HEmoRhoidal disease management with Band ligation versus polidocanol Sclerotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis (the HerBS Review)

Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy combined with rubber band ligation and polidocanol foam sclerotherapy for the management of grade III/IV hemorrhoids: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhoids are one of the most common and annoying benign diseases in the field of colorectal surgery. A Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (MMH) is the most frequently applied surgical technique due to its clear efficacy and high success rate, but the reported postoperative complications remain a major problem. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of a MMH combined with rubber band ligation and polidocanol foam sclerotherapy (MMH + RBL + PFS) for the management of grade III/IV hemorrhoids.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study. A total of 255 patients with grade III/IV hemorrhoids who underwent MMH + RBL + PFS (n = 128) or MMH (n = 127) between May 2022 and June 2023 were included in the study. The primary outcomes included recurrence rates, hemorrhoid severity score (HSS), and patient satisfaction 12 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative outcomes and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Follow-up was conducted by telephone or outpatient visit 12 months after surgery. The recurrence rate was lower in the MMH + RBL + PFS group than in the MMH group (p < 0.05). The patient satisfaction score was higher in the MMH + RBL + PFS group than in the MMH group (p < 0.05), and there was no significant difference in the HSS between the two groups (p > 0.05). The median operation time in the two groups was similar (16 min (15-20 min) vs.16 min (15-18 min), p > 0.05). The median number of incisions in the the MMH + RBL + PFS group was 3 (2-3), while that in the MMH group was 3 (3-4) (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (p > 0.05). Visual analog scale pain scores were lower in the MMH + RBL + PFS group than in the MMH group at the first postoperative defecation at 12 h and at 1, 3, and 7 days (all p < 0.05). The wound healing time was shorter in the MMH + RBL + PFS group than in the MMH group (27.62 ± 3.74 vs. 28.73 ± 4.48 days, respectively, p < 0.05). The incidence of urinary retention was lower in the MMH + RBL + PFS group than in the MMH group (5.47% vs. 12.60, respectively, p < 0.05). Nine patients (one case in the MMH + RBL + PFS group and eight cases in the MMH group (p < 0.05)) had delayed bleeding and were successfully controlled with manual compression or surgical hemostasis. No cases had anal stenosis in the MMH + RBL + PFS group, and six cases (4.72%) had it in the MMH group, all with mild anal stenosis and successfully treated by dilatation alone (p < 0.01). No incision infection or anal incontinence occurred in either group. At the 12-month follow-up after surgery, the recurrence rate was lower in the MMH + RBL + PFS group (0.78%) than in the MMH group (7.09%) (p < 0.05). The patient satisfaction score was higher in the MMH + RBL + PFS group (91.41%) than in the MMH group (81.10%) (p < 0.05), and there was no significant difference in the HSS between the two groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the MMH, the MMH + RBL + PFS surgical procedure is safe and effective for grade III/IV hemorrhoids, which is associated with a lower recurrence rate, a higher patient satisfaction score, a lower postoperative pain score, fewer postoperative complications, and a shorter wound healing time.

Efficacy and safety of office-based procedures for hemorrhoidal disease in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhoidal disease (HD) affects 2-20% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) but treatment recommendations are scarce due to fear of higher morbidity in these patients. Currently, there is almost no data regarding nonsurgical treatment for HD in patients with IBD. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of office-based procedures for HD in patients with IBD.

METHODS

A Portuguese multicenter retrospective study of patients with IBD undergoing office-based treatment for HD between July 2013 and December 2021 was performed. Data regarding the patients' IBD (type, disease location, medication, endoscopic remission) and HD (clinical success, recurrence, complications) were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 129 patients were included, 90 with ulcerative colitis and 37 with Crohn's disease. Only 55% of patients presented endoscopic remission and 18% were under biologics. Additionally, 77 patients underwent rubber band ligation (RBL), 44 underwent polidocanol injection, and 8 had both treatments, for a total of 304 procedures. The treatment of HD was effective in 88% of patients, of which 16% relapsed (mean follow-up time of 55.3 ± 34.5 months). Complications were described in 17 (5.6%) procedures, 2 (0.66%) requiring invasive treatment. There were no cases of suppuration, stenosis, or anal incontinence. Success, relapse, and complications were not associated with IBD features. Clinical success and recurrence were similar between RBL and polidocanol foam sclerotherapy (PFS). RBL had more complications than PFS (15.6% versus 2.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to focus exclusively on office-based procedures for hemorrhoidal disease in patients with IBD, demonstrating similar efficacy to the general population and a low complication rate.

Sclerotherapy for hemorrhoidal disease: Recent evolutions of an oldies goldy

Treatments for low degree hemorrhoids (I-III degree) are numerous and so are their counterparts for higher degrees. These treatments present nebulous differences in terms of indications and outcomes among techniques. Methods previously abandoned due to side effects and long-term results have recently rejoined the mainstream due to recent peculiar modifications: Hemorrhoidal sclerotherapy is enjoying a new age of interest due to the use of the foam form of polidocanol, which is more effective than the liquid one. Various articles have already shown promising results and the logical next step is the combination of polidocanol foam with rubber-band ligation (the historical counterpart of sclerotherapy) in a technique called "sclerobanding". In this article, we comment on the publication by Qu et al further modifying the use of sclerobanding through an endoscopic delivery for patients with grade II-III internal hemorrhoids, and present results compared with endoscopic rubber band ligation. The results achieved are promising.

Injection sclerotherapy for the treatment of haemorrhoids in anticoagulated patients

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic haemorrhoids (SH) are a common condition; however, conventional outpatient treatment, including rubber band ligation, is contraindicated in patients receiving concurrent anticoagulation. Injection sclerotherapy (IST) has been proposed as a treatment option for these patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review of case notes was performed in a colorectal surgery department that sits alongside a tertiary cardiothoracic surgical unit. Patients treated with an IST for SH between 1 April 2014 and 30 November 2021 were identified. Anticoagulation was not stopped in these patients as they were at high risk of developing thromboembolism, except in two patients who required alternative procedures. The primary outcome was symptom resolution, defined as no patient reporting bleeding for at least six months. The secondary outcomes were patient-reported complications, number of IST procedures and number of other procedures performed to achieve symptom resolution.

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients with a median age of 64 years (range 35-86, 14 male) who underwent 32 IST treatments were identified. Symptom resolution was achieved in 18 (90%) patients using IST while continuing anticoagulation treatment, with two (10%) patients requiring alternative interventions. Ten patients (50%) required only one IST procedure, and three patients (15%) required two procedures. The remaining five (25%) patients required three or four interventions. The median time between IST treatments was 32 weeks (range 8-133). No complications were reported.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that IST can be considered as a potential treatment option for patients with SH who are at a high risk of thromboembolic disease requiring anticoagulation.

Shifting Paradigms in Hemorrhoid Management: The Emergence and Impact of Cap-Assisted Endoscopic Sclerotherapy

Hemorrhoidal disease (HD) is a prevalent proctological condition that has puzzled people since ancient times, and the most common symptom is painless bleeding. Traditional treatments include conservative treatment, nonsurgical office-based treatments, and surgery. Sclerotherapy is one of the oldest forms of nonoperative intervention and is widely used to treat internal hemorrhoids with the development of endoscopy technology. However, sclerotherapy is always accompanied by complications such as bleeding, pain, abscess, etc., when the sclerosant is injected into the wrong site. Cap-assisted endoscopic sclerotherapy (CAES), a new minimally invasive technology, was first time coined in 2015 for the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease. The left-posterior-right-anterior (LPRA) anus positioning method under endoscopy provides reliable methodological support for advancing hemorrhoidal treatment via endoscopy. The current trend is that treatment for HD has shifted from being performed predominantly by the Department of Proctology Surgery to being managed mostly by the Department of Gastroenterology. This review reviewed the shifting paradigms of sclerotherapy for HD and discussed the emerging development of CAES.

The Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (Società Italiana Unitaria di Colonproctologia) guidelines for the management of acute and chronic hemorrhoidal disease

The aim of these evidence-based guidelines is to present a consensus position from members of the Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (Società Italiana Unitaria di Colon-Proctologia, SIUCP) on the diagnosis and management of hemorrhoidal disease, with the goal of guiding physicians in the choice of the best treatment option. A panel of experts was charged by the Board of the SIUCP to develop key questions on the main topics related to the management of hemorrhoidal disease and to perform an accurate and comprehensive literature search on each topic, in order to provide evidence-based answers to the questions and to summarize them in statements. All the clinical questions were discussed by the expert panel in multiple rounds through the Delphi approach and, for each statement, a consensus among the experts was reached. The questions were created according to PICO (patients, intervention, comparison, and outcomes) criteria, and the statements were developed adopting the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) methodology. In cases of grade 1 hemorrhoidal prolapse, outpatient procedures including hemorrhoidal laser procedure and sclerotherapy may be considered the preferred surgical options. For grade 2 prolapse, nonexcisional procedures including outpatient treatments, hemorrhoidal artery ligation and mucopexy, laser hemorrhoidoplasty, the Rafaelo procedure, and stapled hemorrhoidopexy may represent the first-line treatment options, whereas excisional surgery may be considered in selected cases. In cases of grades 3 and 4, stapled hemorrhoidopexy and hemorrhoidectomy may represent the most effective procedures, even if, in the expert panel opinion, stapled hemorrhoidopexy represents the gold-standard treatment for grade 3 hemorrhoidal prolapse.

Mid-term outcome of a novel nonexcisional technique using aluminum potassium sulfate and tannic acid sclerotherapy with mucopexy on patients with grade III hemorrhoids

BACKGROUND

Aluminum potassium sulfate and tannic acid (ALTA) is an effective sclerosing agent for the treatment of internal hemorrhoids. ALTA therapy with rectal mucopexy (AM) is a new approach for treating hemorrhoidal prolapse. This study investigated the midterm outcomes of AM surgery in patients with hemorrhoids.

METHODS

Patients with grade III hemorrhoids who underwent AM surgery were enrolled in this retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a single institution. Cumulative success rates, postoperative symptoms, including pain scores, analgesic requirements, and postoperative complications, and patient satisfaction were assessed.

RESULTS

The median number of ALTA injection procedures was 3 (range 1-4), and the median total injection dose was 19 mL (range 7-32 mL). The median number of mucopexy procedures was 2 (range 1-4). The median postoperative pain score (0 = no pain at all, 10 = worst pain imaginable) at rest or during defecation were ≤2. The total dose of analgesics administered during the first two weeks after surgery was 1 (range 0-25). Six patients (5.3%) showed postoperative complications: five showed Clavien-Dindo (C-D) grade I and one showed C-D grade IIIa complications. Cumulative success rates at one, three, and five years were 96.5%, 85.3%, and 85.3%, respectively. Patient satisfaction scores, which were assessed using a 10-point scale, were ≥9 at each postoperative year.

CONCLUSIONS

AM surgery is an effective non-excisional surgery with satisfactory mid-term results for grade III hemorrhoids, and is associated with lower complication rates, postoperative analgesic requirements, and higher patient satisfaction.