Adverse effects of permanent atrial fibrillation on heart failure in patients with preserved left ventricular function and chronic right apical pacing for complete heart block

Atrial antitachycardia pacing and managed ventricular pacing in bradycardia patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial tachyarrhythmias: the MINERVA randomized multicentre international trial

Aims

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common comorbidity in bradycardia patients. Advanced pacemakers feature atrial preventive pacing and atrial antitachycardia pacing (DDDRP) and managed ventricular pacing (MVP), which minimizes unnecessary right ventricular pacing. We evaluated whether DDDRP and MVP might reduce mortality, morbidity, or progression to permanent AF when compared with standard dual-chamber pacing (Control DDDR).

Methods and results

In a randomized, parallel, single-blind, multi-centre trial we enrolled 1300 patients with bradycardia and previous atrial tachyarrhythmias, in whom a DDDRP pacemaker had recently been implanted. History of permanent AF and third-degree atrioventricular block were exclusion criteria. After a 1-month run-in period, 1166 eligible patients, aged 74 ± 9 years, 50% females, were randomized to Control DDDR, DDDRP + MVP, or MVP. Analysis was intention-to-treat.

The primary outcome, i.e. the 2-year incidence of a combined endpoint composed of death, cardiovascular hospitalizations, or permanent AF, occurred in 102/385 (26.5%) Control DDDR patients, in 76/383 (19.8%) DDDRP + MVP patients [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.55–0.99, P = 0.04 vs. Control DDDR] and in 85/398 (21.4%) MVP patients (HR = 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.77–1.03, P = 0.125 vs. Control DDDR). When compared with Control DDDR, DDDRP + MVP reduced the risk for AF longer than 1 day (HR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.52–0.85, P < 0.001), AF longer than 7 days (HR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.36–0.73, P < 0.001), and permanent AF (HR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.21–0.75, P = 0.004).

Conclusion

In patients with bradycardia and atrial tachyarrhythmias, DDDRP + MVP is superior to standard dual-chamber pacing. The primary endpoint was significantly lowered through the reduction of the progression of atrial tachyarrhythmias to permanent AF.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier

NCT00262119.

Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF/CCN2): diagnostic and prognostic value in acute heart failure

BACKGROUND

As a mediator of ECM homeostasis, connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) appears to be involved in adverse structural remodeling processes in the heart. However, the diagnostic and prognostic value of CTGF levels in acute heart failure (AHF) in addition to natriuretic peptide testing has not yet been evaluated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 212 patients presenting with acute dyspnea and/or peripheral edema to the Emergency Department were evaluated. CTGF and NT-proBNP plasma levels were measured at the initial presentation. All patients were followed up to 1 and 5 years. The first endpoint tested was the diagnostic non-inferiority of combined CTGF plus NT-proBNP compared to NT-proBNP alone for AHF diagnosis. Afterwards, the additional diagnostic value of CTGF plus NT-proBNP was tested. CTGF levels were higher in NYHA class III/IV and AHA/ACC class C/D patients compared to lower class patients (p = 0.04). Patients with HFREF revealed highest CTGF levels (median 93.3 pg/ml, IQR 18.2-972 pg/ml, n = 48) compared to patients with a normal heart function (i.e., without HFREF and HFPEF) (median 25.9, IQR <1-82.2 pg/ml, n = 37) (p < 0.05), followed by patients with HFPEF (median 82.2 pg/ml, IQR 11.5-447 pg/ml, n = 32) as assessed by echocardiography. Finally, CTGF levels were higher in patients with AHF (median 77.3 pg/ml, IQR 22.5-1012 pg/ml, n = 66) compared to those without (p = 0.002). CTGF plus NT-proBNP was non-inferior to NT-proBNP testing alone for AHF diagnosis (AUC difference 0.01, p > 0.05). CTGF plus NT-proBNP improved the diagnostic capacity for AHF (accuracy 82 %, specificity 83 %, positive predictive value 66 %, net reclassification improvement +0.11) compared to NT-proBNP alone (p = 0.0001). CTGF levels were not able to differentiate prognostic outcomes after 1 and 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional CTGF measurements might lead to a better discrimination of higher functional and structural heart failure stages and might identify patients of an increased risk for an acute cardiac decompensation.