Risk analysis of periprosthetic knee joint infection (PJI) in total knee arthroplasty after preoperative corticosteroid injection: a systematic review : A study performed by the Early-Osteoarthritis group of ESSKA-European Knee Associates section

[Current AWMF guidelines on knee and hip arthroplasty - individual risks]

BACKGROUND

In the year 2022, more than 300,000 total hip and knee primary arthroplasties were recorded in the German Arthroplasty Registry. The ever-increasing number of interventions naturally leads to an increase in the absolute number of possible complications. The abundance of internationally available data makes it possible to determine risk factors for postoperative complications.

RISK FACTORS

Professional societies involved in the German guidelines in the field of orthopedics place great emphasis on modifiable risk factors, as their adequate management can consequently reduce the likelihood of postoperative complications. One of the most common modifiable risk factors is obesity, with its prevalence remaining consistently high in most developed countries. In the field of orthopedics, the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany focuses on modifiable risk factors including obesity, diabetes mellitus and smoking.

OBESITY

In the case of obesity in particular, the guidelines for knee and hip arthroplasty recommend a weight loss attempt for patients with a BMI > 30 kg/m2. A BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 is considered a "relative contraindication" in the guidelines. Shared decision making is emphasized in both guidelines. Ultimately, the particularly critical individual assessment of risk and benefit for each obese patient remains crucial for the final decision.

Corticosteroid Injection up to 8 Weeks Before Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Doubles the Incidence of Postoperative Infection

PURPOSE

To determine whether at least 1 corticosteroid injection (CSI) within 8 weeks before anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) increases the incidence of postoperative infection.

METHODS

A large globally federated research database (TriNetX) containing more than 200 million patient records was queried retrospectively for patients undergoing ACLR between October 1, 2010, and January 1, 2024, using diagnosis and procedure codes. A cohort of patients receiving CSI up to 8 weeks before ACLR were compared with a cohort of patients who did not receive a CSI before ACLR. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed on the basis of preoperative characteristics and comorbid diagnoses. Outcomes examined were incidence of postoperative infection at 90 days and 180 days. Postoperative infection was defined as a formal infection diagnosis or need for a washout surgery. Comparisons were performed using Pearson χ2 tests.

RESULTS

After matching, 2,439 patients were analyzed in each cohort with matched preoperative characteristics and comorbid diagnoses. Patients receiving a CSI in the 8 weeks before ACLR had a 90-day infection rate of 1.2% (30/2,439) compared with a control group infection rate of 0.6% (14/2,439) represented as an odds ratio of 2.1 (95% confidence interval 1.1-4.0, P = .015). After 180 days, the infection rates grew to 1.3% (33/2,439) for patients receiving CSI and 0.6% (15/2,439) for the control group with an odds ratio of 2.2 (95% confidence interval 1.2-4.1, P = .009).

CONCLUSIONS

CSIs given within 8 weeks of ACL-R approximately double the incidence of postoperative infection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Pathogen Distribution, Drug Resistance, and Postoperative High-Quality Nursing Intervention Effectiveness in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients After Knee Arthroplasty With Postoperative Infection

Objective

To analyze the distribution and drug resistance of pathogens in patients with postoperative infection following knee arthroplasty (TKA) for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and to explore the effectiveness of high-quality nursing interventions postoperatively.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from 87 KOA patients who underwent TKA and developed postoperative wound infections (infection group) at the first Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from July 2022 to September 2024. Another 87 patients without postoperative infection during the same period were selected as the control group. Deep wound exudate samples were collected from the infection group for pathogen culture, isolation, and identification. Drug susceptibility testing was performed using the K-B disk diffusion method. Additionally, venous blood samples were collected from both the infection and control groups one week after surgery, and serum levels of inflammatory markers [interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), procalcitonin (PCT)] were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). According to the type of nursing interventions received, the infection group was divided into the conventional care group (n=43, receiving standard orthopedic perioperative care) and the high-quality care group (n=44, receiving comprehensive high-quality care based on routine care). The pain levels [Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores], knee joint function [Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee scores], activities of daily living (modified Barthel index), and patient satisfaction [Newcastle Satisfaction with Nursing Service (NSNS) scale] were compared between the two groups.

Results

Among the 87 KOA patients with postoperative infection after TKA, 83 patients had a single pathogen infection, and 4 patients had mixed infections with two pathogens, resulting in the cultivation and isolation of 91 pathogens. Of these, 63 (69.23%) were Gram-positive bacteria, primarily Staphylococcus aureus (29.67%) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (17.58%). There were 25 (27.47%) Gram-negative bacteria, primarily Escherichia coli (9.89%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (6.59%). Three (3.30%) fungal strains were isolated, all identified as Candida albicans. Gram-positive bacteria showed high resistance to penicillin, benzylpenicillin, ampicillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, ciprofloxacin, and gentamicin, but low resistance to gatifloxacin, and no resistance to vancomycin or teicoplanin. Gram-negative bacteria showed high resistance to ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin, but low resistance to cefepime, imipenem, meropenem, gatifloxacin, and amikacin. The infection group had significantly higher serum levels of IL-6, TNF-α, and PCT compared to the control group (P<0.05). The VAS scores at 24 hours, 3 days, and 7 days postoperatively were significantly lower in the high-quality care group compared to the conventional care group (P<0.05). The HSS scores and modified Barthel index scores at 3 months postoperatively were higher than preoperative values in both groups, with a greater improvement observed in the high-quality care group (P<0.05). The satisfaction rate in the high-quality care group (93.18%) was significantly higher than in the conventional care group (74.42%) (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The primary pathogens causing postoperative wound infections in KOA patients after TKA are Gram-positive bacteria, with Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis being predominant. Serum levels of inflammatory markers are significantly higher in infection patients compared to non-infection patients. High-quality nursing interventions can effectively alleviate postoperative pain, promote recovery of knee joint function, enhance activities of daily living, and improve patient satisfaction.

The Mechanisms and Safety of Corticosteroid Injections in Orthopaedic Surgery

» Corticosteroid injections (CSIs), including intra-articular, perineural, and those involving tendon sheaths or bursae, offer potential relief from osteoarthritic and inflammatory musculoskeletal pain, including gout attacks, as well as tarsal tunnel syndrome, plantar fasciitis, and interdigital neuromas.» CSI for musculoskeletal pain is commonly used as a nonoperative management option for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, offering pain relief, typically lasting from days to months.» CSIs are often performed prior to surgery as part of the nonoperative management of many conditions, with multiple CSIs within the year of surgery increasing postoperative infection risk in some major joints.» Despite the potential benefits of CSI, there are risks, including a potential increase in the risk of surgical site infection secondary to bacterial contamination and the immunomodulating effect of corticosteroids when given in the perioperative period.» To date, a multitude of studies across orthopaedic subspecialties has reported on perioperative infection risk associated with CSIs. However, heterogeneity in study design and patient populations has made standardized recommendations challenging. It is, therefore, difficult to elucidate, with a high level of evidence, the most appropriate perioperative timeline for CSI administration for which infection risk is nonsignificant.

Intra-articular procedures and associated septic arthritis: A mini-review

Native joint septic arthritis (SA) is a severe, potentially life-threatening condition characterized by the invasion of synovial fluid and membrane by pathogens, most commonly bacteria. The rising frequency of intra-articular procedures such as joint aspirations and injections has led to increased concern regarding iatrogenic septic arthritis. This mini-review aims to summarize current understanding of the incidence, risk factors, bacterial etiology, and strategies for preventing SA associated with intra-articular procedures. Recent studies report that while iatrogenic SA incidence remains low, ranging between 0.002% and 0.008% following injections, it is higher following arthroscopy (0.14%). Risk factors for iatrogenic SA mirror those of hematogenous SA, comprising older age, male gender, comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, and systemic corticosteroid therapy. Staphylococcus aureus remains the most frequently implicated pathogen, followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci and streptococci. Preventive measures, including hand antisepsis, patient skin disinfection, and the wearing of surgical masks, are essential to reducing the risk of SA during intra-articular procedures. Despite low incidence, SA poses significant morbidity and mortality risks, underscoring the need for adherence to infection control protocols. This review highlights the importance of standardized preventive measures and further research into optimized aseptic techniques, the objective being to mitigate the risk of iatrogenic infections in clinical practice.

Perioperative intravenous dexamethasone use is not associated with periprosthetic joint infection or wound healing complications following shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Perioperative intravenous (IV) dexamethasone is commonly used in lower extremity total joint arthroplasty to manage postoperative pain and nausea/vomiting, and recent studies have demonstrated that its use may lower rates of acute postoperative medical complications. However, there is limited information regarding the safety and efficacy of IV dexamethasone in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Additionally, there is concern surrounding corticosteroid use prior to surgery as preoperative corticosteroid injections have been associated with adverse outcomes after TSA, including periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and revision surgery. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of perioperative IV dexamethasone on 90-day rates of PJI, wound complications, and medical complications after TSA.

METHODS

The Premiere national hospital database was used to identify adult patients undergoing elective TSA between 2016 and 2020; patients were excluded if they were under 18 years old, were undergoing revision TSA, or had a prior proximal humerus open reduction internal fixation procedure. Patients who did and did not receive perioperative IV dexamethasone were then compared in both univariate and multivariate analyses. A Bonferroni correction was utilized to adjust for multiple comparisons. The primary end point was risk of acute infectious complications within 90 days of surgery, including PJI and wound infection/dehiscence. Secondary end points included acute pulmonary, renal, and thromboembolic complications.

RESULTS

A total of 135,333 patients underwent TSA during the study period; 61.2% underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, 33.8% underwent anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty, and 5.0% underwent hemiarthroplasty. From 2016 to 2020, perioperative IV dexamethasone use increased by 135%. Multivariate analysis revealed that patients who received perioperative IV dexamethasone did not have increased odds of PJI, superficial wound infection, or wound dehiscence (P = .15-.47) but did have decreased odds of sepsis (odds ratio [OR] 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-0.81) and other medical complications such as urinary tract infection and acute kidney injury. Additionally, there was a trend towards decreased 90-day hospital readmission (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81-0.96, P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative IV dexamethasone was not associated with increased risk of acute infectious and wound healing complications. Moreover, patients who received perioperative IV dexamethasone had decreased odds of medical complications and trended toward lower rates of 90-day hospital readmission. The results of this study support the safety of perioperative IV dexamethasone use in patients undergoing elective TSA.

Corticosteroid injection of the knee within one month prior to meniscus repair increases the risk of repair failure requiring meniscectomy

OBJECTIVE

Meniscal tears are common knee injuries with limited endogenous healing capacity. This study aimed to investigate the association between the timing and administration of preoperative intra-articular corticosteroid injections (CSIs) and the risk of subsequent meniscectomy following meniscus repair.

METHODS

Using a national insurance claims database, patients aged 18-40 years undergoing meniscus repair within six months of tear diagnosis were studied. Patients were categorized based on whether they received preoperative CSIs within three intervals prior to repair. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze the risk of follow-up meniscectomy while controlling for various patient-related variables.

RESULTS

Among 5,390 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 201 received preoperative CSIs. The CSI group was older and had higher rates of diabetes, obesity, and knee osteoarthritis. The overall rate of follow-up meniscectomy did not differ between groups. However, CSIs performed within one month prior to repair were associated with significantly higher odds of subsequent meniscectomy compared to CSIs performed between three and six months prior. Obesity, tobacco use, and knee osteoarthritis were also independently associated with higher risk, while increasing age was associated with lower risk.

CONCLUSION

The study highlights an increased risk of repair failure requiring follow-up meniscectomy for patients receiving intra-articular CSIs within one month prior to meniscus repair. These findings suggest caution when considering CSIs as a treatment option for patients scheduled for meniscus repair. Further research is needed to establish optimal timing guidelines for CSIs in relation to meniscus repair and to understand the underlying mechanisms.

The safety of corticosteroid injection prior to shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review

Introduction

Intra-articular corticosteroid injections are frequently utilised in patients with glenohumeral arthritis for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. A systematic review was performed to assess the relationship between prior corticosteroid injection and infection following shoulder arthroplasty.

Methods

A search was performed, using databases Medline, EMBASE and CINAHL. Studies with comparative data of post-arthroplasty infection following previous corticosteroid injection versus controls were included.

Results

Seven studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, comprising 87,820 patients. On pooled analysis, previous steroid injection did not increase the overall risk of infection (risk ratio 1.17; confidence interval 1.00-1.37, p = 0.06). On subgroup analysis for timing of injection, one given within 3 months before arthroplasty conferred a greater risk of infection than no injection (risk ratio 2.30; confidence interval 1.13-4.69, p = 0.02) or one given between 3 and 12 months before arthroplasty (risk ratio 3.32; confidence interval 1.43-7.72, p = 0.005). An injection at 3 to 12 months before arthroplasty did not increase the risk of infection over controls (risk ratio 0.89; confidence interval 0.63-1.25, p = 0.50).

Conclusions

This review has found there to be a time-dependent relationship between prior corticosteroid injection and infection post-arthroplasty, with an increased risk when performed within three months before arthroplasty. Thus, an interval of at least three months is recommended between injection and arthroplasty.

Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection after Intra-Articular Injection: Any Difference among Shoulder, Knee and Hip?

Osteoarthritis is a degenerative joint disease caused by the wear and tear of joint cartilage. The definitive and resolving treatment is prosthetic replacement of the articular surface, the demand of which is on the rise for patients with mild to moderate severity. However, a conservative strategy may be considered that aims to reduce and contain pain symptoms by postponing surgical treatment in the case of worsening that can no longer be otherwise controlled. Intra-articular infiltrations, like other therapeutic strategies, are not without complications, and among these the most feared is joint infection, especially in anticipation of future prosthetic replacement. Is important to avoid periprosthetic joint infections because they represent one of the third most common reasons for revision surgery. Using cases found in the literature, the aim of this article is to determine if there is a real correlation between the type of injections, the number of doses injected and the time between infiltrations and the surgical procedure.

Intraarticular botulinum toxin type A versus corticosteroid or hyaluronic acid for painful knee osteoarthritis: A meta-analysis of head-to-head randomized controlled trials

Intraarticular botulinum toxin type A (BTA) has been shown to be effective for painful knee osteoarthritis (KOA), while the efficacy and safety of intraarticular BTA compared to corticosteroid and hyaluronic acid (HA) remains unknown. A meta-analysis was performed to compare. A search was conducted in Medline (PubMed), CENTER (Cochrane Library), Embase (Ovid), Web of Science, Wanfang, and CNKI to find head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) directly compare the efficacy and safety between intraarticular BTA and intraarticular corticosteroid or HA for patients with painful KOA. The Cochrane Q test and estimation of I2 were used to assess heterogeneity among studies. After incorporating heterogeneity, a random-effects model was employed for data pooling. Overall, six RCTs involving 348 adults with KOA were included. Intraarticular BTA showed similar efficacy with corticosteroid as evidenced by the changes of pain visual analog scale (VAS: -0.35 [-0.97, 0.28]), total Western Ontario McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC: 0.28 [-4.13, 4.69]), and WOMAC for pain (0.64 [-0.42, 1.70]), stiffness (-0.02 [-0.54, 0.50]), and function (0.00 [-2.99, 3.00]). Intraarticular BTA was shown to be more effective than HA in improving pain VAS (-1.31 [-1.97, -0.64]) and WOMAC for pain (-4.81 [-8.73, -0.89]), while the influence on WOMAC for knee stiffness (-1.01 [-4.43, 2.41]) and knee function (-1.86 [-6.71, 2.99]) were similar between groups. No serious adverse events were reported. Evidence from pilot RCTs suggests that intraarticular BTA may confer similar efficacy to corticosteroid for KOA, while BTA may be superior to HA for improving knee pain.

Local and Systemic Side Effects of Corticosteroid Injections for Musculoskeletal Indications

Corticosteroid injections can be associated with a range of potential side effects, which may be classified as local or systemic and further stratified as immediate or delayed in onset. Radiologists performing image-guided musculoskeletal injections should recognize the potential side effects of corticosteroid medication when counseling patients before injection and consider such side effects in planning individual injections. This Review summarizes the available evidence regarding the local and systemic side effects of corticosteroid injections performed for musculoskeletal indications. Local side effects include postinjection flare, skin hypopigmentation and atrophy, infection, tendon rupture, accelerated progression of osteoarthritis, and osseous injury. Systemic side effects include adrenal suppression or insufficiency, facial flushing, hypertension, hyperglycemia, and osteoporosis. Additional targeted counseling is warranted regarding side effects that are specific to certain patient populations (i.e., premenopausal women, patients with diabetes, athletes, and pediatric patients). Corticosteroid injections are contraindicated in the presence of superficial or deep infection, fracture, or a prosthetic joint. Guidelines on the frequency, duration, and maximal lifetime use of corticosteroid injections are currently lacking. Further research is needed regarding the long-term complications of continuous corticosteroid use, particularly with regard to osseous effects.

Etiology of Total Knee Arthroplasty Revisions: A Two-Decade Institutional Perspective

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implant survival time is determined by various patient and implant-related factors and varies significantly in recent worldwide reports. In our study, we have included 247 TKA revisions in 203 patients performed in our hospital over the last 20 years. Multiple etiologies of revisions were identified and classified into 10 categories. Time to failure was analyzed with regard to etiology, patient demographics, and other relevant data. The overall average time to revision was 44.08 months (95% confidence interval (CI) between 33.34 and 49.82 months). Age at primary implant was negatively correlated with time to revision (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.0521 and 95% CI of HR = 1.0359 to 1.0685) and female patients showed a 1.59 times higher risk of implant failure than males. Periprosthetic joint infection was the cause of 46.56% (n=115) of revisions (out of which 12.55% (n=31) were early infections, diagnosed within the first three months), while aseptic loosening was found in 31.98% (n=79) of cases. Infection correlated with a shorter time to revision compared to aseptic loosening (p<0.05). These findings emphasize the need to intensify efforts to deliver the best patient care, select the best antibiotic regimen, and improve surgical techniques to decrease the incidence of infectious complications.

Corticosteroid injection prior to surgery had no effect on 2-year outcomes following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Background

Corticosteroid injections (CSIs) can be an effective nonsurgical treatment for patients with rotator cuff tears. Recent large database studies have raised concern that CSI may result in a higher reoperation rate, increased infection risk, and worse outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reoperation rate, incidence of postoperative infection, and two-year outcomes of patients undergoing ARCR with and without the use of preoperative CSI.

Methods

An institutional database generated from fellowship-trained orthopedic sports surgeons was retrospectively queried for patients who underwent ARCR with a minimum of two-year follow-up. Inclusion criteria consisted of 1) primary full-thickness rotator cuff tear and 2) preoperative and minimum two-year patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Of the 219 patients identified, 134 patients had preoperative subacromial CSI administered within one year of ARCR. Reoperation rate, number of injections, Visual Analog Scale, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey Physical Component Score/Mental Component Score were compared between groups at six months, one year, and two years. Chi-square and t-tests were used to compare baseline differences, postoperative infections, and reoperations. A repeated measures Analyses of Covariance was used to measure differences between PROMs at each time point. Simple Analyses of Covariance were used for the two-year sub-analyses for patients receiving CSI within 90 days of surgery and if multiple preoperative CSI had been given (α ≤ 0.05).

Results

There were no significant demographic differences between groups (P > .05). Preoperative use of subacromial CSI within one year prior to ARCR did not increase reoperation rate (P = .85) or impact PROMs at any timepoint. There were two reoperations during the study period in the CSI group (2 lysis of adhesions). No infections occurred in either cohort. No differences were found if injections were performed within 90 days of surgery or if more than one CSI was administered within the year prior to surgery (P > .05).

Conclusion

Our results show that preoperative CSI prior to primary ARCR did not increase risk of reoperation, infection, or influence PROMs with a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation after Hyaluronic Acid Injections for Elderly with Knee, Hip, Shoulder, and Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent degenerative joint condition characterized by cartilage deterioration, joint inflammation, and functional limitations, particularly impacting the elderly population. Rehabilitation and hyaluronic acid (HA) injections are common therapeutic approaches routinely used in clinical practice, but their synergistic potential is far from being fully characterized. Thus, the aim of this narrative review was to elucidate the multilevel benefits and synergies of integrating these two approaches in multidisciplinary OA rehabilitation. This narrative review follows the scale for the assessment of narrative review articles (SANRA) criteria and involves a comprehensive literature search from July to August 2023. Two independent reviewers screened studies, including those involving human subjects with OA, rehabilitation strategies, and outcomes following HA injection, published in English. Results: HA injections might improve joint biomechanics, reducing friction, absorbing shocks, and potentially regulating inflammation. Rehabilitation plays a pivotal role in strengthening muscles, increasing the range of motion, and enhancing overall function. Optimizing rehabilitation following HA injection might provide additional benefits in joint health. OA management requires a multidisciplinary approach integrating HA injections, rehabilitation, and personalized care. Challenges in patient adherence and healthcare resources currently exist, but emerging technologies offer opportunities to enhance patient engagement and monitoring optimizing sustainability and outcomes of patients with knee, hip, shoulder, and temporomandibular joint OA.

ESSKA and EBJIS recommendations for the management of infections after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R): prevention, surgical treatment and rehabilitation

PURPOSE

Infection after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) is a rare but severe complication. Despite an increase in articles published on this topic over the last decade, solid data to optimized diagnostic and therapeutic measures are scarce. For this reason, the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) and the European Society for Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA) collaborated in order to develop recommendations for the diagnosis and management of infections after ACL-R. The aim of the workgroup was to perform a review of the literature and provide practical guidance to healthcare professionals involved in the management of infections after ACL-R.

METHODS

An international workgroup was recruited to provide recommendations for predefined clinical dilemmas regarding the management of infections after ACL-R. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases were searched for evidence to support the recommended answers to each dilemma.

RESULTS

The recommendations were divided into two articles. The first covers etiology, prevention, diagnosis and antimicrobial treatment of septic arthritis following ACL-R and is primarily aimed at infectious disease specialists. This article includes the second part of the recommendations and covers prevention of infections after ACL-R, surgical treatment of septic arthritis following ACL-R and subsequent postoperative rehabilitation. It is aimed not only at orthopedic surgeons, but at all healthcare professionals dealing with patients suffering from infections after ACL-R.

CONCLUSION

These recommendations guide clinicians in achieving timely and accurate diagnosis as well as providing optimal management, both of which are paramount to prevent loss of function and other devastating sequelae of infection in the knee joint.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

Methods of Conservative Intra-Articular Treatment for Osteoarthritis of the Hip and Knee

BACKGROUND

Osteoarthritis is a degenerative joint disease that is becoming increasingly common as the population ages. Conservative treatment for hip or knee osteoarthritis has been limited to pain control. Intra-articular injections for targeted local treatment have been widely used in clinical practice for many years.

METHODS

This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective literature search, including recent meta-analyses, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and current guidelines.

RESULTS

In Germany, the 12-month prevalence of osteoarthritis in adults is 17.9%. Conservative treatments are intended to alleviate symptoms and do not affect the progression of the disease. Glucocorticoids can be used to relieve otherwise intractable pain in the short term, but their prolonged use increases the risk of cartilage loss and progression of osteoarthritis. According to multiple guidelines, there is only weak evidence for the use of hyaluronic acid. Evidence does exist that high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid may lead to better outcomes than the low-molecular-weight form. RCTs have revealed no more than short-term clinical efficacy for a variety of specific therapeutic approaches, including the use of cytokine inhibitors. Other treatments, e.g., with platelet-enriched plasma, aspirates from bone marrow or adipose tissue, or expanded mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC), have not been found to have clinically relevant long-term effects.

CONCLUSION

In view of the scant available evidence, further standardized RCTs will be needed to give a more comprehensive picture of the efficacy of intra-articular treatments for hip and knee osteoarthritis.

Pre-operative corticosteroid injection within 1 month of total shoulder arthroplasty is associated with increased risk of periprosthetic joint infection

INTRODUCTION

Corticosteroid injections (CSI) may increase the risk of peri-prosthetic infections (PJI) following total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Our study specifically assessed the risk of PJI in patients who received CSI: (1) less than 4 weeks prior to TSA; (2) 4-8 weeks prior to TSA; and (3) 8-12 weeks prior to TSA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A national all-payer database was queried to identify patients who underwent TSA with a shoulder osteoarthritis diagnosis from October 1, 2015 to October 31, 2020 (n = 25,422). There were four cohorts: CSI within 4 weeks of TSA (n = 214), CSI 4-8 weeks prior to TSA (n = 473), CSI 8-12 weeks prior to TSA (n = 604), and a control cohort that did not receive CSI (n = 15,486). Bivariate chi-square analyses of outcomes were performed in addition to multivariate regression.

RESULTS

A significant increase in PJI risk at 1 year (Odds Ratio [OR] = 2.29, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] = 1.19-3.99, p = 0.007) and 2 years (OR = 2.03, CI = 1.09-3.46, p = 0.016) in patients who received CSI within 1 month of TSA was noted. PJI risk was not significantly increased at any time point for patients who received a CSI greater than 4 weeks prior to TSA (all p ≥ 0.396).

CONCLUSION

PJI risk is increased at both 1 and 2 years post-operatively in patients who received a CSI within 4 weeks of TSA. Therefore, TSA should be deferred at least 4 weeks after a patient receives a CSI to mitigate PJI risk.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Management of acute periprosthetic knee infection: a comparison of arthroscopic and open debridement

INTRODUCTION

In acute periprosthetic knee infections, debridement and implant retention (DAIR) is the preferred treatment prior to one- and two-stage revisions. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of arthroscopic and open debridement of infected primary total knee arthroplasties (TKA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed clinical, laboratory, and antibiotic treatment data, collected in patients with periprosthetic knee infection treated with DAIR at a Swiss Level 1 orthopedic and trauma center over a 10-year period between January 2005 and May 2015. Inclusion criteria were primary total knee arthroplasty and early postoperative or acute hematogenous periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The primary endpoint was the need for further revision surgery due to persistent infection. The secondary endpoint was the prosthesis salvage in further infection surgeries.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients with 44 acute or hematogenous periprosthetic knee infections were included. We recorded 20 recurrent infections (45%) in our study population: 10 (77%) out of 13 in the arthroscopic DAIR group and 10 (32%) out of 31 in the open DAIR group. Two-stage revision, meaning complete removal of the TKA, insertion of a spacer and replantation at a second stage, had to be performed in three patients treated initially arthroscopically (23%) and in six patients treated initially with an open surgical procedure (21%).

CONCLUSIONS

Open debridement for acute periprosthetic knee infection shows clear benefits in terms of infection eradication and prosthesis salvage compared to arthroscopic DAIR.

Recommendations on diagnosis and antimicrobial treatment of infections after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) endorsed by ESSKA and EBJIS

Infection after anterior-cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) is a rare but devastating complication affecting predominantly young and sportive individuals. A timely and correct diagnosis as well as an optimized management are paramount to circumvent serious sequelae and compromise in life quality. These recommendations are primarily intended for use by infectious disease specialists and microbiologists, but also orthopedic surgeons and other healthcare professionals who care for patients with infections after ACL-R. They are based on evidence mainly originating from observational studies and opinions of experts in the field and cover the management of infections after ACL-R with a special focus on etiology, diagnosis, antimicrobial treatment and prevention. Comprehensive recommendations on prevention, surgical treatment and rehabilitation are presented separately in a document primarily addressing orthopedics professionals.