Restoration of hip architecture with bipolar hemiarthroplasty in the elderly: does it affect early functional outcome?

Optimising Soft-Tissue Balancing in Hip Hemiarthroplasty Surgery Using a Simple Planning Protocol

Introduction Intracapsular neck of the femur fractures are some of the most common fragility fractures with significant morbidity and mortality. Cemented hemiarthroplasty is the standard treatment in most cases. Restoring the horizontal offset and leg length is important to optimize the outcome of hip hemiarthroplasty. Preoperative templating based on a scaled radiograph is common prior to total hip arthroplasty surgery to achieve optimum offset and leg length. It is not routine to have scaled radiographs available prior to a hemiarthroplasty surgery. Our simple non-scaled radiograph templating protocol (NSRTP) was introduced to help establish the correct offset and leg length in the absence of scaled radiographs. Methods A retrospective, comparative, case-control study was carried out in an acute hospital setting. Scaled radiographs were not available for any patients in the study, as is usual for hemiarthroplasty patients in our hospital. One group had surgery without any templating. The other group had surgery using the NSRTP. The NSRTP determined optimal ipsilateral offset based on preoperative measurement of the contralateral hip offset and ipsilateral head diameter on unscaled radiographs together with intraoperative measurement of the diameter of the ipsilateral femoral head removed at surgery. To help achieve the correct length, the NSRTP also included assessment and restoration of the contralateral greater trochanter tip-to-head relationship. The neck cut was tailored to restore the correct relationship. Results Twenty-three patients underwent hemiarthroplasty surgery without any templating and 23 had surgery using the NSRTP. The implants used were C-STEM™ (DePuy Synthes, Raynham, Massachusetts, United States) and SPECTRON (Smith & Nephew plc, London, United Kingdom); stems were used together with monopolar heads. The stems were available in standard and high offset versions and with a variety of neck lengths, allowing the correct combination to be selected to restore offset. When the NSRTP was used, horizontal offset and leg length were restored to within 2 mm of the contralateral hip in 22 patients out of 23. There was a statistically significant improvement in restoration of offset and leg length when the NSRTP was used, compared to the control group. Conclusion Restoration of the offset and leg length is important to maximize the outcome of hip arthroplasty surgery. Preoperative templating is helpful to achieve offset and leg length in total hip replacement. In the absence of scaled radiographs, NSRTP enables restoration of offset and leg length to within 2 mm of normal in more than 96% of patients. This protocol requires knowledge of the offset of the hemiarthroplasty stems being used, which is easily available from the relevant manufacturer.

Complications of Hip Hemiarthroplasty

Hip hemiarthroplasty is a commonly performed orthopedic surgery, used to treat proximal femur fractures in the elderly population. Although hip hemiarthroplasty is frequently successful in addressing these injuries, complications can occur. Commonly seen complications include dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, acetabular erosion, and leg-length inequality. Less frequently seen complications include neurovascular injury and capsular interposition. This article presents a comprehensive review of the complications associated with the management of hip hemiarthroplasty. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(4):e199-e209.].

Intraoperative method of femoral head central measurement to prevent leg length discrepancy following hemiarthroplasty

Purpose

This study aimed to introduce and investigate the safety and efficiency of the intraoperative central measurement method of the femoral head (IM-CMFH) to prevent leg length discrepancies (LLD) after hemiarthroplasty.

Methods

Overall, 79 patients aged 75 to 85 years with femoral neck fractures who underwent hemiarthroplasty were divided into two groups: the Control group (n = 46) and the IM-CMFH group (n = 33). The two groups were compared for postoperative LLD and the proportions of patients with greater than 10 mm, 6-10 mm, and within 5 mm, postoperative femoral offset (FO) difference and the proportions of patients within 5 mm, incremental greater than 5 mm and reduction greater than 5 mm. Next, the vertical distance from the center of the femoral head to the tip of the greater trochanter on the anatomical axis of the femur (VD-CFH-TGTAAF), leg length, and FO on the operative and non-operative sides within the IM-CMFH group. Finally, operative time, hemoglobin loss, Harris scores 3 months after surgery, and postoperative complications were analyzed.

Results

Compared with the control group, the postoperative LLD and FO differences were significantly lower in the IM-CMFH group (P = 0.031; P = 0.012), and the proportion of patients with postoperative LLD greater than 10 mm decreased significantly (P = 0.041), while the proportion of patients with FO difference of within 5 mm increased (P = 0.009). In addition, there was no significant difference in the operative time, hemoglobin loss, and Harris score at 3 months postoperatively and postoperative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in FO, leg-length, and VD-CFH-TGTAAF between the operative and non-operative sides within the IM-CMFH group (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Satisfactory results can be achieved by using the IM-CMFH to prevent LLD following hemiarthroplasty, and there is no increase in operative time, hemoglobin loss, or postoperative complications. This technique is efficient for hemiarthroplasties and is both simple and convenient.

Effect of Vertical and Lateral Offset Restoration on Clinical Outcomes in Intracapsular and Extracapsular Hip Fractures Undergoing Hemiarthroplasty

Objective

We aimed to investigate whether there is a change in the postoperative lateral and vertical femoral offset (FO) in patients who underwent bipolar straight stem hemiarthroplasty (SSHA) and calcar stem hemiarthroplasty (CRHA) and whether this change makes a difference in the comparison of both groups.

Material and methods

This study included 109 patients who met these criteria. Patients are divided into two groups according to treatment methods. There were 58 patients (group 1) who underwent SSHA due to intracapsular (AO type 31-B neck and 31-C head fracture) femur fracture, and there were 51 patients (group 2) who underwent CRHA due to extracapsular (AO type 31-A intertrochanteric) femur fracture. We analyzed femoral vertical and lateral femoral offset, Wiberg angle, and head-neck angle difference in both groups.

Results

The median age was significantly higher in the CRHA group (p=0.042). The Harris hip score (HHS) was significantly higher in the SSHA group (p=0.023). The femoral offset difference was 5 mm in the SSHA group, while it was significantly lower (-6 mm) in the CRHA group (p<0.001). The Wiberg angle difference did not differ significantly between patient groups (p=0.214). The limb length difference was found to be similar in both surgical groups (p=0.483).

Conclusions

The study results show that there was no negative correlation between clinical and radiological outcomes in the SSHA group, whereas there was a negative correlation between clinical and radiological outcomes in the CRHA group. It is very difficult to control vertical and lateral offset reconstruction, especially in extracapsular hip fractures reconstructed by hemiarthroplasty. Deficiencies in lateral and vertical stabilization restoration may be associated with poor clinical outcomes in CRHA patients. Orthopedic surgeries should be performed carefully when restoring leg length and femoral offset, especially calcar replacement hemiarthroplasties.

INFLUENCE OF FEMORAL OFFSET ON FUNCTIONAL CAPACITY OF PATIENTS WITH TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY

Objective

To correlate vertical (VFO) and horizontal (HFO) femoral offset with hip range of motion (ROM), peak muscle torque (PT), functional, capacity, and lower limb length in patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods

A cross-sectional case control study, in which 22 individuals (10 men and 12 women) - aged 61 (41-72), and within 23 (10-40) postoperative days - were evaluated for active hip ROM (fleximetry); Isometric PT (portable dynamometer); functional capacity (Timed up and Go test (TUG) and Harris Hip Score questionnaire); lower limb length (measuring tape); and VFO and HFO (radiographs).

Results

The operated limb showed a reduction in length (p = 0.006), ROM for abduction (p = 0.001), flexion (p = 0.003), and external rotation (p = 0.003), as well as in all PT (p < 0.05) when compared with the contralateral limb. Moderate correlations were observed between VFO and external rotators (r = 0.487; p = 0.021); HFO and external rotators PT (r = -0.508; p = 0.016); and the difference between the VFO (operated and non-operated limb) and the TUG (r = -0.570; p = 0.006).

Conclusion

Changes to the femoral offset seem to influence functional capacity, as well as the movement and external rotators PT of the hips in patients with THA, considering the postoperative period evaluated. Level of Evidence III, Case Control Study.

Relationships between Femoral Offset Change and Clinical Score following Bipolar Hip Arthroplasty in Femoral Neck Fractures

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between femoral offset (FO) and clinical outcomes of patients with femoral neck fracture following bipolar hip arthroplasty (BHA).

Materials and Methods

Records for a total of 520 patients who underwent BHA for a femoral neck fracture between December 1, 2003, and September 30, 2018, were reviewed retrospectively. Patients with unclear medical records, a congenital deformity and preoperative trauma history of the hip, high-energy multiple trauma, or a history of neurodegenerative disease or cerebrovascular disease were excluded. The remaining 77 patients included in the analysis had a minimum follow-up period of one year. For clinical assessment, the postoperative pain visual analogue scale (VAS) and Harris hip score (HHS) were analyzed at each follow-up period. For radiological assessment, the difference in leg length discrepancy (LLD) and FO were measured.

Results

The difference in mean FO postoperatively was 6.7±4.8 mm, and the difference in mean postoperative LLD was 4.9±3.4 mm. The mean HHS was 77.1±7.7, 82.3±8.6, 83.4±7.7, and 86.4±6.7 at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperative, respectively. The correlation coefficient between FO and HHS in 1-year follow-up was −0.38, and a statistically significant outcome was found (P=0.001). For the HHS domain, the correlation coefficient for function at 1-year follow-up was −0.42, revealing a statistically significant outcome (P=0.0001).

Conclusion

There was a statistically significant correlation between clinical outcomes and FO difference at 1 year after BHA in patients over 65 years of age with femoral neck fractures.

Modular Versus Monoblock Hemiarthroplasty in Trauma: A 5-Year Retrospective Analysis of Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes

Introduction:

Displaced intraarticular neck of femur fractures for low-demand patients are primarily managed with hemiarthroplasty. The optimal implant design for modularity is unclear. Globally and within Australia, the use of monoblock implants varies significantly by location; however, monoblock use is decreasing in Australia in favour of modular systems, with little evidence-based explanation. This study aimed to compare the radiological and clinical outcomes of monoblock and modular hemiarthroplasties.

Methods:

This retrospective cohort study involved patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty for neck-of-femur fractures between 2009 and 2013 at the Gold Coast University Hospital. Leg length and femoral offset were measured from post-operative pelvic radiographs. Revision and mortality rates were extracted from hospital medical records and Australian Joint Registry data.

Results:

A total of 249 patients were evaluated (112 with modular and 147 with monoblock implants). Patient demographics were comparable between the treatment groups; however, the monoblock group comprised significantly older persons. No between-group differences in leg length discrepancies were identified. Femoral offset was under-restored on average by 5.86mm (p<0.05) compared to the uninjured side within the monoblock group. Mortality rates were significantly higher in the monoblock group (23% vs 12%, P=0.026) at the 1-year mark. No significant between-group differences were found in 30-day mortality, length of stay, or revision rates.

Discussion:

Modular hemiarthroplasty was superior for restoring offset in our cohort, but no group differences were noted for leg length. While modular implants seemed better for restoring normal hip anatomy and were associated with a lower 1-year mortality rate, no other advantages were found.

Does restoration of leg length and femoral offset play a role in functional outcome one year after hip hemiarthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between specific joint biomechanical parameters and 1year functional outcome scores in elderly patients receiving hemiarthroplasty in the setting of intracapsular hip fractures.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, institutional registry based study. 168 hip hemarthroplasties were captured from October 2013 to June 2015. Patients were excluded based on contralateral hip surgery, perioperative complications or inadequate radiographs. 84 patients were alive at one year follow up. We compared mobility and pain scores to radiographically determined variations of leg lengths and femoral offset. We also compared the performance of fellowship trained arthroplasty surgeons to their non-fellowship trained counterparts.

RESULTS

The operated leg was a mean of 1.12±6.8mm longer than the contralateral. leg length discrepancy (LLD) was less than 10mm in 72 patients. Mean difference in offset between limbs was 0.25±3.3mm. The difference was within 5mm in 79 patients (94%). We found no statistically significant correlation between mobility or pain scores and variations in leg length or offset. We found significantly better performance of the arthroplasty surgeons in restoring leg length but no difference in offset reconstruction or functional benefit for the patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study was unable to demonstrate a significant relationship between leg length or femoral offset restoration and the patient's ultimate functional recovery. Arthroplasty surgeons performed better in restoring leg length, but no associated functional advantage was seen.

Does femoral offset recover and affect the functional outcome of patients with displaced femoral neck fracture following hemiarthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Restoring preoperative horizontal femoral offset (FO) promised good functional outcome in patients receiving total hip arthroplasty. However, relatively little was known regarding the clinical relevance of restoring the offset in patients with bipolar hemiarthroplasty to treat displaced femoral neck fracture. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate postoperative FO accurately and verify its relation with functional outcome.

METHODS

One hundred elderly patients who received bipolar hemiarthroplasty to treat displaced femoral neck fracture were identified. Preoperative CT scanning of contralateral hip joint and reconstruction of images led to rotation-free FO. By referencing postoperative implant specification and comparing to measured values in Picture Archive and Communication System, rotation-free postoperative FO and the amount of change were acquired. Postoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Modified Barthel Index (MBI) were evaluated to measure functional outcome at 12-month after the surgery. Patients with significant FO change were identified. Multiple regression analysis was conducted to determine if the FO change might independently affect the outcome regardless of confounding factors.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative offset was 37.4±2.5 increased by 12.7±9.6% after the surgery. Only 25.0% of postoperative offset after hemiarthroplasty was changed within ±5% of preoperative offset. A total of 45.0% of postoperative offset changed within ±10% while 77.0% of postoperative offset changed within ±20%. 23% of patients whose FO changed more than 20% showed significantly worse outcome score than the patients whose FO change remained within ±20% of initial value. Mean MBI and HHS were negatively correlated with FO change. After adjusting for confounding factors, significant correlation remained between modification of FO and MBI, but not between FO change and HHS (B=4.576; β=0.235; 95% confidence interval of B: 0.534 to 8.135).

CONCLUSIONS

FO was not properly restored in 23% of subjects receiving bipolar hemiarthroplasty due to femoral neck fracture. FO restoration independently predicted fair MBI after the surgery. Therefore, surgeons should pay attention to restoring FO with meticulous templating.

Effect of TCM music therapy for hospice care of patients with gastrointestinal cancer

AIM

To evaluate the effect of TCM music therapy for hospice care of patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

METHODS

One hundred and six patients with gastrointestinal cancer treated from April 2013 to January 2016 in the hospice ward of our hospital were randomly divided into either an observation group to receive TCM music therapy or a control group to receive basic therapy. Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) score, Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) score, and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

At 2 and 4 wk after treatment, the HAMD scores were significantly increased and the KPS scores were significantly decreased in both groups (P < 0.05), and the improvement was significantly better in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05). The rate of nursing satisfaction was significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group (90.57% vs 69.81%).

CONCLUSION

Chinese music therapy can significantly improve the hospice care of patients in terms of reducing depression and improving the functional status of patients.

On-table decision-making in intracapsular hip fracture surgery: mid-term results of a pilot study

INTRODUCTION

At the present time, it is generally recommended to use hip replacement in dislocated fractures to avoid failure after internal fixation. A problem is that previous research has demonstrated that observers have problems in discriminating between dislocated and undislocated fractures. A possible solution to this problem would be to use arthroplasty in the majority of the cases. However, this also means that many fractures with the potential for uneventful healing would be replaced.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the current investigation, the mid-term outcome was recorded for patients with intracapsular hip fractures who were treated with either internal fixation or arthroplasty. A novel treatment algorithm was employed. After careful exclusion of cases with known risk factors for failure after internal fixation, a technique called on-table decision was used to identify suitable patients for internal fixation.

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients with intracapsular hip fractures were studied with a median follow-up time of 12 months (IQR 8-15.25 months). Nineteen (19) patients (26 %) were excluded in the selection process, leaving 53 (74 %) for on-table decision-making. Thirty patients (42 %) were identified as suitable for internal fixation and gave anatomically stable closed reductions. Two of these patients (7 %) exhibited non-unions and one (3 %) avascular necrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The mid-term outcome after internal fixation is promising. The careful selection process may be helpful in identifying fracture patterns for which internal fixation may be considered as a safe and less invasive alternative to hip arthroplasty.

Determination of Femoral Neck Angle and Torsion Angle Utilizing a Novel Three-Dimensional Modeling and Analytical Technology Based on CT Datasets

INTRODUCTION

Exact knowledge of femoral neck inclination and torsion angles is important in recognizing, understanding and treating pathologic conditions in the hip joint. However, published results vary widely between different studies, which indicates that there are persistent difficulties in carrying out exact measurements.

METHODS

A three dimensional modeling and analytical technology was used for the analysis of 1070 CT datasets of skeletally mature femurs. Individual femoral neck angles and torsion angles were precisely computed, in order to establish whether gender, age, body mass index and ethnicity influence femoral neck angles and torsion angles.

RESULTS

The median femoral neck angle was 122.2° (range 100.1-146.2°, IQR 117.9-125.6°). There are significant gender (female 123.0° vs. male 121.5°; p = 0.007) and ethnic (Asian 123.2° vs. Caucasian 121.9°; p = 0.0009) differences. The median femoral torsion angle was 14.2° (-23.6-48.7°, IQR 7.4-20.4°). There are significant gender differences (female 16.4° vs. male 12.1°; p = 0.0001). Femoral retroversion was found in 7.8% of the subjects.

CONCLUSION

Precise femoral neck and torsion angles were obtained in over one thousand cases. Systematic deviations in measurement due to human error were eliminated by using automated high accuracy morphometric analysis. Small but significant gender and ethnic differences were found in femoral neck and torsion angles.

Femoral offset following trochanteric femoral fractures: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction of the femoral offset reportedly improves outcome following total hip arthroplasty, but little is known of its influence following hip fractures. We aimed to establish the effect of the femoral offset on the medium-term functional outcome in elderly patients who had sustained trochanteric fractures requiring proximal femoral nailing.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We measured the rotation corrected femoral offset (FORC) and relative femoral offset (FORL) on plain anteroposterior radiographs of the hip in 188 patients (58 male, 130 female) with a trochanteric fracture who underwent proximal femoral nailing at our institution. The primary outcome measure was the Harris hip score (HSS) 6 and 12 months postoperatively; the Barthel index was assessed as a secondary outcome.

RESULTS

The mean FORC after surgery was 58 mm (±11 mm), while the mean FORL was 1.21 (±0.22). At final follow up, we found significant inverse relationships (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, ρ) between FORC and FORL and the functional outcome assessed by the HSS (FORC: ρ = -0.207, p = 0.036; FORL: ρ = -0.247, p = 0.012), and FORL and the Barthel index (FORC: ρ = -147, p = 0.129; FORL: ρ = -0.192, p = 0.046). A consistent trend was observed after adjustment for confounding variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results underline the biomechanical importance of the femoral offset for medium-term outcomes in elderly patients with trochanteric fractures. In contrast with the published findings on total hip arthroplasty, we found an inverse correlation between functional outcome and the extent of the reconstructed femoral offset.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I - Prognostic study.

Functional implications of femoral offset following hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture

PURPOSE

Inadequate reconstruction of femoral offset after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with unfavourable outcomes, but its importance following hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture is unknown.

METHODS

Our study examined the correlation between reconstructed femoral offset and functional outcome 12 months after post traumatic hemiarthroplasty in 126 prospectively enrolled elderly patients. Rotation-corrected femoral offset (FORC), relative femoral offset (FORL) and contralateral femoral offset (FOC) were measured on anteroposterior radiographs. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) was the primary outcome measure; the timed up and go (TUG) test and Lawton instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) score were secondary outcomes. Correlations were sought using the Spearman correlation coefficient (r). Sample size was calculated using an Altman nomogram, with the power set at 80 %, the significance level of 0.05 and a standardised difference of 0.75.

RESULTS

The mean reconstructed FORC was 41 mm (17-67 mm) and showed a linear relationship and excellent correlation with the FOC. At 12 months, we found a significant positive correlation between FORC and HHS (r = 0.303, p = 0.025) and IADL (r = 0.325, p = 0.013), but not TUG (r = -0.026, p = 0.863). These findings were confirmed by bivariate and multivariate correlation between FORL and functional outcome parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a clinically relevant relationship between femoral offset and functional outcome after hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients, comparable with that of THA, for treating osteoarthritis.