Sphincteroplasty for incontinence after surgery for idiopathic fistula in ano

Anatomical sphincteroplasty as a surgical treatment for faecal incontinence: proposal for a global anatomical reconstructive surgical procedure and results from a case series

The aim of this study is to describe the technical details and clinical and functional results of anatomical sphincteroplasty as a global reconstructive surgery for the treatment of faecal incontinence caused by anal sphincter lesions. This was a prospective, longitudinal study that included patients who underwent the anatomical sphincteroplasty procedure described here to treat complete sphincter damage. We have described the different technical steps in detail. We evaluated the intraoperative and postoperative complications rate, Cleveland Clinic Score (CCS), a modification of the CCS that included soiling (mCCS), the Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQLS), and patient satisfaction. An endoanal ultrasound and anorectal manometric study were performed in all the patients. Forty-four patients were included with a mean of 40.5 months follow-up. The CCS reduced from 15 to 3.3 points and the mCCS from 18.5 to 4.5 points over the study period; p < 0.001. Excellent or good results were achieved in 93% of cases. Endoanal ultrasounds showed a good sphincter repair in 66% of the cases. Anorectal manometry showed an increase in the mean maximal resting pressure from 27.6 mmHg to 41.7 mmHg and of the maximal squeeze pressure from 57.9 to 93 mmHg (p < 0.001) with respect to the preoperative values. Anatomical sphincteroplasty is a surgical proposal for the global anatomical reconstruction of anal sphincter lesions, even in cases of very severe damage. The procedure is safe and produced excellent clinical and functional results after a medium-term follow-up.

Anatomic sphincteroplasty with combined reconstruction of internal and external anal muscles in the anal incontinence surgical treatment

Several groups studying the results of the classic sphincteroplasty show improvement of 75% of patients treated in a short-term follow-up, with a worsening of this data in the long-term follow-up down to an improvement of 50% of the patients. Some other groups published more optimistic results, showing an 80% success rate without any deterioration of the technique over time after introducing a separate repair of the internal and external muscles. We think that the introduction of some modifications in the classic technique, named "Anatomic sphincteroplasty with combined reconstruction of external and internal anal sphincter muscles" may obtain very good clinical and anorectal manometric results both in a short and mid-term follow-up. In addition, increasing the pressive length in the anal canal may contribute to maintain more stable results over time.

Fistulotomy with end-to-end primary sphincteroplasty for anal fistula: results from a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Fistulotomy plus primary sphincteroplasty for complex anal fistulas is regarded with scepticism, mainly because of the risk of postoperative incontinence.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and effectiveness of this technique in medium-term follow up and to identify potential predictive factors of success and postoperative continence impairment.

DESIGN AND SETTING

This was a prospective observational study conducted at a tertiary care university hospital in Italy.

PATIENTS

A total of 72 patients with complex anal fistula of cryptoglandular origin underwent fistulotomy and end-to-end primary sphincteroplasty; patients were followed up at 1 week, 1 and 3 months, 1 year, and were invited to participate in a recent follow-up session.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Success regarding healing of the fistula was assessed with 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasound and clinical evaluation. Continence status was evaluated using the Cleveland Clinic fecal incontinence score and by patient report of post-defecation soiling.

RESULTS

Of the 72 patients, 12 (16.7%) had recurrent fistulas and 29 patients (40.3%) had undergone seton drainage before definitive surgery. At a mean follow-up of 29.4 (SD, 23.7; range, 6-91 months, the success rate of treatment was 95.8% (69 patients). Fistula recurrence was observed in 3 patients at a mean of 17.3 (SD, 10.3; range, 6-26) months of follow-up. Cleveland Clinic fecal incontinence score did not change significantly (p = 0.16). Eight patients (11.6% of those with no baseline incontinence) reported de novo postdefecation soiling. None of the investigated factors was a significant predictor of success. Patients with recurrent fistula after previous fistula surgery had a 5-fold increased probability of having impaired continence (relative risk = 5.00, 95% CI, 1.45-17.27, p = 0.02).

LIMITATIONS

The study was limited by potential single-institution bias, lack of anorectal manometry, and lack of quality of life assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Fistulotomy with end-to-end primary sphincteroplasty can be considered to be an effective therapeutic option for the treatment of complex anal fistulas, with low morbidity, a high rate of success even at long-term follow-up, and a very low rate of postoperative major fecal incontinence, although minor impairment of continence (postdefecation soiling) may occur. Caution should be used in selecting patients with a history of recurrent fistula and fecal incontinence.

Endosonography in anorectal disease: an overview

Anorectal endosonography (AE), which was introduced 20 years ago, derives from the study of urology. It was first used to evaluate rectal tumours and later also to investigate benign disorders of the anal sphincters and pelvic floor. The technique is easy to perform, it has a short learning curve and causes no more discomfort than a routine digital examination. A rotating probe with a 360 degrees radius and a frequency between 5 and 16 MHz is introduced to the rectum and then slowly withdrawn so that the pelvic floor and subsequently the sphincter complex are seen. Recently, it has become possible to reconstruct three-dimensional images. AE has been used for almost every possible disorder in the anal region and has increased our insight into anal pathology. The clinical indications for AE are: 1. Faecal incontinence in patients when surgery is an option. AE can show sphincter defects with excellent precision. There is a perfect correlation with surgical findings. Studies comparing AE with endoanal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have shown that both methods are equally good for demonstrating defects in the external anal sphincter; the internal anal sphincter is better visualized with AE. After sphincter repair, the effect is directly related to the decrease in the sphincter defect. 2. Perianal fistulae. AE has been shown to be accurate in staging perianal cryptoglandular fistulae and fistulae in Crohn's disease. When there is an external fistula opening, H2O2 can be introduced with a plastic infusion catheter. The tract then becomes visible as a hyperechoic lesion ("white"). It has been shown that this corresponds well with surgical findings. It is equally sensitive as endoanal MRI. Since recurrent cryptoglandular fistulae are complex in 50% and Crohn's fistula in 75%, it is mandatory to perform AE preoperatively in these patients to avoid missed tracts during surgery and subsequent recurrences. 3. Rectal tumors. In low tubulovillous adenomas or malignant polyps considered removable locally, confirming the local resectability (T0 or T1) is mandatory. Although larger rectal and more advanced tumours can be evaluated with AE, MRI is more sensitive in staging nodal involvement. 4. Anal carcinoma for staging. AE has been shown to stage better than the classical TNM classification for both local extension and prognosis. In conclusion, AE images the internal and external anal sphincter with high accuracy. It is easy to perform and is of particular value in the diagnosis of anal incontinence and perianal fistulae. It is excellent in staging anal carcinoma and can also be used in staging rectal carcinoma, especially very low large malignant polyps.

Incontinencia fecal.Valoración del paciente. Tratamientos clásicos

Fecal incontinence is a very common disease but its exact prevalence is largely unknown. The condition gives rise to personal and social stigma with severe repercussions for the patient. It can be caused by a large number of physiopathologic disorders and consequently there is a wide variety of treatments. In this article we review the incidence and etiology of fecal incontinence, physical and instrumental examinations (with description of the components of the anorectal laboratory), traditional medical and surgical treatments and, lastly, the results of sphincteroplasties.

Fecal incontinence

Fecal incontinence is common and socially disabling. Only a few patients with fecal incontinence present to medical practitioners. Investigative techniques have improved, and it is possible now to define accurately functional or anatomic deficits. Careful planning of treatment with the possibility of using a variety of treatment modalities is essential. Novel conservative and surgical techniques have the potential to improve the outcome for patients with fecal incontinence.

Endosonography in benign anorectal disease: an overview

BACKGROUND

Endosonography may be used for diagnosing various anorectal disorders. This review addresses its technique and clinical use in benign anorectal disease.

METHODS

The English literature available on anal endosonography was reviewed. The different modalities, the endosonography technique itself and its value in benign anorectal disease were described.

RESULTS

Anal endosonography is easy to perform, has a short learning curve and causes less discomfort than routine digital examination. Anal sphincters can be clearly visualized and distinction is possible between the internal (hypoechoic) and external (hyperechoic) anal sphincters. Other pelvic floor structures, like the puborectalis muscle, can also be visualized. Endosonography is mostly used in the assessment of faecal incontinence; it has brought new insight into the pathophysiological mechanisms of this disorder and can select patients with traumatic incontinence for sphincter repair. It has replaced electromyographical sphincter mapping, which is a painful and time-consuming procedure. In perianal sepsis, endosonography assists in defining fistula tract anatomy. The use of contrast agents has significantly increased the accuracy of endosonography in the assessment of perianal fistulae. In addition, endosonography is an excellent alternative to expensive MRI. Besides its use in incontinence and perianal sepsis, with anal endosonography surgical possibilities can be evaluated in individual patients, for example, to decide whether a sphincter repair or a lateral sphincterectomy is preferable. Finally, endosonography may occasionally identify internal sphincter myopathy in patients with intractable constipation or proctalgia.

CONCLUSION

Anal endosonography images the internal and external sphincters with high accuracy. It is easy to perform and is especially valuable in the diagnosis of anal incontinence and perianal sepsis.