Acute MCL and ACL injuries: first results of minimal-invasive MCL ligament bracing with combined ACL single-bundle reconstruction

Nonoperative Management, Repair, or Reconstruction of the Medial Collateral Ligament in Combined Anterior Cruciate and Medial Collateral Ligament Injuries-Which Is Best? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Combined injury of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and the medial collateral ligament (MCL) is a common injury pattern and accounts for 20% of all ligamentous knee injuries. Despite advancements in surgical technique, there is no up-to-date consensus regarding the superiority of nonoperative versus operative management in higher-grade MCL tears of combined ACL-MCL injuries.

PURPOSE

To interpret recent literature on treatment options and to provide an updated evidence-based approach for management of combined ACL-MCL knee injuries.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review on outcomes following treatment of concomitant ACL and MCL injuries. A computerized search was conducted in PubMed, Embase.com, and Scopus.com. Authors independently assessed eligible studies and screened titles and abstracts. Articles reporting on patients with concomitant ACL and MCL injuries with or without concomitant procedures were included. Data regarding study design, sample size, patient age and sex, length of follow-up, timing of surgery, indications, surgical methods, concomitant procedures, outcomes, and complications were recorded. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and functional outcomes, including Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, International Knee Documentation Committee scores, Lysholm and Tegner scores, and range of motion, were estimated via meta-analysis and compared statistically by surgical approach.

RESULTS

In total, 18 studies were included in the systematic review with level 1 to level 4 evidence, with a total of 1,534 cases, were included in the systematic review. Of these, 16 studies with sufficient statistical reporting including 997 cases with sufficient follow-up were included in meta-analysis. Three different approaches to combined ACL-MCL injuries were identified: ACL reconstruction with (1) nonoperative MCL, (2) MCL repair, and (3) MCL reconstruction. There was no statistical difference between nonoperative versus surgically managed MCL injuries for PROs, range of motion at final follow up, or quadriceps strength.

CONCLUSION

Reconstruction of combined injury in a delayed fashion facilitates return of range of motion and may allow time for low-grade MCL tears to heal. If residual valgus or anteromedial rotatory laxity remains after a period of rehabilitation, then concomitant surgical management of ACL and MCL injuries is warranted. Avulsion MCL injuries and Stener-type lesions may benefit from early repair techniques.

Shear wave elastography demonstrates different material properties between the medial collateral ligament and anterolateral ligament

BACKGROUND

Anterolateral ligament and medial collateral ligament injuries could happen concomitantly with anterior cruciate ligament ruptures. The anterolateral ligament is injured more often than the medial collateral ligament during concomitant anterior cruciate ligament ruptures although it offers less restraint to knee movement. Comparing the material properties of the medial collateral ligament and anterolateral ligament helps improve our understanding of their structure-function relationship and injury risk before the onset of injury.

METHODS

Eight cadaveric lower extremity specimens were prepared and mechanically tested to failure in a laboratory setting using a hydraulic platform. Measurements of surface strains of superficial surface of each medial collateral ligament and anterolateral ligament specimen were found using three-dimensional digital image correlation. Ligament stiffness was found using ultrasound shear-wave elastography. t-tests were used to assess for significant differences in strain, stress, Young's modulus, and stiffness in the two ligaments.

FINDINGS

The medial collateral ligament exhibited greater ultimate failure strain along its longitudinal axis (p = 0.03) and Young's modulus (p < 0.0018) than the anterolateral ligament. Conversely, the anterolateral ligament exhibited greater ultimate failure stress than the medial collateral ligament (p < 0.0001). Medial collateral ligament failure occurred mostly in the proximal aspect of the ligament, while most anterolateral ligament failure occurred in the distal or midsubstance aspect (P = 0.04).

INTERPRETATION

Despite both being ligamentous structures, the medial collateral ligament and anterolateral ligament exhibited separate material properties during ultimate failure testing. The weaker material properties of the anterolateral ligament likely contribute to higher rates of concomitant injury with anterior cruciate ligament ruptures.

Acute Percutaneous Repair of Medial Collateral Ligament With Suture Augmentation in the Multiligamentous Injured Knee Results in Good Stability and Low Rates of Postoperative Stiffness

Purpose

To assess the clinical and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of acute superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) repair with suture augmentation (SA) in the setting of a multiligamentous injured knees (MLIKs) at 2-year follow-up.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with MLIK with grade III sMCL injuries who underwent acute (<6 weeks) sMCL repair with SA was conducted. Clinical follow-up was performed at minimum 1-year postoperatively, and PROMs were collected at the latest follow-up (minimum 2 years' postoperatively). Continuous variables were reported in median with interquartile range (IQR).

Results

A total of 20 patients (41.4 [28.5-47.9] years of age) with grade III sMCL injury and additional injury to 1 cruciate ligament (KDI-M; n = 13) or bicruciate (KDIII-M; n = 7) were enrolled with a median follow-up of 4.3 (3.6-5.2) years. In total, 90% (n = 18) of patients with MLIK treated with acute sMCL repair and early range of motion rehabilitation protocol demonstrated negative valgus laxity stress testing in 0 and 30° flexion and low reoperation rates (n = 1, 5%) due to stiffness. In addition, good-to-excellent subjective outcomes were reported at final follow-up: median International Knee Documentation Committee 82.2 (78.7-90.8), Lysholm 95.0 (90.0-100.0), modified Cincinnati Score 89.0 (83.3-96.0), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation 90.0 (83.8-95.0), Forgotten Joint Score 79.2 (62.5-91.7), Tegner 5.0 (IQR 4.0-6.0), and ACL-Return to Sport after Injury Scale 78.3 (IQR 66.7-90.0).

Conclusions

In this study, 20 heterogenous patients with MLIKs treated with acute percutaneous sMCL repair with SA had excellent stability, low rates of postoperative stiffness, and good-to-excellent PROMs at short-term follow-up.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Contribution of the Medial Hamstrings to Valgus Stability of the Knee

Background

Multiligament knee injuries involving the medial side are common. When performing surgical reconstruction, use of the medial hamstrings (HS) as grafts remains controversial in this setting.

Purpose

To determine the role of the medial HS in stabilizing the valgus knee for different types of medial-sided knee injury.

Study Design

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods

A biomechanical study on 10 cadaveric knees was performed. Valgus load (force moment of 10 N/m) was applied at 0°, 30°, and 60° of flexion, and the resultant rotation was recorded using an optoelectronic motion analysis system. Measurements were repeated for 4 different knee states: intact knee, superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) injury, deep medial collateral ligament (dMCL) injury, and posterior oblique ligament (POL) injury. For each state, 4 loading conditions (+ loaded; - unloaded) of the semitendinosus (ST) and gracilis (GRA) tendons were tested: ST+/GRA+, ST+/GRA-, ST-/GRA+, and ST-/GRA-.

Results

At 0° of flexion, combined unloading of the ST and GRA (ST-/GRA-) increased valgus laxity on the intact knee compared with the ST+/GRA+ condition (P < .05). For all medial-sided injury states (isolated sMCL; combined sMCL and dMCL; and combined sMCL, dMCL, and POL damage), ST-/GRA- increased valgus laxity at 0° and 30° of flexion versus ST+/GRA+ (P < .05 for all). The absolute value of valgus laxity increased with the severity of medial-sided ligament injury. Isolated ST unloading increased valgus laxity for the intact knee and the MCL-injured knee (combined sMCL and dMCL) at 0° of flexion (P < .05 vs ST+/GRA+). Isolated unloading of the GRA had no effect on valgus knee stability.

Conclusion

The medial HS tendons contributed to the stabilization of the knee in valgus, and this was even more important when the medial side was severely affected (POL damage). This stabilizing effect was greater between 0° and 30°, in which the POL is the main valgus stabilizer.

Clinical Relevance

When deciding on graft selection for multiligament knee injury reconstruction, the surgeon should be aware of the effect of harvesting the medial HS tendon on valgus laxity.

Treating Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Medial Collateral Ligament Injuries Operatively in the Acute Setting Is Potentially Advantageous

Combined injury of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and medial collateral ligament (MCL) remains among the most common knee injury patterns in orthopaedics. Optimal treatment of grade III MCL injuries is still debated, especially when combined with ACL injury. Most patients with these severe injuries are treated conservatively for at least 6 weeks to allow for MCL healing, followed by delayed ACL reconstruction. Although acute treatment of the MCL was common in the 1970s, postoperative stiffness was frequently reported. Moreover, studies of such treatment failed to show clinical benefits of surgical over conservative treatment, and the MCL exhibited intrinsic healing capacity, leading to the consensus that all MCL injuries are treated conservatively. The current delayed treatment algorithm for ACL-MCL injuries has several disadvantages. First, MCL healing may be incomplete, resulting in residual valgus laxity that places the ACL graft at greater risk of failure. Second, delayed treatment lengthens the overall rehabilitation period, thereby prolonging the presence of atrophy and delaying return to preinjury activity levels. Third, the initial healing period leaves the knee unstable for longer and risks further intra-articular damage. Acute simultaneous surgical treatment of both ligaments has the potential to avoid these shortcomings. This article will review the evolution of treatment of ACL-MCL injuries and explain how it shifted toward the current treatment algorithm. We will (1) discuss why the consensus shifted, (2) discuss the shortcomings of the current treatment plan, (3) discuss the potential advantages of acute simultaneous treatment, and (4) present an overview of the available literature.

Imaging of the medial collateral ligament of the knee: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The primary aim of this investigation was to systematically review relevant literature of various imaging modalities (magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), stress radiography and ultrasonography) in the assessment of patients with a medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature review of articles indexed in PubMed and Cochrane library was performed. Original research reporting data associated with medial gapping, surgical, and clinical findings associated with MCL injuries were considered for inclusion. The methodological quality of each inclusion was also assessed using a verified tool.

RESULTS

Twenty-three imaging studies (magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) n = 14; ultrasonography n = 6; radiography n = 3) were ultimately included into the review. A total of 808 injured, and 294 control, knees were assessed. Interobserver reliabilities were reported in radiographic and ultrasonographic investigations with almost perfect agreement. MRI studies demonstrated agreement ranging between substantial to almost perfect. Intraobserver reliability was only reported in radiographic studies pertinent to medial gapping and was found to be almost perfect. Correlation of MRI with clinical findings was moderate to strong (65-92%). Additionally, MRI imaging was more sensitive in the detection of MCL lesions when compared to clinical examination. However, when compared to surgical findings, MRI underestimated the grade of instability in up to 21% of cases. Furthermore, MRI showed relatively inferior performance in the identification of the exact MCL-lesion location when compared to surgical findings. Interestingly, preoperative clinical examination was slightly inferior to stress radiography in the detection of MCL lesions. However, clinical testing under general anaesthesia performed similar to stress radiography. The methodological quality analysis showed a low risk of bias regarding patient selection and index testing in each imaging modality.

CONCLUSION

MRI can reliably diagnose an MCL lesion but demonstrates limitations in its ability to predict the specific lesion location or grade of MCL instability. Ultrasonography is a widely available, radiation free modality, but is rarely used in clinical practice for detecting MCL lesions and clinical or surgical correlates are scarce. Stress radiography findings correlate with surgical findings but clinical correlations are missing in the literature.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

The management of combined ACL and MCL injuries: A systematic review

Background

The management of combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries remains contentious. Clinical outcomes of surgical, conservative, and combined approaches have been described in a range of prospective and retrospective studies. The aim of the current systematic review was to evaluate these outcomes and assess the study methodologies.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search of the following databases was performed: PubMed, OVID, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Google Scholar. Studies were assessed using the Coleman Methodology Score.

Results

52 articles were included (3 randomised controlled trials, 8 prospective comparative studies, 17 retrospective comparative studies and 24 case series). Outcome measures were heterogeneous amongst articles. The most common outcomes assessed were AP laxity, Lysholm score and medial/valgus laxity. Complications at varying follow-up times with differing grades of MCL injury were reported in 25 (48%) studies. Evidence was conflicting, with no consensus from the available published literature regarding the best method of treatment for a combined ACL and MCL injury.

Conclusions

Heterogeneous outcome measures and limited randomised controlled trials prevent advocacy of a single treatment option. Good outcomes have been reported from repair, reconstruction and conservative management of the MCL together with ACL reconstruction. Further prospective comparative data is required to evaluate MCL management choice and prognostic signs for successful nonsurgical MCL treatment.

Early medial reconstruction combined with severely injured medial collateral ligaments can decrease residual medial laxity in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to describe an anatomic medial knee reconstruction technique for combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and grade III medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries and to assess knee function and stability restoration in patients who underwent primary MCL reconstruction compared with primary repair.

METHODS

A total of 105 patients who had undergone anatomic ACL reconstruction between 2008 and 2017 were enrolled in this retrospective study and divided into two groups according to concomitant MCL ruptures. Group A included patients with isolated ACL ruptures without MCL injuries. Group B included patients with both ACL and MCL injuries, and it was subdivided into three groups according to the severity of the MCL injury and treatment modality: B-1, grade I or II MCL injury treated conservatively; B-2: grade III MCL injury treated by primary MCL repair; and B-3: grade III MCL injury treated by primary reconstruction. Knee stability was measured via Telos valgus radiography at 6-month and 2-year postoperative. The Lysholm score, Tegner activity level, Likert scales (satisfaction), and return to previous sports were evaluated at 2-year postoperative.

RESULTS

At 6-month postoperative, there was no significant difference in medial laxity between the B-2 and B-3 groups. However, at 2-year postoperative, medial laxity were significantly higher both at 30° of flexion (5.2° versus 2.2°, p = 0.020) and at full extension (3.4° versus 1.1°, p < 0.001) in patients in B-2 group compared to those in B-3 group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups with respect to Lysholm scores, Tegner activity levels, Likert scales (satisfaction), and returning to previous sports at the 2-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Primary medial reconstruction combined with severely injured MCL in ACL reconstruction may decrease residual medial laxity more than primary repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective observational study, IV.

Biologically Augmented Suture for Ligament Bracing Procedures Positively Affects Human Ligamentocytes and Osteoblasts In Vitro

PURPOSE

The purpose was to evaluate the response of human ligamentocytes and osteoblasts after biological augmentation with thrombin, concentrated bone marrow aspirate (cBMA), or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on two different types of nonresorbable flat braided suture used for ligament bracing.

METHODS

Uncoated (U) and collagen-coated (C) flat braided suture material was augmented with either thrombin (T), cBMA (B), PRP (P), or a combination of these three (A), while platelet-poor plasma was used as a source for fibrin (F) in each assay. Previously cultured ligamentocytes and osteoblasts were added with a defined density and assayed after the required time period for adhesion, proliferation, and alkaline phosphatase activity.

RESULTS

Biological augmentation of uncoated [(UFT, UFBT, UFA; P < .001), (UFPT; P = .017)] and collagen-coated suture (CFT, CFPT, CFBT, CFA; P < .001) led to a significantly higher ligamentocyte adhesion. Significantly higher adhesion was also observed for osteoblasts (UFT, UFPT, UFBT, UFA; P < .001; CFT, CFPT, CFBT, CFA; P < .001). Similarly, ligamentocyte proliferation was significantly higher [(UFT, UFPT, UFA; P = .009), (UFBT; P = .001), (CFT; P = .009), (CFBT; P = .001), and (CFA; P = .01)]. Osteoblasts showed significantly higher proliferation as well [(UFT, UFPT, UFA; P = .002), (UFBT; P = .001); (CFT: P = .003), and (CFPT, CFBT, CFA; P = .001)]. Augmentation with thrombin, PRP, and BMA for uncoated (UFT; P = .006, UFPT; P = .035, UFBT; P = .001) and BMA for coated suture (CFBT; P = .027) led to significantly higher alkaline phosphatase activity.

CONCLUSION

Biological enhancement of suture used for ligament bracing significantly increased ligamentocyte and osteoblast adhesion and proliferation, as well as alkaline phosphatase activity of osteoblasts in an in vitro model. After biological augmentation, cellular adhesion, proliferation, and alkaline phosphatase activity changed up to 1,077%, 190%, and 78%, respectively. Furthermore, no overall superiority between uncoated or collagen-coated suture material was observed for cellular adhesion, proliferation, or alkaline phosphatase activity.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study provides in vitro data on a new treatment concept of biologic augmentation for acute ligamentous lesions treated with ligament bracing that has not been widely described. This concept may improve the healing of injured ligaments, in addition to providing immediate biomechanical stabilization.

Treatment of Combined Injuries to the ACL and the MCL Complex: A Consensus Statement of the Ligament Injury Committee of the German Knee Society (DKG)

Background:

Different indications and treatment options for combined injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and medial collateral ligament complex (MCL) are not clearly defined.

Purpose:

To perform a modified Delphi process with the Committee for Ligament Injuries of the German Knee Society (DKG) in order to structure and optimize the process of treating a combined injury to the ACL and MCL.

Study Design:

Consensus statement.

Methods:

Scientific questions and answers were created based on a comprehensive literature review using the central registers for controlled studies of Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane including the terms medial collateral ligament, anterior cruciate ligament, MCL, ACL, and outcome used in various combinations. The obtained statements passed 3 cycles of a modified Delphi process during which each was readjusted and rated according to the available evidence (grades A-E) by the members of the DKG Ligament Injuries Committee and its registered guests.

Results:

The majority of answers, including several questions with >1 graded answer, were evaluated as grade E (n = 16) or C (n = 10), indicating that a low level of scientific evidence was available for most of the answers. Only 5 answers were graded better than C: 3 answers with a grade of A and 2 answers with a grade of B. Only 1 answer was evaluated as grade D. An agreement of >80% (range, 83%-100%) among committee members was achieved for all statements.

Conclusion:

The results of this modified Delphi process offer a guideline for standardized patient care in cases of combined injuries to the ACL and MCL.

Single-Row Repair in Chronic Medial Collateral Ligament Insufficiency

ABSTRACT

Medial collateral ligament (MCL) is the most commonly injured ligament of the knee. Acute Grade III MCL injuries can be managed conservatively except bony avulsion, intra-articular entrapment and Stener lesion, which requires surgical treatment by repair with or without augmentation. Chronic MCL injuries are treated surgically with various reconstruction techniques that are well established in the literature, which requires use of autograft or allograft and multiple tunnel placement with multiple implants for graft fixation. These techniques possess higher chances of tunnel convergence and hardware-related complications, further increasing surgery cost, especially for multi ligament injuries. Finally, all these MCL reconstruction surgeries are technically challenging. Here, we propose our technique of single-row repair in cases of chronic femoral side MCL insufficiency with grade III valgus laxity. This technique reattaches the torn ligament at its near anatomical attachment site using a single, double-loaded 5.5-mm suture anchor. This technique preserves and uses the native MCL, requiring no separate graft and no tunnel preparation. Hence, no graft site morbidity and tunnel-related complications, along with maintenance of proprioception. It is a cost-effective, reproducible, and technically simple procedure with good functional outcome.

LEVEL I

knee.

LEVEL II

collateral ligaments.

Promising clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results after internal bracing of acute posterior cruciate ligament lesions in multiple injured knees

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of acute posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) lesions in multiple injured knees that were surgically treated with internal bracing.

METHODS

Acute complete PCL lesions in multiple injured knees with subsequent internal-bracing treatment within 21 days between 2014 and 2016 were eligible for inclusion. At final follow-up, patients were assessed with Tegner, Lysholm, and IKDC scores. PCL stability and healing were verified with KT-2000, stress radiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

RESULTS

Fourteen patients [mean age 37.4 (± 17.8; SD) years] were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 19.9 (± 7.7; SD) months. Thirteen patients suffered complete lesions of the PCL with concomitant ligamentous injuries (Schenck I: six cases, Schenck III M: five cases, Schenck IV N: one case, Schenck V: one case). Median Tegner, mean Lysholm and mean IKDC scores at follow-up were 4 (2-7; interquartile range), 69.1 (± 16.6; SD) and 68.9 (± 18.1; SD) respectively. Posterior translation averaged 5.8 (± 2.2; SD) mm with the KT 2000 and stress radiography showed a mean posterior tibial translation of 5.5 (± 4.1; SD) mm in the side to side comparison. MRI showed adequate PCL healing.

CONCLUSIONS

Internal bracing as treatment for acute PCL ruptures in multiple injured knees showed adequate restoration of posterior tibial translation in a single-centre study including 14 cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

[Effect of posterior oblique ligament repair on rotational stability of knee joint]

Objective

To investigate effect of posterior oblique ligament (POL) repair on the rotational stability of the knee joint for the medial collateral ligament (MCL) combined with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures.

Methods

The clinical data of 50 patients (50 knees) with grade-3 MCL-ACL combined injuries who met the selection criteria between January 2013 and December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. All ACLs were reconstructed with autogenous tendon and the superficial and deep layers of MCLs were sutured; then, POLs were also sutured in 25 patients of repair group and only received conservation treatment postoperatively in 25 patients of conservation group. There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, and preoperative KT-1000 measuring, medial joint space opening, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and knee range of motion between the two groups ( P>0.05).

Results

All incisions of the two groups healed by first intention, no surgical related complications occurred. All patients were followed up, with follow-up time of 28-56 months (mean, 38.1 months) in repair group and 26-55 months (mean, 29.1 months) in conservation group. At last follow-up, the IKDC score, VAS score, KT-1000 measuring, medial joint space opening, and knee range of motion significantly improved in the two groups when compared with preoperative ones ( P<0.05); but there was no significant difference between the two groups ( P>0.05). The Slocum test showed that there was no instability of the anterior medial rotation in the two groups.

Conclusion

The POL repair can't obtain more medial stability after ACL reconstruction and MCL repair (superficial and deep layers) for patients who have MCL-ACL combined injuries.

Improvement of arthroscopic surgical performance using a new wide-angle arthroscope in the surgical training

Background

We have developed a new arthroscope with a field of view of 150°. This arthroscope requires less motion to maneuver and exhibits reduced optical error. It also improves how novices learn arthroscopy. We hypothesized that the surgical performance with this arthroscope is superior to that with a conventional arthroscope. This study tested the hypothesis by using motion analysis and a new validated parameter, “dimensionless squared jerk” (DSJ).

Methods

We compared the surgical performance between the use of the wide-angle arthroscope and that of the conventional arthroscope among 14 novice orthopedic residents who performed 3 standardized tasks 3 times with each arthroscope. The tasks simulated the surgical skills in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The arthroscope motion was analyzed using an optical tracking system. The differences in performance parameters, such as the time taken to complete the tasks, average acceleration of the hands (m/s²), number of movements, and total path length (m) including DSJ between the 2 arthroscopes were investigated using paired t-tests.

Results

All estimated values for the tasks using the 150° arthroscope were lower than those for the tasks using the 105° arthroscope. Statistically significant differences in performance between the 2 arthroscopes were observed only for DSJ (p = 0.014) and average acceleration (p = 0.039).

Conclusions

DSJ and average acceleration are reliable parameters for representing hand-eye coordination. The surgical performance of novice arthroscopists was better with the new wide-angle arthroscope than with the conventional arthroscope.

The Presence of the Arthroscopic "Floating Meniscus" Sign as an Indicator for Surgical Intervention in Patients With Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Grade II Medial Collateral Ligament Injury

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of patients with an arthroscopic floating meniscus sign at 24-month follow-up when treated with and without medial compartment reconstruction surgery. Another aim of the present study was to compare magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopic findings directly related to the characterization and localization medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries.

METHODS

A total of 112 patients diagnosed with combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-MCL grade II injuries to be treated with ACL reconstruction surgery were included in the study. During arthroscopy, patients diagnosed with the "floating meniscus" sign were divided into 2 groups: group 1 (n = 58) was treated with ACL and medial compartment reconstruction surgery and group 2 (n = 54) was treated with ACL reconstruction and nonsurgical medial compartment treatment. Return to competitive sports (Tegner score), Lysholm scores, ACL reconstruction failure, and residual MCL laxity were evaluated 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery.

RESULTS

After 24 months, patients from group 1 (n = 58) had an average Tegner score of 8.98 and Lysholm score of 89.67; 2 patients presented with ACL reconstruction failure and none presented with residual MCL laxity. Patients from group 2 (n = 54) had an average Tegner score of 6.7 and Lysholm score of 78.12; 16 patients presented with ACL reconstruction failure and 13 presented with residual MCL laxity.

CONCLUSIONS

In the presence of a floating meniscus arthroscopic sign, patients with combined ACL and grade II MCL injuries treated with ACL and MCL reconstruction surgery had significantly lower frequency of ACL reconstruction failure, residual MCL laxity, and better Tegner and Lysholm scores at 24 months' follow-up (P < .05). Additionally, magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy differed significantly (P < .05) in their ability to identify mid-substance and tibial site MCL injuries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, randomized clinical trial.

Improved results of ACL primary repair in one-part tears with intact synovial coverage

PURPOSE

It was the aim to assess the influence of synovial sheath disruption on early failure of primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair. It was hypothesized that more-part ACL tears with disruption of the synovial sheath are associated with a higher risk of failure after primary ACL repair.

METHODS

A cohort study was conducted comprising patients with primal ACL tears undergoing primary ACL repair and dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS). The patients were stratified into three groups: A-one-part rupture with intact synovial membrane (n = 50), B-two-part ruptures resultant to separation of the ACL into two main bundles with synovial membrane tearing (n = 52) and C-more parts involving multilacerated ruptures with membrane disruption (n = 22). Failure was defined as a retear or residual laxity (anterior posterior translation > 5 mm compared to healthy knee). Adjustment for potential risk factors was performed using a multivariate logistic-regression model.

RESULTS

The overall failure rate was 17.7% throughout the mean follow-up period of 2.3 ± 0.8 years. The failure rate in patients with one-part ACL tears with an intact synovial membrane was 4% (n = 2) (Group A), which was significantly lower than the failure rates in groups B and C, 26.9% (n = 14) (p = 0.001) and 27.3% (n = 6) (p = 0.003), respectively. Disruption of the synovial sheath in two- or more-part tears was identified as an independent factor influencing treatment failure in primary ACL repair (OR 8.9; 95% CI 2.0-40.0).

CONCLUSION

The integrity of the ACL bundles and synovial sheath is a factor that influences the success of ACL repair. This needs to be considered intra-operatively when deciding about repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Distal Knee Medial Collateral Ligament Repair With Suture Augmentation

The medial collateral ligament (MCL) is the most commonly injured ligament of the knee. Given its extra-articular location, the MCL has great healing capacity such that the mainstay of treatment for most injuries remains conservative management. However, certain injury patterns place patients and athletes at risk of residual valgus laxity, which may require delayed surgical care and prolonged time out from sports. As such, identifying the specific injuries known to place patients at risk for failure with nonoperative management is of paramount importance. Although controversy remains regarding the optimal treatment of grade III MCL injuries, it is generally accepted that MCL ruptures from the distal tibia attachment require operative fixation. This technique article with accompanying video provides a detailed description of a technique for repairing the distal MCL attachment with suture augmentation. There are several advantages associated with an augmented direct repair including early, safe rehabilitation; prevention of valgus instability; and avoiding the comorbidities associated with a larger reconstruction.

Recovery of ACL function after dynamic intraligamentary stabilization is resultant to restoration of ACL integrity and scar tissue formation

PURPOSE

Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS) is recognized as a ligament preserving technique for the treatment of acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. The aim of this study was to assess the integrity and morphology of the recovered ACL after DIS repair.

METHODS

The cohort comprised 47 patients with an acute proximal ACL rupture undergoing DIS repair. All patients underwent diagnostic arthroscopy after a minimum postoperative interval of 6 months for semi-quantitative evaluation of ACL integrity, function and scar tissue formation. Tegner, Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores as well as objective anteroposterior (ap) translation were assessed at 6 weeks, 3-, 6-  and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Full restoration of the ACL volume was affirmed in 30 (63.8%) patients and two-third restoration in 13 (27.7%). Hypertrophic scar formation was observed in 23 (48.9%) patients. Forty-four patients (93.6%) demonstrated sufficient ACL tensioning intraoperatively upon anterior stress. At final follow-up, the median Tegner activity level was 5.5 (3-10), Lysholm and IKDC scores were 100 (64-100) and 94 (55-100) points, respectively. The mean ap-translation differed from the normal knee by 2.1 ± 2.2 mm. Deficient ACL recovery was noted in four patients (8.5%), none of which required secondary reconstructive surgery.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate that clinical recovery of ACL function after DIS repair is resultant to both restoration of ACL volume and scar tissue formation. Factors influencing the degree of scar tissue formation need further investigation to enable future attempts of guiding a balanced biological healing response.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Primary Repair of the Medial Collateral Ligament With Internal Bracing

The medial collateral ligament (MCL) is commonly injured in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Because the MCL has better healing capacity than the ACL, the general perception is that MCL injuries can be treated conservatively. Treating these injuries conservatively, however, can lead to residual valgus laxity. Furthermore, it delays time to surgery, which prevents acute treatment of concomitant ACL injuries using primary repair or acute reconstruction. Several treatment methods for MCL injuries have been proposed, including primary repair, augmented repair with autograft tissue, or primary reconstruction. In this surgical technique article, we present the technique of acute primary MCL repair with internal bracing with 2 limited incisions. With this technique, early surgical intervention is possible, and early rehabilitation is safe because of the internal bracing. Advantages include fast recovery, avoidance of muscle atrophy because of early mobilization, prevention of residual valgus instability, and maintenance of proprioception.

A comparative study of effect of autograft compared with allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on expressions of LOXs and MMPs

The present study aimed to compare the effect of autograft or allograft anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction on the expressions of lipoxygenases (LOXs) and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in a New Zealand white rabbit model. New Zealand white rabbits were divided randomly into control, sham, autograft and allograft groups. At the 4th and 8th week after operation, biomechanical testing was performed to measure the primary length, cross-sectional area, maximum tensile load and stiffness of ACL, and HE staining was used to observe cell morphology and fibre alignment of ACL. At the 2nd, 4th and 8th week after operation, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR), Western blotting and immunohistochemistry were applied to detect LOXs and MMPs expressions, and expressions of adenomatous polyposis coli (APC)/Wnt signalling pathway-related proteins. At the 4th and 8th week after operation, the maximum tensile load and stiffness were higher in the autograft group than in the allograft group, and the values at the 8th week were higher than those at the 4th week after operation. The fibroblast proliferation in the allograft group was more significant than that in the autograft group. Compared with the control group, LOXs and MMPs expressions and the positive expression rates of LOXs and MMPs proteins were elevated, and the values in the allograft group were higher than those in the autograft group at all time points. At 8th week after operation, compared with the autograft group, Wnt expression was higher and APC expression was lower in the allograft group. Autograft and allograft ACL reconstruction can promote LOXs and MMPs expressions by activating the APC/Wnt signalling pathway.