The impact of multiple firings on the risk of anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive restorative rectal cancer resection and the impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival: a population-based study

[Modern approaches and technologies to prevent anastomotic leakage in the gastrointestinal tract]

The healing of gastrointestinal anastomoses is a complex biological process influenced by numerous factors. Various strategies to support healing and prevent anastomotic leakage (AL) exist, encompassing preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative measures. Preoperative interventions aim to optimize the patient and the tissue environment, particularly the gut microbiome. Intraoperative measures are technical in nature and include the choice of surgical access, the anastomotic technique and anastomotic reinforcement. Various procedures of the intraoperative diagnostics enable identification of such anastomoses requiring additional protective measures. Recently, indocyanine green (ICG) fluoroscopy has become established for evaluation of tissue perfusion, while newer techniques such as spectral microscopy offer promising possibilities. Postoperative diagnostic methods aim to identify potential AL as early as possible to enable initiation of therapeutic steps even before the onset of symptoms. These procedures range from various imaging techniques to innovative bioresorbable, pH-sensitive implants for early AL detection. Due to the multifactorial genesis of AL and the diverse technical possibilities, no single method will become established for prevention of AL. Instead, a combination of measures will ultimately lead to optimal anastomotic healing. The use of artificial intelligence and analyses based on the data promises a better interpretation of the vast amount of data and therefore to be able to provide general recommendations.

Analysis of decision-making factors for defunctioning ileostomy after rectal cancer surgery and their impact on perioperative recovery: a retrospective study of 1082 patients

OBJECTIVE

To explore the decision-making factors for defunctioning ileostomy (DI) after rectal cancer surgery and to analyze the impact of the DI on perioperative outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was conducted that included rectal cancer patients who underwent low anterior resection from January 2013 to December 2023. Among them, 33 patients did not undergo DI but with anastomotic leakage (AL) after surgery, and 1030 patients were without AL. Preoperative, operative and tumor factors between these two groups were compared to explore the decision-making factors for DI. Meanwhile, the differences of perioperative outcomes between the DI group of 381 cases and non-DI group of 701 cases were compared.

RESULTS

For preoperative factors, the proportions of male patients and preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in the AL with non-DI group were greater than those in the non-AL group (p < 0.05); for operative factors, the proportion of patients in the AL with non-DI group with a surgical time > 180 min were greater (p < 0.05); for tumor factors, the proportion of T3-4 stage was higher in the AL with non-DI group (p < 0.05). Multiple regression analysis revealed that male sex and preoperative CRT were the independent risk factors affecting DI. For perioperative outcomes, the DI did not reduce the incidence of all and symptomatic AL and non-AL postoperative complications (p > 0.05) but with 12.07% stoma-related complications, and increase hospitalization costs (p < 0.05); however, it can shorten the postoperative hospital stay, pelvic drainage tube removal time, and reduce the anal tube placement rate and readmission rate (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Male patients and preoperative CRT were the independent risk factors affect the decision of DI in our study, and DI can shorten the postoperative hospitalization, pelvic drainage tube removal time, and decrease the anal tube placement rate and readmission rate during the perioperative period but with a higher economic cost.

Association Between Cross-Stapling Technique in Mechanical Colorectal Anastomosis and Short-term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The double-stapled technique is the most common method of colorectal anastomosis in minimally invasive surgery. Several modifications to the conventional technique have been described to reduce the intersection between the stapled lines, as the resulting lateral dog-ears are considered possible risk factors for anastomotic leakage.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to analyze the outcomes of patients receiving conventional versus modified stapled colorectal anastomosis after minimally invasive surgery.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review of the published literature was undertaken. PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Embase databases were screened up to July 2023.

STUDY SELECTION

Relevant articles were searched according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Articles reporting on the outcomes of patients with modified stapled colorectal reconstruction compared with the conventional method of double-stapled anastomosis were included.

INTERVENTIONS

Conventional double-stapling colorectal anastomosis and modified techniques with reduced intersection between the stapled lines were compared.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The rate of anastomotic leak was the primary end point of interest. Perioperative details including postoperative morbidity were also appraised.

RESULTS

There were 2537 patients from 12 studies included for data extraction, with no significant differences in age, BMI, or proportion of high ASA score between patients who had conventional versus modified techniques of reconstructions. The risk of anastomotic leak was 62% lower for the modified procedure than for the conventional procedure (OR = 0.38 [95% CI, 0.26-0.56]). The incidences of overall postoperative morbidity (OR = 0.57 [95% CI, 0.45-0.73]) and major morbidity (OR = 0.48 [95% CI, 0.32-0.72]) following modified stapled anastomosis were significantly lower than following conventional double-stapled anastomosis.

LIMITATIONS

The retrospective nature of most included studies is a main limitation, essentially because of the lack of randomization and the risk of selection and detection bias.

CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence supports the modification of the conventional double-stapled technique with the elimination of 1 of both dog-ears as it is associated with a lower incidence of anastomotic-related morbidity.

Impact of powered circular stapler on anastomotic leak after anastomosis to the rectum: a propensity score matched study

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study is to assess the impact of Echelon Circular™ powered stapler (PCS) on left-sided colorectal anastomotic leaks and to compare results to conventional circular staplers (CCS).

METHODS

A single center cohort study was carried out on 552 consecutive patients, who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection and anastomosis to the rectum between December 2017 and September 2022. Patients who underwent powered circular anastomosis to the rectum were matched to those who had a conventional stapled anastomosis using a propensity score matching. Main outcomes were anastomotic leak (AL) rate, anastomotic bleeding, and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

After adjusting cases with propensity score matching, two new groups of patients were generated: 145 patients in the PCS and 145 in the CCS. The two groups were homogeneous with respect to demographics and comorbidities on admission. Overall, AL occurred in 21 (7.3%) patients. No significant differences were observed with respect to AL (5.5% in PCS vs 9% in CCS; p = 0.66), fistula severity (p = 0.60) or reoperation rate (p = 0.65) in the two groups in study. A higher rate of anastomotic bleeding was observed in the CCS vs PCS (5.5% vs 0.7%, p = 0.03). At univariate analysis performed after propensity score matching, stapler diameter ≥ 31mm and age ≥ 70 years were the only variable significantly associated with anastomotic leak (p = 0.001 and p = 0.031; respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The powered circular stapler has no impact on AL, while it could affect bleeding rate at the anastomotic site.

Implementation of a standardized surgical technique in robot-assisted restorative rectal cancer resection: a single center cohort study

Background

Despite increasing focus on the technical performance of total mesorectal excision over recent decades, anastomotic leakage (AL) continues to be a serious complication for many patients, even in the hands of experienced surgical teams. This study describes implementation of standardized surgical technique in an effort to reduce variability, decrease the risk of anastomotic leakage, and improve associated short-term outcomes for rectal cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted restorative rectal resection (RRR).

Methods

We evaluated all rectal cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted RRR at Aarhus University Hospital between 2017 and 2020. Six standardized surgical steps directed to improve anastomotic healing were mandatory for all RRR. Additional changes were made during the period with prohibition of systemic dexamethasone and limiting the use of endoscopic stapling devices.

Results

The use of the full standardization, including all six surgical steps, increased from 40.3% (95% CI, 0.28–0.54) to 86.2% (95% CI, 0.68–0.95). The incidence of AL decreased from 21.0% (95% CI, 0.12–0.33) to 6.9% (95% CI, 0.01–0.23). Length of hospital stay (LOS) decreased from 6 days (range 2–50) to 5 days (range 2–26). The rate of patients readmitted within 90 days decreased from 21.0% (95% CI, 0.12–0.33), to 6.9% (95% CI, 0.01–0.23).

Conclusion

The full standardization was effectively implemented for rectal cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted RRR. The risk of AL, LOS and readmission decreased during the study period. A team focus on high-reliability and peri-operative complications can improve patient outcomes.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12893-022-01809-3.