Efficacy of hook-type locking plate and partially threaded cancellous lag screw in the treatment of displaced medial malleolar fractures in elderly patients

Letter to the editor regarding "effect of buttress plate in herscovici type D vertical medial malleolar fractures and peripheral fractures: a retrospective comparative cohort study"

In this letter to the editor, we highlight several concerns that may affect the validity of the study results by Luo et al. entitled "Effect of Buttres plate in Herscovici type D vertical medial malleolar fractures and peripheral fractures: a retrospective comparative cohort study." First, we point out a methodological flaw in the selection of treatment groups, as insufficient standardization of criteria potentially led to selection bias. Second, we note that the angle of the screws in vertical fractures differed from the standard recommended in the literature, which may affect the effectiveness of fixation. Studies in the literature have increased the validity of their comparisons by using more reliable screw alignment techniques. They also recommend plate fixation instead of screws for vertical fractures, supporting the idea that plates provide more stable fixation in these cases. The inappropriate placement of screws in the Luo et al. study may therefore bias the results in favor of plate fixation and reduce the validity of the comparison between treatment modalities.

[Fractures of the upper ankle joint]

Fractures of the upper ankle joint are frequent injuries and part of routine clinical trauma surgery. In recent years, treatment strategies have changed in different ways due to advances in imaging diagnostics and a better understanding of the biomechanics. In addition, new implant systems are available. The goals of the reconstruction are anatomical reduction with restoration of the joint anatomy, reconstruction of the length, rotation and axial relationships as well as the restoration of stable joint guidance. In addition to the bony reconstruction, the focus is on restoring ligamentous instabilities. Keywords that are increasingly more in focus and controversial are: the posterior malleolar fragment, syndesmosis instability, the fourth malleolus and the importance of the deltoid ligament. For a good long-term result, anatomical reconstruction remains the basic requirement, regardless of the methods used.

Treatment Strategy for Posterior Malleolar Fractures: Different Operative Strategies Are Needed for Each Morphological Type

Background: The operative indication for posterior malleolar fracture (PMF) remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the midterm outcomes of PMF treatment for developing a treatment strategy for each morphological type. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, patients undergoing operative treatment for an unstable ankle fracture involving PMF were included after at least 3 years of follow-up. PMFs were classified by fracture morphology according to the Haraguchi classification. This study divided the entire cohort into three independent populations based on the types of PMF. For each population, patients were further categorized into two groups depending on whether PMF was surgically fixed or not, and comparisons were made between these two groups. Demographic data, functional and radiographical outcomes were compared between two groups in each of the three populations. Results: With a total of 472 patients, the mean patient age was 45.8 years, and the mean follow-up was 51 months. For type 1 fracture, a total of 237 cases were found. Quality of reduction by CT (QRC) was mostly good in both groups (83.6% vs. 83.3% in the non-fixation vs. fixation group, respectively, p = 0.269). Functional and radiological outcomes between both groups showed no significant difference. For type 2 PMFs, a total of 199 cases were found, and QRC was significantly different between the two groups (good grade, 5.4% vs. 60.7% in the non-fixation vs. fixation group, respectively, p < 0.001). The radiological and clinical outcomes of the PMF fixation group were statistically superior to those of the non-fixation group (both p < 0.001). For type 3 fractures, a total of 36 cases were found. In all the cases in this group, surgical fixation of PMF was not performed. Only the syndesmosis instability was analyzed as a viable factor to be considered for achieving favorable surgical outcomes. PMF fixation group showed significantly more postoperative complications (24.4% vs. 40.4%, non-fixation vs. fixation, respectively, p < 0.001). Major complications in the fixation group were deep wound infection (6.8%), superficial peroneal nerve injury (6.8%), and hallux flexion deficit (5.0%). Conclusions: Different treatment strategies seem to be required for each PMF morphological subtype. Further studies with more detailed designs for each PMFs are warranted for more clinically related results that are helpful for making practical surgical decisions.

Lag screw versus locking plate fixation for traumatic displaced medial malleolar fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Lag screw fixation (LSF) or locking plate fixation (LPF) are both recommended for the treatment of medial malleolar fractures (MMFs). However, no standard has been established for attaining optimal surgical treatment or functional recovery. We hypothesized that LPF for MMFs would result in superior outcomes compared to LSF. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical outcomes of LSF and LPF in the treatment of MMF.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We searched for studies published prior to November 2023 across the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Standardization of individual effect sizes was conducted; subsequently, pooled effect sizes were derived by employing random-effects models.

RESULTS

Five retrospective studies involving 394 patients were reviewed. American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores were significantly higher among patients who received LPF (mean difference [MD]: 2.21; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37-4.04; p = 0.02) than among those who received LSF. Pain scores were significantly lower among patients who received LPF (MD: -0.35; 95% CI: -0.64 to -0.05; p = 0.02) than among those who received LSF. No significant differences in delayed union was observed between the groups (Relative risk [RR]: 1.43; 95% CI, 0.37-4.04; p = 0.42). Fixation failure was slightly higher in patients who received LSF than in those who received LPF (RR: 3.11; 95% CI, 0.88-11.01; p = 0.08).

DISCUSSION

Compared with LSF, LPF yields superior functional outcomes, superior patient comfort, and comparative complication rates. LPF is also better able to prevent rotation and apply compressive forces across fracture sites, which can facilitate the management of different types of MMF. Additional randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Management of non-unions of the malleolar fractures- Current Evidence

Although malleolar non-union is uncommon, it is associated with significant morbidity. Managing this problem requires understanding ankle fracture biomechanics and bone healing. We present in this article the pertinent points to be considered in evaluating and managing patients with malleolar non-union. Our discussion will focus on the important risk factors contributing to this problem, and the need to carefully consider the biomechanical stability and the biological environment to ensure successful bony unions.

Pedobarographic evaluation of five commonly used orthoses for the lower extremity

INTRODUCTION

Orthoses are designed to achieve immobilization or off-loading of certain regions of the foot. Yet, their off-loading capacity for the specific regions has not yet been studied. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the plantar pressure distribution of five commonly applied orthoses for foot and ankle in a healthy population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five orthoses (postoperative shoe, forefoot relief shoe, short walker boot, high walker boot, and calcaneus fracture orthosis) were compared pedobarographically using insoles on a treadmill to a ready-made running shoe in eleven healthy subjects (median age 29 years). Peak pressure, maximum force, force-time integral, contact time, and contact area were evaluated separately for the forefoot, midfoot, and hindfoot.

RESULTS

The forefoot relief shoe, the short- and high walker boot significantly reduced the peak pressure at the forefoot with no significant differences between these orthoses. None of the five orthoses off-loaded the midfoot, but the calcaneus fracture orthosis and the short walker boot instead increased midfoot load. For the hindfoot, the calcaneus fracture orthosis was the only device to significantly reduce the peak pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to investigate the specific off-loading capacities of different orthoses for specific foot regions in a healthy collective. The knowledge of absolute and relative load shifts for the different orthoses is of fundamental interest for targeted clinical decision-making of physicians.

Influence of hindfoot alignment on postoperative lower limb alignment in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy

INTRODUCTION

We have experienced unexpected under-correction after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO). Although the tibia was corrected accurately, the postoperative mechanical axis (MA) was less than 57%. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between hindfoot alignment and postoperative lower limb alignment, and to reveal whether hindfoot alignment affects lower limb alignment after MOWHTO. Our hypothesis was that hindfoot alignment influences the postoperative MA in MOWHTO.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was a retrospective comparative study. The study cohort comprised 43 knees in 43 patients who underwent MOWHTO and had standing long-leg anteroposterior view and hindfoot alignment view radiographs taken preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively. To evaluate the hindfoot alignment, the absolute value of the ankle joint line orientation relative to the ground was added to the absolute value of the hindfoot angle. We defined a postoperative MA of 57-67% as acceptable correction (A group) and a MA of < 56% as under-correction (U group). The two groups were analyzed to identify factors that affected postoperative limb alignment.

RESULTS

The preoperative hindfoot alignment angle was significantly larger in the U group than the A group. The preoperative hindfoot alignment angle was a significant predictive factor of the postoperative MA, and the cut-off value that distinguished under-correction from acceptable correction was 15.9 degrees.

CONCLUSION

Abnormal hindfoot alignment is one of the causes of under-correction after MOWHTO. Attention should be paid to the preoperative ankle joint line orientation relative to the ground and hindfoot angle. If the preoperative hindfoot alignment angle is ≥ 15.9 degrees, surgeons should reconsider the operative procedure and correction angle.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic level III, retrospective study.

Resumption of complete weight bearing after osteosynthesis of bimalleolar fractures using locking plates

INTRODUCTION

Bimalleolar fractures represent 9% of fractures and affect 187/100,000 people per year. The gold standard for osteosynthesis is a one-third tubular or lateral locking plate and compression screwing or use of tension band wiring, with complete weight bearing planned around the 6th week. The development of locking plates seems to allow earlier resumption of weight bearing. The objective of our study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological results after internal fixation of bimalleolar fractures using locking plates with complete weight bearing authorized from the outset. The hypothesis was that this does not predispose to cutaneous or mechanical complications.

HARDWARE AND METHOD

A continuous multi-operator retrospective study was performed. The clinical and radiological data of 55 patients operated on for bimalleolar fractures were collected. All underwent osteosynthesis with medial and lateral locking plates with authorization for weight bearing from the outset.

RESULTS

Complete weight bearing was resumed at 27.4 days 14.7 [7-60] postoperatively. No non-union or malunion was found. Two patients presented with delayed medial healing without the need for hardware removal. Two patients required removal of the lateral Plate 1 month postoperatively due to infection. Seven patients presented with discomfort related to hardware, justifying its removal at 1 year. The Kitaoka score at 1 year was 94.6 7.7 [71-100].

CONCLUSION

The use of medial and lateral locking plates in bimalleolar fractures associated with complete weight bearing authorized from the outset allows complete consolidation. There was no increase in cutaneous or mechanical complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective study.