Short-term results of a second generation anatomic short-stem shoulder prosthesis in primary osteoarthritis

Current trends in shoulder arthroplasty - Are the trends backed by evidence?

Shoulder arthroplasty is the third most common joint replacement performed worldwide and remains a rapidly innovative area for improvement in patient care. This article explores the evidence surrounding current trends aiming to improve patient outcome in all forms of shoulder arthroplasty.

On the concerning early failure of a short stem press-fit humeral component

BACKGROUND

Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a common surgical intervention for various shoulder pathologies, predominantly glenohumeral osteoarthritis. While generally considered safe and effective, complications remain a challenge. Short stem implants, aim to preserve bone stock and reduce complications. However, concerns about a specific short stem implant (Univers Apex; Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA) have surfaced due to high reported rates relatively early aseptic loosening.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed 116 consecutive TSA patients with Univers Apex implants from 2004 to 2022. Fifteen revision cases were assessed for radiographic loosening and explanted implants were examined for damage using a 0-3 scale. Histopathological analysis evaluated cellular responses to wear debris.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 13% (15/116) required revision at 23.2 months on average. A distinct radiographic loosening pattern was identified, with humeral component subsidence and thinning of the proximal humeral cortex. Histopathology revealed a robust inflammatory response to wear debris, with a potential association between macrophage infiltration, hinge damage, and polyethylene wear.

CONCLUSION

This study reveals a notable rate of early aseptic humeral loosening with the Univers Apex short stem implant, emphasizing concerns raised in previous reports and providing a potential explanation for the high rate of early failure. Surgeons should exercise caution and closely monitor patients with this implant design.

Outcomes of a cementless onlay short stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty in elderly patients: a comprehensive analysis of clinical and radiological findings

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes of a short stem reverse shoulder prosthesis with metaphyseal fixation specifically in older patients.

METHODS

All patients, older than 70 years, submitted to a Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA) using a cementless onlay short stem (Aequalis Ascend™ Flex Convertible Shoulder System (Stryker®)) from January 2017 to December 2021, with a minimum follow-up of 2 years, were included. Postoperative radiographs were assessed for stem loosening, subsidence, and varus-valgus tilt. Range of motion, visual analogue scale for pain, constant score, complication rate and revision rate were also analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients with a mean age of 75 years (range 71-83 years) were submitted to a cementless onlay short stem RSA with a Bone Increased Off-Set (BIO-RSA) construct. The mean follow-up period was 61 months (range 54-87). Significant improvements (p < 0.001) were observed for the constant score and range of motion from the preoperative state to final follow-up. One case exhibited a significant varus deviation (> 5˚) during the follow-up period. No case of stem loosening was identified. There was only one case of complication because of post-traumatic dislocation, but the stem didn't need revision.

CONCLUSION

Short stem RSA, even in patients older than 70 years, can yield a stable fixation with a good clinical and radiological outcome at short-medium term follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III; Retrospective Study.

Validation of the distal filling ratio in uncemented convertible short-stem shoulder arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Radiographic stress shielding is a common finding in uncemented convertible short-stem shoulder arthroplasty (UCSSSA). The distal filling ratio (DFR) has been described as a predictor for the occurrence of stress shielding. A DFR > 70% was mentioned as a risk factor for the occurrence of stress shielding for some UCSSSA. However, measurements were only performed on conventional radiographs and no validation exists for 3D automated planning tools.

METHODS

DFR was manually measured on postoperative true ap radiographs of 76 shoulder arthroplasties using a standardized protocol and were compared to preoperative CT scans with an automated calculation of the DFR after virtual implantation of the stem.

RESULTS

The mean DFR measured on X-rays was 75.9% (SD = 8.7; 95% CI = 74-78) vs. 78.9% (SD = 9.1; 95% CI = 76.8-83) automatically measured on CT scans. This difference was significant (p < 0.001). In 7 out of 76 cases (9%) the difference between manual measurement on radiographs and computerized measurement on CT scans was > 10%.

CONCLUSION

Manual measurement of the DFR is underestimated on conventional radiographs compared to automated calculation on CT scans be a mean of 3%. Therefore, automated measurement of the DFR on CT scans seems to be beneficial, especially in cases with osteopenic cortices. Manual measurement of the DFR on conventional ap radiographs in cases without CT scans, however, is still a viable alternative.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective study.

Complications and revisions in anatomic and reverse short stem shoulder arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

One current trend in the field of shoulder arthroplasty is a design shift to shorter and metaphyseal fixed humeral stem components. The aim of this investigation is to analyze complications resulting in revision surgery after anatomic (ASA) and reverse (RSA) short stem arthroplasty. We hypothesize that complications are influenced by the type of prosthesis and indication for arthroplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 279 short stem shoulder prostheses were implanted by the same surgeon (162 ASA; 117 RSA), and 223 of these prostheses were implanted as primary procedures; in 54 cases, arthroplasty was performed secondary to prior open surgery. Main indications were osteoarthritis (OA) (n = 134), cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) (n = 74) and posttraumatic deformities (PTr) (n = 59). Patients were evaluated at 6 weeks (follow-up 1; FU1), 2 years (FU2) and the time span of the last follow-up defined as FU3 with a minimum FU of 2 years. Complications were categorized into early complications (within FU1), intermediate complications (within FU2) and late complications (> 2 years; FU3).

RESULTS

In total, 268 prostheses (96.1%) were available for FU1; 267 prostheses (95.7%) were available for FU2 and 218 prostheses (77.8%) were available for FU3. The average time for FU3 was 53.0 months (range 24-95). A complication leading to revision occurred in 21 prostheses (7.8%), 6 (3.7%) in the ASA group and 15 (12.7%) in the RSA group (p < 0.005). The most frequent cause for revision was infection (n = 9; 42.9%). After primary implantation, 3 complications (2.2%) occurred in the ASA and 10 complications (11.0%) in the RSA group (p < 0.005). The complication rate was 2.2% in patients with OA, 13.5% in CTA and 11.9% in PTr.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty had a significantly higher rate of complications and revisions than primary and secondary anatomic shoulder arthroplasty, respectively. Therefore, indications for reverse shoulder arthroplasty should be critically questioned in each individual case.

Innovations in Shoulder Arthroplasty

Innovations currently available with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty include shorter stem designs and augmented/inset/inlay glenoid components. Regarding reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), metal augmentation, including custom augments, on both the glenoid and humeral side have expanded indications in cases of bone loss. In the setting of revision arthroplasty, humeral options include convertible stems and newer tools to improve humeral implant removal. New strategies for treatment and surgical techniques have been developed for recalcitrant shoulder instability, acromial fractures, and infections after RSA. Finally, computer planning, navigation, PSI, and augmented reality are imaging options now available that have redefined preoperative planning and indications as well intraoperative component placement. This review covers many of the innovations in the realm of shoulder arthroplasty.

Arthroscopic and open partial arthroplasty for the treatment of focal grade IV cartilage defects of the humeral head

INTRODUCTION

Focal Outerbridge grade IV cartilage defects of the proximal humerus may lead to pain and an impaired shoulder function. In cases of failed operative or conservative treatment options such as intraarticular injections or arthroscopic microfracturing of the subchondral bone, partial arthroplasty of the humeral may restore the articular surface of the humeral head without altering the anatomy. This study evaluates mid-term results of open and arthroscopic partial resurfacing of the humeral head in the context of focal grade IV cartilage defects.

METHODS

Eighteen patients (f = 3, m = 15, mean age = 57.7 years) out of 22 patients were available for follow-up after 65 (24-116) months. Thirteen patients were treated with a partial humeral head prosthesis in an open technique and five patients received a partial humeral head prosthesis in an arthroscopic technique. The patients were followed-up clinically using the Constant-Score, the ASES Score as well as the range of motion. Plain radiographs (anterior-posterior and axial view) were carried out for radiologic assessment.

RESULTS

At follow-up the mean CS rated 79.5. The mean ASES Score was 85.8 points. Mean active forward flexion measured 163.8°, while mean active abduction was 160.0°. The average pain level on a visual analogue scale (VAS) made out 0.7 out of 10. Patients treated with an arthroscopically implanted prosthesis achieved a mean CS of 88.8 points and a mean ASES Score of 92.6 points. The patients with openly implanted prosthesis had a CS of 75.3 points and an ASES Score of 83 points. There were no intraoperative or immediate postoperative complications. Until the final follow-up one patient needed to be converted to total shoulder arthroplasty due to progressive glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Nine patients (50%) showed progressive glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Aseptic loosening of the implants was not observed.

CONCLUSION

Partial arthroscopic or open arthroplasty of the humeral head is related to good functional results after mid-term follow-up. Resurfacing of the humeral head is a safe procedure without any implant-related complications. There is a risk for progression of glenohumeral osteoarthritis, which may require surgical revision with conversion to anatomic shoulder arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV (retrospective study).

Current state of short-stem implants in total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature

Background

Humeral stem length in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) continues to decrease in an attempt to preserve bone. Outcomes following short-stem TSA are not well documented. The purpose was to systematically review and report the outcomes and revisions following short-stem humeral implants for TSA.

Methods

A systematic review was registered with PROSPERO and performed with PRISMA guidelines using 3 publicly available free databases. Therapeutic clinical outcome investigations reporting TSA outcomes of short-stem implants with levels of evidence I-IV were eligible for inclusion. All study, subject, and surgical technique demographics were analyzed and described.

Results

Thirteen studies were included (average follow-up: 33 months, range 24-84 months; 8 studies [62%] were multicenter and 6 [46%] were from Europe). All studies were published in the last 8 years, and almost all (12/13, 92%) reported results of uncemented components. Most of the studies (9/13, 70%) reported results from the Aequalis Ascend or Ascend Flex Stem (Tornier). Improvements were seen in all measured range of motion planes and patient-reported outcome scores. Complications were infrequent, with a 2% humeral loosening rate, a 3% overall revision rate, and a 1% rate of revision for aseptic humeral loosening. Radiographic results showed a 13% rate of radiolucent lines, a 16% rate of condensation lines, and a 22% rate of calcar osteolysis.

Conclusion

Short-stem TSA humeral implants provide excellent results, with low revision rates in the short term. Long-term follow-up will be necessary to understand the clinical impact of radiographic calcar osteolysis.

Proximal humeral bony adaptations with a short uncemented stem for shoulder arthroplasty: a quantitative analysis

Background

Short uncemented stems have recently been proposed as an alternative to classic long stems for shoulder arthroplasty. The early results are promising, but bony adaptations of the proximal humerus have been reported. The aim of this study was to quantify these phenomena using the Ascend Flex stem and to determine the risk factors.

Materials and methods

In a retrospective, single-center study, 183 shoulder arthroplasties were evaluated at 2-year follow-up. All patients underwent clinical evaluations preoperatively and at last follow-up. Radiographs were obtained preoperatively, postoperatively, and at last follow-up. Four types of bony adaptations were analyzed: medial cortical narrowing (MCN), medial metaphysis thinning (MMT), lateral metaphysis thinning (LMT), and under-the-baseplate osteolysis. The risk factors were analyzed in a multivariate model.

Results

MCN was found in 72.6% of cases and was severe (>50%) in 4.4%. MMT was found in 46.4% of cases and was severe in 3.3%. LMT was found in 9.8% of cases and was severe in 2.8%. The risk factors for MCN were the distal filling ratio, osteoporosis, and female sex, whereas MMT and LMT were only influenced by stem axis deviation. Under-the-baseplate osteolysis was found in 34.4% of cases. No influence of bony adaptations on the clinical outcomes was observed. We found no complications related to the stem or to stem loosening.

Conclusion

The radiographic evolution was satisfactory at mid-term follow-up. Bony adaptations seemed to be limited phenomena, without any observed consequence. Avoiding excessive filling and axis deviation may limit these phenomena.