The Radial Floating Cup radial head prosthesis to treat radial head fractures: functional and radiographic results after more than 12 years of mean follow-up

Long-term outcomes of a cemented bipolar radial head prosthesis: a large retrospective study

BACKGROUND

In acute radial head fractures (RHFs), a radial head prosthesis can be considered if open reduction and internal fixation are not technically feasible. This study provides the largest long-term clinical and radiologic follow-up study of cemented bipolar Judet prostheses implanted to manage acute RHFs, either isolated and associated with other elbow fractures. We compare their functional and radiographic outcomes to test the hypothesis that the bipolar design can achieve similar results in both groups.

METHODS

We reviewed data of 63 consecutive patients implanted with a bipolar prosthesis (the articulation between the stem and the cup is semiconstrained and gives the radial cup a double range of movement) to treat unreconstructable RHFs with/without other fractures. Fifty-two patients had more than 10-year follow-up. Assessments included range of motion and stability using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score and the QuickDash questionnaire score, pain with a visual analog scale, and overall satisfaction with an interview. X-rays were examined to check the correct seating of the implant and periprosthetic loosening, prosthetic disassembly, heterotopic ossification, and capitellum and ulnohumeral degenerative changes.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 150 months, 90% of patients were satisfied, with a mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score of 89 (range, 70-100) and a mean QuickDash score of 6.8 (range, 0-18.2). The mean arc of motion was 113° (range, 70°-140°) in flexion-extension and 149° (range, 100°-160°) in pronation-supination. Nineteen patients (30%) patients required reoperation in the first 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The bipolar Judet prosthesis is a viable implant for acute irreducible RHFs. Clinical and radiologic outcomes and complications leading to reoperation were not significantly different between isolated radial head fractures and associated radial head fractures patients.

Uncementing the status quo: systematic review of a loose-fit, polished stem radial head prosthesis shows stable clinical results in complex elbow injuries with a concomitant radial head fracture

INTRODUCTION

Selecting the optimal radial head prosthesis to treat radial head fractures, especially in the context of complex elbow injuries like terrible triad, Monteggia, and Essex Lopresti, can be challenging, as there is currently no consensus in the field that favors a particular design. This study investigated the safety and performance of a Polished Stem Radial Head Prosthesis (PS RHP) compared to other modern RHP designs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines to capture data on a Polished Stem Radial Head Prosthesis (PS RHP) and other Radial Head Prostheses (RHPs). Functional scores, range of motion, complications, and revisions were extracted from published literature and analyzed in parallel with the percentage of complex injuries. Comparison of functional outcomes between groups were based on minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs).

RESULTS

There were 16 articles reporting on 711 cases of the PS RHP and 23 articles reporting on 605 cases of other RHPs included in the systematic literature review. Functional scores and range of motion were similar amongst the groups. The PS RHP design achieved a comparable revision rate as other RHPs despite a higher number of terrible triad injuries. Notably, the PS RHP group showed a significantly lower rate of instability (1.0%) than other RHPs (3.4%) (p < 0.05). Other complication rates were similar amongst the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The PS RHP group had higher rates of terrible triads at baseline compared to the other RHPs group. Regardless of greater injury complexity, the clinical outcomes of the PS RHP group were favorable and resulted in a significantly lower rate of postoperative instability as compared to other RHPs.

Long-term outcomes of radial head arthroplasty for radial head fractures-a systematic review at minimum 8-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature to evaluate the functional outcomes, radiologic outcomes, and revision rates following radial head arthroplasty (RHA) at a minimum of 8 years follow-up.

METHODS

Two independent reviewers performed a literature search using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Only studies reporting on outcomes of RHA with a minimum of mean 8 years' follow-up were considered for inclusion.

RESULTS

Our search found 10 studies including 432 elbows (51% males), with average age of 50 years (15-93) and mean follow-up of 117 months (98-145) met our inclusion criteria. At final follow-up, the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire score were 83 (45-100) and 17 (0-63) respectively, and 86% of patients reported having no or minimal pain. The overall dislocation, subluxation, ulnar neuritis, and infection rates were 2%, 4%, 3%, and 3%, respectively. The rates of radiologic loosening, radiolucency, degenerative change, and heterotopic ossification were 9%, 46%, 27%, and 38%, respectively. The overall surgical revision rates were 20%, with 3%, 15%, and 5% requiring RHA implant revision, removal of metal or implants, and arthrolysis, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our systematic review established that RHA results in satisfactory clinical outcomes and modest complication and revision rates at long-term follow-up, despite high levels of radiologic degenerative changes over the same period.