Impact of inflammatory bowel disease on hospital outcomes in acute ischemic stroke: a nationwide cohort study

Ischemic Stroke May Increase the Risk of Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis: Evidence from a Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study

BACKGROUND

The bidirectional causal relationship between ischemic stroke (IS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains unclear, prompting us to propose a bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) study to investigate this relationship further.

METHODS

We obtained IS data from the MEGASTROKE consortium and IBD data, including its subtypes ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), from the International Inflammatory Bowel Disease Genetics Consortium. In this study, we utilized IBD and its subtypes as exposure variables and IS as the outcome variable, and vice versa, to explore the bidirectional relationship between them. We used the IBD genetic data from the FinnGen database as replication data to further explore the causality. In this study, we employed the inverse variance weighting method as our primary approach. For sensitivity analyses, we utilized additional methods including MR-Egger regression, weighted median estimation, MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO), and MR-Robust adjusted profile score. Furthermore, we conducted a random effects meta-analysis to combine the causal relationships derived from both the International Inflammatory Bowel Disease Genetics Consortium and FinnGen datasets, aiming to ascertain more robust causal associations.

RESULTS

The initial phase of the bidirectional MR study revealed a causal relationship between IS and the risk of CD (odds ratio [OR] = 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.20-2.02, P = 0.0008) and UC (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.05-1.69, P = 0.0179), but did not find a causal relationship between IBD as a whole and the risk of IS, nor between IBD subtypes and the risk of IS. During the replication phase, the FinnGen database did not reveal any significant correlation between IS and the risk of IBD, including its subtypes CD and UC. However, additional meta-analysis of the combined data from both databases indicated that IS is significantly associated with an increased risk of CD (OR inverse-variance weighted (IVW) = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.07-1.69, P < 0.05) and UC (ORIVW = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.04-1.50, P < 0.05), but not with the overall risk of IBD (ORIVW = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.87-1.16, P > 0.05). No significant effects were observed between IBD and IS risk, nor were there significant effects between IS and the risks of IBD, CD, or UC. To ensure the robustness of these findings, heterogeneity and pleiotropy tests were conducted.

CONCLUSIONS

IBD and its subtypes were not found to be causally associated with the risk of IS, whereas IS was found to be causally associated with the risk of CD and UC. This suggests that the risks of CD and UC should be closely monitored in patients with IS.

Exploring the causal inference of inflammatory bowel disease and ischemic stroke: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study

Growing evidence suggests inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is linked to ischemic stroke (IS); however, the results are inconclusive. Therefore, it remains uncertain whether the association between IBD and IS is causal. Herein, we performed a bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) study to examine the causal association of IBD with IS. We obtained summary-level data for IBD and IS from several publicly released genome-wide association studies to conduct a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Herein, the inverse-variance weighted method was utilized as the primary approach. Then, we applied the weighted median and MR-Egger estimators for the follow-up sensitivity analyses. In addition, the MR-Egger intercept test was performed to detect the potential directional pleiotropy. Genetically predicted IBD was not causally associated with IS and IS subtypes (IS: OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-1.01, p = 0.49; large artery atherosclerosis stroke: OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.96-1.05, p = 0.88; cardioembolic stroke: OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.96-1.03, p = 0.75; small-vessel occlusion stroke: OR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.99-1.05, p = 0.16). Moreover, we did not find a significant causal effect of UC or CD on IS and IS subtypes. Furthermore, there was no significant association observed between IS and IBD in the reverse MR analysis. The estimates were consistent across sensitivity analyses. Our MR analysis does not support a bidirectional causal association between IBD and IS, despite observational studies reporting an association of IBD with IS.

Association between Multiple Myeloma and Ulcerative Colitis: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell dyscrasia that is common among patients with autoimmune diseases. However, the association between ulcerative colitis (UC) and multiple myeloma (MM) is yet to be established. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of MM among patients with UC in the United States.

METHODS

This cross-sectional cohort analysis used the National Inpatient Sample from 2015-2018 to assess the overall MM prevalence among patients with and without UC, and within specific demographic subgroups. Prevalences were compared using a logistic regression model controlling for sex and age.

RESULTS

The crude prevalence of MM among patients with UC (n = 1750) compared with patients without UC (n = 366,265) was 0.44% vs. 0.37%, respectively. Patients with UC had increased overall odds of having MM (odds ratio (OR), 1.26). Males with UC had higher prevalence of MM (53.7% vs. 46.3%, respectively) than females. Patients with UC and MM were more likely to be African American than White (15.6% vs. 9.2%, respectively). Patients with UC age >64 had a higher prevalence of MM than those aged below 65 (70.9% vs. 29.1%, respectively). Patients with UC who were obese (BMI > 30) had a higher prevalence of MM than those who were non-obese (12.6% vs. 8.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, UC appears to be associated with MM. This association can be particularly observed in specific demographic groups, such as obese, African American males, or patients >64 years of age. Thus, a high degree of clinical suspicion for MM is warranted, even with minimal symptomatology, in patients with UC, in particular among elder, obese, and African American males.

Obesity in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Is Associated with Early Readmissions Characterised by an Increased Systems and Patient-level Burden

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Rates of obesity are rising in patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. We conducted a US population-based study to determine the effects of obesity on outcomes in hospitalised patients with IBD.

METHODS

We searched the Nationwide Readmissions Database 2016-2017 to identify all adult patients hospitalised for IBD, using ICD-10 codes. We compared obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30) vs non-obese [BMI < 30] patients with IBD to evaluate the independent effects of obesity on readmission, mortality, and other hospital outcomes. Multivariate regression and propensity matching were performed.

RESULTS

We identified 143 190 patients with IBD, of whom 9.1% were obese. Obesity was independently associated with higher all-cause readmission at 30 days {18% vs 13% (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.16, p = 0.005)} and 90 days (29% vs 21% [aOR 1.27, p < 0.0001]), as compared with non-obese patients, with similar findings upon a propensity-matched sensitivity analysis. Obese and non-obese patients had similar risks of mortality on index admission [0.24% vs 0.31%, p = 0.18] and readmission [1.5% vs 1.8% p = 0.3]. Obese patients had longer [5.3 vs 4.9 days] and more expensive [USD12,195 vs USD11,154] hospitalisations on index admission. Obesity did not affect the risk of intestinal surgery or bowel obstruction. Compared with index admissions, readmissions were characterised by increased mortality [6-fold], health care use, and bowel obstruction [3-fold] [all p < 0.0001].

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity in IBD appears to be associated with increased early readmission, characterised by a higher burden, despite the introduction of weight-based therapeutics. Prevention of obesity should be a focus in the treatment of IBD to decrease readmission and health care burden.