Redisplacement after reduction with intramedullary nails in surgery of intertrochanteric fracture: cause analysis and preventive measures

Anteromedial cortical support reduction of intertrochanteric fractures-A review

The intertrochanteric fracture is a common fragility fracture typically resulting from low-energy falls. The functional outcome of intertrochanteric fractures is closely linked to the patient's underlying physical condition, intraoperative procedures, and postoperative complications. In terms of surgery, while timely surgery and appropriate internal fixation have demonstrated favorable outcomes, attention to intraoperative reduction is crucial. In recent years, there have been further developments in the evaluation of reduction of intertrochanteric fractures, particularly in the anteromedial cortical reduction, and these advances have been further scientifically elucidated in terms of their ability to provide stable fracture reduction and resist loss of reduction. In order to gain a comprehensive understanding of the anteromedial cortex theory, this article reviewed the anatomy, related theoretical progress, and controversies in recent years.

Tip-neck distance ratio as a novel predictor for failure in cephalomedullary nailing of unstable trochanteric fractures (UTF)

OBJECTIVES

Intertrochanteric femur fractures (ITFF) are frequently fixed with proximal femoral nailing (PFN), and a common cause of fixation failure is cut-out of the lag screws. In the literature, many factors have been defined to determine the failure risk, including the tip-apex distance (TAD), calcar-referenced tip-apex distance (CalTAD), the Cleveland zone and Parker's ratio. In this study, a novel technique is described which favors infero-posterior placement of the lag screw and predicts failure risk for PFN. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the tip-neck distance ratio as a factor for the prediction of cut-out after PFN of ITFF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective evaluation was made of the data of 125 patients applied with PFN for ITFF between October 2016 and September 2019. The occurrence of mechanical complications was analyzed in relation to age, gender, fracture side, American Society of Anaesthesiologists classification, fracture classification, reduction quality, bone quality, Cleveland zone, Parker's ratio, TAD, CalTAD and the TNDR.

RESULTS

A total of 125 patients, including 16 with mechanical complications, were suitable for full analysis. In the univariate analysis, reduction quality (p = 0.003), the TAD (p = 0.048) and the TNDR (p = 0.030) were statistically associated with mechanical complications (p < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, good quality of reduction reduced risk of mechanical failure (p = 0.011) and the TNDR (p < 0.001) indicated that these were two independent factors affecting mechanical complications.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study provide clinical evidence that the TNDR is a predictor for cut-out risk. Placement of the lag screw posterior and inferior reduces the risk of mechanical complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

Daytime versus after-hours surgery outcomes in hip fracture patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Several studies found that hip fracture patient outcome is greatly influenced by the time from admission to surgery. To avoid surgical delay, surgery for hip fracture may be performed at night or weekends. However, after-hours surgery may lead to a reduction in support staff and to surgeon fatigue, which ultimately increases mortality and complications. Therefore, we wanted to compare the outcomes of daytime and after-hours surgery in hip fracture patients.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in the Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Springer databases from inception to December 2019. Relevant studies comparing the results of operations performed at different time periods were included. The main clinical outcomes included total complications, mortality, blood loss, surgical time, and length of hospitalization. Data were pooled, and a meta-analysis was completed.

RESULTS

Nine retrospective cohort studies and one randomized controlled trial met the inclusion criteria; the studies included a total of 583,290 patients. We found no significant differences in mortality, surgical time or blood loss between daytime and after-hours surgery in hip fracture patients (P > 0.05). Of note, the patients who underwent after-hours surgery had fewer surgical complications (P < 0.001) and a shorter length of hospitalization (P = 0.021) than those who underwent daytime surgery.

CONCLUSION

After-hours surgery for hip fracture is safe. To avoid surgical delay, after-hours surgery is still a viable and even necessary option.

Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture Treatment in Asia: What We Know and What the World Can Learn

Hip fractures are of great interest worldwide as the geriatric population continues to increase rapidly. Currently, surgeons prefer to use cephalomedullary nail for internal fixation of pertrochanteric/intertrochanteric fractures. This article summarizes 10 concepts in hip fracture treatment over the past 20 years, including fracture line mapping, proximal lateral wall and anterior cortex, posteromedial lesser trochanter-calcar fragment, anteromedial cortex support reduction, changes of fracture reduction after sliding and secondary stability, nail entry point and wedge-open deformity, tip-apex distance and calcar-referenced tip-apex distance, femoral anterior bowing and nail modification, long nails for wide medullary canal and large posterior coronal fragment, and postoperative stability score.

[The measurement and clinical significance of the rotation angles of head-neck fragments after cephalomedullary nail fixation in intertrochanteric fractures]

OBJECTIVE

To measure the rotation angle of the head-neck fragment of intertrochanteric fracture after cephalomedullary nail fixation by three-dimensional CT imaging, and to explore its clinical significance.

METHODS

The clinical data of 68 patients with unstable intertrochanteric fracture of AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO-OTA) type 31-A2 treated with cephalomedullary nail fixation and with complete intraoperative fluoroscopy and postoperative three-dimensional CT imaging data between July 2016 and October 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, there were 21 males and 47 females, aged 68-93 years, with an average age of 81.8 years. There were 31 cases of AO/OTA type 31-A2.2 and 37 cases of 31-A2.3. Fracture reduction quality was evaluated according to Baumgaertner et al. and Chang et al. criteria. The anteromedial cortical contact or not of each patient was observed by three-dimensional CT imaging on T3DView software after operation. The rotation of head-neck fragments were divided into three types: non-rotation, flexion rotation, and hyperextension rotation. The rotation angles of each type were measured and the relationship between the rotation type of the head-neck fragments and the contact of the anteromedial cortex was analyzed.

RESULTS

The reduction and fixation of the small trochanter were not performed in 68 patients. According to Baumgaertner et al. criteria, the quality of fracture reduction was excellent in 15 cases (22.1%), acceptable in 50 cases (73.5%), and poor in 3 cases (4.4%). According to Chang et al. criteria, 31 cases were excellent (45.6%), 33 cases were acceptable (48.5%), and 4 cases were poor (5.9%). Thirty-nine cases (57.4%) received anteromedial cortical support and 29 cases (42.6%) did not receive cortical support. Three-dimensional CT imaging showed non-rotation in 12 cases (17.6%), flexion rotation in 39 cases (57.4%), and hyperextension rotation in 17 cases (25.0%). There were 7 cases (58.3%), 30 cases (76.9%), and 2 cases (11.8%) of cortical support in non-rotation group, flexion rotation group, and hyperextension rotation group, respectively. The rotation angles were (1.05±0.61), (13.96±6.17), (8.21±3.88)°, respectively. There were significant differences between groups ( P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

In the unstable intertrochanteric fracture after cephalomedullary nail fixation, the rotation of head-neck fragment exists in most patients, and the types of flexion rotation and non-rotation can easily obtain cortical support reduction.

[Failure analysis of proximal femoral nail antirotation in treatment of geriatric intertrochanteric fractures]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the failure factors of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in the treatment of geriatric intertrochanteric fractures.

METHODS

The clinical data of 136 cases of intertrochanteric fracture treated with PFNA internal fixation between May 2015 and June 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 106 males and 30 females, aged from 60 to 80 years, with an average age of 75.5 years. According to Evans-Jensen classification, there were 45 cases of type Ⅰ, 50 cases of type Ⅱ, 23 cases of type Ⅲ, 13 cases of type Ⅳ, and 5 cases of type Ⅴ. The time from injury to operation was 2-4 days, with an average of 3 days. According to the X-ray films before and after operation, the fracture types (stable and unstable), reduction quality (according to Baumgaertner's criteria), integrity of lateral wall and posteromedial cortex of the patients with failure of PFNA internal fixation were summarized, and the causes of failure were analyzed.

RESULTS

All the 136 patients were followed up 7-18 months (mean, 13.6 months). There were 17 cases (12.5%) of PFNA internal fixation failure after operation, including 3 cases of stable fracture and 14 cases of unstable fracture; the quality of fracture reduction was excellent in 2 cases, good in 5 cases, and poor in 10 cases; 10 cases with complete lateral wall and 7 cases with defect; 9 cases with complete posteromedial cortex and 8 cases with defect. Reasons for failure of internal fixation: ① There were 8 cases of coxa varus at 12 weeks after operation due to the loss of posteromedial cortex of femoral intertrochanteric, 7 of them continued non-weight-bearing observation and fracture healed at 6 months after operation; 1 case underwent total hip arthroplasty with spiral blade excision after operation. ② There were 7 cases of internal fixation failure caused by lateral wall defect, including 2 cases of screw blade retraction, continued non-weight-bearing observation, and removed the internal fixator after fracture healing; 2 cases of malunion of rotation with the rotation of no more than 15°, fracture healed at 6 months after operation without special treatment; and 3 cases of rupture of lateral intertrochanteric wall during operation, continued non-weight-bearing observation and fracture healed at 6 months after operation. ③ The distal locking of the main screw was deviated in 2 cases during operation. One of them was found and replanted in time during operation, and 1 case was found with fracture of femoral shaft on 3 days after operation, following 1 year of non-weight-bearing observation and fracture ending healing.

CONCLUSION

The types of intertrochanteric fractures (especially unstable fractures), the integrity of the proximal lateral wall of femur, and the defect of the posteromedial cortex are the internal risk factors for the success or failure of PFNA in the treatment of geriatric intertrochanteric fractures. The effective protection of the lateral wall during operation and the good quality of fracture reduction are the external factors that must be paid attention to.

[Clinical study on reduction of difficult-reducing intertrochanteric fracture with ball head screw driver of proximal femoral nail antirotation]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of the leverage reduction with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) ball head screw driver for difficult-reducing intertrochanteric fracture.

METHODS

The clinical data of 8 patients with difficult-reducing intertrochanteric fractures between July 2015 and February 2018 were retrospectively analysed. There were 3 males and 5 females, aged 66-89 years, with an average age of 76.3 years. According to Evans classification, there were 3 cases of type Ⅲ and 5 cases of type Ⅳ. The time from injury to operation was 2-8 days (mean, 3.9 days). All patients were reducted with ball head screw driver leverage through PFNA proximal incision during operation. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, reduction time, and fluoroscopy times were recorded. Harris hip function score was used to evaluate the effectiveness at last follow-up.

RESULTS

The operation time was 52.5-83.7 minutes (mean, 68.1 minutes), the intraoperative blood loss was 49.8-96.4 mL (mean, 73.1 mL), the reduction time was 3.7-9.1 minutes (mean, 6.4 minutes), and the fluoroscopy times were 18.4-27.4 times (mean, 22.9 times). Patients were followed up 6-18 months (mean, 9.6 months). Postoperative X-ray films showed that the fracture obtained good reduction. No fracture displacement, fixation failure, and coxa vara occurred after operation. Fracture healing time was 3-6 months (mean, 4.6 months). At last follow-up, the Harris hip function score was 85-96 (mean, 91.6), with a result of excellent in 6 cases and good in 2 cases.

CONCLUSION

The reduction of difficult-reducing intertrochanteric fracture by using ball head screw driver can obtain good reduction and reliable fixation. The method has such advantages as no more incision, and less blood loss and soft tissue injury.

Restrictive versus liberal strategy for red blood-cell transfusion in hip fracture patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Most clinical guidelines recommend a restrictive red-blood-cell (RBC) transfusion threshold. However, indications for transfusion in patients with a hip fracture have not been definitively evaluated or remain controversial. We compared the pros and cons of restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategies in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective cohort studies (RCSs) to investigate the effects of a restrictive strategy versus its liberal counterpart in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. The main clinical outcomes included delirium, mortality, infections, cardiogenic complications, thromboembolic events, cerebrovascular accidents, and length of hospital stay. The meta-analysis program of the Cochrane Collaboration (RevMan version 5.3.0) was used for data analysis. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed by both Cochran chi-squared test (Q test) and I test. Both Begg and Egger tests were used to assess potential publication bias.

RESULTS

We identified 7 eligible RCTs and 2 eligible RCSs, involving 3,575 patients in total. In patients undergoing hip fracture surgery, we found no differences in frequency of delirium, mortality, the incidence rates of all infections, pneumonia, wound infection, all cardiovascular events, congestive heart failure, thromboembolic events or length of hospital stay between restrictive and liberal thresholds for RBC transfusion (P >.05). However, we found that the use of restrictive transfusion thresholds is associated with higher rates of acute coronary syndrome (P <.05) while liberal transfusion thresholds increase the risk of cerebrovascular accidents (P <.05).

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing hip fracture surgery, clinicians should evaluate the patient's condition in detail and adopt different transfusion strategies according to the patient's specific situation rather than merely using a certain transfusion strategy.

Provisional pin fixation can maintain reduction in A3 intertrochanteric fractures

A3 intertrochanteric fracture has a higher incidence of intraoperative re-displacement than A1 and 2. The authors have also experienced difficulty with maintenance of reduction in A3 intertrochanteric fractures, as the technique depends on manual effort and can fail easily during the procedure. It induced us to develop this surgical technique to ease the surgical procedure and improve clinical outcomes. This paper introduces a modified provisional guide pin fixation technique applicable to even AO/OTA A3 intertrochanteric fractures, and presents preliminary results of 11 patients who were treated by provisional pin fixation-assisted nailing in A3 intertrochanteric fractures. Using this technique, we have reduced the chances of intraoperative reduction loss and achieved favorable clinical outcomes.

A retrospective analysis of the InterTan nail and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation-Asia in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of elderly patients undergoing surgery for treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures receiving either proximal femoral nails anti-rotation-Asia (PFNA-IIs) or InterTan nails (ITs).

METHODS

Between January 1, 2012, and June 31, 2015, 168 elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures enrolled in this study. The only intervention was ITs or PFNA-IIs of the unstable trochanteric femur fractures. Follow-up was at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and yearly thereafter. Intraoperative variables and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Eight patients died, six were too infirmed for follow-up, and seven were lost during follow-up, leaving 147 patients meeting the criteria were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 20 months (range 16-26 months). Significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding local complications (IT, n = 10 vs. PFNA-II, n = 20), varus collapse of the head/neck or femoral shaft fractures at the tip of the nail (IT, n = 1 vs. PFNA-II, n = 8), femoral neck shortening (IT, 4.4 ± 1.1 mm vs. PFNA-II, 7.4 ± 2.4 mm), fracture healing time (IT, 14.7 ± 2.1 weeks vs. PFNA-II, 15.7 ± 2.4 weeks), femoral shaft fractures (IT, n = 0 vs. PFNA-II, n = 4), rotational loss of reduction (IT, n = 0 vs. PFNA-II, n = 9), lateral cortex fractures of the proximal femur or lateral greater trochanter fractures (IT, n = 8 vs. PFNA-II, n = 1), operative time (IT, 71.9 ± 6.8 min vs. PFNA-II, 52.3 ± 4.0 min), intraoperative blood loss (IT, 190.6 ± 6.0 mL vs. PFNA-II, 180.9 ± 10.8 mL), fluoroscopy time (IT, 5.0 ± 0.48 min vs. PFNA-II, 2.8 ± 0.33 min), hospital stay (IT, 9.65 ± 0.95 days vs. PFNA-II, 8.58 ± 0.93 days), cut-out (IT, n = 0 vs. PFNA-II, n = 6), and tip-apex distance (IT, 26.7 ± 0.91 mm vs. PFNA-II, 23.2 ± 1.22 mm). No significant differences existed for the other observation indexes (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The IT nail may have more advantage for patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. However, for those complicated with lateral greater trochanter fractures, lateral cortex fractures of the proximal femurs, or unfit for surgery, the PFNA-II nail could be a good option. In addition, a large-sample, multicenter observational study is required for evaluation of its long-term efficacy, and optimal management strategies for specific unstable fracture patterns, different sorts of bone quality, and different levels of patient demand.