Characterization of risk factors for floppy pouch complex in ulcerative colitis

Salvage Surgery: An Effective Therapy in the Management of Ileoanal Pouch Prolapse

BACKGROUND

Restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA is the surgical treatment of choice for patients requiring surgery for IBD and, less frequently, for other pathologies. Pouch prolapse is a rare complication that compromises pouch function and negatively affects patients' quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe our experience from a single high-volume center in this infrequent condition.

DESIGN

Restrospective cohort study of a prospectively maintained, Institutional Review Board-approved database.

SETTINGS

All consecutive eligible patients with IPAA and pouch prolapse were identified from 1990 to 2021.

PATIENTS

Patients with full-thickness prolapse treated by pouch pexy were included.

INTERVENTIONS

Pouch pexy (with/without mesh).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Success rate of pouch pexy, defined as no recurrence of prolapse.

RESULTS

A total of 4791 patients underwent IPAA; 7 (0.1%) were diagnosed with full-thickness prolapse. An additional 18 patients who underwent IPAA and had full-thickness prolapse were referred from outside institutions. Among 25 included patients, 16 (64.0%) were women, and the overall mean age was 35.6 ± 13.4 years. The time interval from initial pouch formation to prolapse was 4.2 (interquartile range, 1.1-8.5) years. Nine patients (36.0%) underwent previous treatment for prolapse. All patients presented with symptoms and physical examination compatible with full-thickness prolapse. Twenty patients (80.0%) underwent surgical pouch pexy without mesh and 5 (20.0%) had pouch pexy with mesh placement. A diverting ileostomy was performed in 1 patient (4.0%) before pouch pexy and in 8 patients (32.0%) at the time of surgical prolapse correction. After surgery, recurrent prolapse was noted in 3 patients (12.0%) at a median of 6.9 (interquartile range, 5.2-8.3) months.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective study, small sample size thus prone to selection, and referral biases, which may limit the generalizability of our findings.

CONCLUSION

Pouch prolapse can be effectively treated with salvage surgery. Surgical intervention is safe and provides acceptable outcomes. See Video Abstract.

CIRUGA DE RESCATE UNA TERAPIA EFICAZ EN EL MANEJO DEL PROLAPSO DE LA BOLSA ILEOANAL

ANTECEDENTES:La proctocolectomía restauradora con anastomosis reservorio ileoanal es el tratamiento quirúrgico de elección para aquellos pacientes que requieren cirugía por enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal y, con menor frecuencia, por otras patologías. El prolapso de la bolsa es una complicación rara que compromete la función de la bolsa y afecta de manera negativa la calidad de vida de los pacientes.OBJETIVO:Describir nuestra experiencia de un solo centro de alto volumen en esta condición poco frecuente.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo de una base de datos mantenida prospectivamente aprobada por el IRB.AJUSTES/PACIENTES:Fueron identificados y elegibles de manera consecutiva todos los pacientes con anastomosis de bolsa ileoanal y prolapso de bolsa entre 1990 y 2021. Se incluyeron pacientes con prolapso de bolsa de espesor total tratados con pexia.INTERVENCIONES:Pexia de la bolsa (con/sin malla).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Tasa de éxito de la pexia de la bolsa, definida como ausencia de recurrencia del prolapso.RESULTADOS:Un total de 4.791 pacientes fueron sometidos a anastomosis de bolsa ileoanal; siete (0,1%) fueron diagnosticados con prolapso de espesor total. Otros 18 pacientes con anastomosis de reservorio ileoanal fueron derivados de instituciones externas. De entre los 25 pacientes incluidos, 16 (64,0 %) eran mujeres y la edad media promedio fue de 35,6+/-13,4 años. El intervalo de tiempo desde la creación inicial de la bolsa hasta el prolapso fue de 4,2 (IQR 1,1-8,5) años. Nueve (36,0 %) pacientes fueron sometidos a tratamiento previo para el prolapso (fisioterapia n = 4, pexia de la bolsa n = 2, pexia de la bolsa con malla n = 2, resección de la mucosa n = 1). Todos los pacientes presentaron síntomas y exploración física compatibles con prolapso de espesor total. Veinte (80,0%) pacientes se sometieron a pexia de bolsa quirúrgica sin malla y cinco (20,0%) se sometieron a pexia de bolsa con colocación de malla. Se realizó una ileostomía de derivación en un (4,0%) paciente antes de la pexia de la bolsa y en ocho (32,0%) pacientes en el momento de la corrección quirúrgica del prolapso. Posterior a la cirugía, se observó prolapso recurrente en tres pacientes (12,0 %) con una mediana de 6,9 (IQR 5,2-8,3) meses.LIMITACIONES:Estudio retrospectivo, pequeño tamaño de muestra, por lo tanto, propenso a sesgos de selección y referencia que pueden limitar la generalización de nuestros hallazgos.CONCLUSIÓN:El prolapso de la bolsa ileoanal puede tratarse de manera efectiva mediante la cirugía de rescate. La intervención quirúrgica es segura y proporciona resultados aceptables. (Traducción-Dr. Mauricio Santamaria ).

Classification and Management of Disorders of the J Pouch

Total abdominal proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC) is associated with substantial complications despite the benefits of managing refractory and/or neoplasia-associated disease. For the purpose of this review, we focused on the diagnosis of some of the most common inflammatory and structural pouch disorders and their respective management. Pouchitis is the most common complication, and it is typically responsive to antibiotics. However, chronic antibiotic refractory pouchitis (CARP) has been increasingly recognized, and biologic therapies have emerged as the mainstay of therapy. Crohn's-like disease of the pouch (CLDP) can affect up to 10% of patients with UC after IPAA. Medical options are similar to CARP therapies, including biologics with immunomodulators. Studies have shown higher efficacy rates of biologics for CLDP when compared with those for CARP. In addition, managing stricturing and fistulizing CLDP is challenging and often requires interventional endoscopy (balloon dilation and/or stricturotomy) and/or surgery. The implementation of standardized diagnostic criteria for inflammatory pouch disorders will help in advancing future therapeutic options. Structural pouch disorders are commonly related to surgical complications after IPAA. We focused on the diagnosis and management of anastomotic leaks, strictures, and floppy pouch complex. Anastomotic leaks and anastomotic strictures occur in approximately 15% and 11% of patients with UC after IPAA, respectively. Further complications from pouch leaks include the development of sinuses, fistulas, and pouch sepsis requiring excision. Novel endoscopic interventions and less invasive surgical procedures have emerged as options for the management of these disorders.

Diagnosis and classification of ileal pouch disorders: consensus guidelines from the International Ileal Pouch Consortium

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is an option for most patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis who require colectomy. Although the construction of an ileal pouch substantially improves patients' health-related quality of life, the surgery is, directly or indirectly, associated with various structural, inflammatory, and functional adverse sequelae. Furthermore, the surgical procedure does not completely abolish the risk for neoplasia. Patients with ileal pouches often present with extraintestinal, systemic inflammatory conditions. The International Ileal Pouch Consortium was established to create this consensus document on the diagnosis and classification of ileal pouch disorders using available evidence and the panellists' expertise. In a given individual, the condition of the pouch can change over time. Therefore, close monitoring of the activity and progression of the disease is essential to make accurate modifications in the diagnosis and classification in a timely manner.

Endoscopic evaluation of surgically altered bowel in inflammatory bowel disease: a consensus guideline from the Global Interventional Inflammatory Bowel Disease Group

The majority of patients with Crohn's disease and a proportion of patients with ulcerative colitis will ultimately require surgical treatment despite advances in diagnosis, therapy, and endoscopic interventions. The surgical procedures that are most commonly done include bowel resection with anastomosis, strictureplasty, faecal diversion, and ileal pouch. These surgical treatment modalities result in substantial alterations in bowel anatomy. In patients with inflammatory bowel disease, endoscopy plays a key role in the assessment of disease activity, disease recurrence, treatment response, dysplasia surveillance, and delivery of endoscopic therapy. Endoscopic evaluation and management of surgically altered bowel can be challenging. This consensus guideline delineates anatomical landmarks and endoscopic assessment of these landmarks in diseased and surgically altered bowel.

Afferent limb syndrome after total proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis

Background

Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a common postoperative complication of ulcerative colitis (UC). There have been a few recent reports of afferent limb syndrome (ALS) as a rare occurrence in cases of SBO. We present a case of ALS with recurrent SBO that was successfully managed surgically.

Case presentation

When this male patient was 55 years old, he underwent laparoscopy-assisted anus-preserving total proctocolectomy, the creation of a J-type ileal pouch, ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis (IPAA), and creation of ileostomy for intractable UC. Three months later, ileostomy closure was performed. The first onset of SBO was observed 5 months after ileostomy closure. SBO occurred repeatedly, and the patient was hospitalized nine times in approximately 2 years. Each SBO was improved by non-surgical treatment. A computed tomography (CT) scan revealed that the afferent limb was narrowing and twisted, and gastrografin enema confirmed narrowing at the proximal portion of the pouch inlet. Endoscopy showed a sharp angulation at the pouch inlet. We suspected ALS and decided on a surgical policy and performed pouchopexy and ileopexy to the retroperitoneum by suturing with excision of the remaining blind end of the ileum. Endoscopy 3 days after surgery showed neither twist nor stricture in the fixed ileal pouch or the afferent limb. At the time of writing, the patient remains free of SBO symptoms.

Conclusion

Clinicians should consider ALS when examining a patient with recurrent intermittent SBO after IPAA surgery. When ALS is suspected, the patient is indicated for surgery such as surgical pexy.

Lower peripouch fat area is related with increased frequency of pouch prolapse and floppy pouch complex in inflammatory bowel disease patients

BACKGROUND

Pouch prolapse is a rare pouch complication which often leads to pouch failure in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Its exact cause remains unknown. Floppy pouch complex (FPC) was defined as the presence of any one of the following pouch disorders: pouch prolapse, afferent limb syndrome (ALS), redundant loop, and pouch folding. We aimed to explore the role of peripouch fat area in the occurrence of pouch prolapse and FPC.

METHODS

Pouch patients with available pouchoscopy and abdominal CT scans who were followed up between 2011 and 2017 in Cleveland Clinic were reviewed. Peripouch fat was measured on CT images.

RESULTS

Of the 93 included patients, 31 were females; 87 had J pouches and 6 had S pouches. The median duration of pouch was 8.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 5.0-16.5) years. A total of 18 cases (19.4%, 18/93) were identified as FPC, including 12 pouch prolapse, 5 ALS, 1 redundant loop, and 3 pouch folding. Patients with pouch prolapse had lower peripouch fat area (13.6 (9.3-18.5) vs. 27.6 (11.0-46.2)cm², P = 0.022) than those without. Patients with FPC had lower peripouch fat area (15.4 (11.4-20.6) vs. 27.6 (11.0-46.9)cm², P = 0.040) than those without. Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that lower peripouch fat area, lower weight, and family history of IBD were independent predictors of pouch prolapse and FPC.

CONCLUSIONS

A lower peripouch fat area was observed in inflammatory bowel disease patients with pouch prolapse and FPC. Longitudinal studies are needed to further elucidate the role of peripouch fat in the pathogenesis of pouch prolapse and FPC.