and healthy individuals. The microbiome samples were extracted by repeatedly wiping the rectal wall with intestinal swab. Before this operation, the whole intestine of all participants was irrigated and the score of the Boston bowel preparation scale reached 9. The biodiversity of gut microbiome of rectum revealed significant difference between anal fistula patients and healthy individuals. 36 discriminative taxa were identified by LEfSe analysis between two groups. At the phylum level, Synergistetes was enriched in anal fistula patients, while Proteobacteria was higher in healthy individuals. We also found that at the genus level, Blautia, Faecalibacterium, Ruminococcus, Coprococcus, Bacteroides, Clostridium, Megamonas and Anaerotruncus were highly enriched in anal fistula patients, while the microbiome of healthy individuals was enriched with Peptoniphilus and Corynebacterium. Spearman correlations showed the extensive and close association among genera and species. Finally, a diagnostic prediction model was constructed by random forest classifier, and the area under curve (AUC) reached 0.990. This study gave an important hint for analyzing gut microbiome of rectum in anal fistula patient.Keypoints.We use the 16S rRNA gene sequencing to test the microbiome samples extracted from the intestinal swab. This is the first study to explore the gut microbiome of rectum using this workflow. We also found the distinct gut microbiome of rectum differences between anal fistula patients and healthy individuals.

Current Therapy of Cryptoglandular Anal Fistula: Gold Standards and Alternative Methods

Cryptoglandular anal fistulas are one of the most common colorectal diseases and occur with an incidence of about 20/100,000. Anal fistulas are defined as an inflammatory junction between the anal canal and the perianal skin. They develop from an abscess or chronic infection of the anorectum. Surgical treatment of the disease is the method of choice. Even when treating an acute abscess, its cause should be sought at the same time. If there is a connection to the anal canal without affecting relevant parts of the sphincter muscles, primary fistulotomy should be performed. If larger parts of the sphincter muscle are involved, the insertion of a seton drain is usually useful. There are essentially two recommendations for the elective treatment of cryptoglandular anal fistulas. Distal fistulas should be excised, with the proviso that as little sphincter muscle as possible is sacrificed. In the case of highly proximally located and complex fistulas, sphincter-preserving surgical techniques should be used. In this case, the method of choice is the mucosal or advancement flap. Alternatively, clips, fibrin injections, fistula plugs, fistula ligatures, or laser-based procedures are described in the literature. In the case of intermediate fistulas, a fistulectomy with primary sphincter reconstruction can be useful. Every operation is carried out as a compromise between definitive healing of the fistula and a potential risk to the patient's continence. It is often difficult to make a reliable prognosis about the continence function to be expected postoperatively. In addition to the fistula morphology, particular attention should be paid to whether previous proctological operations have already been performed, the gender of the patient, and whether there are pre-existing sphincter dysfunctions. Since the surgeon's expertise plays a decisive role in the success of the treatment, the procedure should be carried out in a specialist proctological centre, especially in the case of complex fistulas or in the case of a condition after previous operations. In addition to the classic procedures, such as fistulectomy or the plastic fistula closure, this article examines alternative methods and their areas of application.

Primary sphincter repair after fistulectomy: A simple and safe option for complex fistula-in-ano

Complete tract excision for complex fistula-in-ano, where the sphincter, is divided is increasingly being followed by immediate sphincter repair. We concluded, by a prospective study conducted on 60 consecutive patients, that this procedure is feasible and safe, and polydioxanone and polyglactin 910 in repair result in a comparable outcome.

Cohort study of fistulotomy with external tract fistulectomy and primary sphincter reconstruction in high trans-sphincteric fistula-in-ano

AIM

Treatment of complex fistula-in-ano is challenging and there is no consensus on the optimal treatment that can provide complete healing and preserve sphincter function. The aim of this study was to evaluate fistulotomy with external tract fistulectomy and primary sphincter reconstruction (FFSR) in the treatment of high trans-sphincteric fistula.

METHOD

This is a prospective single-centre study including patients with a high trans-sphincteric fistula who underwent FFSR from June 2017 to June 2018. All patients were evaluated preoperatively by pelvic MRI and clinical examination. Other types of complex fistula were excluded. All patients were followed up for 1 year for recurrence and incontinence.

RESULTS

Forty patients underwent FFSR during the study period, 62.5% were men and the mean age was 37.45 (range 20-60) years. The mean time to achieve complete healing was 8.4 weeks, 35 (87.5%) patients achieved primary healing within 8 weeks and 5 (12.5%) patients required more time to achieve delayed healing. Four (10%) patients developed recurrence with a mean time for recurrence of 20 weeks. Only four (10%) patients developed incontinence; one to liquid stools and three patients only to gas.

CONCLUSION

Fistulotomy with external tract fistulectomy and primary sphincter reconstruction is a safe option in the treatment of high trans-sphincteric fistula in selected patients. This showed an acceptable recurrence rate when compared with other procedures with comparable sphincter function outcomes.

Fistulectomy and primary sphincteroplasty in complex anal fistula treatment: a hospital-based long-term follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Currently, there is no agreement on the best treatment for complex anal fistulas with the least recurrence and lowest complication rate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term recurrence and incontinence after fistulectomy and primary sphincteroplasty (FIPS) in a group of patients with complex perianal fistula.

METHODS

This prospective observational study was done at the colorectal ward of Taleghani Hospital of Tehran from January 2010 to December 2020. Patients with anal fistula who underwent FIPS were studied. After surgery, patients were evaluated regularly by a colorectal surgeon for fistula recurrence and incontinence. Recurrence was described as a new fistula tract formation after the initial cure and failure of healing in the operation site or any purulent discharge from the fistula tract and openings. In addition, the patient's continence was assessed based on the Wexner score.

RESULTS

There were 335 patients (66 men and 269 women, mean age 42.74 ± 12.44 years), 191 of them with low fistula and 144 with high fistula. Thirteen patients (3.90%) experienced recurrence (all had a low fistula). Thirty-nine patients (11.64%), 19 patients with high and 20 patients with low fistula, had a Wexner score ≥ 3 during the follow-up. Fifteen patients were lost to follow-up. Male patients (OR = 2.67, 95% CI 0.84, 8.45, p = 0.094, adjusted OR = 4.41, 95% CI 1.05, 18.48, p = 0.042), patients with low fistula (p = 0.001), and recurrent cases had a significantly higher rate of recurrence (OR = 10.38, 95% CI 3.24-33.20 p ≤ 0.001, adjusted OR = 23.36, 95% CI 4.35-125.39, p ≤ 0.001). A significant correlation between body mass index > 35 kg/m² and incontinence was found (OR = 4.40, 95% CI 1.35, 14.33, p = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, an acceptable healing rate and a low percentage of complications following FIPS were seen in patients with complex anal fistula. Randomized clinical trials with appropriate follow-up duration and sample size comparing different surgical methods in these patients are needed to confirm these results.

Comparison between recent sphincter-sparing procedures for complex anal fistulas-ligation of intersphincteric tract vs transanal opening of intersphincteric space

Complex anal fistulas are difficult to treat. The main reasons for this are a higher recurrence rate and the risk of disrupting the continence mechanism because of sphincter involvement. Due to this, several sphincter-sparing procedures have been developed in the last two decades. Though moderately successful in simple fistulas (50%-75% healing rate), the healing rates in complex fistulas for most of these procedures has been dismal. Only two procedures, ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract and transanal opening of intersphincteric space have been shown to have good success rates in complex fistulas (60%-95%). Both of these procedures preserve continence while achieving high success rates. In this opinion review, I shall outline the history, compare the pros and cons, indications and contraindications and future application of both these procedures for the management of complex anal fistulas.

Is fistulotomy with immediate sphincter reconstruction (FISR) a sphincter preserving procedure for high anal fistula? A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

This systematic review aimed to assess the outcomes of fistulotomy or fistulectomy and immediate sphincter repair (FISR) in relation to healing, incontinence and sphincter dehiscence both overall and in patients with high anal fistulae.

METHODS

Medline, Embase and The Cochrane library were searched for studies of patients undergoing FISR for anal fistula. Data regarding healing, continence and sphincter dehiscence were extracted overall and for high anal fistulae. The DerSimonian-Laird random-effects method was used for pooled analysis, heterogeneity between studies was assessed based on the significance of between-study heterogeneity, and on the size of the I²  value. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

RESULTS

We identified 21 studies evaluating 1700 patients. Pooled analysis of healing reached 93% (95% CI: 91%-95%, I²  = 51% p-value for heterogeneity = 0.004), with continence disturbance and worsening continence reaching 11% (95% CI: 6%-18%, I²  = 87% p < 0.001) and 8% (95% CI: 4%-13%, I²  = 74% p < 0.001), respectively. Subgroup analysis according to fistula height could only be conducted on limited data. Pooled healing in high anal fistulae was 89% (95% CI: 84%-94%, I²  = 76% p < 0.001), 16% suffered disturbance of continence (95% CI: 7%-27%, I²  = 89% p < 0.001), 8% worsening continence from baseline (95% CI: 2%-16%, I²  = 80% p < 0.001) and 2% suffered sphincter dehiscence (95% CI: 0%-10%, I²  = 89% p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The evidence suggests FISR is a safe, effective procedure. However, data are limited by inconsistencies in reporting of continence and definition of fistula height, particularly high anal fistulae. Significant heterogeneity means that outcomes in high fistulae remain uncertain.

Fistulectomy and primary sphincteroplasty (FIPS) to prevent keyhole deformity in simple anal fistula: a single-center retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Fistulotomy remains the gold standard for the surgical treatment of simple anal fistula, but may cause fecal incontinence and a characteristic anal 'keyhole' deformity. Although seemingly trivial, keyhole deformity may lead to bothersome symptoms such as anal pruritus and fecal soiling. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of fistulectomy and primary sphincteroplasty (FIPS), a technique with immediate sphincter reconstruction, in the treatment of simple anal fistula and the prevention of keyhole deformity created by simple fistulotomy.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on all consecutive patients who underwent FIPS for a simple anal fistula at our institution between January 2015 and August 2019. The primary outcome of the study was the rate of early postoperative wound dehiscence, which essentially transforms a FIPS into a simple fistulotomy and may lead to keyhole deformity. All patients received follow-up at regular intervals to evaluate fistula healing and the presence of keyhole deformity.

RESULTS

FIPS was performed in 24 patients (median age: 52.8 years). After a median follow-up time of 3.0 (2.0, 6.3) months, the overall healing rate was 95.8% (23/24 patients). Six (25%) patients experienced early postoperative wound dehiscence resulting in the development of a keyhole deformity. Five of them were symptomatic (mainly soiling). Keyhole deformity was diagnosed at a median time of 6.0 (3.8, 7.5) months postoperatively. The occurrence of early wound dehiscence and subsequent keyhole deformity was associated with a posteriorly located fistula (p = .02).

CONCLUSION

FIPS avoids the development of keyhole deformity in the majority of patients with simple anal fistula, but is less successful in posterior fistulas. Since FIPS is a very effective, fast and simple procedure, it should be considered a valid alternative for the treatment of every simple anal fistula.

Video-assisted anal fistula treatment versus fistulectomy and sphincter repair in the treatment of high cryptoglandular anal fistula: a randomized clinical study

BACKGROUND

Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) may have a recurrence rate comparable to that of fistulectomy and sphincter repair (FSR) in the treatment of high anal fistula and with potential advantages in wound healing, functional outcome and quality of life. The aim and objectives of the study are to compare the outcome of VAAFT with that of FSR for high cryptoglandular anal fistula.

METHODS

This was a single-centre randomized controlled trial of adults with high anal fistula comparing FSR with VAAFT. Primary outcome was fistula recurrence. Secondary outcomes were results of anal manometry, quality of life and faecal continence. A power calculation of 33 patients in each arm (1 : 1) was based on recurrence in the FSR and VAAFT groups of 5 per cent and 30 per cent respectively. Follow-up at 6 months after surgery included physical examination, MRI, anal manometry, quality-of-life assessment (RAND SF 36 questionnaire) and faecal-continence assessment (Wexner score).

RESULTS

The study was terminated early due to high recurrence rates in both groups. A total of 45 patients were included. Recurrence rates were 65 per cent for VAAFT and 27 per cent for FSR, with hazard ratio 4.18 (P = 0.016). Length of the fistula was a risk factor with an association with recurrence (hazard ratio 1.8, P = 0.020). There were significant differences in quality of life in favour of FSR and in anal manometry in favour of VAAFT with a significant improvement in Wexner score in both groups.

CONCLUSION

FSR was associated with a lower recurrence rate than VAAFT in the management of complex anal fistulae in this single-centre study but the study was terminated early due to higher than predicted recurrence rate in both groups.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02585167 (http://www.clinicaltrials.org).

Healing of rectal advancement flaps for anal fistulas in patients with and without Crohn's disease: a retrospective cohort analysis

Background

Surgical closure of anal fistulas with rectal advancement flaps is an established standard method, but it has a high degree of healing failure in some cases. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for anal fistula healing failure after advancement flap placement between patients with cryptoglandular fistulas and patients with Crohn’s disease (CD).

Methods

From January 2010 to October 2020, 155 rectal advancement flaps (CD patients = 55, non-CD patients = 100) were performed. Patients were entered into a prospective database, and healing rates were retrospectively analysed.

Results

The median follow-up period was 189 days (95% CI: 109–269). The overall complication rate was 5.8%. The total healing rate for all rectal advancement flaps was 56%. CD patients were younger (33 vs. 43 years, p < 0.001), more often female (76% vs. 30%, p < 0.001), were administered more immunosuppressant medication (65% vs. 5%, p < 0.001), and had more rectovaginal fistulas (29% vs. 8%, p = 0.001) and more protective stomas (49% vs. 2%, p < 0.001) than patients without CD. However, no difference in healing rate was noted between patients with or without CD (47% vs. 60%, p = 0.088).

Conclusions

Patients with anal fistulas with and without Crohn’s disease exhibit the same healing rate. Although patients with CD display different patient-specific characteristics, no independent factors for the occurrence of anal fistula healing failure could be determined.

Trial registration Not applicable due to the retrospective study design.

Lessons learned from an audit of 1250 anal fistula patients operated at a single center: A retrospective review

BACKGROUND

A complex anal fistula is a challenging disease to manage.

AIM

To review the experience and insights gained in treating a large cohort of patients at an exclusive fistula center.

METHODS

Anal fistulas operated on by a single surgeon over 14 years were analyzed. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging was done in all patients. Four procedures were performed: fistulotomy; two novel sphincter-saving procedures, proximal superficial cauterization of the internal opening and regular emptying and curettage of fistula tracts (PERFACT) and transanal opening of intersphincteric space (TROPIS), and anal fistula plug. PERFACT was initiated before TROPIS. As per the institutional GFRI algorithm, fistulotomy was done in simple fistulas, and TROPIS was done in complex fistulas. Fistulas with associated abscesses were treated by definitive surgery. Incontinence was evaluated objectively by Vaizey incontinence scores.

RESULTS

A total of 1351 anal fistula operations were performed in 1250 patients. The overall fistula healing rate was 19.4% in anal fistula plug (n = 56), 50.3% in PERFACT (n = 175), 86% in TROPIS (n = 408), and 98.6% in fistulotomy (n = 611) patients. Continence did not change significantly after surgery in any group. As per the new algorithm, 1019 patients were operated with either the fistulotomy or TROPIS procedure. The overall success rate was 93.5% in those patients. In a subgroup analysis, the overall healing rate in supralevator, horseshoe, and fistulas with an associated abscess was 82%, 85.8%, and 90.6%, respectively. The 90.6% healing rate in fistulas with an associated abscess was comparable to that of fistulas with no abscess (94.5%, P = 0.057, not significant).

CONCLUSION

Fistulotomy had a high 98.6% healing rate in simple fistulas without deterioration of continence if the patient selection was done judiciously. The sphincter-sparing procedure, TROPIS, was safe, with a satisfactory 86% healing rate for complex fistulas. This is the largest anal fistula series to date.

Advances in the Treatment of Anal Fistula: A Mini-Review of Recent Five-Year Clinical Studies

Anal fistula, with its complicated pathogenesis, has been considered as a clinical challenge for centuries. The risk of frequent recurrence and incontinence constitutes a considerable threat in the long-term treatment of anal fistula. In this work, we narratively reviewed the scientific literature of new techniques that have been used for anal fistula treatment over the recent 5 years, objectively evaluated the pros and cons of each technique on the basis of clinical outcomes, and tried to disclose the effective strategies for anal fistula treatment. Up to date, surgery is the main method used for treating anal fistula, but there is no simple technique that can completely heal complex anal fistula. In the course of surgery treatment, the healing outcome, and the protection of anal function should be weighed comprehensively. Among the innovative techniques that have emerged in recent years, combined techniques based on drainage Seton and LIFT-plug seem to be the relatively effective therapies, but their effectiveness requires more multi-center prospective randomized controlled trials with large sample size and long-term follow-up to be validated.

Enteral resorbable diet versus standard diet in primary sphincter reconstruction: a prospective randomised trial

AIM

Bowel movements after reconstructive anorectal surgery may negatively affect surgical outcome. This study was aimed to assess any differences between a standard diet (SD) and the enteral resorbable diet (ED) in terms of operative outcomes and patient tolerance after fistulectomy with primary sphincter reconstruction.

METHOD

Adult patients undergoing elective fistulectomy with primary sphincter reconstruction for anorectal and rectovaginal fistulas were eligible for inclusion. Patients were intraoperatively randomised to receive either the ED and peristalsis-inhibiting medication (ED) or a SD. The primary endpoint was the healing rate. Secondary endpoints included continence scores, complications and quality of life. Sample size calculation resulted in the analysis of 60 patients to detect a difference in fistula recurrence of 30% with 70% power and a 5% significance level.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients (24 women) were prospectively and randomly assigned to the ED (n = 34: 51%) or a SD (n = 32; 48%); mean age was 47 (18-74) years. The primary healing rate was 64 out of 66 patients (96%). No statistical difference in healing rate was seen between the groups. However, patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the SD group (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Fistulectomy with primary sphincter reconstruction is a safe method with low complication rates. Postoperative stool behaviour has no significant influence on the healing rate but has a significant negative impact on patient satisfaction. Therefore, maintaining a standard diet seems to be preferable following reconstructive anal surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered with the German Clinical Trials Register ( DRKS00020524 ).

CAN Stryphnodendron adstringens EXTRACT IMPROVE THE RESULTS OF FISTULOTOMY FOLLOWED BY PRIMARY SPHINCTEROPLASTY IN THE TREATMENT OF TRANSSPHINCTERIC FISTULAE?

BACKGROUND

There is still a need for progress in the treatment of transsphincteric anal fistulae and the use of herbal medicines seems promising.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of Stryphnodendron adstringens associated with fistulotomy and primary sphincteroplasty in the treatment of transsphincteric fistulae in rats.

METHODS

Thirty Wistar rats were used, which were submitted to transsphincteric fistulas with steel wire 0; after 30 days a treatment was performed according to the group. Group A (n=10) was submitted to fistulotomy; group B (n=10), fistulotomy followed by primary sphincteroplasty with "U" stitch with polyglactin 911 4-0; group C(n=10) , similar to group B, but with the interposition between the muscular stumps of hemostatic sponge soaked in Stryphnodendron adstringens extract. Euthanasia was performed after 14 days, resecting a segment of the anal canal for histological analysis, which aimed to evaluate the closure of the fistula, the area of separation of the muscle cables, the inflammatory process and the degree of fibrosis.

RESULTS

No animal had a remaining fistulous tract. About the spacing between the muscle cables, an average of 106.3 µm2 was observed in group A, 82.8 µm2 in group B and 51.8 µm2 in group C (p<0.05). There was no difference between the groups regarding the inflammatory process and, in relation to fibrosis, in group A there was a mean of 0.6, in group B 0.7 and in group C 0.2 (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Stryphnodendron adstringens extract was able to allow less spacing between muscle cables in rats submitted to fistulotomy followed by primary sphincteroplasty, in addition to providing less local fibrosis.

[Standards and New Developments in Proctology]

During the last years there was quite a lot of new developments in the international literature. Mostly these were technical methods and instruments. The results were from acceptable improvements to disappointing outcomes. Their focus was haemorrhoidal disease, anorectal fistulas and anal fissures. Despite these new developments all current standards remain on a high level of value.

Modern surgical strategies for perianal Crohn's disease

One of the most challenging phenotypes of Crohn’s disease is perianal fistulizing disease (PFCD). It occurs in up to 50% of the patients who also have symptoms in other parts of the gastrointestinal tract, and in 5% of the cases it occurs as the first manifestation. It is associated with severe symptoms, such as pain, fecal incontinence, and a significant reduction in quality of life. The presence of perianal disease in conjunction with Crohn’s disease portends a significantly worse disease course. These patients require close monitoring to identify those at risk of worsening disease, suboptimal biological drug levels, and signs of developing neoplasm. The last 2 decades have seen significant advancements in the management of PFCD. More recently, newer biologics, cell-based therapies, and novel surgical techniques have been introduced in the hope of improved outcomes. However, in refractory cases, many patients face the decision of having a stoma made and/or a proctectomy performed. In this review, we describe modern surgical management and the most recent advances in the management of complex PFCD, which will likely impact clinical practice.

Management of Complex Cryptoglandular Anal Fistula: Challenges and Solutions

Anal fistulae can be a very difficult disease to manage. The management of complex fistulae is even more challenging. The risk to the fecal continence mechanism due to damage to the anal sphincters and refractoriness to the treatment (high recurrence rate) pose the two biggest challenges in the management of this disease. Apart from these, there are several other challenges in the treatment of complex fistulae. The intriguing and uphill task is that satisfactory solutions to most of these challenges are still not known, and there is hardly any consensus on whatever treatment solutions are available. To summarize, there is no gold-standard treatment available for treating complex anal fistulae, and the search for a satisfactory treatment option is still on. In this review, the endeavor has been to discuss and highlight recent path-breaking updates in the management of complex anal fistulae.

Management of Perianal Fistulas in Crohn's Disease

Background

Perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease is associated with severe symptoms such as pain, fecal incontinence, and a significant reduction in quality of life.

Results

In refractory cases, many patients face the decision of having a stoma and/or requiring proctectomy. In former years, the standard of care was a complete fistulectomy, bringing with it a high rate of continence disorders. Additionally, many patients received indefinite treatment, namely the placement of a seton to maintain surgical drainage.

Conclusion

More recently, newer biologics, cell-based therapies as well as novel surgical techniques have been introduced, raising new hopes that outcomes can be improved upon.

A new understanding of the principles in the management of complex anal fistula

The management of complex anal fistula is confusing and far from satisfactory. Due to this reason, most colorectal surgeons are not comfortable dealing with this disease and tend to avoid it. Despite the innovation of several new procedures in the last few years, the cure rate of complex anal fistula has not improved much. This points out that there is some flaw with our current understanding of the disease pathogenesis as well as its management. All the surgical procedures described to treat anal fistulas in complex anal fistulas were analyzed. The reasons were sought as why most of the procedures don't work well in complex fistulas. Based on that, the pathophysiology of complex anal fistula was understood from a totally new perspective. The new hypothesis has been categorized in three cardinal principles-Intersphincteric tract is like an abscess in a closed space (ISTAC), draining all pus and ensuring continuous drainage (DRAPED) and healing occurs progressively till it is interrupted irreversibly by a collection (HOPTIC). The surgical procedures which take care of all these three principles have a high success rate in complex fistulas. The success rate falls in the procedures which ignore one or more of these principles. These principles are logical and are basics of wound healing process anywhere in the body but were somehow ignored in the management of complex anal fistulas. These principles fill the void in the understanding of complex anal fistula and when integrated in the management, the cure rate improves drastically.

Fistelchirurgie und primäre Sphinkterrekonstruktion

Die operative Therapie transsphinktärer Fisteln zeichnet sich durch eine variantenreiche Methodik aus. Die zumeist durchgeführten Techniken sind wohl die Fistulektomie mit Lappenplastik, die Fistulotomie mit oder ohne Sphinkterrepair und die (modifizierte) LIFT-Technik (Ligatur des intersphinktären Fisteltrakts). Ungeklärt aber ist die genaue Definition der Indikation einer Technik zu allen definierten Fisteltypen, was zum Teil dem Studiendesign anzuschulden ist und zu einer Variabilität der Auswertungen führt. Im vorliegenden Beitrag wird der Frage nach bisher vorhandenen Erfahrungen und Studien zur operativen Technik mit primärem Sphinkterrepair bei bestimmten Fisteltypen nachgegangen. In den letzten Jahrzehnten sind randomisierte Studien zu hoch- und suprasphinktären sowie zu rezidivierenden Fisteln mit guten Heilungs- und postoperativen Inkontinenzraten zur Technik der Fistulotomie mit Exzision des Fistelgewebes und primärem Sphinkterrepair erschienen. Die Technik wird in großen retrospektiven Studien jedoch bei allen transsphinktären Fisteln als erfolgreiche Therapieoption mit guter Kontinenzerhaltung beschrieben.

Fistulotomy and primary sphincteroplasty for anal fistula: long-term data on continence and patient satisfaction

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and long-term efficacy of fistulotomy and primary sphincteroplasty (FIPS). Secondary endpoints were its impact on postoperative continence status and patients' satisfaction.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on patients with cryptoglandular anal fistula (AF) who had FIPS between June 2006 and May 2017. Patients were evaluated with standardized telephone interviews and clinical/instrumental assessment. Main outcome measures included fistula healing rate, continence status, and patient satisfaction. Incontinence was defined as an inability to hold either gas, liquid, or solid stools, as well as postdefecation soiling, and was measured by the Cleveland Clinic fecal incontinence score. Patient satisfaction was evaluated by an 11-point numeric rating scale.

RESULTS

There were 203 patients (139 males; mean age: 48.7 years) who had FIPS. The overall healing rate was 93% (188 patients) with a mean follow-up period of 56 ± 31 months. Half of the total cohort (51%) had a complex fistula. Preoperatively, 8 (4%) patients complained of postdefecation soiling and 2 (1%) of gas incontinence. Postoperatively, 26 (13%) patients had continence impairment (de novo n = 24), mainly consisting of postdefecation soiling (10%). In univariate analysis, patients with recurrent (RR 6.153 95% CI 2.097-18.048; p = 0.002) or complex (RR 3.005 95% CI 1.203-7.506; p = 0.012) AF and those with secondary tracts (RR 8.190 95% CI 2.188-30.654; p = 0.004) or previous set on drainage (RR 5.286 95% CI 2.235-12.503; p = 0.0001) were at higher risk of incontinence. In multivariate analysis, no significant predictors were found, although fistula complexity approached statistical significance (RR 5.464 95% CI 0.944-31.623; p = 0.050). The mean patient satisfaction numeric rating scale was 9.3 ± 1.6. Lower satisfaction rates were found in patients with transphincteric (p = 0.011) or complex (p = 0.0001) AF, with secondary tracts (p = 0.041) or previous seton drainage (p = 0.008), and in those with postoperative continence impairment (p = 0.0001). Postoperative onset of incontinence was the only significant factor in multivariate analysis (p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

FIPS should be considered a valid therapeutic option for selected AF. However, the risk of postoperative minor fecal incontinence exists, and should be discussed during preoperative patient counselling.

Risk Factors for Recurrence after anal fistula surgery: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite a burgeoning literature during the last two decades regarding perioperative risk management of anal fistula, little is known about its risk factors that influence postoperative recurrence. We performed a meta-analysis to summarize and assess the credibility of evidence of potential risk factors for anal fistula recurrence (AFR) after surgery.

METHODS

Pubmed and EMBASE without language restriction were searched from inception to April 2018 that reported risk factors which predisposed recurrence after anal fistula surgery. We excluded studies that involved patients with anal fistula associated with Crohn's disease. MOOSE guidelines were followed when this meta-analysis was performed. We used random-effects models to pool relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Evidence from observational studies was graded into high-quality (Class I), moderate-quality (Class II/III) and low-quality (Class IV) based on Egger's P value, total sample size and between-study heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Of 3514 citations screened, 20 unique observational studies comprising 6168 patients were involved in data synthesis. High-quality evidence showed that AFR was associated with high transsphincteric fistula (RR, 4.77; 95% CI, 3.83 to 5.95), internal opening unidentified (RR, 8.54; 95% CI, 5.29 to 13.80), and horseshoe extensions (RR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.43 to 2.59). Moderate-quality evidence suggested an association with prior anal surgery (RR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.23), seton placement surgery (RR, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.10 to 8.06), and multiple fistula tract (RR, 4.77; 95% CI, 1.46 to 15.51). High-quality evidence demonstrated no significant association with gender or smoking; moderate-quality evidence also suggested no association with age, tertiary referral, alcohol use, diabetes mellitus, obesity, preoperative seton drainage, high internal opening, postoperative drainage, mucosal advancement flap surgery, supralevator extensions, location or type of anal fistula.

CONCLUSION

Several patient, surgery and fistula-related factors are significantly associated with postoperative AFR. These findings strengthen clinical awareness of early warning to identify patients with high-risk disease recurrence for AFR.

[Quality indicators in the treatment of anal fistulas]

Anal fistulas are a common anorectal disease and are frequently associated with a perianal abscess. The etiology is based on a cryptoglandular infection in the intersphincteric space. Surgery remains the only definitive therapy. The primary goal of definitive fistula surgery is healing; however, success of fistula surgery is influenced by a variety of factors including the surgeon's experience, type of fistula, involvement of sphincter muscles, type of surgical procedure and patient-related factors. For the surgical treatment of a complex anal fistula, a variety of operative procedures have been described including fistulectomy with sphincterotomy, different flap procedures (e.g. mucosal flap and advancement flap) and finally so-called sphincter-preserving techniques, such as LIFT (ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract), VAAFT (video-assisted anal fistula treatment), the use of plugs of collagen or fibrin glue sealants as well as laser procedures or the clip. In the search for suitable quality indicators in anal fistula surgery there is a conflict between healing and preservation of continence. If potential quality indicators are identified the principles of anal fistula surgery must be adhered to and the appropriate selection of patients and procedures is of crucial importance to achieve high healing rates without compromising continence or inducing surgical revision due to abscesses or recurrence. Based on the available literature and guidelines, in the assessment of quality indicators considerable differences exist with respect to patient selection, etiology of anal fistulas and length of follow-up. Heterogeneity of treatment protocols lead to difficulties in a definitive assessment of which surgical treatment is the best option for complex anal fistulas.