Surgical overreduction and hyperlordotic fusion of C1-C2 joint are associated with cervical sagittal malalignment

Atlantoaxial Instability in the Course of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Relation to Selected Parameters of Sagittal Balance

Background: Atlantoaxial instability is the most common cervical instability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Its course may differ in different patients and may have different degrees of severity and symptoms. Methods: There are a number of studies on systemic factors associated with the development of this instability, but there are few publications in the scientific literature on the influence of biomechanical factors on the development of cervical instability. One of the areas that allows the study of biomechanical factors influencing spine pathologies is the analysis of sagittal balance using radiological parameters. The study of radiological parameters of sagittal balance has contributed to understanding the pathology of selected spine diseases and is currently an indispensable tool in planning surgical treatment. Results: The presented study, conducted on a group of RA patients with cervical instability, was performed to look for a relationship between C1-C2 instability and sagittal balance parameters. Conclusions: Among the examined selected parameters, a statistically relationship between C1-C2 instability and the Cobb angle C1-C7 and OD-HA parameters has been found. This confirms the need for further in-depth research on this areas.

Analysis of Components of Upper Cervical Lordosis in Asymptomatic Lordotic and Kyphotic Subjects

BACKGROUND

Upper cervical lordosis (CL) can be divided into 2 components: C2 slope (C2S) and McGregor slope (MGS) or C0-1 and C1-2 angles. The aim of this study was to investigate the components of upper CL in asymptomatic kyphotic and lordotic subjects.

METHODS

CL, C0-2 Cobb angle, MGS, C2S, C1 Slope, C0-1 Cobb angle, C1-2 Cobb angle, T1 slope angular parameters, and the C2-7 sagittal vertical axis distance of 78 asymptomatic subjects were measured.

RESULTS

Sixty subjects had lordotic curvature and 18 had kyphotic curvature. There was a significant difference between the kyphotic and lordotic groups in all parameters, except for C0-1 Cobb angle and C2-7 sagittal vertical axis. In lordotic subjects, MGS and C2S accounted for 58% and 42% of the C0-2 angle, whereas in kyphotic subjects, 86% of C0-2 was accounted for by C2S. There was a strong negative correlation between C2S and MGS.

CONCLUSIONS

In asymptomatic subjects, as CL decreases, MGS decreases, C2S increases, and the C0-2 angle turns down on the horizontal plane to maintain the horizontal gaze. Turning down the C0-2 angle is more important than its value for maintaining horizontal gaze; thus, the slopes (MGS and C2S) can better represent the upper and lower cervical alignment than angle values can. The relationship between upper and lower cervical alignment should be evaluated in terms of slope angles rather than simple angles. The lack of significant difference between the C0-1 angles in the kyphotic and lordotic groups suggests that only the C1-2 angle is involved in the compensatory mechanism for the horizontal gaze.

Efficacy and Safety of Goel-Harms Technique in Upper Cervical Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The main purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to estimate the incidence of implant-associated complications and fusion rates for the Goel-Harms technique (GHT) and to show potential factors affecting the complications and nonunion development.

METHODS

A systematic search of the PubMed database according to PRISMA guidance was performed. The main inclusion criteria comprised description of fusion rate and/or implant-associated complications rate.

RESULTS

This systematic review included 86 articles focused on the results of surgery in 4208 patients. The rate of screw-related complications was as follows: 1) vertebral artery (VA) injury, 2.8%; 2) screw malposition in the direction of the VA, 5.8%; and 3) C2 nerve root irritation, 6.1%. The nonunion rate was 4.2%. Transpedicular screw insertion to the C1 and C2 vertebrae were the safest regarding VA injury and correlated with lower blood loss. For C1-C2 fusion, there was no statistical difference for the different bone graft localization. C2 nerve root irritation rate did not depend on screw insertion technique. The use of a freehand technique did not correlate with a high rate of screw-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The Goel-Harms technique is a promising method of C1-C2 fusion, with a relatively low nonunion and VA injury rate. It can be performed safely without C-arm or navigation system assistance. Transpedicular screw insertion trajectories to the C1 and C2 vertebrae were safest regarding VA injury and blood loss volume. Further comparative studies of various C1-C2 stabilization methods with a high level of significance should be carried out to identify the optimal approach.

Sequential sagittal alignment changes in the cervical spine after occipitocervical fusion

BACKGROUND

There are few studies regarding sequential changes in the sagittal alignment of the upper and lower cervical regions of the spine after occipitocervical fusion (OCF). In addition, no comparisons of cervical sagittal alignment (CSA) between patients with craniocervical junction disorders (CJDs) and normal populations have been reported.

AIM

To compare the CSA of patients with CJDs with that of normal controls and investigate the sequential changes in the CSA of the upper and lower cervical spine after OCF.

METHODS

Eighty-four patients who underwent OCF (OCF group) and 42 asymptomatic volunteers (control group) were included. Radiographic parameters, including the occipital to C2 angle (O-C2a), occipital and external acoustic meatus to axis angle (O-EAa), C2–7 angle (C2-7a), and pharyngeal inlet angle (PIA), were measured and compared pre- and postoperatively. The correlations among the parameters were analyzed using Pearson’s correlation test.

RESULTS

The O-C2a and PIA of the OCF group were smaller than those of the control group, while their O-EAa and C2-7a values were larger than those of the normal controls. There were no significant differences in O-C2a, C2-7a, or PIA in the OCF group at baseline, 1 mo, or the final follow-up after surgery. The Pearson’s correlation results showed that there were significant correlations between the O-C2a and C2Ta, C2-7a, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and PIA at 1 mo after OCF surgery and between O-C2a and O-EAa, C2Ta, C2-7a, C2-7 SVA, and PIA at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Patients with CJDs have a more kyphotic upper CSA and a more lordotic lower CSA than normal controls. The effectiveness of OCF surgery in restoring CSA may be limited by the realignment of the craniocervical junction being neglected. The reduction in O-C2a after OCF surgery may increase C2-7a and decrease PIA.

Surgical resection of intradural extramedullary tumors in the atlantoaxial spine via a posterior approach

BACKGROUND

The anatomical features of the atlantoaxial spine increase the difficulty of complete and safe removal of atlantoaxial intradural extramedullary (IDEM) tumors. Studies concerning surgical interventions via a posterior approach are limited.

AIM

To investigate the safety and efficacy of atlantoaxial IDEM tumor resection using a one-stage posterior approach.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed clinical databases for one-stage atlantoaxial IDEM tumor resection via a posterior approach between January 2008 and January 2018. The analyzed data included tumor position, histopathological type, pre- and post-operative Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores and Nurick grades, postoperative complication and recurrence status.

RESULTS

A total of 13 patients who underwent C1-C2 Laminectomy and/or unilateral facetectomy via the posterior approach were enrolled in the study. In all cases reviewed, total tumor resection and concomitant C1-C2 fusion were achieved. The average follow-up was 35.3 ± 6.9 mo (range, 26-49 mo). A statistically significant difference was noted between the preoperative JOA score (11.2 ± 1.1) and the score at the last final follow-up (15.6 ± 1.0) (P < 0.05). A statistically significant difference was noted between the preoperative Nurick grade (2.3 ± 0.9) and that at the last follow-up (1.2 ± 0.4) (P < 0.05). However, no statistically significant difference was noted between the preoperative and last follow-up C1-2 Cobb angle and C2-7 Cobb angle (P > 0.05). No mortalities, severe complications or tumor recurrence were observed during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Total resection of atlantoaxial IDEM tumors is feasible and effective via a posterior approach. Surgical reconstruction should be considered to avoid iatrogenic kyphosis and improve spinal stability and overall clinical outcomes.

Risk factor analysis of postoperative kyphotic change in subaxial cervical alignment after upper cervical fixation

OBJECTIVE

Little is known about the risk factors for postoperative subaxial cervical kyphosis following craniovertebral junction (CVJ) fixation. The object of this study was to evaluate postoperative changes in cervical alignment and to identify the risk factors for postoperative kyphotic change in the subaxial cervical spine after CVJ fixation.

METHODS

One hundred fifteen patients were retrospectively analyzed for postoperative subaxial kyphosis after CVJ fixation. Relations between subaxial kyphosis and radiological risk factors, including segmental angles and ranges of motion (ROMs) at C0-1, C1-2, and C2-7, and clinical factors, such as age, sex, etiology, occipital fixation, extensor muscle resection at C2, additional C1-2 posterior wiring, and subaxial laminoplasty, were investigated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the risk factors for postoperative kyphotic changes in the subaxial cervical spine.

RESULTS

The C2-7 angle change was more than -10° in 30 (26.1%) of the 115 patients. Risk factor analysis showed CVJ fixation combined with subaxial laminoplasty (OR 9.336, 95% CI 1.484-58.734, p = 0.017) and a small ROM at the C0-1 segment (OR 0.836, 95% CI 0.757-0.923, p < 0.01) were related to postoperative subaxial kyphotic change. On the other hand, age, sex, resection of the C2 extensor muscle, rheumatoid arthritis, additional C1-2 posterior wiring, and postoperative segmental angles were not risk factors for postoperative subaxial kyphosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Subaxial alignment change is not uncommon after CVJ fixation. Muscle detachment at the C2 spinous process was not a risk factor of kyphotic change. The study findings suggest that a small ROM at the C0-1 segment with or without occipital fixation and combined subaxial laminoplasty are risk factors for subaxial kyphotic change.

Influence of Atlantoaxial Fusion on Sagittal Alignment of the Occipitocervical and Subaxial spines in Os Odontoideum with Atlantoaxial Instability

Study Design

Retrospective case analysis.

Purpose

We hypothesized that larger the C1–C2 fusion angle, greater the severity of the sagittal malalignment of C0–C1 and C2–C7.

Overview of Literature

In our experience, instances of sagittal malalignment occur at C0–C1 and C2–C7 following atlantoaxial fusion in patients with Os odontoideum (OO).

Methods

We assessed 21 patients who achieved solid atlantoaxial fusion for reducible atlantoaxial instability secondary to OO. The mean patient age at the time of the operation was 42.8 years, and the mean follow-up duration was 4.9 years. Radiographic parameters were preoperatively measured and at the final follow-up. The patients were divided into two groups (A and B) depending on the C1–C2 fusion angle. In group A (n=11), the C1–C2 fusion angle was ≥22°, whereas in group B, it was <22°. The differences in the radiographic parameters of the two groups were evaluated.

Results

At the final follow-up, the C1–C2 angle was increased. However, this increase was not statistically significant (18° vs. 22°, p=0.924). The C0–C1 angle (10° vs. 5°, p<0.05) and C2–C7 angle (22° vs. 13°, p<0.05) significantly decreased. The final C1–C2 angle was negatively correlated with the final C0–C1 and C2–C7 angles. The final C0–C1 angle (4° vs. 6°, p<0.05) and C2–C7 angle (8° vs. 20°, p<0.05) were smaller in group A than in group B. After atlantoaxial fusion, the C0–C1 range of motion (ROM; 17° vs. 9°, p<0.05) and the C2–C7 ROM (39° vs. 31°, p<0.05) were significantly decreased.

Conclusions

We found a negative association between the sagittal alignment of C0–C1 and C2–C7 after atlantoaxial fusion and the C1–C2 fusion angle along with decreased ROM. Therefore, overcorrection of C1–C2 kyphosis should be avoided to maintain good physiologic cervical sagittal alignment.

Odontoid fracture with missed diagnosis of Transverse Atlantal Ligament (TAL) injury resulting in late-onset instability

Background:

Concurrent injuries to both the odontoid and transverse atlantal ligament are rare and can be easily missed. Failure to diagnose both lesions potentially leads to the late onset of sagittal plane instability and acute myelopathy. Here, we present a patient with an odontoid fracture whose transverse atlantal ligament (TAL) injury was originally missed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) scans. He later developed atlantoaxial instability requiring surgery.

Case Description:

A 17-year-old male presented with neck pain, restricted cervical range of motion, but a normal neurological exam following a motor vehicle accident. The original X-rays showed a moderately displaced type-3 odontoid fracture. Additional MRI and CT scans excluded ligamentous injury, and he was initially treated with 13 weeks of halo vest immobilization. Radiographs 5 months later showed an enlarged atlanto-dens interval (e.g., >3 mm); the diagnosis of an odontoid fracture with an accompanying TAL injury was established, following which the patient successfully underwent a posterior C1–C2 fusion.

Conclusion:

Odontoid fractures require strict clinical and radiographic (X-ray, MRI, CT) surveillance to help rule out accompanying TAL injuries that may warrant surgical intervention.