Salvage surgery for continent ileostomies (CI) after a first successful revision: more long-term blame on the reservoir than the nipple valve

Complications and failure after Kock continent ileostomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A significant number of patients experience complications of the Kock pouch (KP) warranting revision or excision. This systematic review aimed to assess the pooled prevalence and risk factors for complications and failure of the KP.

METHODS

This Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA)-compliant systematic review (CRD42023416961) searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies on adult patients with Kock continent ileostomy published after the year 2000. The main outcome measures were revision, complications, and failure of the KP. Risk factors for complications and failure were assessed using a meta-regression analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-1 tool. A proportional meta-analysis of the main outcomes was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 19 studies (2042 patients) were included. The weighted mean prevalence of complications was 60.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 46.1-74.7%], of pouch revision was 46.6% (95% CI: 38.5-54.7%), and of pouch failure was 12.9% (95% CI: 9.3-16.4%). Studies conducted in the USA had a mean failure prevalence of 12.6% (95% CI: 6.2-18.9%) comparable to studies conducted in Europe (11.1%; 95% CI: 7.5-14.7%). Factors associated with higher complications were increased body mass index (BMI) and previous ileoanal pouch anastomosis (IPAA); however, these factors were not associated with increased pouch failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The KP is a highly complex operation as shown by a pooled complication prevalence of 60%, and thus, it should be only performed by experienced surgeons. Despite the high prevalence of complications and need for revisional surgery, patients are keen to preserve their KP. Increased BMI and a previous failed IPAA are risk factors for pouch complications, but not failure.

Comparing continent ileostomy (CI) conversion to repair/redo IPAA: favorable outcomes

PURPOSE

This study aims to compare the outcomes of repair/redo ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (repair/redo-IPAA) with the conversion of IPAA to continent ileostomy (CI) in an effort to prevent the need for a permanent ileostomy (IS) following IPAA failure.

METHODS

This research involved a retrospective analysis of surgical records, employing descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

RESULTS

Among 57 patients with an IPAA, up to three revisions were necessary due to complications or complete failure. Ultimately, repair/redo-IPAA preserved the IPAA in 14 patients (24.6%), conversion to CI salvaged the pouch in 21 patients (36.8%), and IS was unavoidable in 22 patients (38.6%). The cumulative probability of requiring conversion surgery was calculated to be 54.0% at 20 years, thereby reducing the cumulative risk of IS to 32.3%. The 20-year cumulative probability of pouch salvage by repair/redo IPAA was only 21.9%. However, this rate increased to 67.7% when conversion procedures were considered. Following repair/redo-IPAA, only 8.3% of patients reported evacuation frequencies of ≤ 4 during the day, and 16.7% were evacuation-free at night. In contrast, after conversion to CI, 98.0% of patients reported a maximum of four evacuations in a 24-h period. After undergoing repair/redo IPAA, between half and two-thirds of patients reported experiencing incontinence or soiling, while complete continence was achieved in all patients following conversion to CI. Notably, the majority of patients expressed overall satisfaction with their respective procedures. A positive correlation was identified between very high subjective satisfaction and positive objective surgical outcomes exclusively in patients who underwent conversion to CI.

CONCLUSION

When complications or failure of IPAA occur, conversion to CI emerges as a highly viable alternative to repair/redo IPAA. This conclusion is supported by the observation that patient satisfaction appears to be closely tied to stable surgical outcomes. To reinforce these findings, further prospective studies are warranted.

Continent ileostomies: what the radiologist needs to know

Continent ileostomies are performed in patients who are not candidates for or do not want a traditional J-pouch after total colectomy. In these cases, patients may opt for a type of continent ileostomy instead of an end ileostomy. The most common types of continent ileostomies include the Kock (K) pouch, S-pouch and Barnett Continent Intestinal Reservoir. The normal fluoroscopic and CT appearance of these types of continent ileostomies are reviewed. CT provides better evaluation of the proximal small bowel and pouch for inflammatory bowel disease, while fluoroscopy is superior in evaluating the nipple valve. Common complications of these types of continent ileostomies are discussed including slipped nipple valve, pouch inflammation, fistulas, and polyps. Radiologist should be familiar with the different types of continent ileostomies that exist and their common complications.

Redo Continent Ileostomy in Patients With IBD: Valuable Lessons Learned Over 25 Years

BACKGROUND

Patients with IBD with continent ileostomies may require revision surgeries. There remains a paucity of data regarding outcomes after redo continent ileostomy.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate patient outcomes after redo continent ileostomy.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at a high-volume, specialized colorectal surgery department.

PATIENTS

We identified patients who underwent redo continent ileostomy (defined as neo-pouch construction or major operations changing the pouch configuration) for IBD between 1994 and 2020.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcomes measured were patient demographics, short- and long-term outcomes, and quality of life.

RESULTS

A total of 168 patients met inclusion criteria; 102 (61%) were female, the mean age was 51 years (±13.1), and the mean BMI was 24.4 (±3.9). The median time between primary and redo continent ileostomy was 16.8 years. One hundred twenty-two patients (73%) who underwent redo surgery had ulcerative colitis, 36 (21%) had Crohn's disease, and 10 (6%) had indeterminate colitis. Slipped nipple valve and valve stricture were the most common indications for redo continent ileostomy (86%). After a median follow-up of 4 years, 48 patients (29%) required a subsequent reoperation and 27 (16%) had pouch failure requiring pouch excision. The pouch survival rate was 89% at 3 years, 84% at 5 years, and 79% at 10 years. On univariate analysis, a shorter interval between the primary and redo continent ileostomy was associated with long-term pouch failure ( p = 0.003). Cox regression multivariate analysis confirmed that a shorter interval between surgeries was independently associated with pouch failure ( p = 0.014). The mean Cleveland Clinic Global Quality of Life score was 0.61 (± 0.23) among the 70 patients who responded to the questionnaire.

LIMITATIONS

The main limitations were that this was a retrospective, single-center study and that it had a low response rate for the Global Quality of Life questionnaire.

CONCLUSIONS

Redo continent ileostomy surgery is associated with a long-term pouch retention rate of 79% and satisfactory quality of life. Therefore, redo surgery should be offered to patients who are motivated to keep their continent ileostomy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C87 .

REHACER LA ILEOSTOMA CONTINENTE EN PACIENTES CON ENFERMEDAD INFLAMATORIA INTESTINAL VALIOSAS LECCIONES APRENDIDAS DURANTE AOS

ANTECEDENTES:Los pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal con ileostomías continentes pueden requerir cirugías de revisión. Sigue habiendo escasez de datos con respecto a los resultados después de volver a realizar la ileostomía continente.OBJETIVO:Evaluar los resultados después de rehacer la ileostomía continente.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.ESCENARIO:Departamento especializado en cirugía colorrectal de alto volumen.PACIENTES:Identificamos pacientes que se sometieron a una nueva ileostomía continente (definida como construcción de una nueva bolsa u operaciones mayores que cambian la configuración de la bolsa) por enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal entre 1994 y 2020.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Datos demográficos de los pacientes, resultados a corto y largo plazo y calidad de vida.RESULTADOS:Un total de 168 pacientes cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión; 102 (61%) eran mujeres, la edad media fue de 51 años (±13,1) y el IMC medio fue de 24,4 (±3,9). La mediana de tiempo entre la ileostomía primaria y la nueva ileostomía continente fue de 16,8 años. Ciento veintidós pacientes (73%) que se sometieron a una nueva cirugía tenían colitis ulcerosa, 36 (21%) tenían enfermedad de Crohn y 10 (6%) tenían colitis indeterminada. El deslizamiento de la válvula del pezón y la estenosis de la válvula fueron las indicaciones más comunes para rehacer la ileostomía continente (86%). Después de una mediana de seguimiento de 4 años, 48 (29%) pacientes requirieron una reintervención posterior y 27 (16%) tuvieron falla de la bolsa que requirió la escisión de la bolsa. La tasa de supervivencia de la bolsa fue del 89 % a los 3 años, del 84% a los 5 años y del 79% a los 10 años. En el análisis univariable, un intervalo de tiempo más corto entre la ileostomía continente primaria y la nueva se asoció con falla de la bolsa a largo plazo (p = 0,003). El análisis multivariable de regresión de Cox confirmó que el intervalo más corto entre cirugías se asoció de forma independiente con el fracaso de la bolsa (p = 0,014). La puntuación media de la Calidad de Vida Global fue de 0,61 (± 0,23) entre los 70 pacientes que respondieron al cuestionario.LIMITACIONES:Estudio retrospectivo de un solo centro. Baja tasa de respuesta al cuestionario de Calidad de Vida.CONCLUSIÓN:La cirugía de ileostomía continente se asocia con una tasa de retención de la bolsa a largo plazo del 79% y una calidad de vida satisfactoria. Por lo tanto, se debe ofrecer una nueva cirugía a los pacientes que están motivados para mantener su ileostomía continente. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C87 . (Traducción-Dr. Felipe Bellolio ).

Don't Forget about the K-Pouch!

The continent ileostomy (CI) was popularized by Nils Kock as a means to provide fecal continence to patients, most commonly in those with ulcerative colitis, after proctocolectomy. Although the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) now represents the most common method to restore continence after total proctocolectomy, CI remains a suitable option for highly selected patients who are not candidates for IPAA or have uncorrectable IPAA dysfunction but still desire fecal continence. The CI has exhibited a fascinating and marked evolution over the past several decades, from the advent of the nipple-valve to a distinct pouch design, giving the so-inclined and so-trained colorectal surgeon a technique that provides the unique patient with another option to restore continence. The CI continues to offer a means for appropriately selected patients to achieve the highest possible quality of life (QOL) and functional status after total proctocolectomy.

A systematic description of continent ileostomy revision techniques

PURPOSE

Comprehensive description of surgical techniques for revision of complications of continent ileostomy (CI).

METHODS

By analyzing 133 revision procedures performed over 30 years, a systematically classified approach to the appropriate techniques for CI revision surgery has been derived. Based on the anatomic site and severity of the respective complication, four classes of revision surgeries have been defined: class 1 refers to the nipple valve, class 2 to the pouch, class 3 to the stoma, and class 4 to the afferent loop. The severity of the complication or the complexity of the revision procedure is indicated by a subdivision from a to d.

RESULTS

The surgical variants (class 1a-d, class 2a-c, class 3a-b, and class 4a-b) are shown in schematic illustrations with accompanying descriptions of technical details, the respective fields of application, and the special indications.

CONCLUSION

Based on these classes of revision surgeries, the specialized surgeon may find differentiated techniques at their disposal to save the CI and avoid unnecessary sacrifice of the artificial continence organ.