Long-term follow-up after MIPO Philos plating for proximal humerus fractures

Let Us Agree to Disagree on Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Multicenter International Prospective Cohort Study of Gray-Zone, Clinical Equipoise Fractures

Background

Internationally, the optimal treatment strategy of proximal humerus fractures remains much debated.

Methods

To investigate whether operative treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures is superior to nonoperative treatment, this international multicenter prospective natural experiment based on clinical equipoise was performed. Two hundred twenty-six patients with acute proximal humerus fractures presenting from July 2020 to March 2022 were included after expert panel evaluation, consisting of Dutch and Swiss surgeons with diverse ideas on optimal treatment. Patients were included when no consensus on optimal treatment was reached i.e., clinical equipoise. Follow-up was completed after 1 year (n = 191 [84%]). The primary outcome was Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) after 1 year. Secondary outcomes included QuickDASH at 6 weeks and EQ5D, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain at 6 weeks and 1 year.

Results

No difference in QuickDASH score after 1 year (12.8 vs. 16.2, p = 0.73) was found. At 6 weeks, operative treatment resulted in lower NRS (4.3 vs. 3.0, p < 0.001), higher EQ5D (0.59 vs. 0.67, p = 0.011), and higher SSV (40.9 vs. 51.4, p = 0.005). At 1 year, operative treatment resulted in higher SSV (72.1 vs. 83.7, p = 0.002), while EQ5D was comparable (0.87 vs. 0.85, p = 0.95).

Conclusion

No difference between treatments was observed in the primary outcome. Patient-tailored care may still include counseling operative treatment to patients to reduce short-term pain and/or facilitate early return to sport/work in young active patients.

Level of Evidence

Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Assessment of Functional Outcome and Postoperative Complications in Proximal Humerus Fracture Patients Managed With Proximal Humerus Internal Locking System (PHILOS) Plating

BACKGROUND

Proximal humerus fractures are primarily common in the old age group. The appropriate approach to managing such displaced and comminuted fracture patterns is often questionable. Hence, this study was conducted to assess the functional outcome of proximal humerus fractures following treatment with a proximal humerus locking plate and to assess the frequency of complications in such patients.

METHODOLOGY

In this robust study, 33 cases of proximal humerus fractures underwent surgical management at a prestigious teaching hospital from February 2021 to August 2022 utilizing a proximal humerus internal locking system (PHILOS) plate. The NEER classification was employed to categorize the fractures, and the NEER score was used for functional assessment. It's crucial to note that individuals with pathological fractures, associated injuries in the ipsilateral limb, nerve injuries, and cases of open fracture were rigorously excluded from the study.

RESULTS

The mean age was 47 ± 5.2 years. Based on NEER's classification, the distribution of fractures was as follows: two-part fractures accounted for 18.18% (n = 6) of cases, three-part fractures for 54.54% (n = 18) of cases, and four-part fractures for 27.27% (n = 9) of cases. A history of road traffic accidents and falls was reported in 54.54% (n = 18) and 45.45% (n = 15) of cases, respectively. Functional outcome assessment utilizing NEER's score revealed a minimum score of 48 and a maximum of 96, with an average score of 82.96 ± 12.73. Notably, 39% of patients demonstrated excellent results, 27% exhibited satisfactorily, 21% manifested unsatisfactorily, and 12.12% presented failure outcomes. Of the 33 operated cases, 81.8% (n = 27) exhibited no complications during follow-up. The predominant complication observed was shoulder stiffness (9.09%, n = 3), followed by Varus mal-union (6.06%, n = 2), and superficial surgical site infection (3.03%, n = 1), managed with debridement and antibiotics leading to subsequent resolution.

CONCLUSIONS

Managing proximal humerus fractures has consistently posed a formidable challenge. Our study indicates that using the PHILOS plate represents a reliable option for addressing such fractures. This plate provides sturdy fixation, facilitates early mobilization, and culminates in exceptional functional outcomes. The insights gained from this study can inform clinical decision-making and guide orthopedic surgeons in selecting the appropriate treatment strategy for proximal humerus fracture patients.

Limb Fractures Treated With the Novel Plate Osteosynthesis Application Technique: Second to Minimally Invasive Plates osteosynthesis

BACKGROUND

The main aim of this article was to propose a new concept of minimally invasive surgery for treating limb fractures, named as second to minimally invasive plates osteosynthesis (STMIPO).

METHODS

We have described the STMIPO technique in a step-wise and standardized manner based on our findings from a study involving six patients treated at our institution. All patients with fracture achieved satisfactory outcomes.

RESULTS

Ours clinical trials have shown that the STMIPO technique can be successfully applied in various limb fractures, including fibula fractures, tibial fractures, femur fractures, humerus fractures, ulna fractures, and radius fractures. All fracture patients achieved satisfactory outcomes.

CONCLUSION

As a new minimally invasive technology, the STMIPO technique can serve as an alternative solution for fractures that are difficult to reduce with minimally invasive plates osteosynthesis (MIPO).

Study of Functional Outcome and Postoperative Complications Among Proximal Humerus Fracture Patients Treated With Proximal Humerus Internal Locking System (PHILOS) Plating

Background Proximal humerus fractures comprise nearly 4%-5% of all fracture types and nearly 25% of fracture humerus. These fractures are commonly seen in the elderly population (people aged 60 years or more). The best way to treat elderly people who have three- or four-part fractures of the proximal humerus is debatable, with many in favour of prosthetic humeral head replacements. This study aimed to assess the functional outcome of proximal humerus fractures managed with a proximal humerus locking plate and to investigate the incidence of complications in these patients. Methodology This retrospective study included 32 cases of proximal humerus fractures managed surgically at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Rajasthan between July 2016 to July 2022 with a proximal humerus internal locking system (PHILOS) plate. NEER scoring system was used to categorise the fractures. Functional assessment was done using Constant Murley's shoulder score. Constant Murley shoulder score was graded as failure (0-69 points), unsatisfactory (70-79), satisfactory (80-89), and excellent (90-100). Subjects having metastatic and pathological fractures; associated fractures in the ipsilateral limb; having major nerve injury and cases of open fracture were excluded from this study. Results The mean age was 54.5±6.4 years. Of the total 32 cases of proximal humerus fractures, 12 cases of two-part fractures received an excellent grade, compared to seven cases of three-part fractures. Three two-part fracture cases and two three-part fracture cases all received satisfactory grades. Excellent results (score > 89) were noticed in 62.5% (n = 20) of the instances, satisfactory results (scoring 80-89) in 21.87% (n=7), poor results (score 70-79) in 9.38% (n=3), and failure results (score 70) in 6.25% (n=2). In 65.6% of cases, follow-up showed no complications. Shoulder stiffness and malunion (9.38%) were the most frequent consequences, followed by avascular necrosis (6.25%). Conclusions Based on the findings of this retrospective study, it can be opined that PHILOS plaiting appears to be a secure option for proximal humerus fracture cases. It offers solid fixation, prompt mobilisation, and excellent functional outcomes as observed in this study. Additionally, very few post-operative complication rates again support our conclusion.

Proximal humeral fracture-dislocation: Outcome analysis in osteosynthesis and arthroplasties

PURPOSE

Proximal humeral fracture-dislocations (PHFD) are challenging to treat. In older patients, usually arthroplasty is performed. In younger patients, osteosynthesis is chosen. This study presents functional outcomes of these different treatment modalities.

METHODS

All patients operated for PHFD from 2010 until 2017 were included. Osteosynthesis was performed in younger patients and if reconstruction was possible. Either an open deltopectoral approach or a minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) was performed. Hemiarthroplasty (HA) was done if reconstruction of the tubercles was possible, age was below 63 years and no signs of osteoarthritis were present. In all other cases, a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) was done. The primary endpoint was functional outcome assessed with the QuickDASH Score (QDS). Secondary outcomes were subjective shoulder value (SSV), complications, revisions, and conversion into arthroplasty.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up of 40 patients was 56 ± 24 months. The mean QDS was 4.5 (0.6-9.1) and the mean SSV was 90 (80-98.6). Of these, 33 patients (mean age: 50) had an osteosynthesis, 25 were treated with MIPO. Only 18% were converted into an arthroplasty after a mean of 22 months. Among them, 7 patients received a primary arthroplasty (mean age: 68), no revisions were recorded. Subgroup analysis showed functional outcome deficits in avascular necrosis (AVN) compared to no AVN (p = 0.021), revision surgery compared to no revision (p = 0.040) and in HA compared to rTSA (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

Both osteosynthesis and primary arthroplasty after PHFD can lead to good or even excellent functional outcome. Revision rates in osteosynthesis are high. Revision procedures or secondary conversion into arthroplasty after failed osteosynthesis decrease outcome scores significantly.

Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs): comparison of functional outcome 1 year after minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) versus open reduction internal fixation (ORIF)

PURPOSE

Osteosynthetic treatment strategies of PHFs include MIPO or ORIF techniques. The aim of this study was to compare the 1 year outcome following either technique in type B PHFs.

METHODS

This study was designed as a retrospective cohort study of patients treated at one academic Level 1 trauma center. Patients from 2009 to 2019 who required surgical treatment of a type B PHF were eligible to be included in this study. Patients with A- or C-type fractures or patients requiring arthroplasty were excluded. All patients were treated with Proximal Humerus Interlocking System (PHILOS) and stratified according the approach into Group MIPO or Group ORIF. Outcome measures include local complications that occurred during hospitalization, nonunion after 12 months, and range of motion after 1 year follow-up.

RESULTS

This study included 149 (75.3%) patients in Group ORIF, and 49 (24.7%) in Group MIPO. The fracture morphology and concomitant injuries were comparable amongst these groups. When compared with Group MIPO, Group ORIF had a 2.6 (95% CI 0.6-11.7) higher risk of suffering from local complications. The rate of postoperative nerve lesions was comparable (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.1-9.7) as was the rate of soft tissue complications (OR 2.0, 95% CI 0.2-17.2). The risk for nonunion was 4.5 times higher (95% 1.1-19.5) in Group ORIF when compared with Group MIPO. Group MIPO had a higher chance of flexion above 90° (OR 8.2, 95% CI 2.5-27.7).

CONCLUSION

This study provides indications that patients following surgical treatment of PHFs in MIPO technique might have favourable outcome. Large-scale and high-quality studies are warranted to confirm these results.

Shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture treatment: a retrospective functional outcome analysis

PURPOSE

Following proximal humeral fractures hemiarthroplasty (HA) or reversed total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) are performed if osteosynthesis or conservative treatment is not possible. HA has been reported to result in decreased functional outcomes compared with rTSA. Secondary shoulder arthroplasty, performed after a different initial treatment, has also been associated with inferior outcomes.

METHODS

Patients recieving a shoulder arthroplasty related to a proximal humeral fracture from 2010 to 2019 were included. A retrospective analysis of functional outcomes was performed using QuickDASH and subjective shoulder value (SSV).

RESULTS

The mean [standard deviation (SD)] follow-up time among the 82 included patients was 48 (28) months. The mean age was 70 (10) years. The mean age for HA was significantly different from rTSA [57 (9) and 72 (21) years; p < .001]. The mean QuickDASH score for primary arthroplasty was 11 (2) versus 12 (16) for secondary arthroplasty (p = .313). The mean SSV for primary arthroplasty was 84 (22) versus 82 (17) for secondary arthroplasty (p = .578). The mean QuickDASH score for HA was 24 (36) versus 9 (15) for rTSA (p = .346). The mean SSV for HA was 70 (34) versus 86 (17) for rTSA (p = .578).

CONCLUSION

Functional outcomes after fracture-related shoulder arthroplasty were excellent in an older population, even when performed secondarily after failed primary osteosynthesis or conservative treatment. No significant differences in shoulder function were identified between rTSA and HA, likely due to restrictive indications for HA.

Let's Agree to Disagree on Operative versus Nonoperative (LADON) treatment for proximal humerus fractures: Study protocol for an international multicenter prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The proximal humerus fracture is a common injury, but the optimal management is much debated. The decision for operative or nonoperative treatment is strongly influenced by patient specific factors, regional and cultural differences and the preference of the patient and treating surgeon. The aim of this study is to compare operative and nonoperative treatment of proximal humerus fractures for those patients for whom there is disagreement about optimal management.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This protocol describes an international multicenter prospective cohort study, in which all patients of 18 years and older presenting within three weeks after injury with a radiographically diagnosed displaced proximal humerus fracture can be included. Based on patient characteristics and radiographic images several clinical experts advise on the preferred treatment option. In case of disagreement among the experts, the patient can be included in the study. The actual treatment that will be delivered is at the discretion of the treating physician. The primary outcome is the QuickDash score at 12 months. Propensity score matching will be used to control for potential confounding of the relation between treatment modality and QuickDash scores.

DISCUSSION

The LADON study is an international multicenter prospective cohort study with a relatively new methodological study design. This study is a "natural experiment" meaning patients receive standard local treatment and surgeons perform standard local procedures, therefore high participation rates of patients and surgeons are expected. Patients are only included after expert panel evaluation, when there is proven disagreement between experts, which makes this a unique study design. Through this inclusion process, we create two comparable groups whom received different treatments and where expert disagree about the already initiated treatment. Since we are zooming in on this particular patient group, confounding will be largely mitigated. Internationally the treatment of proximal humerus fractures are still much debated and differs much per country and hospital. This observational study with a natural experiment design will create insight into which treatment modality is to be preferred for patients in whom there is disagreement about the optimal treatment strategy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered in Netherlands trial register NL9357 and Swiss trial register CH 2020-00961; https://clinicaltrials.gov/.

The role of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique for treating 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures in the elderly - a case study

Background and aim of the work:

Proximal humeral fractures incidence in the elderly population is increasing. Treatment management is complicated by fracture complexity and patients’ comorbidities. The aim of our prospective study is the outcome evaluation of the role of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) for elderly patients with a 3- or 4-parts proximal humeral fractures having an intact medial wall.

Methods:

N=45 patients were selected using inclusion criteria (>75yo, unilateral 3- or 4-parts proximal humeral fracture and with a surgical indication). We analyzed n=42 fractures treated with MIPO (3 patients had been reversed to ORIF and arthroplasty intraoperatively): n=20 4-parts fractures and n=22 were 3-parts. Of the 42 operated patients 17 identified as male and 25 as female (mean age 84yo). A trans-deltoid approach has been used with minimal surgical exposure and tissue damage to preserve the local tissue for early shoulder mobilization.

Results:

At follow-up, the DASH recorded mean value was 72, while the Constant mean score was 68. Complications have been recorded in 23,8% of patients with 4-parts fractures having the highest complication frequency. Mean shoulder joint ROM was recorded: anterior elevation 75°, lateral elevation 80°, abduction 90°, intra-rotation 50°, extra-rotation 25°. The following factors were identified influencing the outcome: >8mm calcar fragment, head valgus impaction and periosteal medial hinge preservation.

Conclusions:

The increase in population longevity matches the increase in complex humeral fracture frequency. We strongly for management consensus for proximal humerus fracture, in a similar way as for neck femoral fractures. MIPO is excellent in reducing soft tissue damage and complications for elderly patients with limited functional demand. (www.actabiomedica.it)

PHILOS Plate Plus Oblique Insertion of Autologous Fibula for 2-Part Proximal Humerus Fractures With Medial Column Disruption: A Retrospective Study

Introduction:

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the outcomes of older patients with 2-part proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) with medial column disruption stabilized using a proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) plate plus oblique insertion of autologous fibula as a primary procedure.

Materials and Methods:

Data involving 112 patients (112 shoulders) sustaining 2-part PHFs with medial column disruption treated with PHILOS plate plus oblique insertion of autologous fibula as a primary procedure during 2012-2019 were identified. The median follow-up was 36 months (range: 11.2-43.5 months). The primary endpoint was the Constant scores and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores. The secondary endpoint was the main orthopedic complication rate.

Results:

The median Constant and ASES scores were 78 (range, 52-95) and 77 (range, 62-96) at the final follow-up, respectively. The main orthopedic complication rate was 10.7% (12/112). Twelve orthopedic complications in 8 patients were detected, and they involved loss of reduction, varus collapse, aseptic loosening, mal-union, revision, and intolerable shoulder pain. Of these complications, 3 (2.6%) involved loss of reduction, 2 (1.7%) involved varus collapse, 3 (2.6%) involved aseptic loosening, 1 (0.8%) involved mal-union, 2 (1.7%) required revision surgery, and 1 (0.8%) presented intolerable shoulder pain.

Conclusion:

PHILOS plate plus oblique insertion of autologous fibula as a primary procedure may yield good functional outcomes and a low rate of the main orthopedic complications.

Treatment options for proximal humeral fractures in the older adults and their implication on personal independence

BACKGROUND

No consensus exists on the optimal treatment of proximal humeral fractures (PHFx). Uncertainty about surgical treatment in the older adults using locking plates (e.g., PHILOS) has emerged, due to a high number of complications. This study aimed to assess the impact of non-operative versus operative treatment of a PHFx on the level of self-dependence in our older population.

METHODS

We included patients aged over 65 years with some level of self-dependence, treated at our hospital between 5/2011 and 4/2013 for isolated PHFx of AO subtypes A2, A3, and B1 for which either non-operative or surgical treatment using a PHILOS plate had been applied. The patients were questioned, examined, or interviewed via phone; AO fracture patterns and treatment were documented as well as level of self-dependence, complications, constant score (CSM), subjective shoulder value (SSV), quality of life (EQ-5D), and shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI).

RESULTS

Patients with PHFx of AO subtypes A2, A3, or B1 that were either treated non-operative (n = 50) or operative by insertion of the PHILOS plate (n = 63) were included. Operative-treated patients were 3.3 times as likely to lose some level of independence (95% CI 0.39-28, p = 0.271). Shoulder motion, strength, and functional outcomes tended to be lower in operative-treated patients, with adjusted differences of, - 11 CMS points (95% CI - 23 to 2), - 9 SPADI points (95% CI - 18 to 0), and - 6% in SSV (95% CI - 17 to 5). Quality-of-life EQ-5D utility index was similar in both groups (mean - 0.04; 95% CI - 0.18 to 0.10).

CONCLUSION

In our study population, non-operatively treated older adults with an AO type A2, A3, B1 fracture of the proximal humerus tended to have a high chance to return to their premorbid level of independence, compared to patients treated with a locking plate. A change in the treatment algorithm for these PHFx may be carefully considered and further investigated in clinical practice.

Operative Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fracture-dislocations Through an Anterolateral Deltoid Split Approach

Background

Proximal humeral fracture-dislocations (PHFD) are a special entity in proximal humeral fracture treatment. The aim of this study is to present our minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique through an anterolateral deltoid split approach. In addition, we performed a retrospective cohort study analyzing the patient reported functional outcome and complications.

Methods

A single center cohort study was performed. All patients operated through a deltoid split approach for PHFD between 2009 and 2016 were eligible for inclusion. The primary endpoint was subjective shoulder function measured with QuickDASH and subjective shoulder value (SSV). Secondary endpoints were complications and implant-related irritation.

Results

28 patients were included. The mean age was 49 (SD ± 10.3). The mean follow-up was 48 months (SD ± 23.7). The mean QuickDASH score was 6.8 (SD ±7.8) and the mean SSV was 86 (SD ±14.6). Four patients had a conversion into a reversed arthroplasty (14%), one patient (4%) a shortening of secondary perforated screws, four patients an early re-osteosynthesis (14%), four patients (14%) developed an AVN and in one patient damage of the axillary nerve was observed. 21 patients (75%) had their implant removed.

Conclusion

Patient reported functional results after humeral head preservation and internal fixation of PHFDs through an anterolateral deltoid spilt approach are promising. However, there is a high rate of re-operations either because of complications or for implant removal. Comparing our data to literature these rates are not depending on the approach chosen.

Selective Glenohumeral external rotation deficit - sequelae of post-ORIF deltoid adhesions after treatment of the proximal humerus fracture

Background

The deltopectoral approach is commonly used for plate stabilization of proximal humerus fracture. Although adhesions between the deltoid, plate, and humerus are common sequelae of plate ORIF, little is known about their effect on the range of movement and a function of the shoulder. To confirm their impact, the preoperative and intraoperative evaluation of the range of motion (ROM) was measured during the sequential arthroscopic release of adhesions, with special regard to external rotation. Postoperative ROM and subjective shoulder function were also evaluated.

Methods

Eighteen patients treated with ORIF of the proximal humerus were scheduled to the unified arthroscopic procedures comprising sequential limited subacromial bursectomy, removal of the adhesions between the deltoid, plate, and humerus, as well as the plate removal. The ROM of the operated and opposite shoulders were assessed before surgery, intraoperatively and after a minimum two-year follow-up, with special regard to external rotation in adduction (AddER) and abduction (AbdER). Besides, the Constant-Murley score and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) were evaluated before a plate removal and after a minimum two-year follow-up after the surgery.

Results

Deltoid adhesion release correlated with considerable and statistically significant improvement of AddER (p < 0.0002) but not with the intraoperative range of AbdER. Significant improvement of AddER, but also of AbdER and other range of motion was noted at the follow-up. The improvement of the affected shoulder function following arthroscopic plate removal was considerable and statistically significant according to the modified Constant-Murley score (p < 0,01) and SSV (p < 0.0000) after a minimum of two-year follow-up.

Conclusions

Our findings are the first to highlight the influence of deltoid muscle, plate, and humerus adhesions on limiting external rotation in adduction after ORIF treatment of proximal humerus fractures. These observations allow the identification of a new shoulder evaluation symptom: Selective Glenohumeral External Rotation Deficit (SGERD) as well as functional deltohumeral space.

Does the magnitude of injuries affect the outcome of proximal humerus fractures treated by locked plating (PHILOS)?

PURPOSE

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) becomes increasingly relevant in an aging society. Functional outcome (FO) and the patient-reported outcome (PRO) after surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) depends on numerous factors, including patient- and injury-specific factors. There is little evidence on how the FO and the PRO vary in different settings such as monotrauma or multiple injuries, even though the PHF is one of the more frequent fractures. In addition, to a previous study, on multiple injured patients and upper extremity injuries, the aim of the current study was to investigate the impact of multiple injuries, quantified by the ISS, on the FO and PRO after surgically treated PHF by PHILOS.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort-study was conducted with an additional follow-up by a questionnaire. HRQoL tools such as range of motion (ROM), the Quick-Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand score (DASH), EuroQol Five Dimension Three Levels (EQ-5D-3L), and EuroQol VAS (EQ-VAS) were used. The study-population was stratified according to ISS obtained based on information at discharge into Group I/M-H (ISS < 16 points) and Group PT-H (ISS ≥ 16). Median outcome scores were calculated and presented.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

adult patients (> 18 years) with PHF treated at one academic Level 1 trauma center between 2007 and 2017 with Proximal Humeral Inter-Locking System (PHILOS) and preoperative CT-scan. Group stratification according Injury Severity Score (ISS): Group PT-H (ISS ≥ 16 points) and Group I/M-H (ISS < 16 points).

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

oncology patients, genetic disorders affecting the musculoskeletal system, paralysis or inability to move upper extremity prior or after injury, additional ipsilateral upper limb fractures, open injuries, associated vascular injuries as well brachial plexus injuries and nerve damages. Follow-up 5-10 years including PRO: EQ-5D-3L and EQ-VAS. FO, including DASH and ROM. The ROM was measured 1 year after PHILOS.

RESULTS

Inclusion of 75 patients, mean age at injury was 49.9 (± 17.6) years. The average follow-up period in Group I/M-H was 6.18 years (± 3.5), and in Group PT-H 5.58 years (± 3.1). The ISS in the Group I/M-H was 6.89 (± 2.5) points, compared to 21.7 (± 5.3) points in Group PT-H (p ≤ 0.001). The DASH-score in Group I/M-H was 9.86 (± 13.12 and in Group PT-H 12.43 (± 15.51, n.s.). The EQ-VAS in Group I/M-H was 78.13 (± 19.77) points compared with 74.13 (± 19.43, n.s.) in Group PT-H. DASH, EQ-VAS as well as ROM were comparable in Groups I/M-H and PT-H (9.9 ± 13.1 versus 12.4 ± 15.5, n.s.). The EQ-5D-3L in Group I/M-H was 0.86 (± 0.23) points compared to Group PT-H 0.72 (± 0.26, p ≤ 0.017). No significant differences could be found in Group I/M-H and PT-H in the severity of traumatic brain injury (TBI). A multivariable regression analyses was performed for DASH, EQ-5D-3L and EQ-VAS. All three outcome metrics were correlated. There was a significant difference between the EQ-5D-3L and the ISS (Beta-Coefficient was 0.86, 95% low was 0.75, 95% high was 0.99, p ≤ 0.041). No significant correlation could be found comparing DASH, EQ-5D-3L and EQ-VAS to age, gender and TBIs.

CONCLUSION

Multiple injuries did not affect the DASH, ROM or EQ-VAS after PHILOS; but a higher ISS negatively affected the EQ-5D-EL. While the ROM and DASH aim to be objective measurements of functionality, EQ-5D-3L and EQ-VAS represent the patients' PRO. The FO and PRO outcomes are not substitutable, and both should be taken into consideration during follow-up visits of multiple injured patients. Future research should prospectively explore whether the findings of this study can be recreated using a larger study population and investigate if different FO and PRO parameters come to similar conclusions. The gained information could be used for an enhanced long-term evaluation of patients who suffered a PHF from multiple injuries to meet their multifarious conditions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Comparison of the Effects of Proximal Humeral Internal Locking System (PHILOS) Alone and PHILOS Combined with Fibular Allograft in the Treatment of Neer Three- or Four-part Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderly

Objective

To compare and analyze the clinical outcomes of the proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) alone and the PHILOS combined with fibular allograft in the treatment of Neer three‐ and four‐part proximal humerus fractures (PHF) in the elderly.

Methods

From January 2014 to January 2018, a total of 42 elderly patients with Neer three‐ or four‐part PHF admitted to our hospital were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 21 patients in each group. The observation group was treated with the PHILOS combined with fibular allograft. The control group was treated with the PHILOS alone. Perioperative parameters and fracture classification were recorded in the two groups. Function results were assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Constant‐Murley score (CMS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and the Disability of Arm‐Shoulder‐Hand (DASH) score. Radiological results were evaluated using the neck‐shaft angle (NSA) and humeral head height (HHH), and complications were also recorded in each group.

Results

There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of preoperative status, age, gender, cause of trauma, fracture site, and fracture classification. The average follow‐up time was 12 months. At the last follow‐up, the VAS and DASH observation groups were lower than the control group, and there was significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). The CMS and ASES were higher in the observation group than the control group, and there was significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). The mean difference in the NSA and HHH were lower in the observation group than the control group, and there was a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). There was one postoperative complication in the observation group, which was humeral head avascular necrosis (AVN). There were seven postoperative complications in the control group, including three cases of humeral head collapse and three cases of screw cutout and one case of humeral head AVN. The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was significantly lower than the control group (P < 0.05), there was a significant difference between the two groups.

Conclusions

For Neer three‐ or four‐part PHF in the elderly patients, PHILOS fixation with fibular allograft shows satisfactory short‐term results with respect to humeral head support and maintenance of reduction, and may reduce the incidence of complications associated with fixation using a PHILOS alone.