Radical lymphadenectomy of a para-aorta lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer prolongs relapse-free survival

Long-term Outcome After Surgical Resection of Para-aortic Lymph Node Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

The significance of resection of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer is controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the prognosis of colorectal cancer after para-aortic lymph node metastasis resection.

DESIGN

Multicenter retrospective study.

SETTINGS

Thirty-six institutions in Japan participated in this study. Database and medical records at each institution were used for data collection.

PATIENTS

Patients with resected and pathologically proven para-aortic lymph node metastasis of colorectal cancer between 2010 and 2015 were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Overall survival after para-aortic lymph node metastasis resection, recurrence-free survival, and recurrence patterns after R0 resection of para-aortic lymph node metastasis.

RESULTS

A total of 133 patients were included in the primary analysis population in this study. The 5-year overall survival rate (95% CI) was 41.0% (32.0-49.8), and the median survival (95% CI) was 4.1 (3.4-4.7) years. Independent prognostic factors for overall survival were the pathological T stage (pT4 vs pT1- 3, adjusted HR: 1.91, p = 0.006), other organ metastasis (present vs absent, adjusted HR: 1.98, p = 0.005), time to metastases (synchronous vs metachronous adjusted HR: 2.02, p = 0.02), and the number of para-aortic lymph node metastasis (3 or more vs less than 3, adjusted HR: 2.13, p = 0.001). The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate (95% CI) was 21.1% (13.5-29.7), with a median (95% CI) of 1.2 (0.9-1.4) years. The primary tumor location (left- vs right-sided colon, adjusted HR: 4.77, p = 0.01; rectum vs right-sided colon, adjusted HR: 5.27, p = 0.006), other organ metastasis (present vs absent, adjusted HR: 1.90, p = 0.03), number of para-aortic lymph node metastases (3 or more vs less than 3, adjusted HR: 2.20, p = 0.001), and hospital volume (less than 10 vs 10 or more, adjusted HR: 2.18, p = 0.02) were identified as independent prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival. Para-aortic lymph node recurrence was the most common at 33.3%.

LIMITATIONS

Selection bias cannot be ruled out because of the retrospective nature of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Less than 3 para-aortic lymph node metastases were a favorable prognostic factor for overall and recurrence-free survival. However, para-aortic lymph node metastases were considered to be a systemic disease, and the significance of resection was limited. See Video Abstract .

RESULTADO A LARGO PLAZO POSTERIOR A LA RESECCIN QUIRRGICA DE METSTASIS EN GANGLIOS LINFTICOS PARAARTICOS DE CNCER COLORRECTAL UN ESTUDIO RETROSPECTIVO MULTICNTRICO

ANTECEDENTES:La importancia de la resección de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos paraaórticos (PALNM) en el cáncer colorrectal (CCR) es controvertida.OBJETIVO:Aclarar el pronóstico del CCR después de la resección PALNM.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo multicéntrico.ENTORNO CLINICO:Treinta y seis instituciones en Japón participaron en este estudio.PACIENTES:Pacientes con PALNM de CCR resecado y patológicamente probado entre 2010 y 2015.FUENTES DE DATOS:Base de datos y registros médicos de cada institución.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Supervivencia general (SG) después de la resección PALNM, supervivencia libre de recurrencia (SLR) y patrones de recurrencia después de la resección R0 de PALNM.RESULTADOS:Se incluyó un total de 133 pacientes en la población de análisis primario de este estudio. La tasa de SG a 5 años (intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95 %) fue del 41,0 % (32,0, 49,8) y la mediana de supervivencia (IC del 95 %) fue de 4,1 (3,4, 4,7) años. Los factores de pronóstico independientes para la SG fueron el estadio T patológico (pT4 vs. pT1-3, índice de riesgo ajustado [aHR]: 1,91, p = 0,006), metástasis en otros órganos (presente vs. ausente, aHR: 1,98, p = 0,005), tiempo hasta las metástasis (síncronas vs. metacrónicas, aHR: 2,02, p = 0,02) y número de PALNM (≥3 vs. <3, aHR: 2,13, p = 0,001). La tasa de SLR a 5 años (IC del 95%) fue del 21,1% (13,5, 29,7), con una mediana (IC del 95%) de 1,2 (0,9, 1,4) años. La ubicación del tumor primario (colon del lado izquierdo vs. derecho, aHR: 4,77, p = 0,01; recto vs. colon del lado derecho, aHR: 5,27, p = 0,006), metástasis en otros órganos (presente vs. ausente, aHR: 1,90, p = 0,03), el número de PALNM (≥3 vs. <3, aHR: 2,20, p = 0,001) y el volumen hospitalario (<10 vs. ≥10, aHR: 2,18, p = 0,02) se identificaron como independientes factores pronósticos del SLR. La recurrencia de los ganglios linfáticos paraaórticos fue la más común con un 33,3%.LIMITACIONES:No se puede descartar un sesgo de selección debido a la naturaleza retrospectiva del estudio.CONCLUSIONES:Menos de tres PALNM fue un factor pronóstico favorable tanto para la SG como para la SLR. Sin embargo, las PALNM se consideraron una enfermedad sistémica y la importancia de la resección fue limitada. (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon ).

Surgery for Infrarenal Retroperitoneal Node Metastases from Colon Cancer

PURPOSE

Treatment of retroperitoneal lymph node metastases (RPN) from colon cancer (CC) is a therapeutic challenge. Available evidence supporting a curative approach is weak and uncertainties remain concerning the extent of the dissection, the optimal timing for surgery, and the role of adjuvant radiotherapy. We report the outcomes of a curative intent strategy in a recent monocentric series of patients.

METHODS

We did a retrospective review of all curative intent surgical treatment of RPN from CC performed consecutively in a French university hospital from June 2015 to April 2021. Demographics, clinicopathological, and molecular characteristics were evaluated. We describe recurrence-free and overall survival and factors related to recurrence.

RESULTS

Records from 18 patients were reviewed. The median age was 69 years. Most of the patients were male (55%), ASA 1-2 (94%), had a left-sided primary colon cancer (73%), and had metachronous RPN (62%). Thirteen patients (72%) experienced recurrence. Recurrence was often limited to RPN (27%) or liver (22%). Four patients underwent a second surgery for RPN recurrence. Median disease-free and overall survival were 22 months and 50 months after RPN surgery. We did not find any factor associated with recurrence. Short-term recurrence (< 6 months) was associated with shorter overall survival (0.031).

CONCLUSION

The current results suggest that RPN resection is feasible and associated with long survival in selected patients. Further studies evaluating the benefit of curative strategies including radical surgery for patients with potentially resectable RPN are warranted.

Outcomes of metachronous para-aortic lymphadenectomy in colorectal cancer: a systematic review of the literature

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Para-aortic lymph node metastasis associated with colorectal cancer is a very rare occurrence, but at the same time an important predictor of survival. Despite its importance, there is still no gold standard management strategy, particularly for lymph nodes detected during follow-up, after resection of the primary tumour. Therefore, this review was undertaken to examine the evidence available on the surgical and non-surgical management of metachronous para-aortic lymph node metastasis (m-PALNM) in colorectal cancer treatment.

METHODS

This is a systematic review using the patient, intervention, comparison, outcome and study strategy. The literature search was undertaken using Cochrane, MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed databases with the following MeSH terms: lymph node excision, para-aortic lymph node, metastasis, metachronous and colorectal neoplasms.

RESULTS

Five original papers met the study criteria including 188 patients in total (55.3% male, 44.7% female). Surgical resection of the m-PALND was the management of choice in 64% of patients. Reporting styles on survival outcomes were heterogeneous. However, patients undergoing surgical management for m-PALNM had longer disease-free survival and overall survival rates.

CONCLUSION

There is significant paucity in the evidence available on the management of m-PALNM. However, the evidence reported by this review suggests that surgical management should be considered whenever possible, with the aim of prolonging survival. Future randomised trials are needed in order to provide further high-level evidence on m-PALNM management.

Survival benefits of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in colorectal cancer with clinically suspected para-aortic lymph node metastasis: a meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In patients with colorectal cancer and clinically suspected para-aortic lymph node metastasis, the survival benefit of para-aortic lymphadenectomy is unknown. We conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review to investigate it.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched until January 2000 to April 2022 to identify studies reporting overall survivals, complication rates, and hazard ratios of prognostic factors in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing para-aortic lymphadenectomy, and those data were pooled.

RESULTS

Twenty retrospective studies (1021 patients undergoing para-aortic lymphadenectomy) met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis indicates that participants undergoing para-aortic lymphadenectomy were associated with 5-year survival benefit, compared to those not receiving para-aortic lymphadenectomy (odds ratio = 3.73, 95% confidence interval: 2.05-6.78), but there was no significant difference in complication rate (odds ratio = 0.97, 95% confidence interval: 0.46-2.08). Further analysis of para-aortic lymphadenectomy group showed that 5-year survival of the positive group with pathologically para-aortic lymph node metastasis was lower than that of the negative group (odds ratio = 0.19, 95% confidence interval: 0.11-0.31). Moreover, complete resection (odds ratio = 5.26, 95% confidence interval: 2.02-13.69), para-aortic lymph node metastasis (≤4) (hazard ratio = 1.88, 95% confidence interval: 0.97-3.62), and medium-high differentiation (hazard ratio = 2.98, 95% confidence interval: 1.48-5.99) were protective factors for survival. Preoperative extra-retroperitoneal metastasis was associated with poorer relapse-free survival (hazard ratio = 1.85, 95% confidence interval: 1.10-3.10).

CONCLUSION

Para-aortic lymphadenectomy had promising clinical efficacy in prolonging survival rather than complication rate in patients with colorectal cancer and clinically diagnostic para-aortic lymph node metastasis. Further prospective studies should be performed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO: CRD42022379276.

Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection in Colorectal Cancer with Lymph Node Metastasis: A Systematic Review

The benefits and prognosis of RPLND in CRC have not yet been fully established. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the outcomes for CRC patients with RPLNM undergoing RPLND. A literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMCare, and CINAHL identified studies from between January 1990 and June 2022 that reported data on clinical outcomes for patients who underwent RPLND for RPLNM in CRC. The following primary outcome measures were derived: postoperative morbidity, disease free-survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and re-recurrence. Nineteen studies with a total of 541 patients were included. Three hundred and sixty-three patients (67.1%) had synchronous RPLNM and 178 patients (32.9%) had metachronous RPLNM. Perioperative chemotherapy was administered in 496 (91.7%) patients. The median DFS was 8.6-38.0 months and 5-year DFS was 24.4% (10.0-60.5%). The median OS was 25.0-83.0 months and 5-year OS was 47.0% (15.0-87.5%). RPLND is a feasible treatment option with limited morbidity and possible oncological benefit for both synchronous and metachronous RPLNM in CRC. Further prospective clinical trials are required to establish a better evidence base for RPLND in the context of RPLNM in CRC and to understand the timing of RPLND in a multimodality pathway in order to optimise treatment outcomes for this group of patients.

Effect of radical lymphadenectomy in colorectal cancer with para-aortic lymph node metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) with para-aortic lymph node metastasis (PALNM) is an intractable clinical situation, and the role of radical lymphadenectomy in the treatment of CRC with PALNM is still controversial. The aim of the current system review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of radical lymphadenectomy in CRC patients with PALAN.

Methods

We performed a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and other online databases up to 31 October 2021. The clinical data including overall survival and postoperative complications were screened and analyzed after data extraction. Odds ratios (ORs) were applied to analyze these dichotomous outcomes with a fixed effects model.

Results

A total of 7 available retrospective clinical studies involving 327 patients were finally included. CRC patients with PALNM who underwent radical lymphadenectomy showed significantly overall survival (OR: 6.80, 95% CI: 3.46–13.38, P < 0.01; I² = 0%) when compared to those who did not receive radical lymphadenectomy. Moreover, in terms of postoperative complications (OR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.35–1.44, P = 0.48; I² = 0%), there was no statistical difference between radical lymphadenectomy treatment and control groups.

Conclusions

The radical lymphadenectomy treatment has showed the expected clinical efficacy in prolonging overall survival time of CRC patients with PALAN. Moreover, the preemptive radical lymphadenectomy could not cause additional postoperative complications.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12893-022-01631-x.