AMP579 is revealed to be a potent A2b-adenosine receptor agonist in human 293 cells and rabbit hearts

Cupping alleviates lung injury through the adenosine/A2BAR pathway

BACKGROUND

Acute lung injury (ALI) is a serious condition. Inflammation plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of ALI. Cupping, as a part of traditional Chinese medicine, is still a popular complementary and alternative therapy for a variety of ailments including respiratory diseases. However, reliable scientific data about cupping therapy are scarce. Adenosine, a purine nucleoside produced under metabolic stress by the action of extracellular ectonucleotidases (i.e. CD39 and CD73), can attenuate ALI through the A2BAR receptor. The aim of this study was to investigate the protective effect of cupping in a rat model of ALI and the role of adenosine in it.

METHODS

Male adult rats were subjected to ALI by intratracheal LPS instillation (0.3 mg/kg). Immediately after intratracheal LPS instillation, vacuum pressure was applied to a sanitized plastic bell cup on the back of the rat by suction for 10 min. Pulmonary injury and inflammation were assessed at 4 h after LPS challenge. The role of adenosine and A2BAR in cupping's protection after LPS instillation were evaluated.

RESULTS

Cupping alleviated LPS-induced lung injury, reduced inflammation and inhibited NF-kB activation in rats. Cupping upregulated CD39 and CD73 mRNA expression of the skin tissue at the cupping site and increased circulating levels of adenosine. Administration of PSB1115, a specific adenosine A2BAR receptor antagonist, abolished cupping's beneficial effects in LPS-induced ALI.

CONCLUSIONS

Cupping attenuates lung inflammation and injury through the adenosine/A2BAR pathway. The current study provides evidence-based information about cupping therapy in ALI.

Targeting of G-protein coupled receptors in sepsis

The Third International Consensus Definitions (Sepsis-3) define sepsis as life-threatening multi-organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Sepsis can progress to septic shock-an even more lethal condition associated with profound circulatory, cellular and metabolic abnormalities. Septic shock remains a leading cause of death in intensive care units and carries a mortality of almost 25%. Despite significant advances in our understanding of the pathobiology of sepsis, therapeutic interventions have not translated into tangible differences in the overall outcome for patients. Clinical trials of antagonists of various pro-inflammatory mediators in sepsis have been largely unsuccessful in the past. Given the diverse physiologic roles played by G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR), modulation of GPCR signaling for the treatment of sepsis has also been explored. Traditional pharmacologic approaches have mainly focused on ligands targeting the extracellular domains of GPCR. However, novel techniques aimed at modulating GPCR intracellularly through aptamers, pepducins and intrabodies have opened a fresh avenue of therapeutic possibilities. In this review, we summarize the diverse roles played by various subfamilies of GPCR in the pathogenesis of sepsis and identify potential targets for pharmacotherapy through these novel approaches.

Blood Platelet Adenosine Receptors as Potential Targets for Anti-Platelet Therapy

Adenosine receptors are a subfamily of highly-conserved G-protein coupled receptors. They are found in the membranes of various human cells and play many physiological functions. Blood platelets express two (A_2A and A_2B) of the four known adenosine receptor subtypes (A₁, A_2A, A_2B, and A₃). Agonization of these receptors results in an enhanced intracellular cAMP and the inhibition of platelet activation and aggregation. Therefore, adenosine receptors A_2A and A_2B could be targets for anti-platelet therapy, especially under circumstances when classic therapy based on antagonizing the purinergic receptor P2Y₁₂ is insufficient or problematic. Apart from adenosine, there is a group of synthetic, selective, longer-lasting agonists of A_2A and A_2B receptors reported in the literature. This group includes agonists with good selectivity for A_2A or A_2B receptors, as well as non-selective compounds that activate more than one type of adenosine receptor. Chemically, most A_2A and A_2B adenosine receptor agonists are adenosine analogues, with either adenine or ribose substituted by single or multiple foreign substituents. However, a group of non-adenosine derivative agonists has also been described. This review aims to systematically describe known agonists of A_2A and A_2B receptors and review the available literature data on their effects on platelet function.

Pharmacological postconditioning of the rabbit heart with non-selective, A1, A2A and A3 adenosine receptor agonists

Objectives

We investigated the effects of novel selective and non-selective adenosine receptor agonists (ARs) on cardioprotection.

Methods

Male rabbits divided into six groups were subjected to 30-min heart ischaemia and 3-h reperfusion: (1) control group, (2) postconditioning (PostC) group, (3) group A: treated with the non-selective agonist (S)-PHPNECA, (4) group B: treated with the A1 agonist CCPA, (5) group C: treated with the A2A agonist VT 7 and (6) group D: treated with the A3 agonist AR 170. The infarcted (I) and the areas at risk (R) were estimated as %I/R. In additional rabbits of all groups, heart samples were taken for determination of Akt, eNOS and STAT 3 at the 10th reperfusion minute.

Key findings

(S)-PHPNECA and CCPA reduced the infarct size (17.2 ± 2.9% and 17.9 ± 2.0% vs 46.8 ± 1.9% in control, P < 0.05), conferring a benefit similar to PostC (26.4 ± 0.3%). Selective A2A and A3 receptor agonists did not reduce the infarct size (39.5 ± 0.8% and 38.7 ± 3.5%, P = NS vs control). Akt, eNOS and STAT 3 were significantly activated after non-selective A1 ARs and PostC.

Conclusions

Non-selective and A1 but not A2A and A3 ARs agonists are essential for triggering cardioprotection. The molecular mechanism involves both RISK and the JAK/STAT pathways.

Pharmacologic therapy that simulates conditioning for cardiac ischemic/reperfusion injury

Cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of deaths due to noncommunicable diseases, of which ischemic heart disease forms a large percentage. The main therapeutic strategy to treat ischemic heart disease is reperfusion that could either be medical or surgical. However, reperfusion following ischemia is known to increase the infarct size further. Newer strategies such as ischemic preconditioning (IPC), ischemic postconditioning, and remote IPC have been shown to condition the myocardium to ischemia-reperfusion injury and thus reduce the final infarct size. Research over the past 3 decades has deepened our understanding of cellular and subcellular pathways that mediate ischemia-reperfusion injury. This in turn has resulted in the development of several pharmacological agents that act as conditioning agents, which reduce the final myocardial infarct size following ischemia-reperfusion. This review discusses many of these agents, their mechanisms of action, and the animal and clinical evidence behind them.

Adora2b signaling on bone marrow derived cells dampens myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury

BACKGROUND

Cardiac ischemia-reperfusion (I-R) injury represents a major cause of cardiac tissue injury. Adenosine signaling dampens inflammation during cardiac I-R. The authors investigated the role of the adenosine A2b-receptor (Adora2b) on inflammatory cells during cardiac I-R.

METHODS

To study Adora2b signaling on inflammatory cells, the authors transplanted wild-type (WT) bone marrow (BM) into Adora2b(-/-) mice or Adora2b(-/-) BM into WT mice. To study the role of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs), neutrophil-depleted WT mice were treated with an Adora2b agonist. After treatments, mice were exposed to 60 min of myocardial ischemia and 120 min of reperfusion. Infarct sizes and troponin I concentrations were determined by triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively.

RESULTS

Transplantation of WT BM into Adora2b(-/-) mice decreased infarct sizes by 19 ± 4% and troponin I by 87.5 ± 25.3 ng/ml (mean ± SD, n = 6). Transplantation of Adora2b(-/-) BM into WT mice increased infarct sizes by 20 ± 3% and troponin I concentrations by 69.7 ± 17.9 ng/ml (mean ± SD, n = 6). Studies on the reperfused myocardium revealed PMNs as the dominant cell type. PMN depletion or Adora2b agonist treatment reduced infarct sizes by 30 ± 11% or 26 ± 13% (mean ± SD, n = 4); however, the combination of both did not produce additional cardioprotection. Cytokine profiling showed significantly higher cardiac tumor necrosis factor α concentrations in Adora2b(-/-) compared with WT mice (39.3 ± 5.3 vs. 7.5 ± 1.0 pg/mg protein, mean ± SD, n = 4). Pharmacologic studies on human-activated PMNs revealed an Adora2b-dependent tumor necrosis factor α release.

CONCLUSION

Adora2b signaling on BM-derived cells such as PMNs represents an endogenous cardioprotective mechanism during cardiac I-R. The authors' findings suggest that Adora2b agonist treatment during cardiac I-R reduces tumor necrosis factor α release of PMNs, thereby dampening tissue injury.

The mechanism of beta-adrenergic preconditioning: roles for adenosine and ROS during triggering and mediation

The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanism of beta-adrenergic preconditioning (BPC). The roles of adenosine and its receptor subtypes, the generation of oxygen free radicals (ROS) and activation of the K(ATP) channels as well as the phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI(3)K)/PKB/Akt and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signal transduction pathways during the triggering and mediation phases were evaluated. Using the isolated working rat heart, BPC was elicited by administration of denopamine (beta1 adrenergic receptor agonist, 10(-7) M), isoproterenol (beta1/beta2 adrenergic receptor agonist, 10(-7) M) or formoterol (beta2 adrenergic receptor agonist, 10(-9) M) for 5 min followed by 5 min washout. Index ischaemia was 35 min regional ischaemia and infarct size determined using the tetrazolium method. The role of adenosine was studied using adenosine deaminase and selective antagonists as well as the PI(3)K and ERK inhibitors, wortmannin and PD98,059, bracketing the triggering and mediating phases. Involvement of ROS, PKC, the mitochondrial K(ATP) channels, release of endogenous opioids and bradykinin was studied by administration of N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), bisindolylmaleimide, the K(ATP) channel blocker 5-hydroxydecanoate (5-HD), naloxone or HOE140, respectively. Activation of PKB/Akt and ERKp44/p42 during triggering and reperfusion was determined by Western blot. Preconditioning with all three beta-adrenergic receptor agonists caused a reduction in infarct size and an improvement in postischaemic function. BPC preconditioning with isoproterenol, denopamine or formoterol was abolished by the adenosine A3 receptor antagonist MRS1191 during both the triggering and mediation phases. Isoproterenol-induced preconditioning (beta1/beta2 PC) was attenuated by MRS1754, an adenosine A(2B) receptor antagonist, during the triggering phase and abolished during reperfusion. The mediation phase of beta1/beta2 PC was also abolished by ZM241385, an adenosine A(2A) antagonist. The free radical scavenger NAC caused a significant attenuation of cardioprotection induced by isoproterenol when administered during both trigger and mediation phases, while being effective during the trigger phase with denopamine and during reperfusion in formoterol preconditioned hearts. The mitochondrial K(ATP) channel blocker, 5-HD, was without effect on beta1/beta2 PC during both triggering and mediation phases. BPC in rat hearts is dependent on activation of the A(3) adenosine receptors by endogenously produced adenosine and production of free radicals during the triggering and mediation phases while the A(2A) and A(2B) adenosine receptors participate mainly during reperfusion. The mitochondrial K(ATP) channels do not contribute to cardioprotection at any stage. Activation of ERK and PI3K/PKB/Akt during the triggering and reperfusion phases is associated with cardioprotection.

The new oral adenosine A1 receptor agonist capadenoson in male patients with stable angina

BACKGROUND

Anti-ischaemic effect of A1 adenosine receptor agonists was shown in animal and preclinical studies. The present proof-of-concept study aimed at evaluation of the efficacy and safety of a new adenosine A1 receptor agonist capadenoson in patients with stable angina.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single dose-escalating, multicenter trial comparing the effect of capadenoson at 1, 2.5, 5, 10, and 20 mg versus placebo. For each dose step patients were randomized to receive single doses of either capadenoson or matching placebo in a 5:1 ratio. The primary efficacy variable was the absolute difference in heart rate (HR) at maximum comparable level of workload between baseline and post dose exercise tolerance test at maximum concentration of capadenoson. Capadenoson effect on total exercise time and time to 1-mm ST-segment depression were also measured.

RESULTS

Sixty-two male patients with stable angina were enrolled in the study. There was a consistent trend for HR reduction at comparable maximum work load in active treatment groups, with significant differences against placebo for 10 and 20 mg (HR reduction by 12.2 and 6.8 beats per min, p = 0.0002 and p = 0.032, respectively). A statistically significant trend (p = 0.0003) for a reduction in HR with increasing doses of capadenoson was shown. Increases in total exercise time and time to 1-mm ST-segment depression were also observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with stable angina capadenoson lowers exercise HR at comparable maximum workload, which is associated with improved total exercise time and prolongation of time to ischaemia.

A2B adenosine receptors inhibit superoxide production from mitochondrial complex I in rabbit cardiomyocytes via a mechanism sensitive to Pertussis toxin

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

A(2B) adenosine receptors protect against ischaemia/reperfusion injury by activating survival kinases including extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K). However, the underlying mechanism(s) and signalling pathway(s) remain undefined.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

HEK 293 cells stably transfected with human A(2B) adenosine receptors (HEK-A(2B) ) and isolated adult rabbit cardiomyocytes were used to assay phosphorylation of ERK by Western blot and cation flux through cAMP-gated channels by patch clamp methods. Generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by mitochondria was measured with a fluorescent dye.

KEY RESULTS

In HEK-A(2B) cells, the selective A(2B) receptor agonist Bay 60-6583 (Bay 60) increased ERK phosphorylation and cAMP levels, detected by current through cAMP-gated ion channels. However, increased cAMP or its downstream target protein kinase A was not involved in ERK phosphorylation. Pertussis toxin (PTX) blocked ERK phosphorylation, suggesting receptor coupling to G(i) or G(o) proteins. Phosphorylation was also blocked by inhibition of PI3K (with wortmannin) or of ERK kinase (MEK1/2, with PD 98059) but not by inhibition of NO synthase (NOS). In cardiomyocytes, Bay 60 did not affect cAMP levels but did block the increased superoxide generation induced by rotenone, a mitochondrial complex I inhibitor. This effect of Bay 60 was inhibited by PD 98059, wortmannin or PTX. Inhibition of NOS blocked superoxide production because NOS is downstream of ERK.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Activation of A(2B) adenosine receptors reduced superoxide generation from mitochondrial complex I through G(i/o) , ERK, PI3K, and NOS, all of which have been implicated in ischaemic preconditioning.

Recent developments in adenosine receptor ligands and their potential as novel drugs

Medicinal chemical approaches have been applied to all four of the adenosine receptor (AR) subtypes (A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3)) to create selective agonists and antagonists for each. The most recent class of selective AR ligands to be reported is the class of A(2B)AR agonists. The availability of these selective ligands has facilitated research on therapeutic applications of modulating the ARs and in some cases has provided clinical candidates. Prodrug approaches have been developed which improve the bioavailability of the drugs, reduce side-effects, and/or may lead to site-selective effects. The A(2A) agonist regadenoson (Lexiscan®), a diagnostic drug for myocardial perfusion imaging, is the first selective AR agonist to be approved. Other selective agonists and antagonists are or were undergoing clinical trials for a broad range of indications, including capadenoson and tecadenoson (A(1) agonists) for atrial fibrillation, or paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, respectively, apadenoson and binodenoson (A(2A) agonists) for myocardial perfusion imaging, preladenant (A(2A) antagonist) for the treatment of Parkinson's disease, and CF101 and CF102 (A(3) agonists) for inflammatory diseases and cancer, respectively.

Cooperative cardioprotection through adenosine A1 and A2A receptor agonism in ischemia-reperfused isolated mouse heart

Recent reports have shown that adenosine A1 receptor-mediated cardioprotection requires concomitant A2 receptor activation, but no study thus far has shown that this phenomenon occurs using A1 agonists at reperfusion. Thus, we compared adenosine A2A receptor knockout (A2AKO) and wild-type mouse hearts (n = 9-11) subjected to global ischemia (30 minutes) and reperfusion (60 minutes) in the presence and absence of the A1 agonist N-cyclopentlyadenosine (CPA). We also determined the effects of selective antagonists at A2A and A2B receptors on CPA-induced protection. In wild-type hearts, CPA (100 nM) significantly (P < 0.05) improved contractility (52.7 ± 6.2% versus 23.9 ± 4.9% of preischemia), left ventricular developed pressure, end diastolic pressure; reduced infarct size (7.9 ± 1.7% versus 23.9 ± 6.6% area at risk); decreased lactate dehydrogenase efflux; and increased ERK1/2 phosphorylation at 60 minutes of reperfusion. Adenosine A2A (ZM241385, 50 nM) and A2B (MRS1754, 100 nM) receptor antagonists abolished CPA-mediated cardioprotection in wild-type groups as did the A1 receptor antagonist DPCPX (P < 0.05). In A2AKO hearts, CPA did not improve functional parameters and protective signaling with the exception of end diastolic pressure. In this model, using a clinically relevant mode of pharmacologic intervention, pERK 1/2-dependent A1-mediated cardioprotection requires a cooperative activation of A2 receptors, presumably through endogenous adenosine.

Ischemic postconditioning: from receptor to end-effector

Ischemic preconditioning, a robust cardioprotective intervention, has limited clinical efficacy because it must be initiated before myocardial ischemia. Conversely, ischemic postconditioning, repeated brief reocclusions of a coronary artery after release of prolonged coronary occlusion, provides cardioprotection in clinically feasible settings, that is, coronary angioplasty. Ischemic postconditioning's signaling is being investigated to identify pharmacological triggers that could be used without angioplasty. In initial minutes of reperfusion H(+) washes out of previously ischemic cells. pH rises enabling mitochondrial permeability transition pores (MPTPs) to form leading to cessation of ATP production and cell necrosis. Coronary reocclusions maintain sufficient acidosis to keep MPTP closed while signaling is initiated that can generate endogenous antagonists of MPTP formation even after cellular pH normalizes. Reintroduction of oxygen generates reactive oxygen species that activate protein kinase C to increase sensitivity of adenosine A(2b) receptors allowing adenosine released from ischemic cells to bind leading to activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activation results in phosphorylation of Akt promoting activation of nitric oxide synthase and nitric oxide production, which inhibits glycogen synthase kinase-3β, perhaps the final cytosolic signaling step before inhibition of MPTP formation. Interference with MPTP may be the final step that determines cell salvage.

Both A2a and A2b adenosine receptors at reperfusion are necessary to reduce infarct size in mouse hearts

Pre- and postconditioning depend on the activation of adenosine receptors (ARs) at the end of the index ischemia. The aim of this study was to determine which receptor subtypes must be activated. In situ mouse hearts underwent 30 min of regional ischemia, followed by 2 h of reperfusion. As expected, either ischemic postconditioning (6 cycles of 10 s of reperfusion and 10 s of coronary occlusion) or infusion of the selective A(2b) adenosine receptor (A(2b)AR) agonist BAY60-6583 (BAY60) for 60 min, starting 5 min before reperfusion reduced infarct size in wild-type C57Bl/6N mice. Protection from either was abolished by the selective A(2b)AR antagonist MRS-1754, confirming a role for A(2b)AR. Additionally, the coadministration of ischemic postconditioning and a selective A(2a)AR antagonist led to the loss of protection as well. 5'-Ectonucleotidase (CD73) is thought to be necessary for the production of adenosine during ischemia. As predicted, ischemic postconditioning did not protect CD73 knockout mice. Selective agonists of either A(2b)AR (BAY60) or A(2a)AR (CGS-21680), as well as the coadministration of ischemic postconditioning and BAY60, also failed to protect hearts of the CD73 knockout mice. But the nonselective A(1)/A(2)AR agonist 5'-(N-ethylcarboxamido)adenosine (NECA) was protective, suggesting that the activation of multiple AR subtypes might be required. The coadministration of CGS-21680 and BAY60 also elicited profound protection, indicating that two AR subtypes, A(2a) and A(2b), must be simultaneously activated for protection to occur.