The effects of soft tissue lateral release on the stability of the ligament complex of the knee

[Posterolateral instability of the knee joint]

The posterolateral corner of the knee is composed of a multilayered complex of ligamentous, musculotendinous, and capsular structures, which interact in a synergistic stabilizing manner with the central structures, particularly the posterior cruciate ligament. Injuries of the posterolateral corner are generally accompanied by rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament. Depending on the injured structures, injuries of the posterolateral corner result in posterolateral rotational instability alone (Fanelli A) or with lateral instability (Fanelli B/C). For rotational instability alone, isolated popliteus bypass is an effective procedure; with concomitant lateral instability in flexion, additional stabilization of the lateral collateral ligament is required. Most of the various available techniques are described as open reconstruction procedures. In recent years, arthroscopic techniques for posterolateral reconstruction have also been successfully developed.

Pre-Planning the Surgical Target for Optimal Implant Positioning in Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty can attain highly accurate implantation. However, the target for optimal positioning of the components remains debatable. One of the proposed targets is to recreate the functional status of the pre-diseased knee. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of reproducing the pre-diseased kinematics and strains of the ligaments and, subsequently, use that information to optimize the position of the femoral and tibial components. For this purpose, we segmented the pre-operative computed tomography of one patient with knee osteoarthritis using an image-based statistical shape model and built a patient-specific musculoskeletal model of the pre-diseased knee. This model was initially implanted with a cruciate-retaining total knee system according to mechanical alignment principles; and an optimization algorithm was then configured seeking the optimal position of the components that minimized the root-mean-square deviation between the pre-diseased and post-operative kinematics and/or ligament strains. With concurrent optimization for kinematics and ligament strains, we managed to reduce the deviations from 2.4 ± 1.4 mm (translations) and 2.7 ± 0.7° (rotations) with mechanical alignment to 1.1 ± 0.5 mm and 1.1 ± 0.6°, and the strains from 6.5% to lower than 3.2% over all the ligaments. These findings confirm that adjusting the implant position from the initial plan allows for a closer match with the pre-diseased biomechanical situation, which can be utilized to optimize the pre-planning of robotic-assisted surgery.

Arthroscopic anatomy of the posterolateral corner of the knee: anatomic relations and arthroscopic approaches

INTRODUCTION

Although open-surgical techniques for the reconstruction of the posterolateral corner (PLC) are well established, the use of arthroscopic procedures has recently increased. When compared with open surgical preparation, arthroscopic orientation in the PLC is challenging and anatomic relations may not be familiar. Nevertheless, a profound knowledge of anatomic key structures and possible structures at risk as well as technical variations of arthroscopic approaches are mandatory to allow a precise and safe surgical intervention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a cadaveric video demonstration, an anterolateral (AL), anteromedial (AM), posteromedial (PM) and posterolateral (PL) portal, as well as a transseptal approach (TSA) were developed. Key structures of the PLC were defined and sequentially exposed during posterolateral arthroscopy. Finally, anatomic relations of all key structures were demonstrated.

RESULTS

All key structures of the PLC can be visualized during arthroscopy. Thereby, careful portal placement is crucial in order to allow an effective exposure. Two alternatives of the TSA were described, depending on the region of interest. The peroneal nerve can be visualized dorsal to the biceps femoris tendon (BT), lateral to the soleus muscle (SM) and about 3 cm distal to the fibular styloid (FS). The distal attachment of the fibular collateral ligament (FCL) can be exposed on the lateral side of the fibular head (FH). The fibular attachment of the popliteofibular ligament (PFL) is exposed at the tip of the FS.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopy of the posterolateral recessus allows full visualization of all key structures of the posterolateral corner, which provides the basis for anatomic and safe drill channel placement in PLC reconstruction. A sufficient exposure of relevant anatomic landmarks and precise portal preparation reduce the risk of iatrogenic vascular and peroneal nerve injury.

Severity of valgus knee osteoarthritis has no effect on clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Advanced valgus osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most challenging indications for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There is no information in the literature about the optimal timing of surgery. The current study investigates the impact of the preoperative deformity and degree of arthritis on postoperative outcome after TKA.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study evaluated 133 knees in 107 patients with valgus OA that failed nonoperative treatment with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Mechanical alignment, Kellgren and Lawrence (K/L) score, and minimal joint space width (minJSW) were measured on AP- and hip-to-ankle radiographs. All knees had advanced OA (i.e., K/L grades 3 or 4 and less than 50% minJSW). Pre- and postoperative WOMAC, VR-12, UCLA, VAS, ROM were recorded.

RESULTS

There was no difference in clinical outcome (WOMAC, UCLA, VR-12, VAS or ROM) between patients with different degrees of valgus deformities (< 5.0 deg., 5.0-9.9 deg., 10.0-14.9 deg., ≥ 15.0 deg.). There was also no correlation between K/L score or minimal joint space width and any of the outcome parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

The degree of valgus deformity and the grade of osteoarthritis do not predict the outcome of TKA in patients with valgus OA. Since the risk of complication and the need for implant constraint increases with increasing deformity and instability of the knee, surgery appears to be justified in patients with advanced OA that failed nonoperative treatment, regardless of the degree of deformity.