Is there a relationship between the load distribution on the tibial plateau and hip knee ankle angle after TKA?

A Comparison of Dynamic and Static Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle during Gait in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients and Healthy Individuals

Malalignment of the lower limbs is the main biomechanical factor for knee osteoarthritis (KOA). The static hip-knee-ankle angle (S-HKAA) measured from radiograph is regarded as the "gold standard" of the malalignment. However, many evidences showed that the S-HKAA has no significant correlation with the knee dynamic-load distribution, unlike the dynamic HKAA (D-HKAA). The purpose of this study was to quantitatively analyze the D-HKAA and investigate the relationship between D-HKAA and S-HKAA for both KOA and healthy participants. In this paper, twenty-five healthy subjects and twenty-five medial compartment KOA (M-KOA) patients were recruited. Three-dimensional motion analysis and standing lower-limbs-full-length radiograph were utilized to obtain the D-HKAA and S-HKAA, respectively. The results showed that the mean D-HKAA was more varus than the S-HKAA (p < 0.05). For the mean D-HKAA, larger varus angle was observed in swing phase than stance phase (p < 0.05). Compared with healthy subjects, the M-KOA patients had remarkably smaller S-HKAA and D-HKAA during gait cycle (p < 0.01). For the relationship between the S-HKAA and mean D-HKAA, no significant correlation was found for both healthy subjects and M-KOA patients (r < 0.357, n = 25, p > 0.05, Spearman correlation analysis). In conclusion, the S-HKAA was limited to predict the D-HKAA for both M-KOA patients and healthy subjects. The D-HKAA should be given more attention to the orthopedist and the designer of knee brace and orthotics.

Midterm Comparison of Tibial Fixation between Posterior Cruciate-Retaining and Substituting Porous Tantalum Total Knee Arthroplasty: Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Analysis

Porous tantalum tibial component is durable with excellent bone ingrowth, higher knee scores, and long-term survivorship. However, to our knowledge, the effect of posterior cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior cruciate-substituting (PS) porous tantalum tibial component has not been reported. The aim of the current study was to investigate the prosthetic bone quality between CR porous tantalum tibial component and PS using three-dimensional multi-detector-row computed tomography (3D-MDCT). Porous twenty-two (22) CR total knee arthroplasties and 22 PS received 3D-MDCT at every 6 months up to 5.5 years postoperatively to assess prosthetic bone quality (bone marrow contents/tissue volumes [BMC/TV, mg/cm³]) underneath the pegs of porous tantalum modular tibial component. Clinical outcomes (Knee Society score [KSS], Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC), FJS-12, Patella score) were evaluated at a minimum follow-up period of 5.5 years. No statistically significant differences were found in age, gender, body mass index, KSS, and BMC/TV volumes in the proximal tibia between the two groups before total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There were also no significant differences between the CR and PS groups with regard to BMC/TV at every 6 months up to 5.5 years after TKA. At 5.5 years postoperatively, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the KSS, WOMAC, forgotten joint score (FJS-12), and Patella score. The present study revealed that the prosthetic bone quality of the CR porous tantalum tibial component and PS were equivalent at every 6 months up to 5.5 years after TKA. This study reflects level II evidence.

A whole leg radiograph is not necessary for postoperative determination of the mechanical leg axis after total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Anteroposterior (AP) whole leg radiographs (WLR) in the standing position for assessment of the mechanical leg axis are generally performed preoperatively for the planning of total knee replacement (TKR) and postoperatively to assess the leg axis. The objective of the present study was to investigate whether, if preoperative WLR are available, postoperative AP standard knee radiographs in the standing position are sufficient for calculating the mechanical leg axis.

METHODS

In the present prospective study, the mechanical and the anatomical leg axes were determined on the basis of WLR from 104 patients prior to implantation of a TKR and the difference was calculated. Twelve weeks postoperatively, standing long AP radiographs and WLR were prepared. In addition, the mechanical axis was calculated by adding the preoperative difference between the anatomical and mechanical axis to the anatomical axis from the postoperative AP radiographs. Accuracy, bias and level of agreement for calculated relative to measured mechanical alignment were determined.

RESULTS

Mean accuracy of calculated mechanical alignment was 0.5° ± 0.4°, and mean bias was 0.0° ± 0.6° (p = 1.00). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a 95% upper and lower level of agreement of - 1.3° and 1.3°, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A preoperative WLR and a postoperative long AP knee standard radiograph are sufficient to determine the mechanical leg axis after TKR. If these are available, it is possible to do without WLR after TKR, particularly since they involve higher radiation exposure, are time-consuming, and are also prone to errors in the first postoperative weeks.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II diagnostic study.