Low-profile locking-plate vs. the conventional AO system: early comparative results in wrist arthrodesis

Wrist Arthrodesis Using the Medartis Carpometacarpal Joint Sparing Plate

BACKGROUND

Total wrist arthrodesis is a well-established surgical technique that provides reliable pain relief in patients with advanced wrist disease. Key limitations of existing plating systems include hardware pull-out, hardware failure, and nonunion. There is limited literature on the newer style carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) sparing plating system, produced by Medartis. The objective of this study was to determine the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of wrist arthrodesis with a CMCJ sparing wrist plate.

METHODS

This study retrospectively identified 23 wrist arthrodeses using the Medartis CMCJ sparing plate for review. This study assessed the outcomes of 18 unilateral wrist fusions and 1 bilateral wrist fusion. The study group consisted of 12 men and 5 women with an average age of 56 years (range: 29-82 years) with a mean follow-up period of 17 months.

RESULTS

At the time of follow-up, all patients' wrists had fused without postsurgical complication. The final grip strength in the operative hand was 28.2 kg/cm2, which was 87% of the contralateral side. The mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score at follow-up was 23.9, with all patients returning to daily living activities and work. Patients reported minimal pain (1.3/10), with almost all (17/18) satisfied with the outcome of the surgery and describing that they would recommend this procedure.

CONCLUSION

Our case series highlights that the Medartis wrist arthrodesis plate is a newer design that is a well-tolerated option for wrist arthrodesis based on clinical assessment, functional hand assessment, and patient satisfaction, when compared with the existing literature on traditional plating systems.

Union and Complication Rates After Total Wrist Arthrodesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Total wrist arthrodesis (TWA) has been performed using various techniques. We aimed to provide pooled prevalence estimates of union and complications of TWA by technique. A secondary aim was to provide estimates of union and complication rates by treatment of the carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) in TWA using plates. Given the widespread adoption of wrist arthrodesis plates (WAP), we hypothesized that these implants would result in higher union and lower complication rates. We also hypothesized that TWA with CMCJ arthrodesis would improve these outcomes.

METHODS

Online databases including PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane were searched. Studies reporting union and/or complication rates of 10 or more TWA performed with a similar technique (analyzed as bone graft only, bone graft with minimal fixation, intramedullary, augmented intramedullary, plate, WAP, and other) were included. Studies with fewer than 10 TWA, studies reporting TWA where union or complications could not be analyzed separately, and studies without union and complication rates were excluded. Data extraction was performed independently by two English-speaking reviewers with a translator where required. Pooled prevalence estimates were made using a random-effects meta-analysis model and presented as a percent prevalence with 95% confidence and prediction intervals.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-six studies with a total of 3,517 patients and 3,969 TWA were analyzed. No differences in union and complication prevalence were observed between TWA techniques and in TWA with different treatments of the CMCJ using plates and WAP.

CONCLUSION

Using meta-analysis, we found no difference in union and complication prevalence between TWA techniques and TWA with different treatments of the CMCJ with plates and WAP. It must be acknowledged that this research included low-quality studies with high heterogeneity, and confidence in the precision of the estimates is low.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic IV.

Biomechanical Performance of Total Wrist Arthrodesis Plates With and Without Arthrodesis of the Carpometacarpal Joint

BACKGROUND

It is unknown whether total wrist arthrodesis (TWA) should be performed with or without arthrodesis of the carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ). The aim of this study is to compare CMCJ-spanning TWA plates using 3D printed wrist arthrodesis model with and without arthrodesis of the CMCJ.

METHODS

Total wrist arthrodesis plates mounted to 3D printed models were tested under a 4-N bending load at 4 Hz for 50 000 cycles, increased by 15% every 10 000 cycles until failure.

RESULTS

Plates with arthrodesis CMCJ were stiffer and failed at a significantly greater load and number of cycles than plates mounted to models without CMCJ arthrodesis. The Synthes stainless steel locking TWA plate performed better than the Trimed plate applied to the model without CMCJ arthrodesis and the Acumed plate applied to the model with CMCJ arthrodesis. Based on these findings, we recommend arthrodesis of the CMCJ in TWA.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporation of the CMCJ in TWA may protect against plate failure. If arthrodesis of the CMCJ is not performed, plate removal should be considered before breakage occurs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

The Effect of 3rd Carpometacarpal Arthrodesis in the Outcomes of Total Wrist Fusion Using Modern Plate Technology

Background  The inclusion of the third carpometacarpal (CMC) joint in the fusion mass in total wrist fusion (TWF) remains controversial. Our goal was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and effects of third CMC joint arthrodesis compared with bridging the CMC joint during TWF. A retrospective chart review was performed. Outcomes assessed included hardware loosening, hardware failure, symptomatic hardware necessitating removal, and need for revision arthrodesis. Case Description/Literature Review  We found that concomitant third CMC joint arthrodesis was associated with a significantly reduced rate of radiocarpal and midcarpal joint nonunion, hardware loosening, and symptomatic hardware removal when compared to bridging of the CMC joint. There was no significant difference in hardware failure rates or the need for revision arthrodesis. Clinical Relevance  When using a contoured dorsal spanning plate, concomitant CMC joint arthrodesis should be considered during TWF to mitigate against hardware loosening and symptomatic hardware. Level of Evidence  Level IV.

Wrist Arthrodesis Using a Trapezoidal Wedge Graft from the Distal Radius and a Low-Profile Reconstruction Plate

Background

Various intramedullary or dorsally based fusions have been utilised to perform wrist arthrodesis. Although the dorsal plate is rigid and well constructed, the standard of care was replenishing the arthrodesis site with an iliac crest bone graft. Due to the high morbidity of the donor site, alternatives such as distal radius bone grafts have gained popularity. In this study, wrist arthrodesis was performed with a locally accessible trapezoidal wedge graft from the distal radius and a low-profile reconstruction plate to evaluate the radiological and functional outcome.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 22 wrists, 14 brachial plexus injuries, 4 post-traumatic injuries, and 4 rheumatoid arthritis patients, with a mean follow-up of 31 months. Union was evaluated on radiography. The functional outcomes were evaluated using a visual analog scale incorporated into a questionnaire.

Results

All 22 fusions united successfully, with a mean duration of 12 weeks and a wrist position of an average 17.5 degrees of extension and 6 degrees of ulnar deviation. The aesthetics of the wrist showed the most significant change, and overall satisfaction levels increased.

Conclusions

A locally accessible cortico-cancellous graft from the dorsum of the radius is a reliable alternative to an iliac crest or carpal bone graft with high potential for the union. It also serves as a stable strut in our construct, allowing us to use a low-profile reconstruction plate. The Reconstruction (3.5 System) plate can be used safely with excellent results and a low implant prominence or breakage risk.

Wrist shortening arthrodesis with volar plate in a dorsal position for spastic wrist contracture

Total wrist arthrodesis in severe wrist flexion deformities (greater than 60°) due to spasticity represents a valid therapeutic option. It aims to improve the hand's appearance, hygiene, function and to prevent the deformity from getting worse. The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical and anatomical results of wrist shortening arthrodesis using a classic volar plate in the dorsal position in functional surgery for central spastic hands. We conducted a single-center analysis of a series of patients who underwent this shortening arthrodesis. The review at a minimum 1-year follow-up included a clinical evaluation (House score, INOM score, patient satisfaction and complications), and anatomical evaluation (arthrodesis position, bone healing and carpometacarpal arthropathy). Twenty-eight patients with a mean age of 40.6 years (18-74) were included at a mean follow-up of 30.6 months (12-75). The fusion rate was 100%. No carpometacarpal arthropathy was noted. The mean position of the fused wrist was 11° extension and 15° ulnar tilt. There were two complications (7%): one postoperative hematoma and one case of discomfort due to impingement that required plate removal. The House score was significantly improved postoperatively (2.4 (0-5) versus 1.8 (0-4), p < 0.001), as was the INOM score (45 (12-64) versus 63 (36-84), p < 0.001). The patient satisfaction rate was 93%. The use of a simple and common material (volar plate in dorsal position) during this challenging surgery (spastic wrist contracture), provides good anatomical results and high patient satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4, case series, therapeutic study.

Total wrist arthrodesis with and without arthrodesis of the carpoMetacarpal joint (WAWWAM): study protocol

Background

It is controversial whether or not the carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) should be included in total wrist arthrodesis (TWA). Complications commonly occur at this site and studies examining its inclusion and exclusion are conflicting. A randomised clinical trial comparing wrist arthrodesis with CMCJ arthrodesis and spanning plate to wrist arthrodesis with CMCJ preservation and non-CMCJ spanning plate has not been performed.

Method

A single centre randomised clinical trial including 120 adults with end-stage isolated wrist arthritis will be performed to compare TWA with and without the CMCJ included in the arthrodesis. The primary outcome is complications in the first post-operative year. Secondary outcomes are Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) and grip strength measured at 1, 2 and 5 years. Late complications, return to work and satisfaction will also be recorded.

Discussion

It is unknown whether the CMCJ should be included in TWA. This trial will contribute to an improved understanding of optimal management of the CMCJ in total wrist arthrodesis.

Trial registration

This trial was prospectively registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry with identifying number ACTRN12621000169842 on the 16th February 2021.

WHO: U1111–12626523.

ANZCTR:

ACTRN12621000169842

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04644-4.

[Revision surgery after failed (partial-) arthrodesis of the wrist]

(Partial) arthrodeses of the wrist have been proven cornerstones to treat many lesions for decades, especially in the case of revision surgery. Four-corner, scapho-trapezo-trapezoidal (STT), radio-scapho-lunate (RSL) and total wrist fusions are very common techniques in hand surgery. However, even these proven surgical procedures have significant non-fusion rates. Prior to revising a failed arthrodesis, it is essential to analyse the latter failure precisely. A technically adequate revision is only feasible when based on a correct and meticulous analysis. The understanding of the biological processes and technical aspects of the implants are the basis for solving this issue.

Rehabilitation after distal radius fractures: is there a need for immobilization and physiotherapy?

Although the literature generally agrees that displaced distal radius fractures require surgery, no single consensus exists concerning the length of immobilization and type of post-operative physiotherapeutic rehabilitation program. Palmar locking plate fixation represents a very stable fixation of the distal radius, and was assessed biomechanically in various studies. Surprisingly, most authors report additional immobilization after plate fixation. One reason might be due to the pain caused during active wrist mobilization in the early post-operative stages or secondly to protect the osteosynthesis in the early healing stages preventing secondary loss of reduction. This article addresses the biomechanical principles, current available evidence for early mobilization/immobilization and impact of physiotherapy after operatively treated distal radius fractures.