The Sirolimus-eluting coronary stent in daily routine practice in Germany: trends in indications over the years. Results from the prospective multi-centre German Cypher Stent Registry

Occurrence and predictive factors of restenosis in coronary heart disease patients underwent sirolimus-eluting stent implantation

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the occurrence and predictive factors of restenosis in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with sirolimus-eluting stent (SES).

METHODS

Demographic data, clinical features, and laboratory tests of 398 CHD patients underwent PCI with SES were retrospectively reviewed. Coronary angiography was performed to evaluate coronary stenosis before PCI and in-stent restenosis at 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

There were 37 (9.3%) patients suffered restenosis, but 361 (90.7%) patients did not develop restenosis at 1-year follow-up. Demographic characteristic (age), cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension and hyperuricemia), biochemical indexes (fasting blood-glucose, total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (HsCRP)), cardiac function index (cardiac troponin I), lesion features (multivessel artery lesions, target lesion at left circumflex artery (LCX), two target lesions and length of target lesion), and operation procedure (length of stent) were correlated with higher restenosis risk. Moreover, age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, LDL-C, HsCRP, and target lesion at LCX were independent predictive factors for raised restenosis risk. Based on these independent predictive factors, we established a restenosis risk prediction model, and receiver-operating characteristic curves displayed that this model exhibited an excellent predictive value for higher restenosis risk (areas under the curve 0.953 (95% CI 0.926-0.981)).

CONCLUSION

Our findings provide a new insight into the prediction for restenosis in CHD patients underwent PCI with SES.

[3-year results of the SYNTAX trial--stent or surgery? A surgeon's perspective]

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the standard of care for patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease. However, clinical practice has proven to differ substantially with even the most complex coronary lesions being targeted by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) today. An abundancy of both large registries and randomized clinical trials has demonstrated superiority of surgery over PCI in advanced coronary artery disease. Recently, these results have been confirmed by the landmark SYNTAX trial where CABG was found to be superior to PCI for three-vessel and/or left main coronary artery disease regarding repeat revascularization, rate of myocardial infarction, and cardiac mortality at the latest follow-up of 3 years. On the other hand, PCI proved to be a viable alternative for less complex forms of left main disease.In conclusion, patients with three-vessel and/or left main coronary artery disease should be discussed in an interdisciplinary heart team consisting of cardiologists and cardiac surgeons within a heart center. Final decision making should be a formal process as recommended in the recently updated guidelines on myocardial revascularization by the European Society of Cardiology.

Comparison between on-label versus off-label use of drug-eluting coronary stents in clinical practice: results from the German DES.DE-Registry

BACKGROUND

Observational studies from the USA have demonstrated that off-label use of drug-eluting stents (DES) is common. Data on off-label use in Western Europe are limited.

METHODS

We analyzed the data of consecutive patients receiving DES prospectively enrolled in the multicenter German DES.DE registry (Deutsches Drug-Eluting Stent Register) between October 2005 and October 2006. Off-label use was defined in the presence of one of the following criteria: ST-elevation myocardial infarction, in-stent stenosis, chronic total occlusion, lesions in a bypass graft, in bifurcation or left main stem, stent length per lesion ≥32 mm, and vessel diameter <2.5 or >3.5 mm.

RESULTS

Overall, 4,295 patients were included in this analysis and divided into two groups: 2,366 (55.1%) received DES for off-label and 1,929 (44.9%) for on-label indications. There were substantial differences in the rates of off-label use at the participating hospitals. Patients with off-label DES more often presented with high-risk features such as acute coronary syndrome, cardiogenic shock, congestive heart failure, and more complex coronary anatomy. Among hospital survivors, the incidence of the composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction and stroke (MACCE) (9.2 vs. 7.4%, p < 0.05), and target vessel revascularization (TVR) (11.3 vs. 9.1%, p < 0.05) was increased in the off-label group at the 1-year follow-up. However, in the multivariate analysis off-label use was not linked with an elevated risk for MACCE (hazard ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.62-1.18) and TVR (hazard ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval 0.78-1.42).

CONCLUSIONS

In clinical practice, DES was very frequently used off-label. After adjustment for confounding variables, off-label use was not associated with an increase of adverse events.

Reduction of neointimal hyperplasia in porcine coronary arteries by 2-deoxy-D-glucose

BACKGROUND

The drug eluting stents have been shown to play a substantial role in preventing in-stent restenosis. This study was initiated to determine the efficacy of 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) in an in-stent restenosis model for reducing neointimal hyperplasia after coronary stent placement.

METHODS

In a porcine overstretch model, three kinds of stents were investigated (n = 12 per group): bare metal stents (BMS), rapamycin-eluted stents (RES), and BMS after intracoronary short-term application of 2-DG (DGS). After 42 days histomorphometric and histopathological analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Neointimal thickness (BMS: 0.38 +/- 0.08, RES: 0.24 +/- 0.11, DGS: 0.15 +/- 0.01), area stenosis (BMS: 47.39 +/- 2.76, RES: 32.2 +/- 2.08, DGS: 29.30 +/- 2.98) did not differ after 42 days between the RES and DGS but were significantly lower as compared to BMS only. Lumen area (BMS: 3.15 +/- 1.53, RES: 4.37 +/- 1.72, DGS: 4.77 +/- 2.14) was significantly higher in the DGS group in comparison to the BMS group. The calculated injury and inflammation scores were similar and re-endothelialization was confirmed in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study could demonstrate that in porcine stent model neointimal hyperplasia and re-endothelialization after application of 2-DG are comparable to those seen in RES. Thus, 2-DG might be a promising clinical application for coronary stent coating.

[Acute coronary syndrome - a challenge for the cooperation between outpatient and inpatient care]

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) summarizes all phases of coronary heart disease, which are imminently life-threatening. In clinical practice, these are unstable angina pectoris, acute myocardial infarction, and sudden cardiac death. As the transitions between these clinical entities are smooth, it has been established during the last years to distinguish patients based on ECG findings in groups with (STEMI) and without ST segment elevation (NSTEMI/unstable angina pectoris). Because of the life-threatening character of this disease, continuous monitoring and immediate diagnostic evaluation are mandatory in all patients with suspected ACS. Regularly, this has to be done in the emergency department of a hospital. As the diagnostic and therapeutic management of ACS necessitates rapid decision-making, an optimal cooperation between outpatient and inpatient departments is essential for maximal therapeutic performance. However, it has been shown that only 20-30% of patients admitted to an emergency department with acute chest pain have ACS and only 10-15% have acute myocardial infarction. About 50% of patients presenting with acute chest pain are part of a low-risk group and do not need hospital admission. On the other hand, 2-8% of patients with acute myocardial infarction are misdiagnosed in interdisciplinary emergency departments and discharged too early in spite of an ongoing life-threatening risk. Therefore, chest pain units (CPUs) were founded in many hospitals to optimize the diagnosis and treatment of ACS and the related consumption of financial resources. A task force of the German Society of Cardiology is presently preparing a consensus paper on the basic requirements for CPUs in Germany. The positioning of CPUs at the gateway between outpatient and inpatient care and the additional need for short-term outpatient exercise testing (stress ECG, stress echocardiography, scintigraphy, stress MRI) after ruling out ACS and myocardial infarction, predestine these facilities for new models of managed care including cardiologists in private practice.

Effect of a novel drug-eluted balloon coated with genistein before stent implantation in porcine coronary arteries

BACKGROUND

The major drawback of stent implantation in native human coronary vessels is the occurrence of restenosis. Drug-eluting stents significantly reduce restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but may be associated with persistent local inflammation involved in the restenosis mechanisms. In this setting coating coronary devices with anti-inflammatory agents represents an intriguing alternative to stent-based local drug delivery. The aim of the present study was to test in a porcine model the safety and efficacy of a novel Genistein-eluting balloon preceding coronary stenting.

DESIGN

Female piglets underwent PCI in a randomized fashion with either a Genistein-eluting or a standard balloon angioplasty, followed in all vessels by bare-metal stent implantation. Pigs were sacrificed at different time points to appraise safety (i.e. endothelialization) and efficacy (i.e. anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative effects): 1, 4, and 6-8 weeks following PCI.

RESULTS

Overall analysis was conducted on 14 piglets. Twenty-five bare-metal stents were implanted preceded by angioplasty with a conventional balloon in 13 vessels and by the Genistein-eluted balloon in 12. No untoward effects were reported in either group. Healing and endothelialization appeared universal within 4 weeks. The Genistein-eluted balloon group disclosed a significant reduction, at four weeks from implantation, of the peri-stent inflammatory cells count (mononucleocytes 39 +/- 32 Vs. 96 +/- 29 per square millimetre, P = 0.019). This effect did not clearly translate into a trend towards a reduced neointimal hyperplasia at 6-8 weeks (0.13 +/- 0.11 Vs. 0.14 +/- 0.09, P = 0.835).

CONCLUSION

This study provides the first in vivo demonstration of the anti-inflammatory effects of a Genistein-eluting balloon in PCI, warranting further research including the combination of a Genistein-eluting balloon with standard drug-eluting stent.

Screening for undiagnosed diabetes in patients with acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Screening for undiagnosed diabetes in patients with acute myocardial infarction is recommended (ESC and EASD Task Force 2007). Glucose tolerance testing in the peri-infarct period may not be valid because of confounding, e.g. by the acute stress reaction. The aim was to evaluate undiagnosed diabetes (DM) and impaired glucose regulation (IGR) in AMI during hospital stay and 3 months after discharge.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 96 consecutively admitted AMI patients (Heart Center Wuppertal, Germany) OGTT were performed, of whom in 62 OGTT were also carried out 3 months later.

RESULTS

Before discharge 32% of the patients had newly diagnosed diabetes and 47% patients had prediabetes (IGR). Glucose tolerance was normal in 20 (21%) patients only. After 3 months, 74% with newly diagnosed DM at baseline still had disturbed glucose metabolism (58% DM, 16% IGT). No patient with normal OGTT became diabetic after 3 months. In multivariate regression, the odds of having diabetes (3 months) was about sixfold higher when having diabetes before discharge (OGTT). Admission glucose, infarction size CK(MAX), and inflammation (CRP) were not significantly related to OGTT results.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective study confirms a high prevalence of undiagnosed DM in patients with AMI. In about 60% of AMI patients, newly diagnosed DM persisted after 3 months. For the first time we could show that there is no correlation between infarction size and undiagnosed diabetes. Thus, an OGTT performed before discharge may provide a reliable measure of disturbed glucose regulation but needs to be repeated.

Prognostic value of the modified American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association lesion morphology classification for clinical outcome after sirolimus-eluting stent placement (results of the prospective multicenter German Cypher Registry)

The modified American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) lesion morphology classification scheme has prognostic impact for early and late outcomes when bare-metal stents are used. Its value after drug-eluting stent placement is unknown. The predictive value of this lesion morphology classification system in patients treated using sirolimus-eluting stents included in the German Cypher Registry was prospectively examined. The study population included 6,755 patients treated for 7,960 lesions using sirolimus-eluting stents. Lesions were classified as type A, B1, B2, or C. Lesion type A or B1 was considered simple (35.1%), and type B2 or C, complex (64.9%). The combined end point of all deaths, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization was seen in 2.6% versus 2.4% in the complex and simple groups, respectively (p = 0.62) at initial hospital discharge, with a trend for higher rates of myocardial infarction in the complex group. At the 6-month clinical follow-up and after adjusting for other independent factors, the composite of cumulative death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization was nonsignificantly different between groups (11.4% vs 11.2% in the complex and simple groups, respectively; odds ratio 1.08, 95% confidence interval 0.8 to 1.46). This was also true for target vessel revascularization alone (8.3% of the complex group, 9.0% of the simple group; odds ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.72 to 1.05). In conclusion, the modified ACC/AHA lesion morphology classification system has some value in determining early complications after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Clinical follow-up results at 6 months were generally favorable and cannot be adequately differentiated on the basis of this lesion morphology classification scheme.

Sirolimus eluting stent (Cypher) in patients with diabetes mellitus: results from the German Cypher Stent Registry

BACKGROUND

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are at increased risk for adverse outcomes. The use of sirolimus eluting stents (SES) has been shown to improve outcomes in diabetic patients. Since results from randomized trials were derived from selected patients scientific scrutiny under real world conditions is necessary.

METHODS AND RESULTS

1,948 patients with DM and 4,707 patients without DM were included in the German Cypher Registry, a post-marketing survey of use of SES in Germany. In >99% of entry cases a structured clinical follow-up was completed. By angiographic criteria severity of coronary artery disease was higher in diabetic patients compared to non-diabetics. However, procedural success and in-hospital complication rates were comparable between DM- and non-DM-patients. 6 months MACE rate in the DM group was significantly higher than in the non-DM group (16.4% vs. 13.0%) but lower than expected from historical data with the use of bare metal stents (BMS).

CONCLUSION

The results with SES in diabetics are encouraging but DM remains a risk factor for poor outcome of PCI. No statement is justified whether the treatment of diabetics with SES is at least as safe as bypass surgery. This intriguing question has to be answered in a direct randomized head-to-head comparison with state of the art surgery.