Diagnostic value of speckle-tracking echocardiography in confirmed cardiac sarcoidosis

Basal interventricular septum thinning and long-term left ventricular function in patients with sarcoidosis

BACKGROUND

Basal interventricular septum (IVS) thinning on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is highly specific to cardiac sarcoidosis. Although basal IVS thinning is listed as one of the five major diagnostic criteria for cardiac sarcoidosis, its association with long-term cardiac function has not been investigated. This study aimed to evaluate the epidemiology and clinical relevance of basal IVS thinning in a clinic-based cohort of patients with sarcoidosis.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study was conducted at a general sarcoidosis clinic. The incidence of basal IVS thinning and associations with variables at baseline and a delayed onset of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (LV ejection fraction [LVEF] < 50%) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 1009 patients, 23 (2.3%) had basal IVS thinning. Basal IVS thinning was associated with cardiac pacemaker (PM) implantation at baseline (adjusted odds ratio = 20.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 7.9-53.2; P < 0.01). Of the 768 patients with an LVEF of ≥50% at baseline who underwent one or more longitudinal TTEs after baseline, 36 (4.7%) developed LV dysfunction over a median observation period of 88.9 months. Basal IVS thinning and PM implantation at baseline were the independent predictors of a delayed onset of LV dysfunction (basal IVS thinning, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 3.7; 95% CI = 1.5-9.6; PM implantation, adjusted HR = 15.7; 95% CI = 7.4-33.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Basal IVS thinning in patients with sarcoidosis can predict a delayed onset of LV dysfunction even when the LV function is preserved at the time of detection.

Cardiac sarcoidosis: from diagnosis to treatment

Sarcoidosis is a systemic granulomatous disease of unknown cause. Its clinical presentations are heterogeneous and virtually any organ system can be affected, most commonly lungs. The manifestations of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) are heterogenous depending on the extent and location of the disease and range from asymptomatic forms to life-threatening arrhythmias as well as to progressive heart failure. Cardiac involvement is associated with a worse prognosis. The diagnosis of CS is often challenging and requires a multimodality approach based on current international recommendations. Pharmacological treatment of CS is based on administration of anti-inflammatory therapy (mainly corticosteroids), which is often combined with heart failure medication and/or antiarrhythmics. Nonpharmacological therapeutic approaches in CS cover pacemaker or defibrillator implantation, catheter ablations and heart transplantation. This review aims to summarize the current understanding of CS including its epidemiology, etiopathogenesis, clinical presentations, diagnostic approaches, and therapeutic possibilities.

Optimizing routine screening for cardiac sarcoidosis through use of commonly available studies

BACKGROUND

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous disorder with unclear etiology. Morbidity and mortality vary based on organ involvement, with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) associated with higher mortality; despite this, CS remains underdiagnosed. The Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) expert consensus statement recommends screening sarcoidosis patients for CS utilizing a symptom screen, EKG, and echocardiogram (TTE), while the American Thoracic Society (ATS) guideline recommends only EKG and symptom screening. These recommendations, however, are based on limited data with recommendations for further studies.

RESEARCH QUESTION

The purpose is to evaluate the prevalence of abnormal screening tests in patients with sarcoidosis and the correlation of these tests with the subsequent diagnosis of CS. A specific emphasis was placed on evaluating the sensitivity of the recommendations versus the sensitivity of a modified criteria.

STUDY DESIGN

and Methods: This study retrospectively evaluated a database of prospectively enrolled patients from a tertiary military academic center. All patients who underwent imaging with cardiac MRI and/or FDG-PET were identified. These results were correlated with screening studies (symptom screen, EKG, TTE, and ambulatory rhythm monitoring (ARM)) and used to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for each test. Using a clinical diagnosis of CS as the reference standard, the sensitivity and specificity of the HRS criteria were calculated and compared to a modified screening rubric developed a priori, consisting of minor changes to the criteria and the addition of ARM.

RESULTS

This study evaluated 114 patients with sarcoidosis with 132 advanced imaging events, leading to a diagnosis of CS in 36 patients. Utilizing HRS screening recommendations, the sensitivity for CS was 63.9%, while the modified criteria increased sensitivity to 94.4%.

INTERPRETATION

This study suggests that the HRS guidelines lack sensitivity to effectively screen for CS and that a modified screening model which includes ARM may be more effective.

Update in Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Increasing awareness of cardiac manifestations of sarcoidosis and the widespread availability of advanced imaging tests have led to a tidal wave of interest in a condition that was once considered rare. In this Focused Review, we explore important clinical questions that may confront specialists faced with possible cardiac involvement. In the absence of an ideal reference standard, three main sets of clinical criteria exist: the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare, the Heart Rhythm Society, and the World Association for Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Disorders criteria. Once cardiac sarcoidosis is suspected, clinicians should be familiar with the prevalence of the disease in different clinical scenarios. Before obtaining advanced cardiac imaging, electrocardiogram, ambulatory electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, and B-type natriuretic peptide may be useful. The available therapies for cardiac sarcoidosis include immunosuppression, antiarrhythmic medications, heart failure medications, device therapy, ablation therapy, and heart transplantation. Contemporary data suggest that long-term survival in cardiac sarcoidosis is better than previously believed. There is no randomized controlled trial demonstrating benefits of screening, but screening is recommended based on observational data.

Imaging in Suspected Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Diagnostic Challenge

Cardiac Sarcoidosis (CS) represents a unique diagnostic dilemma. Guidelines have been recently revised to reflect the established role of sophisticated imaging techniques. Trans-thoracic Echocardiography (TTE) is widely adopted for initial screening of CS. Contemporary TTE techniques could enhance detection of subclinical Left Ventricular (LV) dysfunction, particularly LV global longitudinal strain assessment which predicts event-free survival (meta-analysis of 5 studies, hazard ratio 1.28, 95% confidence interval 1.18-1.37, p < 0.0001). However, despite the wide availability of TTE, it has limited sensitivity and specificity for CS diagnosis. Cardiac Magnetic resonance Imaging (CMR) is a crucial diagnostic modality for suspected CS. Presence of late gadolinium enhancement signifies myocardial scar and enables risk stratification. Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) coupled with myocardial perfusion imaging can identify active CS and guide immunosuppressant therapy. Gallium scintigraphy may be considered although FDG-PET is often preferred. While CMR and FDG-PET provide complementary information in CS evaluation, current guidelines do not recommend which imaging modalities are essential in suspected CS and if so, which modality should be performed first. The utility of hybrid imaging combining both advanced imaging modalities in a single scan is currently being explored, although not yet widely available. In view of recent, significant advances in cardiac imaging techniques, this review aims to discuss changes in guidelines for CS diagnosis, the role of various cardiac imaging modalities and the future direction in CS.

A case of longitudinal care of a patient with cardiac sarcoidosis

Cardiac sarcoidosis has long been an evasive diagnosis with a spectrum of clinical presentations that extend from asymptomatic to ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. The diagnosis has traditionally relied on histology which suffers from the low sensitivity of endomyocardial biopsy due to the patchy nature of the disease in addition to its invasive nature. Due to significant advancements in imaging, it is now possible to accurately identify cardiac sarcoidosis using non-invasive imaging modalities even without histological confirmation. Emerging guidelines are highlighting the role of multimodality imaging in the diagnosis and management of this challenging entity. We present the case of a 36-year-old man known to have sarcoidosis in which a variety of imaging modalities not only assisted in the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis, but also played a key role in the monitoring of disease activity and response to therapy.

Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Review of Contemporary Challenges in Diagnosis and Treatment

Sarcoidosis is a systemic disease characterized by noncaseating granulomas and is often a diagnosis of exclusion. The actual prevalence of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is unknown, as studies have demonstrated mixed data. CS may be asymptomatic and is likely more frequently encountered than previously thought. Sudden death may often be the presenting feature of CS. Most deaths attributed to CS are caused by arrhythmias or conduction system disease, and congestive heart failure may occur. Current expert consensus on diagnosis of CS continues to rely on endomyocardial biopsy, in the absence of which, histologic proof of extracardiac sarcoid involvement is necessitated. Emergence of newer noninvasive imaging modalities such as cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography, have become increasingly popular tools utilized in patients with both clinical and asymptomatic CS, and have demonstrated good diagnostic capability. The main therapeutic approaches in patients with CS can be broadly divided into the following 2 categories: pharmacological management and invasive or device oriented. However, much remains unknown about the optimal screening protocols of asymptomatic patients with extracardiac sarcoidosis and treatment of biopsy-proven CS. Our knowledge about CS has amplified significantly over the last 30 years and the growing realization that this process is often asymptomatic is paving the way for better screening protocols and earlier detection of this serious condition.