The impact of primary tumor location on prognosis after colorectal lung metastasectomy

Effects of location of primary tumor on survival after pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The benefit of pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) with isolated lung metastases remains unclear, and failure to separate colon from rectal cancer may contribute. Using a large national database, we investigate whether PM is associated with survival benefits in patients presenting with CRC with synchronous lung metastases based on primary tumor location.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2015 was queried to identify patients with stage IV CRC with isolated synchronous lung metastases at initial diagnosis. These patients were restricted to include only those in which the location of the primary tumor being either colon or rectum could be conclusively identified, and the primary site was resected. SEER-Medicare linked claims were also queried to identify cases of PM that were not adequately recorded in SEER alone. Patients were then analyzed using Kaplan-Meier (K-M) methods and multivariate analysis was performed to identify variables associated with overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

From the SEER database 185,871 patients with metastatic CRC were identified. Only 588 had isolated synchronous lung metastases, with 441 with colon cancer and 147 with rectal cancer. PM was performed in 15.3% (n = 90) with two-thirds being colon cancer. Univariate K-M demonstrated worse OS for rectal cancer than colon cancer, which remained significant on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

OS is associated with the site of primary CRC in patients undergoing PM. Distinct mutational and molecular characteristics differences between colon and rectal cancer may explain these findings and are an area for future research.

Primary tumor resection improves prognosis of unresectable carcinomas of the transverse colon including flexures with pulmonary metastasis: a cohort study

PURPOSE

Studies of unresectable colorectal cancer pulmonary metastasis (CRPM) have rarely analyzed patient prognosis from the perspective of colonic subsites. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of primary tumor resection (PTR) on the prognosis of patients with unresectable pulmonary metastases of transverse colon cancer pulmonary metastasis (UTCPM), hepatic flexure cancer pulmonary metastasis (UHFPM), and splenic flexure cancer pulmonary metastasis (USFPM).

METHODS

Patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2000 and 2018. The Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS). The Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank tests were conducted to assess the effectiveness of PTR on survival.

RESULTS

This study included 1294 patients: 419 with UHFPM, 636 with UTCPM, and 239 with USFPM. Survival analysis for OS and CSS in the PTR groups, showed that there were no statistical differences in the the UHFPM, UTCPM, and USFPM patients. There were statistical differences in the UHFPM, UTCPM, and USFPM patients for OS and CSS. Three non-PTR subgroups showed significant statistical differences for OS and CSS.

CONCLUSION

We confirmed the different survival rates of patients with UTCPM, UHFPM, and USFPM and proved for the first time that PTR could provide survival benefits for patients with unresectable CRPM from the perspective of the colonic subsites of the transverse colon, hepatic flexure, and splenic flexure.

CT-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer: Prognosis analyses based on the origin of the primary tumor

BACKGROUND

Microwave ablation (MWA) is becoming an effective therapy for inoperable pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC). However, it is unclear whether the primary tumor location affects survival after MWA.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the survival outcomes and prognostic factors of MWA based on different primary origins between colon and rectal cancer.

METHODS

Patients who underwent MWA for pulmonary metastases from 2014 to 2021 were reviewed. Differences in survival outcomes between colon and rectal cancer were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests. The prognostic factors between groups were then evaluated by univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients with 154 pulmonary metastases from CRC were treated in 140 MWA sessions. Rectal cancer had a higher proportion with seventy (59.32% ) than colon cancer with forty-eight (40.68% ). The average maximum diameter of pulmonary metastases from rectal cancer (1.09 cm) was greater than that of colon cancer (0.89 cm; p = 0.026). The median follow-up was 18.53 months (range 1.10 - 60.63 months). The disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in colon and rectal cancer groups were 25.97 vs 11.90 months (p = 0.405), and 60.63 vs 53.87 months (p = 0.149), respectively. Multivariate analyses showed that only age was an independent prognostic factor in patients with rectal cancer (HR = 3.70, 95% CI: 1.28 - 10.72, p = 0.023), while none in colon cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary CRC location has no impact on survival for patients with pulmonary metastases after MWA, while a disparate prognostic factor exists between colon and rectal cancer.

Prognostic value of primary tumor sidedness in patients with non-metastatic IBD related CRC - Is it the exception to the rule?

BACKGROUND

Although primary tumor sidedness (PTS) has a known prognostic role in sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC), its role in Inflammatory Bowel Disease related CRC (IBD-CRC) is largely unknown. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic role of PTS in patients with IBD-CRC.

METHODS

All eligible patients with surgically treated, non-metastatic IBD-CRC were retrospectively identified from institutional databases at ten European and Asian academic centers. Long term endpoints included recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression as well as propensity score analyses were performed to evaluate whether PTS was significantly associated with RFS and OS.

RESULTS

A total of 213 patients were included in the analysis, of which 32.4% had right-sided (RS) tumors and 67.6% had left-sided (LS) tumors. PTS was not associated with OS and RFS even on univariable analysis (5-year OS for RS vs LS tumors was 68.0% vs 77.3%, respectively, p = 0.31; 5-year RFS for RS vs LS tumors was 62.8% vs 65.4%, respectively, p = 0.51). Similarly, PTS was not associated with OS and RFS on propensity score matched analysis (5-year OS for RS vs LS tumors was 82.9% vs 91.3%, p = 0.79; 5-year RFS for RS vs LS tumors was 85.1% vs 81.5%, p = 0.69). These results were maintained when OS and RFS were calculated in patients with RS vs LS tumors after excluding patients with rectal tumors (5-year OS for RS vs LS tumors was 68.0% vs 77.2%, respectively, p = 0.38; 5-year RFS for RS vs LS tumors was 62.8% vs 59.2%, respectively, p = 0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to sporadic CRC, PTS does not appear to have a prognostic role in IBD-CRC.

Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer (PulMiCC) randomised controlled trial: a systematic review of published responses

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the nature and tone of the published responses to the Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer (PulMiCC) randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

Published articles that cited the PulMiCC trial were identified from Clarivate Web of Science (©. Duplicates and self-citations were excluded and relevant text extracted. Four independent researchers rated the extracts independently using agreed scales for the representativeness of trial data and the textual tone. The ratings were aggregated and summarized. Two PulMiCC authors carried out a thematic analysis of the extracts.

RESULTS

Sixty-four citations were identified and relevant text was extracted and examined. The consensus rating for data inclusion was a median of 0.25 out of 6 (range 0 to 5.25, IQR 0-1.5) and for textual tone the median rating was 1.87 out of 6 (range 0 to 5.75, IQR 1-3.5). The majority of citations did not provide adequate representation of the PulMiCC data and the overall the textual tone was dismissive. Although some were supportive, many discounted the findings because the trial closed early and was underpowered to show non-inferiority. Two misinterpreted the authors' conclusions but there was acceptance that five-year survival was much higher than widely assumed.

CONCLUSIONS

Published comments reveal a widespread reluctance to consider seriously the results of a carefully conducted randomized trial. This may be because the results challenge accepted practice because of 'motivated reasoning'. But there is a widespread misunderstanding of the fact that though PulMiCC with 93 patients was underpowered to test non-inferiority, it still provides reliable evidence to undermine the widespread belief in a major survival benefit from metastasectomy.

When left does not seem right: epigenetic and bioelectric differences between left- and right-sided breast cancer

Background

During embryogenesis lateral symmetry is broken, giving rise to Left/Right (L/R) breast tissues with distinct identity. L/R-sided breast tumors exhibit consistently-biased incidence, gene expression, and DNA methylation. We postulate that a differential L/R tumor-microenvironment crosstalk generates different tumorigenesis mechanisms.

Methods

We performed in-silico analyses on breast tumors of public datasets, developed xenografted tumors, and conditioned MDA-MB-231 cells with L/R mammary extracts.

Results

We found L/R differential DNA methylation involved in embryogenic and neuron-like functions. Focusing on ion-channels, we discovered significant L/R epigenetic and bioelectric differences. Specifically, L-sided cells presented increased methylation of hyperpolarizing ion channel genes and increased Ca²⁺ concentration and depolarized membrane potential, compared to R-ones. Functional consequences were associated with increased proliferation in left tumors, assessed by KI67 expression and mitotic count.

Conclusions

Our findings reveal considerable L/R asymmetry in cancer processes, and suggest specific L/R epigenetic and bioelectric differences as future targets for cancer therapeutic approaches in the breast and many other paired organs.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10020-022-00440-5.