Early time course of neointima formation and vascular remodelling following percutaneous coronary intervention and vascular brachytherapy of in-stent restenotic lesions as assessed by intravascular ultrasound analysis

Efficacy and safety of absorbable metallic stents with adjunct intracoronary beta radiation in porcine coronary arteries

BACKGROUND

Absorbable metallic stents (AMS) utilizing Mg alloy carry advantages over permanent metallic stents because of their potential to eliminate stent thrombosis, chronic inflammation, or artifacts with noninvasive imaging. These stents, however, are associated with a modest degree of late recoil and intimal hyperplasia. The aim of the study was to test whether adjunct vascular brachytherapy (VBT) compared to AMS alone can overcome these limitations.

METHODS

Juvenile domestic pig coronary arteries underwent implantation of either AMS (n = 11) with prior adjunct VBT utilizing Sr/Y-90 beta source seeds, with a dose of 24 Gy at 2 mm from the source, or AMS alone (n = 11). At 28 days following intravascular ultrasound, vessels were harvested and analyzed by histomorphometry.

RESULTS

Intravascular ultrasound analysis indicated that at follow-up, though statistically not significant, lumen and stent areas in the segments deployed with AMS following radiation were larger than those deployed with AMS alone (3.94 +/- 1.38 and 3.53 +/- 1.75 vs. 2.99 +/- 1.05 and 3.58 +/- 1.48). Extrastent plaque and intrastent plaque areas in the same segments were smaller (2.76 +/- 0.82 and 0.24 +/- 0.47 vs. 3.25 +/- 1.94 and 0.58 +/- 0.81). Morphometric data indicate that vessels in the VBT + AMS group showed characteristics of delayed healing and re-endothelialization. Neointimal area was significantly lower in the VBT + AMS group (0.49 +/- 0.34) compared to AMS (1.3 +/- 0.62, P = 0.001). Lumen area of the VBT + AMS was larger when compared with AMS alone (2.49 +/- 0.82 vs. 1.75 +/- 0.51, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

VBT as an adjunct to AMS further reduces the intimal hyperplasia and improves the lumen area when compared to AMS alone but does not have any impact on late recoil.

Current understanding of coronary in-stent restenosis. Pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic work-up, and management

In-stent restenosis is the limiting entity following coronary stent implantation. It is associated with significant morbidity and cost and thus represents a major clinical and economical problem. Worldwide, approximately 250 000 in-stent restenotic lesions per year have to be dealt with. The pathophysiology of instent restenosis is multifactorial and comprises inflammation, smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation and extracellular matrix formation, all mediated by distinct molecular pathways. Instent restenosis has been recognised as very difficult to manage, with a repeat restenosis rate of 50% regardless of the mechanical angioplasty device used. Much more favourable results were reported for the adjunctive irradiation of the in-stent restenotic lesion, with a consistent reduction of the incidence of repeat in-stent restenosis by 50%. Data from the first clinical trials on drug-eluting stents for the treatment of in-stent restenosis have shown very much promise yielding this strategy likely to become the treatment of choice. This review outlines the histological and molecular findings of the pathophysiology, the epidemiology, the predictors and the diagnostic work-up of in-stent restenosis and puts emphasis on the various treatment options for its prevention and therapy.