Rates of inflammatory bowel disease in Hispanics comparable to non-Hispanic Whites: results of a cohort study

Epidemiology and clinical outcomes of hospitalized Hispanic patients with IBD: results of a large national cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has historically been seen as predominantly affecting non-Hispanic Whites (NHW). Hispanics are the largest minority group in the USA, yet they remain grossly underrepresented in studies of IBD. With this study, we aimed to better understand the epidemiology of hospitalized Hispanic patients with IBD in the US.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study utilizing the National Inpatient Sample, the largest publicly available all-payer inpatient care database in the United States. We compared demographics, hospitalization characteristics, clinical outcomes, and year-to-year trends from 2016 to 2020 in Hispanic and NHW with a primary diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn's disease, or ulcerative colitis.

RESULTS

NHWs hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of IBD had significantly higher rates of hospitalization than Hispanics (122.67 vs 71.12, P < 0.01). While hospitalized Hispanics with IBD are more likely to be in the lowest quartile for household income (31.6% vs 19.3%, P < 0.01), have a younger median age (37.0 vs 45.0, P < 0.01), and be uninsured (4.3% vs 8.8%, P < 0.01) compared to NHW. Length of admission was similar, yet NHWs had higher rates of mortality (0.3% vs 0.2%, P = 0.01), while total charges for hospitalizations were significantly higher for Hispanic patients (P < 0.01).

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this is one of the largest US-based studies of Hispanics with IBD. Our findings suggest that among hospitalized IBD patients, Hispanics are more likely to be younger, uninsured, have a lower household income, and are less likely to undergo surgery while having higher hospital charges.

Significant Racial and Ethnic Disparities Exist in Health Care Utilization in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is rising worldwide, though the differences in health care utilization among different races and ethnicities remains uncertain. We aimed to better define this through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

We explored the impact of race or ethnicity on the likelihood of needing an IBD-related surgery, hospitalization, and emergency department visit. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with I2 values reporting heterogeneity. Differences in IBD phenotype and treatment between racial and ethnic groups of IBD were reported.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight studies were included. Compared with White patients, Black patients were less likely to undergo a Crohn's disease (CD; OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50-0.95; I2 = 68.0%) or ulcerative colitis (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.40-0.83; I2 = 85.0%) surgery, more likely to have an IBD-hospitalization (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.06-2.24; I2 = 77.0%), and more likely to visit the emergency department (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.32-2.30; I2 = 0%). There were no significant differences in disease behavior or biologic exposure between Black and White patients. Hispanic patients were less likely to undergo a CD surgery (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.48-0.68; I2 = 0%) but more likely to be hospitalized (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.01-1.88; I2 = 37.0%) compared with White patients. There were no differences in health care utilization between White and Asian or South Asian patients with IBD.

CONCLUSIONS

There remain significant differences in health care utilization among races and ethnicities in IBD. Future research is required to determine factors behind these differences to achieve equitable care for persons living with IBD.

Ostomy-Related Quality of Life in Puerto Ricans Living With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine ostomy-related quality of life (QOL) in Hispanic Puerto Ricans living with an enteral stoma and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We analyzed possible associations between QOL and sex, diagnosis, and type and duration of stoma.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SUBJECTS AND SETTINGS

The sample comprised 102 adults living with IBD and an ostomy; 60 of 101 (59.4%) were males, 44 of 102 (43.1%) had Crohn's disease, and 60 of 102 (58.9%) had an ileostomy. Participants were receiving care at the Center for IBD of the University of Puerto Rico in San Juan, Puerto Rico, between January 2012 and December 2014.

METHODS

One-hundred two adults Puerto Ricans with IBD completed the Stoma Quality of Life (Stoma-QOL) questionnaire. Data were analyzed using frequency distributions for categorical variables and summary statistics for continuous variables. Independent-group t test and one-way analysis of variance, with the post hoc Tukey test, were used to determine group differences for the variables of age, sex, civil status, time living with an ostomy, type of ostomy, and IBD diagnosis. Results were analyzed according to the number of responses to each variable; the denominator varied for some variables.

RESULTS

Having an ostomy for more than 40 months was significantly associated with a higher QOL score (59.0 vs 50.7; P = .05). Males had significantly higher scores than females (59.94 vs 50.23; P = .0019). Age, IBD diagnosis, and type of ostomy were not associated with the Stoma-QOL scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The achievement (over 40 months) to attain improved ostomy-related QOL suggests that early training in the care of the ostomy and advanced planning when leaving home may enhance ostomy-related QOL. Lower QOL in women may represent an opportunity for a sex-specific educational intervention.

Towards Equitable Surgical Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review of Disparities in Surgery for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Existing evidence for disparities in inflammatory bowel disease is fragmented and heterogenous. Underlying mechanisms for differences in outcomes based on race and socioeconomic status remain undefined. We performed a systematic review of the literature to examine disparities in surgery for inflammatory bowel disease in the United States.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched from 2000 through June 11, 2021, to identify studies addressing disparities in surgical treatment for adults with inflammatory bowel disease. Eligible English-language publications comparing the use or outcomes of surgery by racial/ethnic, socioeconomic, geographic, and/or institutional factors were included. Studies were grouped according to whether outcomes of surgery were reported or surgery itself was the relevant end point (utilization). Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies.

RESULTS

Forty-five studies were included. Twenty-four reported surgical outcomes and 21addressed utilization. Race/ethnicity was considered in 96% of studies, socioeconomic status in 44%, geographic factors in 27%, and hospital/surgeon factors in 22%. Although study populations and end points were heterogeneous, Black and Hispanic patients were less likely to undergo abdominal surgery when hospitalized; they were more likely to have a complication when they did have surgery. Differences based on race were correlated with socioeconomic factors but frequently remained significant after adjustments for insurance and baseline health.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical disparities based on sociologic and structural factors reflect unidentified differences in multidisciplinary disease management. A broad, multidimensional approach to disparities research with more granular and diverse data sources is needed to improve health care quality and equity for inflammatory bowel disease.