1
|
Hoi H, Ebner B, Grünbart M, de Cillia M, Uzel R, Schlosser L, Weiss H, Mittermair C. Teaching residents in emergency surgery for acute bowel obstruction-is supervised surgery safe and feasible? A retrospective single-center analysis from a MIS-specialized hospital. Surg Endosc 2025; 39:830-836. [PMID: 39623170 PMCID: PMC11794331 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11410-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2024] [Accepted: 11/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/06/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Emergency surgery for acute bowel obstruction (ABO) is a common and occasionally technically demanding procedure, requiring both surgical skill and strategic planning. The risk entailed in teaching residents during ABO surgery has not been defined or investigated in detail to date. It is the aim of this study to reveal whether surgery for ABO, performed by resident surgeons under supervision, is safe and feasible. DESIGN A retrospective analysis was conducted of all emergency surgeries for ABO performed between 2009 and 2023 at a community-based hospital. Patients' general characteristics, procedural data and outcome parameters were compared. Differences between teaching procedures and non-teaching procedures were analysed. SETTING The study was conducted at the Department of General and Visceral surgery at a community-based hospital (St. John of God Hospital Salzburg, Austria). PARTICIPANTS All emergency surgeries for ABO (n = 300 patients) that were performed during the study period were included. RESULTS Emergency surgery for ABO was performed in 300 patients during the study period, 15.3% of which operations were performed by residents under supervision and 84.7% by senior surgeons. No differences between these two groups were found in terms of patient characteristics, except for a past medical history of previous gynecologic or urologic surgery that was more frequent in the senior surgeon group (p = 0.02). Neither procedural data nor conversion rates from a minimally invasive (MIS) to an open (OS) approach, nor postoperative complication rates were found to be significantly different between these groups. CONCLUSION Emergency surgery for ABO, performed by residents under supervision, is safe and feasible, showing no significant differences in terms of complication rates, morbidity or mortality as compared to procedures performed by senior surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannes Hoi
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, St. John of God Hospital, Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Kajetanerplatz 1, 5010, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Barbara Ebner
- Department of Radiology, St. John of God Hospital, Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Kajetanerplatz 1, 5010, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Martin Grünbart
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, St. John of God Hospital, Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Kajetanerplatz 1, 5010, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Michael de Cillia
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, St. John of God Hospital, Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Kajetanerplatz 1, 5010, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Robert Uzel
- Department of Internal Medicine, St. John of God Hospital, Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Kajetanerplatz 1, 5010, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Lisa Schlosser
- Department of Mathematics, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstrasse 13, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Helmut Weiss
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, St. John of God Hospital, Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Kajetanerplatz 1, 5010, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Christof Mittermair
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, St. John of God Hospital, Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Kajetanerplatz 1, 5010, Salzburg, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Identifying technical skills and clinical procedures in surgery for a simulation-based curriculum: a national general needs assessment. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:47-56. [PMID: 33398569 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08235-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy of simulation-based training in surgical education is well known. However, the development of training programs should start with problem identification and a general needs assessment to ensure that the content is aligned with current surgical trainee needs. The objective of the present study is to identify the technical skills and clinical procedures that should be included in a simulation-based curriculum in general surgery. METHODS A national, three-round Delphi process was conducted to achieve consensus on which technical skills and clinical procedures should be included in a simulation-based curriculum in general surgery. In total, 87 key opinion leaders were identified and invited to the study. RESULTS Round 1 of the Delphi process had a response rate of 64% (56/87) and a total of 245 suggestions. Based on these suggestions, a consolidated list of 51 technical skills or clinical procedures was made. The response rate in Delphi round 2 was 62% (54/87) resulting in a pre-prioritized order of procedures for round 3. The response rate in Delphi round 3 was 65% (35/54). The final list included 13 technical skills and clinical procedures. Training was predominantly requested within general open surgical skills, laparoscopic skills, and endoscopic skills, and a few specific procedures such as appendectomy and cholecystectomy were included in the final prioritized list. CONCLUSION Based on the Delphi process 13 technical skills and clinical procedures were included in the final prioritized list, which can serve as a point of departure when developing simulation-based training in surgery.
Collapse
|
3
|
Inequalities in access to minimally invasive general surgery: a comprehensive nationwide analysis across 20 years. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:6227-6243. [PMID: 33206242 PMCID: PMC8523463 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08123-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Background Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has profoundly changed standards of care and lowered perioperative morbidity, but its temporal implementation and factors favoring MIS access remain elusive. We aimed to comprehensibly investigate MIS adoption across different surgical procedures over 20 years, identify predictors for MIS amenability and compare propensity score-matched outcomes among MIS and open surgery. Methods Nationwide retrospective analysis of all hospitalizations in Switzerland between 1998 and 2017. Appendectomies (n = 186,929), cholecystectomies (n = 57,788), oncological right (n = 9138) and left hemicolectomies (n = 21,580), rectal resections (n = 13,989) and gastrectomies for carcinoma (n = 6606) were included. Endpoints were assessment of temporal MIS implementation, identification of predictors for MIS access and comparison of propensity score-matched outcomes among MIS and open surgery. Results The rates of MIS increased for all procedures during the study period (p ≤ 0.001). While half of all appendectomies were performed laparoscopically by 2005, minimally invasive oncological colorectal resections reached 50% only by 2016. Multivariate analyses identified older age (p ≤ 0.02, except gastrectomy), higher comorbidities (p ≤ 0.001, except rectal resections), lack of private insurance (p ≤ 0.01) as well as rural residence (p ≤ 0.01) with impaired access to MIS. Rural residence correlated with low income regions (p ≤ 0.001), which themselves were associated with decreased MIS access. Geographical mapping confirmed strong disparities for rural and low-income areas in MIS access. Matched outcome analyses revealed benefits of MIS for length of stay, decreased surgical site infection rates for MIS appendectomies and cholecystectomies and higher mortality for open cholecystectomies. No consistent morbidity or mortality benefit for MIS compared to open colorectal resections was observed. Conclusion Unequal access to MIS exists in disfavor of older and more comorbid patients and those lacking private insurance, living in rural areas, and having lower income. Efforts should be made to ensure equal MIS access regardless of socioeconomic or geographical factors. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-020-08123-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
4
|
Huber T, Richardsen I, Klinger C, Mille M, Roeth AA. See (n)One, Do (n)One, Teach (n)One: Reality of Surgical Resident Training in Germany. World J Surg 2020; 44:2501-2510. [PMID: 32355988 PMCID: PMC7326792 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05539-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Due to technological changes, working time restrictions and the creation of specialized centers, surgical training has changed. A competence-based learning technique of surgical skills is the sub-step practice approach, which has been proven important in nationwide opinion surveys. The aim of this prospective multi-center trial was to determine the status quo of the sub-step concept in Germany. METHODS Over 6 months, the voluntarily participating centers evaluated the following index procedures: laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCHE), laparoscopic and open sigmoid resection, minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair, thyroid resection and pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD). Patients with private insurance were excluded. The detailed sub-steps were documented as well as the reason why these were not performed. In addition, an online survey regarding the sub-step concept was performed before and after the study. RESULTS In total, 21 centers included 2969 surgical procedures in 2018 for final analyses. While 24.4% of the procedures were performed by residents, sub-steps were performed in 22.2%. LCHE was most often performed completely by residents (43.3%), and PPPD revealed the highest rate of performed sub-steps (43.3%). Reasons for not assisting sub-steps to residents were often organizational and other reasons. After an initial increase, the number of performed sub-steps decreased significantly during the second half of the survey. The opinion survey revealed a high importance of the sub-step concept. The number of resident procedures was overestimated, and the number of performed sub-steps was underestimated. After the study, these estimations were more realistic. CONCLUSION Even though the sub-step practice concept is considered highly important for surgical education, it needs to be put into practice more consequently. The current data suggest a low participation of surgical residents in the operating room, although the participating hospitals are most likely highly interested in surgical education, hence their voluntary participation. Conceptual changes and a control of surgical education are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Huber
- Young Surgeons Working Group (CAJC) of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV), Berlin, Germany.
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
| | - I Richardsen
- Young Surgeons Working Group (CAJC) of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV), Berlin, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Central Hospital, Koblenz, Germany
| | - C Klinger
- German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV), Berlin, Germany
| | - M Mille
- Young Surgeons Working Group (CAJC) of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV), Berlin, Germany
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, HELIOS Hospital Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany
| | - A A Roeth
- Young Surgeons Working Group (CAJC) of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV), Berlin, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Moeckli B, Burgermeister LC, Siegrist M, Clavien PA, Käser SA. Evolution of the Surgical Residency System in Switzerland: An In-Depth Analysis Over 15 Years. World J Surg 2020; 44:2850-2856. [PMID: 32367397 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05552-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The landscape of surgical training has been subject to many changes over the past 15 years. This study examines resident satisfaction, determinants of satisfaction, demographics, working hours and the teaching rate of common operations in a longitudinal fashion with the aim to identify trends, shortcomings and possible ways to improve the current training system. METHODS The Swiss Medical Association administers an annual survey to all Swiss residents to evaluate the quality of postgraduate medical training (yearly respondents: 687-825, response rate: 68-72%). Teaching rates for general surgical procedures were obtained from the Swiss association for quality management in surgery. RESULTS During the study period (2003-2018), the number of surgical residents (408-655 (+61%)) and graduates in general surgery per year (42-63 (+50%)) increased disproportionately to the Swiss population. While the 52 working hour restriction was introduced in 2005 reported average weekly working hours did not decline (59.9-58.4 h (-3%)). Workplace satisfaction (6 being highest) rose from 4.3 to 4.6 (+7%). Working climate and leadership culture were the main determinants for resident satisfaction. The proportion of taught basic surgical procedures fell from 24.6 to 18.9% (-23%). CONCLUSIONS The number of residents and graduates in general surgery has risen markedly. At the same time, the proportion of taught operations is diminishing. Despite the introduction of working hour restrictions, the self-reported hours never reached the limit. The low teaching rate combined with the increasing resident number represents a major challenge to the maintenance of the current training quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beat Moeckli
- Department of Visceral- and Transplantation Surgery, Zurich University Hospital, Universitätsspital Zürich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Lea C Burgermeister
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology (HEST), ETH Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Siegrist
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology (HEST), ETH Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Pierre A Clavien
- Department of Visceral- and Transplantation Surgery, Zurich University Hospital, Universitätsspital Zürich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Samuel A Käser
- Department of Visceral- and Transplantation Surgery, Zurich University Hospital, Universitätsspital Zürich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gimm O, Barczyński M, Mihai R, Raffaelli M. Training in endocrine surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2019; 404:929-944. [PMID: 31701231 PMCID: PMC6935392 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-019-01828-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2019] [Accepted: 09/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE In Europe, the Division of Endocrine Surgery (DES) determines the number of operations (thyroid, neck dissection, parathyroids, adrenals, neuroendocrine tumors of the gastro-entero-pancreatic tract (GEP-NETs)) to be required for the European Board of Surgery Qualification in (neck) endocrine surgery. However, it is the national surgical boards that determine how surgical training is delivered in their respective countries. There is a lack of knowledge on the current situation concerning the training of surgical residents and fellows with regard to (neck) endocrine surgery in Europe. METHODS A survey was sent out to all 28 current national delegates of the DES. One questionnaire was addressing the training of surgical residents while the other was addressing the training of fellows in endocrine surgery. Particular focus was put on the numbers of operations considered appropriate. RESULTS For most of the operations, the overall number as defined by national surgical boards matched quite well the views of the national delegates even though differences exist between countries. In addition, the current numbers required for the EBSQ exam are well within this range for thyroid and parathyroid procedures but below for neck dissections as well as operations on the adrenals and GEP-NETs. CONCLUSIONS Training in endocrine surgery should be performed in units that perform a minimum of 100 thyroid, 50 parathyroid, 15 adrenal, and/or 10 GEP-NET operations yearly. Fellows should be expected to have been the performing surgeon of a minimum of 50 thyroid operations, 10 (central or lateral) lymph node dissections, 15 parathyroid, 5 adrenal, and 5 GEP-NET operations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Gimm
- Department of Surgery and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKE), Linköping University, 58183 Linköping, Sweden
| | - Marcin Barczyński
- Department of Endocrine Surgery, Third Chair of Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 37 Prądnicka Street, 31-202 Kraków, Poland
| | - Radu Mihai
- Department of Endocrine Surgery, Churchill Cancer Centre, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, OX3 7DU United Kingdom
| | - Marco Raffaelli
- U.O. Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Istituto di Semeiotica Chirurgica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|