Long-term survival of CLS Spotorno femoral stem: a systematic review of literature

Biomechanical analysis of different THA cementless femoral stem designs in physiological and osteoporotic bone during static loading conditions

BACKGROUND

The influence of THA stem design on periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) risk is subject of debate. This study aims to compare the effects of different cementless stem designs on stress-strain distributions in both physiological and osteoporotic femur under various loading conditions.

MATERIALS

A biomechanical study using finite-element analysis was conducted. Four models were developed: three with implanted femurs and a native one chosen as control. Each model was analyzed for both healthy and osteoporotic bone. The following stem designs were examined: short anatomical stem with femoral neck preservation, double-wedge stem, and anatomical standard stem. Three loading conditions were assessed: gait, sideways falling, and four-point bending.

RESULTS

During gait in physiological bone, the anatomical stem and the short anatomical stem with femoral neck preservation showed stress distribution similar to the native model. The double-wedge stem reduced stress in the proximal area but concentrated it in the meta-diaphysis. In osteoporotic bone, the double-wedge stem design increased average stress by up to 10%. During sideways falling, the double-wedge stem exhibited higher stresses in osteoporotic bone. No significant differences in average stress were found in any of the studied models during four-point bending.

CONCLUSION

In physiological bone, anatomical stems demonstrated stress distribution comparable to the native model. The double-wedge stem showed uneven stress distribution, which may contribute to long-term stress shielding. In the case of osteoporotic bone, the double-wedge stem design resulted in a significant increase in average stress during both gait and sideways falling, potentially indicating a higher theoretical risk of PFF.

Rectangular Taper Stem Designs Are Associated With a Higher Risk for Periprosthstic Femoral Fractures After Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) remain a major concern following cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aimed to evaluate the association between different types of cementless tapered stems and the risk of postoperative PFF.

METHODS

A retrospective review of primary THAs performed at a single center from January 2011 to December 2018 included 3,315 hips (2,326 patients). Cementless stems were classified according to their design. The incidence of PFF was compared between flat taper porous-coated stems (type A), rectangular taper grit-blasted stems (type B1), and quadrangular taper hydroxyapatite-coated stems (type B2). Multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify independent factors related to PFF. The mean follow-up duration was 61 months (range, 12 to 139). Overall, 45 (1.4%) postoperative PFFs occurred.

RESULTS

The incidence of PFF was significantly higher in type B1 stems than in type A and type B2 stems (1.8 versus 0.7 versus 0.7%; P = .022). Additionally, more surgical treatments (1.7 versus 0.5 versus 0.7%; P = .013) and femoral revisions (1.2 versus 0.2 versus 0%; P = .004) were required for PFF in type B1 stems. After controlling for confounding variables, older age, diagnosis of hip fracture, and use of type B1 stems were significant factors associated with PFF.

CONCLUSION

Type B1 rectangular taper stems were found to have higher risks for postoperative PFF and PFF requiring surgical management than type A and type B2 stems in THA. Femoral stem geometry should be considered when planning for cementless THA in elderly patients who have compromised bone quality.

Influence of different CCD angles on osseointegration and radiological changes after total hip arthroplasty of a triple wedge shape cementless femoral stem: a prospective cohort study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the osseointegration and radiological outcomes in patients after total hip arthroplasty, hypothesizing different load patterns with one cementless stem design and different CCD angles (CLS Spotorno femoral stem 125° vs 135°).

METHODS

All cases of degenerative hip osteoarthritis fulfilling strict inclusion criteria were treated with cementless hip arthroplasty between 2008 and 2017. Ninety-two out of one hundred six cases were clinically and radiologically examined three and 12 months after implantation. Two groups with each 46 patients were rendered prospectively and compared in clinical (Harris Hip Score) and radiological outcome.

RESULTS

At final follow-up, no significant difference regarding Harris Hip Score was detected between the two groups (mean 99.2 ± 3.7 vs. 99.3 ± 2.5; p = 0.73). Cortical hypertrophy was found in none of the patients. Stress shielding was seen in a total of 52 hips (n = 27 vs. n = 25; 57% of the 92 hips). No significant difference regarding stress shielding was detected when comparing both groups (p = 0.67). Significant bone density loss was detected in Gruen zone one and two in the 125° group. The 135° group showed significant radiolucency in Gruen zone seven. No overall radiological loosening or subsidence of the femoral component was observed.

CONCLUSION

According to our results, the use of a femoral component with a 125° CCD angle versus a 135° CCD did not result in a different osseointegration and load transfer with a clinically relevant significance.

A 24-year single-centre experience with Collum Femoris Preserving stem: clinical and radiological results in young and elderly population

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim was to evaluate the long-term follow-up of Collum Femoris Preserving (CFP) stem, specifically focusing on stem survivorship, complications, as well as on clinical and radiological results. The secondary study objective is an age-based sub-analysis (<65 years vs. ⩾65 years) of long-term results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent CFP implantation between 1997 and 2009. A total of 311 patients (342 hips) were included with a mean follow-up of 15.8 ± 2.2 (range 11-24) years. 2 age groups were analysed: Group-Y (age <65) and Group-E (age ⩾65). Group-Y included 182 hips (mean follow-up 16.3 ± 4.2 years), whereas Group-E included 160 hips (mean follow-up 15.5 ± 3.7 years). Clinical (HHS, OHS and VAS) and radiological data were obtained at final follow-up. Any complications, reoperations, prosthetic components revisions and stem revisions were analysed.

RESULTS

According to HSS score, 95% of patients reported excellent/good results (95.6% Group-Y vs. 94.4% Group-E) with an overall stem survival rate of 93.3% (94% Group-Y vs. 92.5% Group-E; p = 0.37). Overall, 87% of stem revisions were performed with primary stems. The rate of prosthetic components revision was 9.9 % (9.9% in Group-Y vs. 10% in Group-E; p = 1). The reoperation rate was 10.8% (11.5% in Group-Y vs. 10.0% in Group-E; p = 0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

The CFP stem provides good clinical and radiological long-term results with low rate of complications in both young and elderly patients. No significant difference in stem revision and reoperation rates was observed between the 2 groups. Both in elderly and young patients, CFP stem allows revisions to be performed with primary stems.