Robert Mathys Finger prosthesis of the proximal interphalangeal joint: a retrospective case series of 19 joints in 17 patients

Rehabilitation after proximal interphalangeal joint replacement: A structured review of the literature

Proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint arthroplasty is an unsolved biomechanical challenge despite advances in materials and new implant designs. This leads to a high rate of complications. Moreover, there is heterogeneity in postoperative management according to the literature. The present structured review examined the therapeutic strategies utilized by physiotherapists to restore a functional finger chain and prevent postoperative complications following PIP joint replacement. Patients undergoing primary total PIP joint arthroplasty of the index, ring, middle or little finger were included. Articles published from 2008 onwards, in French or English, and reporting on PIP joint replacement and postoperative management, were included. Therapeutic strategies were organized according to the surgical approach. Details of splint strategies, mobilization and muscle strengthening and management of postoperative complications were collected. Forty-eight studies, 3 of which provided a description of surgical techniques, were included. In relation to hand function, most authors advocated joint mobilization (n = 45) and some recommended muscle strengthening (n = 4). Static (n = 43) and dynamic splints (n = 14) and buddy taping (n = 12) were frequently recommended to prevent and manage postoperative complications. Few studies (n = 13) reported wound assessment or control of postoperative edema. Precise recommendations concerning therapeutic strategies following PIP joint arthroplasty cannot be made based on available evidence. Specific protocols for rehabilitation following PIP joint replacement need to be clarified in future research.

[Implant arthroplasty in the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal finger joints]

BACKGROUND

 Osteoarthritic changes in the finger joints are common, especially in the elderly population. Without adequate treatment, these changes can lead to pain, joint deformity, instability or impaired motion. Operative treatment options can be divided into prosthetic joint replacement, joint fusion and denervation.

PATIENTS/MATERIAL AND METHOD

 During the last decades, various prosthetic implant designs have appeared on the market. This article provides an overview of implant evolution, current implants, clinical results and promising technical novelties.

RESULTS

 Due to favourable clinical long-term results, low revision rates and low costs, the proven silicone spacer has been the gold standard since the 1960 s. In the index and middle finger, lateral stability is crucial to providing a counter bearing to the thumb for a strong key pinch. Medullary-anchored prostheses and modular surface replacement designs have a higher intrinsic stability and may thus be advantageous in the index and middle finger. These implants show promising clinical medium-term results.

CONCLUSION

 In the past, technical novelties from big joint replacements could not automatically be translated to the finger joints and other parts of the hand. However, new trends such as customised or 3D-printed prosthetic implants are slowly beginning to gain importance in hand surgery.

Surgeon level of expertise reported in Journal of Hand Surgery (American Volume) and (European Volume) publications

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the trend in documentation of surgeon level of expertise among the Journal of Hand Surgery (American Volume) and the Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) publications. A review of Journal of Hand Surgery (American Volume) and Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) databases for level of expertise between January 2015 and October 2019 was performed. Of 1042 articles identified, all 115 (20%) reporting level of expertise were published in Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). Since 2015, there has been an increase in reported level of expertise in Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) (2015: 8 (7%); 2016: 15 (13%); 2017: 22 (19%); 2018: 28 (24%); 2019: 42 (37%)). In the same period, no publications have reported level of expertise in Journal of Hand Surgery (American Volume). Documenting level of expertise may provide readers with additional information for incorporation of novel techniques into their practices. It may identify procedures that require a baseline level of expertise for effective performance. Further evaluation of level of expertise criteria may improve the reliability of the numeric scale, while widespread adoption of this scale will allow future outcome analysis by level of expertise.

Failure of Osseointegration of a Semiconstrained Finger Prosthesis in a Post-traumatic Metacarpophalangeal Joint Defect: A Case Report

CASE

Post-traumatic defects of the metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPj) remain challenging for hand surgeons. Restoration of stability and motion are difficult to achieve because of the complex anatomy and kinematics. The Robert Mathys (RM) semiconstrained prosthesis offers good intrinsic stability and mobility and therefore seems suitable. We report on a patient where the RM prosthesis was used for a traumatic destroyed ring finger MCPj reconstruction but failed because of aseptic loosening. We discuss possible reasons in light of the current literature on post-traumatic MCPj arthroplasties and the RM prosthesis in particular.

CONCLUSION

The RM proximal interphalangeal prosthesis does not seem suitable for post-traumatic replacement of the MCPj.

Comparison of outcomes of three surgical approaches for proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty using a surface-replacing implant

The objective was to compare outcomes of the volar, Chamay and tendon splitting approaches for proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty using a surface-replacing implant (CapFlex-PIP). One-hundred prospectively documented patients with a 2-year follow-up were included. Range of proximal interphalangeal joint motion, the brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and complications were analysed. Between baseline and follow-up, mean proximal interphalangeal joint motion increased for the volar (53° to 54°), Chamay (38° to 53°) and tendon splitting (40° to 61°) approaches. The volar approach yielded the greatest flexion and the highest extension deficit. The mean brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire scores at baseline and 2 years were 45 and 74 (volar), 45 and 66 (Chamay) and 41 and 75 (tendon splitting). Seven patients in the Chamay group and two in the volar group required a reoperation consisting of teno-/arthrolysis. The tendon splitting approach tended to result in the best outcomes that were associated with fewer complications compared with the volar and Chamay approaches. Level of evidence: IV.

Functional evaluation following emergency arthroplasty of the proximal interphalangeal joint for complex fractures with silicone implant

The proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint is particularly vulnerable to trauma. In comminuted fractures, arthroplasty with a silicone implant is a treatment option that may be controversial in an emergency setting. This joint destruction is usually accompanied by soft tissue injuries (skin and tendon damage, devascularization) making the reconstruction all the more complex. The aim of our work was to evaluate emergency finger silicone implants for complex and comminuted fractures of the PIP joint as well as clinical and radiological complications. In this single-center, retrospective study, 13 patients operated between January 2007 and January 2019 on an emergency basis with a Neuflex® PIP arthroplasty were reviewed. This PIP joint reconstruction was associated with the soft tissue repair at the same time (skin cover, tendons, nerves) in all patients. The average age was 57.7 years with a male predominance (92%). The injuries were caused by a domestic accident in 61% of cases. The average follow-up was 4.7 years. The average total active motion arc was 183.8°. The average QuickDASH score was 24. There was one case of broken implant with no functional consequence. No infection or instability was reported. Silicone implant arthroplasty is a simple, reliable, fast, and durable solution for complex PIP fractures when conservative treatment is impossible. This solution is an alternative to arthrodesis or even finger amputation.

Non-vascularized partial joint transfer for Finger Proximal Interphalangeal joint reconstruction: a series of 9 patients

INTRODUCTION

Finger proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) reconstruction after the destruction of parts of the joint remains challenging. Surgical techniques include implant arthroplasty, arthrodesis, free vascularized joint transfer, and non-vascularized bone and joint transfer. This study analyzes our experience after non-vascularized transfer in terms of range of motion, postoperative rehabilitation, and patient satisfaction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2009 and 2014, ten patients underwent non-vascularized partial joint transfer for PIP joint reconstruction. One of them was lost to follow-up. Included patients had osteochondral partial joint transplants of 25-50% of the toes (n = 4) and the hand (n = 5). Range of motion (ROM), grip-, and pinch-strength were measured at the last follow-up control and compared to the healthy side. Patients were asked to score the pain at rest/ on load on a visual scale (VAS: 0 = no pain; 10 = excruciating pain). Satisfaction self-assessment was evaluated by asking the patients to grade their postoperative result as excellent, very good, good or poor.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up period was 4.0 years (range 1.2-7.9 years). Mean PIP joint flexion was 93 ± 26° at the last follow-up control. Mean grip- and pinch-strength of the operated side at the last control were, respectively, 43 ± 18 kg and 8 ± 5 kg, close to the healthy side values (45 ± 15 kg and 9 ± 4 kg). Mean pain at rest/on load measured on a visual scale was, respectively, 0.3 ± 1 and 1.8 ± 2. Eight patients (89%) rated their operation as excellent, and one as poor.

CONCLUSION

In this study, non-vascularized partial joint transfer provides a mobile and stable PIP joint 4 years after reconstruction. The surgical technique presented herein is complex depending on additional injuries but results in great patient satisfaction.

[Percutaneous treatment of unstable fractures of the base of the middle phalanx : Technique according to Hintringer and Ender]

OBJECTIVE

Reconstruction of intra-articular impression fractures of the middle phalanx by percutaneous reduction over a small dorsal cortical window. Stabilization by lattice-like arranged K‑wires.

INDICATIONS

Impression fractures of the base of the middle phalanx with or without dislocation in the proximal interphalangeal joint.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Fractures extending to the shaft of the middle phalanx.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

By a cortical window at the dorsum of the middle phalanx (through the tendon free triangle) the impression fracture is reduced from the medullary cavity. Reduction is secured and the articular surface is supported by lattice-like arranged K‑wires.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Thermoplastic splint for the finger for 6 weeks, subsequently K‑wire removal, active range of motion exercises and hand occupational therapy.

RESULTS

In two case series already published, good clinical and radiological results were reported. No complications were detected in either series.

Biomechanical comparison of the proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis using a compression wire

INTRODUCTION/AIM

Arthrodesis of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the finger is a common procedure for the treatment of osteoarthritis. The aim of this biomechanical study was to compare the primary stability of one, respectively, two compression wires to intraosseous wiring and tension band wiring for the arthrodesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The stability of the arthrodesis was tested by applying flexion (n = 11) and extension (n = 10) force with 10° bending. Arthrodesis was achieved by one, respectively, two crossed compression wires and intraosseous wiring. In a control group (n = 11) tension band wiring was tested to 10° flexion and extension as well.

RESULTS

Mean values for flexion bending for intraosseous wiring were 10.94 N, for one compression wire 12.82 N, for tension band wiring 17.95 N, and for two crossed compression wires 20.42 N. Mean values for extension bending were 9.71 N for intraosseous wiring, 13.63 N for one compression wire, 21.43 N for tension band wiring and 22.56 N for two crossed compression wires.

CONCLUSION

The primary stability of the compression wires was statistically significant superior to intraosseous wiring. In comparison to tension band wiring which showed an intermediate stability. The application of a compression wire could be considered for further clinical testing in the arthrodesis of interphalangeal joints.

Force distribution of a cylindrical grip differs between dominant and nondominant hand in healthy subjects

INTRODUCTION

Grip strength and load distribution of the hand are important parameters for evaluating hand function. The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare grip force and load distribution of dominant and nondominant hands in right-handed healthy subjects.

METHODS

Gripping measurements were performed on 40 healthy right-handed subjects using a cylindrical gripping device. Two different cylinders with circumferences of 150 mm (small cylinder) and 200 mm (large cylinder), respectively, were used for the measurements. Subjects were assigned to either the small or the large cylinder with respect to their hand size. Maximum and mean force applied during three intervals of gripping as well as the percent contribution of each digit, thenar, and hypothenar in relation to the total load applied were acquired. Values of dominant and nondominant hands were compared.

RESULTS

Percent contribution of mean grip strength differed for the thumb (p = 0.007), ring finger (p < 0.001), little finger (p = 0.047), and palm (p < 0.001). Comparing the dominant and nondominant side, the dominant hand showed a lower contribution of the thumb, ring finger, and little finger, but a higher contribution of the palm. When analyzing maximum grip, percent contribution of the small fingers was equal between dominant and nondominant side (p = 0.1). Differences between dominant and nondominant thumb, ring finger, and palm persisted (p = 0.007, p = 0.001, p = 0.005, respectively). No differences could be shown for the index finger, middle finger, thenar, and hypothenar when analyzing both mean and maximum force.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Percent contribution of the thumb and the fingers to total grip strength differed between dominant and nondominant hands with a change in distribution when assessing maximum grip force. In right-handed subjects, thumb and ring finger have important roles during gripping.