Effect of antithrombotic drugs on bone health

Incidence of hip fracture in underweight individuals: a nationwide population-based cohort study in Korea

BACKGROUND

Hip fracture is a major public health problem worldwide and being underweight is a risk factor for fractures. Few studies have investigated the association between being underweight and hip fracture in the general population. The present study investigated the incidence of hip fracture in a large population cohort based on detailed information about the degree of underweight.

METHODS

A nationwide retrospective cohort study of adults ≥40 years of age included 962,533 subjects who were not overweight or obese in 2009. The incidence and risk of hip fracture occurring between 2010 and 2018 was assessed based on the degree of underweight. Based on body mass index (BMI), the study population was categorized into normal (18.50-22.99 kg/m² ), mild (17.00-18.49 kg/m² ), moderate (16.00-16.99 kg/m² ), and severe underweight (<16.00 kg/m² ) groups. Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) for the hip fracture based on the degree of underweight in reference to the normal weight.

RESULTS

Compared with subjects who were normal weight, those who were classified as mild underweight (1.03/1000 person-years (PY) increase in incidence rate (IR); adjusted HR (aHR) 1.61; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.48-1.76), moderate underweight (2.04/1000 PY increase in IR; aHR 1.85; 95% CI 1.65-2.08), or severe underweight (4.58/1000 PY increase in IR; aHR 2.33; 95% CI 2.03-2.66) were at significantly increased risk of hip fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

The severity of underweight was significantly associated with risk of hip fracture. The subdivision of underweight helps to estimate fracture risk more accurately.

The association of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants vs. warfarin and the risk of fractures for patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The fracture risks of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remain controversial.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Clinical Trials.gov databases for RCTs, and cohort studies were systematically searched from inception to 10 June 2021.

RESULTS

Twelve-two studies met the inclusion criteria and 477,821 patients were included. Warfarin increased the risk of fracture in AF patients compared with NOACs in overall any fracture (RR = 0.79; 95% CI = 0.70-10.88; p = 0.00), osteoporotic fracture (RR = 0.746; 95% CI = 0.630-0.883; p = 0.001). No significant difference was observed in the hip or pelvic fracture, vertebral fracture, extremity fracture, wrist fracture, femoral neck fracture, and ankle fracture. In subgroup analyses based on several aspects, NOACs were associated with a significant reduction in any fracture (standard dosage NOACs, cohort studies, elderly patients, rivaroxaban in RCTs, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban in cohort studies), in the hip/pelvic fracture (follow-up time ≤1 year, cohort studies), and osteoporotic fracture (cohort studies).

CONCLUSION

NOACs were associated with a significantly lower risk of any fracture and osteoporotic fracture compared to warfarin. This benefit was also observed in specific NOACs types of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. However, whether NOACs had a less fracture risk than warfarin on the other risk of fractures was still uncertain.

Comparative Risks of Fracture Among Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Importance

Previous studies have shown the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including lower fracture risks, compared to warfarin. However, direct or indirect comparisons between different DOACs are scarce in the literature.

Objective

This study aims to compare fracture risks among different DOACs and warfarin, including apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban, in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) or venous thromboembolism (VTE).

Methods

We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies comparing the fracture risks among patients who used warfarin or DOACs, up to March 2021. Two authors extracted data and appraised the risk of bias of included studies. The primary outcome was fracture risk. We performed pairwise meta-analyses to compare differences between medications and network meta-analyses using frequentist random-effects models to compare through indirect evidence. We used surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) and mean ranks to determine the probability of a DOAC ranking best in terms of fracture risk.

Results

Thirty-one studies were included in the final analysis. Twenty-four randomized controlled trials and seven cohort studies with 455,343 patients were included in the systematic review and network meta-analysis. Compared to warfarin, the risk of any fractures was lowest with apixaban [relative risk (RR) = 0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48-0.73], followed by rivaroxaban (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.60-0.86), edoxaban (RR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.62-1.23), and dabigatran (RR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.75-1.07). No substantial inconsistency between direct and indirect evidence was detected for all outcomes.

Conclusions

All DOACs were safer than warfarin concerning the risk of fracture; however, apixaban had the lowest relative risk of fracture within the class of DOACs. Further head-to-head prospective studies should confirm the comparative safety profiles of DOACs regarding fractures.

How Do Drugs Affect the Skeleton? Implications for Forensic Anthropology

Simple Summary

Forensic anthropologists analyze human remains to assist in the identification of the deceased, predominantly by assessing age-at-death, sex, stature, ancestry and any unique identifying features. Whilst methods have been established to create this biological profile of the skeleton, these may be influenced by a number of factors. This paper, for the first time, provides an overview from a reading of the clinical and pharmacological literature to explore whether the intake of drugs can affect the skeleton and whether these may have implications for forensic anthropology casework. In effect, drugs such as tobacco, heroin, and prescription medications can alter bone mineral density, can increase the risk of fractures, destroy bone and changes to the dentition. By considering how drugs can affect the skeleton, forensic anthropologists can be aware of this when attempting to identify the deceased.

Abstract

Forensic anthropologists rely on a number of parameters when analyzing human skeletal remains to assist in the identification of the deceased, predominantly age-at-death, sex, stature, ancestry or population affinity, and any unique identifying features. During the examination of human remains, it is important to be aware that the skeletal features considered when applying anthropological methods may be influenced and modified by a number of factors, and particular to this article, prescription drugs (including medical and non-medical use) and other commonly used drugs. In view of this, this paper aims to review the medical, clinical and pharmacological literature to enable an assessment of those drug groups that as side effects have the potential to have an adverse effect on the skeleton, and explore whether or not they can influence the estimation of age-at-death, sex and other indicators of the biological profile. Moreover, it may be that the observation of certain alterations or inconsistencies in the skeleton may relate to the use of drugs or medication, and this in turn may help narrow down the list of missing persons to which a set of human remains could belong. The information gathered from the clinical and medical literature has been extracted with a forensic anthropological perspective and provides an awareness on how several drugs, such as opioids, cocaine, corticosteroids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, alcohol, tobacco and others have notable effects on bone. Through different mechanisms, drugs can alter bone mineral density, causing osteopenia, osteoporosis, increase the risk of fractures, osteonecrosis, and oral changes. Not much has been written on the influence of drugs on the skeleton from the forensic anthropological practitioner perspective; and this review, in spite of its limitations and the requirement of further research, aims to investigate the current knowledge of the possible effects of both prescription and recreational drugs on bones, contributing to providing a better awareness in forensic anthropological practice and assisting in the identification process of the deceased.

Association between osteoporosis or osteopenia and taking antiplatelet agents in general US population of NHANES

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis (OP) and osteopenia are common bone disorders in old age, and lots of patients suffering from OP or osteopenia need to take antiplatelet agents to treat basic diseases. However, clinical data on the link between osteopenia or OP and antiplatelet agents are limited.

METHODS

Data in this study were collected and screened from the NHANES from 2013 to 2014 and 2017 to 2018. The variables were extracted from interviews and compared between OP or osteopenia participants and normal. The relationship between OP or osteopenia and taking antiplatelet drugs was analyzed by weighted multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

After excluding individuals who were not eligible and had invalid data, we finally identified 894 participants for inclusion in the study. We found a negative association between OP or osteopenia and taking antiplatelet agents (OR = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.33-0.84; p < 0.05). These results did not change on multiple imputations (OR = 0.32, 95% CI, 0.19-0.56; p <0.01). In the subgroup analyses, the associations were more significant in women (OR = 0.18, 95% CI, 0.05-0.62; p <0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that the association between OP or osteopenia and taking antiplatelet agents was significant. Therefore, it is necessary to confirm the result by extending further research.

Vascular transplantation with dual-biofunctional ePTFE vascular grafts in a porcine model

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) poses serious health concerns worldwide. The lack of transplantable vascular grafts is an unmet clinical need in the surgical treatment of CVD. Although expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) vascular grafts have been used in clinical practice, a low long-term patency rate in small-diameter transplantation application is still the biggest challenge. Thus, surface modification of ePTFE is sought after. In this study, polydopamine (PDA) was used to improve the hydrophilia and provide immobilization sites in ePTFE. Bivalirudin (BVLD), a direct thrombin inhibitor, was used to enhance the anti-thrombotic activity of ePTFE. The peptides derived from extracellular matrix proteins were used to elevate the bioactivity of ePTFE. The morphology, chemical composition, peptide modified strength, wettability, and hemocompatibility of modified ePTFE vascular grafts were investigated. Then, an endothelial cell proliferation assay was used to evaluate the best co-modification strategy of the ePTFE vascular graft in vitro. Since a large animal could relatively better mimic human physiology, we chose a porcine carotid artery replacement model in the current study. The results showed that the BVLD/REDV co-modified ePTFE vascular grafts had a satisfactory patency rate (66.7%) and a higher endothelial cell coverage ratio (70%) at 12 weeks after implantation. This may offer an opportunity to produce a multi-biofunctional ePTFE vascular graft, thereby yielding a potent product to meet the clinical needs.

Antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome is one of the more common acquired causes of hypercoagulability. Its major presentations are thrombotic (arterial, venous, or microvascular) and pregnancy morbidity (miscarriages, late intrauterine fetal demise, and severe pre-eclampsia). Classification criteria include 3 different antiphospholipid antibodies: lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin, and anti-beta 2 glycoprotein I. Management includes both preventive strategies (low-dose aspirin, hydroxychloroquine) and long-term anticoagulation after thrombosis.

Proton pump inhibitors and fracture risk. The HUNT study, Norway

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been linked to increased risk of fracture; the data have, however, been diverging. We did not find any increased risk of fractures among users of PPIs in a Norwegian population of 15,017 women and 13,241 men aged 50-85 years with detailed information about lifestyle and comorbidity.

INTRODUCTION

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely prescribed and have been linked to increased risk of fracture.

METHODS

We used data from the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT3), The Fracture registry in Nord-Trøndelag, and the Norwegian Prescription Database, including 15,017 women and 13,241 men aged 50-85 years. The study population was followed from the date of participating in HUNT3 (2006-2008) until the date of first fracture (forearm or hip), death, or end of study (31 December 2012). The Cox proportional hazards model with time-dependent exposure to PPIs was applied, and each individual was considered as unexposed until the first prescriptions was filled. To be included, the prescription of PPIs should minimum be equivalent to 90 defined daily doses (DDD) in the period. Individuals were defined as exposed until 6 months after end of drug supply.

RESULTS

The proportion of women and men using PPIs was 17.9% and 15.5%, respectively. During a median of 5.2 years follow-up, 266 women and 134 men had a first hip fracture and 662 women and 127 men, a first forearm fracture. The combined rate/1000 patient-years for forearm and hip fractures in women was 49.2 for users of PPIs compared with 64.1 among non-users; for men 18.6 and 19.8, respectively. The hazard ratios with 95% confidence interval for the first forearm or hip fracture among users of PPIs in the age-adjusted analysis were 0.82 (0.67-1.01) for women and 1.05 (0.72-1.52) for men. Adjusting for age, use of anti-osteoporotic drugs, and FRAX, the HR declined to 0.80 (0.65-0.98) in women and 1.00 (0.69-1.45) in men.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of PPIs was not associated with an increased risk of fractures.