Comparison of risk for postoperative hyperextension between cruciate retaining and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasties

Sagittal accuracy and functional impact of tibial slope in imageless robotic-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Study of the sagittal accuracy of the 'Robotic Surgical Assistant' (ROSA®), compared to conventional surgery, regarding the application of the tibial slope (TS). Study of the impact of TS on the range of motion (ROM) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS).

METHODS

Inclusion of patients who underwent primary Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) between 1/1/2021 and 15/4/2024. Divided into robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) and manual TKA (M-TKA). Measurement of pre- and post-operative TS, using the posterior tibial cortex, on profile knee X-rays. 3° TS applied arbitrarily for both groups. ROM was measured pre-operatively and at three, six and 12 months post-operatively. Patient satisfaction assessed via Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS).

RESULTS

266 patients were included in the study. The M-TKA (110) had a post-operative TS of 3.11° (± 2.12°). 81.21% were within 2° of the target and 92.87% within 3°. The RA-TKA (82) had a post-operative TS of -0.11° ± (1.93°). 36.83% were within 2° of the target and 56.63% within 3°. RA-TKA had a KOOS of 64.43 ± 12.87 and OKS of 33.05 ± 6.01. M-TKA had a KOOS of 64.18 ± 13.11 and OKS of 32.31 ± 5.97. Maximum flexion at 12 months was 118.74° ± 8.19° for M-TKA and 121.88° ± 7.43° for RA-TKA (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

The application of TS using ROSA® was less precise than the conventional method in achieving post-operative TS values as measured on X-rays. However, there were no clinical differences in ROM or PROMS.

Similar Midterm Outcomes of Total Knee Arthroplasties with Anterior and Posterior Tibial Slopes Performed on Paired Knees at a Minimum Follow-up of 5 Years

A small posterior tibial slope (PTS) is generally recommended in posterior stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). An unwanted anterior tibial slope (ATS), which can affect postoperative results, may be created in PS TKA because of the inaccuracy of surgical instruments and techniques, as well as high interpatient variability. We compared midterm clinical and radiographic results of PS TKAs with ATS and PTS performed on paired knees using the same prosthesis. One-hundred-twenty-four patients who underwent TKAs with ATS and PTS on paired knees using ATTUNE posterior-stabilized prostheses were retrospectively reviewed after a minimum follow-up period of 5 years. The mean follow-up period was 5.4 years. The Knee Society Knee and Function scores, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Feller and Kujalar scores, and range of motion (ROM) were evaluated. The preferred TKA out of ATS and PTS was also investigated. The hip-knee-ankle angle, component positions, tibial slope, posterior femoral offset, Insall-Salvati ratio, and knee sagittal angle were measured by radiography. There were no significant differences in the clinical results, including ROM, between TKAs with ATS and PTS preoperatively and at the last follow-up. Regarding patient preference, 58 patients (46.8%) were satisfied with bilateral knees, 30 (24.2%) preferred knees with ATS, and 36 (29%) preferred knees with PTS. There was no significant difference in the rate of preference between TKAs with ATS and PTS (p = 0.539). Except for the postoperative tibial slope (-1.8 vs. 2.5 degrees, p < 0.001), there were also no significant differences in the radiographic results, including the knee sagittal angle, preoperatively and at the last follow-up. The midterm outcomes were similar between PS TKAs with ATS and PTS performed on paired knees at a minimum of 5 years of follow-up. Nonsevere ATS did not affect midterm outcomes in PS TKA with proper soft tissue balancing and the current prosthesis of improved design. However, a long-term follow-up study is required to confirm the safety of nonsevere ATS in PS TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE::  III.

Predictors of Recurrent Flexion Contracture after Total Knee Arthroplasty in Osteoarthritic Knees with Greater Than 15° Flexion Contracture

Background

This study aimed to analyze the risk factors that predict recurrent flexion contracture (FC) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in osteoarthritic knees with FC ≥ 15°.

Methods

Data from a consecutive cohort comprising 237 TKAs in 187 patients with degenerative osteoarthritis, preoperative FC ≥ 15°, and a minimum follow-up period of 2 years were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative FC was corrected intraoperatively from 0° to 5°. The incidence of recurrent FC (FC ≥ 10°) at 2 years postoperatively was investigated. Potential risk factors predicting recurrent FC including age, sex, body mass index, unilateral TKA, severity of preoperative FC, 3-month postoperative residual FC, γ angle, change in posterior femoral offset ratio, and lumbar degenerative kyphosis (LDK) were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. The post-hoc powers for the identified factors were then determined.

Results

Forty-one knees (17.3%) with recurrent FC were identified. Risk factors with sufficient power for recurrent FC were unilateral TKA, severity of preoperative FC, residual FC at 3 months postoperatively, and LDK (odds ratios of 3.579, 1.115, 1.274, and 3.096, respectively; p < 0.05; power ≥ 86.1).

Conclusions

Recurrent FC can occur in TKAs with the risk factors including unilateral TKA, severe preoperative FC, residual FC at 3 months postoperative, and LDK despite appropriate intraoperative correction. Surgical strategies and rehabilitation protocols used in managing FC should be applied in TKA cases with risk factors for recurrent FC.

Trunk control, motion and alignment after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Trunk control improves mobility, balance and quality of life early after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and is therefore considered an important parameter during the recovery process. However, little is known about trunk control, motion and alignment after TKA. Increasing our understanding aids in optimizing treatment strategies to enhance functional mobility after TKA.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does trunk control, motion and alignment return to normal after TKA and is this related to functional mobility?

METHODS

Five scientific databases were searched until July 2021. Eligibility criteria consisted of outcomes assessing trunk control and alignment in a population of adults undergoing TKA. Two reviewers independently screened studies and risk of bias was assessed by Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Meta-analysis was performed for subgroups gait and alignment.

RESULTS

Of the 362 studies retrieved, 24 were included. Study designs were cohorts with mixed methods (pre-post treatment, case-control and case-case) and three randomized controlled trials. The mean MMAT score was 75%, corresponding to low bias. In total 1178 patients and 197 controls were included. Results showed that pre-operative trunk motion was characterized by increased amplitudes in all three planes and altered alignment which did not all return to normal after TKA. Frontal plane motion and alignment recovered faster than the sagittal and transversal plane. Although pelvic tilt improved after surgery, sagittal imbalance (anteriorly shifted trunk position) was still present.

SIGNIFICANCE

Recovery of trunk motion after TKA is time-, speed- and technique-dependent. The observed differences in trunk motion with the healthy controls persisted after TKA. This indicates that incorporating a full biomechanical chain approach, including trunk motion and gait-retraining exercises with a strong focus on postural alignment could improve functional mobility after TKA. Limited studies are available assessing trunk control and trunk motion during functional tasks besides walking which warrant further investigation.