A systematic review of salvage therapies in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer

Chemotherapy Rechallenge or Reintroduction Compared to Regorafenib or Trifluridine/Tipiracil for Pretreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Propensity Score Analysis of Treatment Beyond Second Line (Proserpyna Study)

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) beyond second line is still questioned. Besides the standard of care agents (regorafenib, REG, or trifluridine/tipiracil, FTD/TPI), chemotherapy rechallenge or reintroduction (CTr/r) are commonly considered in clinical practice, despite weak supporting evidence. The prognostic performance of CTr/r, REG and FTD/TPI in this setting are herein evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PROSERpYNa is a multicenter, observational, retrospective study, in which patients with refractory mCRC, progressing after at least 2 lines of CT, treated with CTr/r, REG or FTD/TPI, are considered eligible and were enrolled in 2 independent data sets (exploratory and validation). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints were investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (RR) and safety. A propensity score adjustment was accomplished for survival analyses.

RESULTS

Data referring to patients treated between Jan-10 and Jan-19 from 3 Italian institutions were gathered (341 and 181 treatments for exploratory and validation data sets respectively). In the exploratory cohort, median OS (18.5 vs. 6.5 months), PFS (6.1 vs. 3.5 months) and RR (28.6% vs. 1.4%) were significantly longer for CTr/r compared to REG/FTD/TPI. Survival benefits were retained at the propensity score analysis, adjusted for independent prognostic factors identified at multivariate analysis. Moreover, these results were confirmed within the validation cohort analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the retrospective fashion, CTr/r proved to be a valuable option in this setting in a real-world context, providing superior outcomes compared to standard of care agents at the price of a moderate toxicity.

A panorama of colon cancer in the era of liquid biopsy

Colon cancer (CC) is one of the most frequent cancers worldwide being responsible for over 500 thousand deaths in 2022. Its financial and human burden is expected to increase in the next decades accompanying the growing and aging of the global population. Much of this burden could be alleviated considering that the lethality of CC is mostly due to its late diagnosis and failure in the individualized management of patients. Coordinated government actions and implementation of better diagnostic tools capable of detecting CC earlier and of tracking tumoral evolution are mandatory to achieve a reduction in CC's social impact. CtDNA-based liquid biopsy (LB) has great potential to contribute to patients' screening adhesion, CC earlier detection, and to longitudinal tumor follow-up. In this review, we will discuss the latest epidemiological data on CC disease, diagnostic, subtypes, genetics, and treatment management focusing on the advantages and limitations of ctDNA-based LB, including important bottlenecks and solutions necessary for its clinical translation. The latest ctDNA-directed CC clinical trials will also be examined.

Can immunotherapy reinforce chemotherapy efficacy? a new perspective on colorectal cancer treatment

As one of the main threats to human life (the fourth most dangerous and prevalent cancer), colorectal cancer affects many people yearly, decreases patients' quality of life, and causes irreparable financial and social damages. In addition, this type of cancer can metastasize and involve the liver in advanced stages. However, current treatments can't completely eradicate this disease. Chemotherapy and subsequent surgery can be mentioned among the current main treatments for this disease. Chemotherapy has many side effects, and regarding the treatment of this type of tumor, chemotherapy can lead to liver damage, such as steatohepatitis, steatosis, and sinus damage. These damages can eventually lead to liver failure and loss of its functions. Therefore, it seems that other treatments can be used in addition to chemotherapy to increase its efficiency and reduce its side effects. Biological therapies and immunotherapy are one of the leading suggestions for combined treatment. Antibodies (immune checkpoint blockers) and cell therapy (DC and CAR-T cells) are among the immune system-based treatments used to treat tumors. Immunotherapy targets various aspects of the tumor that may lead to 1) the recruitment of immune cells, 2) increasing the immunogenicity of tumor cells, and 3) leading to the elimination of inhibitory mechanisms established by the tumor. Therefore, immunotherapy can be used as a complementary treatment along with chemotherapy. This review will discuss different chemotherapy and immunotherapy methods for colorectal cancer. Then we will talk about the studies that have dealt with combined treatment.

Targeting UNC-51-like kinase 1 and 2 by lignans to modulate autophagy: possible implications in metastatic colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC), especially metastatic (mCRC) form, becomes a major reason behind cancer morbidity worldwide, whereas the treatment strategy is not optimum. Several novel targets are under investigation for mCRC including the autophagy pathway. Natural compounds including dietary lignans are sparsely reported as autophagy modulators. Nonetheless, the interaction between dietary lignans and core autophagy complexes are yet to be characterised. We aimed to describe the interaction between the dietary lignans from flaxseed (Linum usitatissimum) and sesame seeds (Sesamum indicum) along with the enterolignans (enterodiol and enterolactone) and the UNC-51-like kinase 1 and 2 (ULK1/2), important kinases required for the autophagy. A range of in-silico technologies viz. molecular docking, drug likeness, and ADME/T was employed to select the best fit modulator and/or inhibitor of the target kinases from the list of selected lignans. Drug likeness and ADME/T studied further selected the best-suited lignans as potential autophagy inhibitor. Molecular dynamic simulation (MDS) analyses were used to validate the molecular docking results. Binding free energies of the protein-ligand interactions by MM-PBSA method further confirmed best-selected lignans as ULK1 and/or ULK2 inhibitor. In conclusion, three dietary lignans pinoresinol, medioresinol, and lariciresinol successfully identified as dual ULK1/2 inhibitor/modifier, whereas enterodiol emerged as a selective ULK2 inhibitor/modifier.

Trifluridine/tipiracil with or without bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab (FTD/TPI + BEV) has shown efficacy and tolerability in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Because randomized controlled trial (RCT) data comparing FTD/TPI + BEV with FTD/TPI are lacking, this meta-analysis evaluated outcomes with both regimens.

Data Sources and Methods

Electronic databases, congress proceedings (past 3 years), trial registries, systematic review bibliographies, gray literature, and guidelines through June 2021 were searched for RCTs, non-RCTs, and prospective observational studies involving >20 previously treated patients with mCRC receiving FTD/TPI + BEV or FTD/TPI. Absolute and relative disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), adverse event (AE) rates, and discontinuation rates due to AEs were evaluated using fixed-effects and random-effects models. Study quality, heterogeneity, and publication bias were assessed.

Results

In all, 29 of 875 screened publications were selected (26 studies: 5 RCTs, 11 non-RCTs, and 10 prospective observational studies). One RCT compared FTD/TPI + BEV with FTD/TPI. FTD/TPI + BEV versus FTD/TPI had a higher absolute DCR [64% (6 studies; n = 289) versus 43% (10 studies; n = 2809)], median PFS [4.2 (5 studies; n = 244) versus 2.6 (6 studies; n = 1781) months], 12-month PFS [9% (5 studies; n = 244) versus 3% (6 studies; n = 1781)], median OS [9.8 (5 studies; n = 244) versus 8.1 (6 studies; n = 1814) months], and 12-month OS [38% (5 studies; n = 244) versus 32% (6 studies; n = 1814)]. Grade ⩾3 febrile neutropenia, asthenia/fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting rates were similar (1%-7%). Grade ⩾3 neutropenia rate was higher with FTD/TPI + BEV than with FTD/TPI [43% (6 studies; n = 294) versus 29% (12 studies; n = 7139)]. Discontinuation rates due to AEs were similar [8% (5 studies; n = 244) and 7% (10 studies; n = 3724)]. Low study quality, heterogeneity, and/or publication bias were detected in certain instances.

Conclusion

Despite fewer patients treated with the combination, this meta-analysis consistently suggested that FTD/TPI + BEV provides benefits over FTD/TPI in refractory mCRC and has similar safety, except for more frequent grade ⩾3 neutropenia.

Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for third-line management of metastatic colorectal cancer: SUNLIGHT study design

Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is an orally active formulation of trifluridine, a thymidine-based nucleoside analog, and tipiracil hydrochloride, a thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor that increases the bioavailability of trifluridine. Preliminary studies of FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab have produced encouraging results in the treatment of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Here, we describe the design of the multinational Phase III SUNLIGHT, an open-label study of FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab as third-line treatment for patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. A total of 490 patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab, or FTD/TPI monotherapy. The primary objective is to significantly improve overall survival with FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab compared with FTD/TPI monotherapy. The first patient was enrolled in November 2020.

Oxaliplatin retreatment in metastatic colorectal cancer: Systematic review and future research opportunities

BACKGROUND

Oxaliplatin represents a main component of cytotoxic treatment regimens in colorectal cancer (CRC). Given its efficacy, oxaliplatin is frequently re-administered in the context of the continuum of care in metastatic CRC (mCRC). However, efficacy and tolerability of this therapeutic strategy has not been comprehensively assessed.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature on September 19th 2020, according to PRISMA criteria 2009. The research was performed on PubMed, ASCO Meeting Library, ESMO library and ClinicalTrials.gov for citations or ongoing trials.

RESULTS

64 records were retrieved and 13 included in the systematic review: 8 full-text articles, 4 abstracts and 1 ongoing clinical trial. According to readministration timing, studies were classified as rechallenge/reintroduction (n = 8) or stop & go/intermittent therapeutic strategies (n = 4). The studies presented wide heterogeneity in terms of efficacy (Response Rate 6-31%; Disease Control Rate 39-79%; median Progression-Free Survival 3.1-7 months). Those patients who received retreatment after prior adjuvant oxaliplatin or exploiting a stop-&-go strategy appeared to achieve better outcomes. However, no formal comparisons on treatment outcomes were feasible. The most frequent grade 3 or higher adverse events were hematologic toxicities (5-27%), peripheral neuropathy (5-14%) and hypersensitivity reactions (5-20%).

CONCLUSIONS

Retreatment with oxaliplatin for mCRC is practiced based on scarce and heterogeneous data indicating efficacy and manageable toxicity. The best strategy to exploit this approach remains to be defined, and the most promising research avenue to improve therapeutic index of oxaliplatin is represented by selection of responder patients whose tumors harbor molecular defects in the DNA damage repair pathway.