After hours surgery for elderly hip fracture patients: How safe is it?

Two surgical pathways for isolated hip fractures: A comparative study

BACKGROUND

Hip fractures (HF) are common among the aging population, and surgery within 48 h is recommended. Patients can be hospitalized for surgery through different pathways, either trauma or medicine admitting services.

AIM

To compare management and outcomes among patients admitted through the trauma pathway (TP) vs medical pathway (MP).

METHODS

This Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective study included 2094 patients with proximal femur fractures (AO/Orthopedic Trauma Association Type 31) who underwent surgery at a level 1 trauma center between 2016-2021. There were 69 patients admitted through the TP and 2025 admitted through the MP. To ensure comparability between groups, 66 of the 2025 MP patients were propensity matched to 66 TP patients by age, sex, HF type, HF surgery, and American Society of Anesthesiology score. The statistical analyses included multivariable analysis, group characteristics, and bivariate correlation comparisons with the χ² test and t-test.

RESULTS

After propensity matching, the mean age in both groups was 75-years-old, 62% of both groups were females, the main HF type was intertrochanteric (TP 52% vs MP 62%), open reduction internal fixation was the most common surgery (TP 68% vs MP 71%), and the mean American Society of Anesthesiology score was 2.8 for TP and 2.7 for MP. The majority of patients in TP and MP (71% vs 74%) were geriatric (≥ 65-years-old). Falls were the main mechanism of injury in both groups (77% vs 97%, P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in pre-surgery anticoagulation use (49% vs 41%), admission day of the week, or insurance status. The incidence of comorbidities was equal (94% for both) with cardiac comorbidities being dominant in both groups (71% vs 73%). The number of preoperative consultations was similar for TP and MP, with the most common consultation being cardiology in both (44% and 36%). HF displacement occurred more among TP patients (76% vs 39%, P = 0.000). Time to surgery was not statistically different (23 h in both), but length of surgery was significantly longer for TP (59 min vs 41 min, P = 0.000). Intensive care unit and hospital length of stay were not statistically different (5 d vs 8 d and 6 d for both). There were no statistical differences in discharge disposition and mortality (3% vs 0%).

CONCLUSION

There were no differences in outcomes of surgeries between admission through TP vs MP. The focus should be on the patient’s health condition and on prompt surgical intervention.

Spinal Dexamethasone Effect on Cognitive Disorders After Hip Surgery

Background

Proximal femoral fractures (PrFF) are one of the most common causes of emergency admission in the elderly population. The majority of patients have pre-existing conditions that get worsened by unplanned surgery.

Objective

Purpose of this article was to evaluate if a is single shot of dexamethasone with levobupivacaine administered intrathecally reduces postoperative pain and cognitive complications in patients with proximal femoral fractures.

Methods

The study was performed at a level II trauma center which is a part of a teaching hospital with a catchment population of around 300,000 patients, the first author's affiliation. Around 500 PrFF are performed yearly in the center. All participants gave oral and written informed consent before randomization.

Results

In total, 60 patients with a PrFF, ASA status 2 or 3 were randomized into two groups for spinal anaesthesia as DLSA study group (received 8 mg of dexamethasone and 12.5 mg of 0.5 % levobupivacaine) or LSA control group (received 12.5 mg of 0,5 % levobupivacaine). Postoperative cognitive disturbance was evaluated using simplified Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) scale, pain intensity was measured using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and blood samples for defining cortisol concentrations were taken before and after the surgical procedure. The primary outcomes were effects of intrathecal dexamethasone on plasma cortisol affecting cognitive disturbances. Secondary outcomes included pain scores and length of hospital stay. The DLSA group demonstrated a reduced incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD), p=0.043, longer analgesia duration, p<0.001, decreased cortisol levels and shorter hospitalization p=0.045. Intrathecal dexamethasone was the only significant predictor of postoperative delirium, OR 7.76, p=0.019.

Conclusion

Single shot intrathecal administration of dexamethasone with levobupivacaine used in anaesthesia for proximal femoral fractures reduces the stress response by decreasing plasma cortisol concentrations prolonging analgesia. Complications such as delirium and POCD occurred with significantly lower frequency allowing better postoperative rehabilitation and shortening the hospitalization.

Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for the management of femoral neck fractures in the elderly: a meta-analysis and systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Hemiarthroplasty is commonly used to treat unstable femoral neck fractures in older patients. However, there is no consensus on the use of cement during hemiarthroplasty. Therefore, we performed a systematic review to focus on the outcomes of cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in older patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pubmed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Ovid were searched for studies related comparison of cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for unstable femoral neck fractures from inception to Jan 20, 2020. The quality of the included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. The meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.2 software.

RESULTS

Eleven RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Cemented hemiarthroplasty was found to be superior to uncemented arthroplasty with respect to reoperation rate (RR 0.6, 95% CI 0.38-0.96, p = 0.03), complications related to prosthesis (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.23-0.68, p = 0.0008), residual pain (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.52-0.83, p = 0.0004), and operation time (MD 8.22, 95% CI 6.30-10.14, p < 0.00001). There were no significant between-group differences with respect to local and general complications, duration of hospital stay, hip function, and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis showed cemented hemiarthroplasty might be an optimum choice for treating unstable femoral neck fractures in older patients. However, the results of this meta-analysis should be interpreted cautiously owing to some limitations. Further studies are required to provide more robust evidence.