A very rare localization of metastatic lung carcinoma to the interosseous membrane

Foot metastasis: Current knowledge

Foot metastasis are rare and often overlooked due to non-specifical symptoms. This often leads to misdiagnosis delaying the right diagnosis. Metastatic disease of the foot is rare. Foot pain and swelling may be the presenting symptom of an occult malignancy. If metastatic disease is not kept in the differential diagnosis of foot pain, diagnosis and treatment will be delayed. The purpose of this study was to analyze articles presenting cases of foot metastasis to provide a more accurate incidence of symptomatic foot acrometastasis as well as to review the clinical course and outcomes. Studies were searched on PubMed/Medline from the inception to February 2020. All studies included in the review presented foot metastasis either with or without a known primary tumor. Most of the articles were case reports, to which we added two case reports of foot acrometastasis produced by our Institute. Forty-three studies with a total of 45 patients were included in this review. The literature published mostly concerning case reports about old patients (average age: 63,2), in a late phase of their disease. Lung cancer appeared to be the most common primary tumor, followed by endometrial and breast cancer. In the 36% of the cases foot metastasis were found when the primary site was still unknown. Calcaneus and metatarsal bones were the most common bones involved. Surgical solution is rare, the chosen treatments are often of palliative care. Prognosis was often poor, death occurred within 2 years since the discovery of foot metastasis in about 50% of cases.

Skeletal muscle metastasis from the most common carcinomas orthopedic surgeons deal with. A systematic review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

There is scarce information in the literature dealing with the clinical presentation, management and oncologic outcomes of skeletal muscle metastases (SMM). We sought to perform a systematic review of the literature to investigate: (1) tumor characteristics of SMM, (2) therapeutic approach, and (3) oncological outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed using PubMed and EMBASE search engines. A total of 3231 references were reviewed and 49 studies were included. Demographic data, presentation characteristics, and oncological outcomes were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 22.0 software (IBM; Armonk, New York) and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software version 3 (Biostat, Inc.), with p < 0.05 as statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 231 patients were included. These tumors presented more commonly on males 58.4% (135/231), with a mean age of 60.08 ± 10.6 years, and in the axial area 39.6% (88/222). The most common carcinoma type was lung 41.1% (95/231). Resection of a single metastases did not change survival significantly (p = 0.992). LRR was higher within the group of patients that underwent WLE compared with non-WLE [31.3% (23/74) vs. 8.7% (2/23), p ≤ 0.001]. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for the entire cohort showed an estimate of 15.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.6-19; standard error (SE) 0.432], with lung carcinoma carrying the worst prognosis 6.7 months (95% CI 5.4-8.07; SE 0.68). Patients with a single SMM showed a worse estimate mean survival time compared to patients with multiple metastases limited to muscles [8.6 months (95% CI 4.7-12.5; SE 2.0) vs 25.4 months (95% CI 19.8-31.05; SE 2.8; p ≤ 0.001)].

CONCLUSIONS

Overall survival is poor and is driven mainly by the type of carcinoma. An Increased LRR might be present due to the systemic nature of the condition, and degree of control of the primary carcinoma.

Surgical treatment of impending and pathological fractures of tibia

Advances in adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies have improved the prognosis of cancer patients leading to an increasing incidence of bone metastases and consequent long bone fractures. In the present study the authors consider the indications and the different surgical options of treatment of tibial pathological lesions. 13 patients (14 lesions, 6 pathological fractures), treated according to histotype and lesion localisation, were retrospectively evaluated. Using generic outcome instruments such as the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) and Quality of life questionnaire of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (QLQ-C30) pain, mobility and use of analgesics were evaluated before and after surgery. In all patients, mechanical stabilisation of the osteolytic lesion was achieved. There were no pathological fractures, and no implant mechanical failure. All patients reported pain relief, with a relevant reduction in the amount of analgesics used. Surgical treatment of tibial metastases has to be decided taking into consideration the histotype, localisation of the metastases and life expectancy. The treatment has to be all-encompassing in a solitary lesion in patients with a good prognosis but less invasive in plurimetastatic patients with poor prognosis. Acquisition of good mechanical stability is crucial for a successful outcome.

Clinical management and surgical treatment of distal fibular tumours: a case series and review of the literature

PURPOSE

Study reports clinical and functional outcomes of surgical treatment in a case series of nine patients with distal fibular tumours.

METHODS

Nine patients with distal fibular tumours were observed between 2005 and 2010. A PubMed search was performed using the terms "fibula", "lower limb tumour [cancer]", "sarcoma", "Ewing", "peroneal", "fibular metastasis", and "limb-salvage surgery".

RESULTS

In all our patients, lesions were unilateral. All patients complained of pain; limping was present in 5 of 9 tumours. Patients were managed surgically, except one who underwent local radiotherapy. In six patients, a benign or tumor-like lesion was detected. Malignancies consisted of metastatic lung adenocarcinoma (two cases) or multifocal mesenchymal cancer (one case). Non-malignant lesions were treated by curettage and filling, followed by internal fixation when needed. In malignant or locally aggressive lesions, metadiaphyseal fibular resection was performed. The literature search retrieved either case reports or small case series, reflecting the rarity of distal fibular tumours. Surgical treatment was successful in all patients with benign lesions, whereas the rate of success was 40-100 % in case of malignancies.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the low incidence of distal fibular tumours, controversies exist about the optimal surgical management. Clinical observation and imaging should be reserved to asymptomatic benign lesions. In non-malignant tumours causing pain, limping, and pathological fractures; in malignancies, surgery is recommended. Finally, in patients with asymptomatic lesions of uncertain nature, biopsy and histological examination should be performed to plan appropriate management.