Early ACL reconstruction shows an improved recovery of isokinetic thigh muscle strength compared to delayed or chronic cases

Delayed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Associated With Lower Odds of Returning to Preinjury Physical Activity Level at 12 Months Follow-Up

PURPOSE

To examine the effects of timing of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction on the odds to recover muscle (quadriceps and hamstring) strength, return to preinjury physical activity level, and achieve rehabilitation goals at 12 months follow-up.

METHODS

Data were extracted from a local rehabilitation registry in Sweden in November 2023. Patients ≥16 years old who underwent primary ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autografts, who underwent isokinetic muscle strength assessment, and responded to patient-reported outcomes 12 months after surgery were included. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the association between timing of ACL reconstruction and the recovery of muscle strength, return to preinjury physical activity level, and achievement of rehabilitation goals. The results of the logistic regression analysis were expressed as odds ratios for every 1-unit increase in the predictor variable (months between ACL injury and reconstruction).

RESULTS

In total, 715 patients were included, of whom 53.4% (n = 383) were women. The mean age at ACL reconstruction was 28.3 ± 10.5 years, and the median time between ACL injury to reconstruction was 4.9 months (interquartile range [IQR] 2.9-9.4). Delayed ACL reconstruction significantly decreased the odds of returning to preinjury physical activity level at 12 months in patients with a Tegner score of 6-10 (odds ratio 0.97; 95% confidence interval 0.94-0.99, P = .009), regardless of age. Shorter median time in months from ACL injury to reconstruction was observed for patients who returned to preinjury physical activity level, especially in younger patients (16-30 years old) (3.9 [IQR 2.5, 6.5] vs 4.7 [IQR 2.9, 9.1], P = .007) and in patients who participated in pivoting activities (Tegner scale 6-10) preinjury (3.4 [IQR 2.3, 6.2] vs 5.0 [IQR 2.9, 9.7], P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed ACL reconstruction reduces the odds of returning to preinjury physical activity level in patients active in pivoting activities preinjury (Tegner 6-10), regardless of age, 12 months after surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective study.

Sensorimotor control of functional joint stability: Scientific concepts, clinical considerations, and the articuloneuromuscular cascade paradigm in peripheral joint injury

Human movement depends on sensorimotor control. Sensorimotor control refers to central nervous system (CNS) control of joint stability, posture, and movement, all of which are effected via the sensorimotor system. Given the nervous, muscular, and skeletal systems function as an integrated "neuromusculoskeletal system" for the purpose of executing movement, musculoskeletal conditions can result in a cascade of impairments that affect negatively all three systems. The purpose of this article is to revisit concepts in joint stability, sensorimotor control of functional joint stability (FJS), joint instability, and sensorimotor impairments contributing to functional joint instability. This article differs from historical work because it updates previous models of joint injury and joint instability by incorporating more recent research on CNS factors, skeletal muscle factors, and tendon factors. The new 'articuloneuromuscular cascade paradigm' presented here offers a framework for facilitating further investigation into physiological and biomechanical consequences of joint injury and, in turn, how these follow on to affect physical activity (functional) capability. Here, the term 'injury' represents traumatic joint injury with a focus is on peripheral joint injury. Understanding the configuration of the sensorimotor system and the cascade of post-injury sensorimotor impairments is particularly important for clinicians reasoning rational interventions for patients with mechanical instability and functional instability. Concurrently, neurocognitive processing and neurocognitive performance are also addressed relative to feedforward neuromuscular control of FJS. This article offers itself as an educational resource and scientific asset to contribute to the ongoing research and applied practice journey for developing optimal peripheral joint injury rehabilitation strategies.

Late (≥60 years old) and middle adulthood (40-59 years old) patients achieve similar improvement in patient-reported outcomes following ACL reconstruction

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the range of motion (ROM), surgical outcomes, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction outcomes in patients 60 years or older at the time of surgery to 40- to 59-year-old patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study from 2015 to 2022, a 3:1 propensity match was performed to match late adulthood patients (≥60 years old) undergoing ACL reconstruction with middle adulthood (40-59 years old) ACL reconstruction patients. Patients were matched based on sex, ACL graft utilized and concomitant procedures performed during ACL reconstruction. Statistical analysis compared demographics, preoperative injury management, surgical outcomes, PROMs, and minimal clinical important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) achievement rates for all ACL reconstruction patients included.

RESULTS

Twenty late adulthood and 60 middle adulthood patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were included in the final cohort. Patients who were 60 years or older experienced no difference in reoperation rate (n.s.), incidence of retears (n.s.) or ROM (n.s.) at 1 year post-operatively. There were also no differences in International Knee Documentation Committee (ΔIKDC) (31.3 ± 19.1 vs. 34.2 ± 18.2, n.s.) or ΔPCS-12 (12.4 ± 9.8 vs. 12.9 ± 10.8, n.s.) scores at 1 year post-operatively. Furthermore, the younger and older patient cohorts demonstrated similar rates of achieving the MCID (80.0% vs. 83.3%, n.s.) and SCB (50.0% vs. 61.7%, n.s.) scores for IKDC.

CONCLUSION

Patients 60 years or older and 40- to 59-year-old patients demonstrated similar outcomes after undergoing ACL reconstruction with allograft. This study concludes that ACL reconstruction in late adulthood can still be a successful treatment option and should allow surgeons to feel more comfortable when performing indicated surgical intervention for older patients who experience an ACL tear.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Therapeutic III, retrospective cohort study.

Clinical and radiological outcome of acute quadriceps tendon repair at 2 - year follow-up

PURPOSE

Though previous studies on surgical quadriceps tendon repair reported good to satisfactory results its impact on knee extensor strength and patellofemoral joint is unknown. The purpose of the study was to assess the clinical and functional outcome by quantifying subjective knee related outcome, isokinetic extensor strength complemented by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

For this retrospective clinical trial twenty-one patients with a mean age of 59.1 (±14.9) years were carried out for follow-up evaluation. For clinical outcome numeric rating scale for pain (NRS), Kujala anterior knee pain score, Knee osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) with its subscores, Tegener Activity Score (TAS), Isokinetic extensor strength testing (ISO) and the Limb symmetry index (LSI) were utilized. Muscle volume (Vmqf), atrophy and cartilage status were assessed on MRI. Tendon integrity and implant loosening were evaluated. Statistical analysis was carried out using Student´s t-test, Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 56.2 (± 17.5) months. Clinical outcomes in mean were as follows: NRS 1.7 (±2.0), Kujala score 75.8 (± 15.8) points; KOOS 62.9 (±30.6) % (Subscores: (KOOSPain 84 (± 18.3)%, KOOSSymptoms 63.4 (± 15.3) %, KOOSADL 79.8% (± 19.4)%, KOOSSports&Rec 61.5 (± 28.8))%, TAS 3.7 (± 1.2). Mean ISO difference was 3.7 (±32.3) %). 41.2% of patients had an LSI < 90% and showed non-significantly (p > 0.05) better outcomes in NRS, Kujala score and KOOS than patients with LSI < 90%. ISO correlated with better subjective outcome (r > 0.5) but not with MRI findings. Vmqf asymmetry > 10% was seen in 41,2% of patients. Degenerative muscle and cartilage changes were few and low grade. One tendon showed partial retear. Patients showed no signs of implant loosening.

CONCLUSION

Distal quadriceps tendon repair leads to satisfactory subjective outcome in patients with low to moderate activity levels. Tendon integrity was reliably restored. However, extensor strength deficits remain in more than 40% of patients. Atrophy signs of advanced fatty infiltration were recorded in 15% and patellofemoral cartilage defects in 20% of all patients, indicating that previous assessment tools do not display functional outcome adequately.

Knee flexor strength at 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon can be predicted from that at 3 months

PURPOSE

This study aimed to identify factors influencing persistent muscle weakness in knee flexor strength after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using the hamstring tendon and establish a clear cut-off value at 3 months postoperatively for the limb symmetry index (LSI) to exceed 90% at 6 months postoperatively.

METHODS

One hundred forty-eight patients undergoing ACL reconstruction were included and categorised into two groups based on knee flexor strength at 6 months postoperatively: patients with LSI of 90% or greater (achieved group: n = 114) and patients with LSI less than 85% (nonachieved group: n = 34). Items with significant differences between the two groups (preoperative waiting period, LSI to body weight ratio of knee flexor and extensor strength at 3 months postoperatively and peak torque angle of knee flexor muscle) were included in the multiple logistic regression analysis. Additionally, a receiver operating characteristic curve was used to calculate the cut-off value of the LSI at 3 months postoperatively, which was required to achieve the LSI criteria for knee flexor strength 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Multiple logistic regression analysis extracted the preoperative waiting period and LSI for knee flexor strength at 3 months postoperatively. The cut-off value at 3 months postoperatively was 76.9% (area under the curve value, 0.82; sensitivity, 0.76; and specificity, 0.81) of the LSI.

CONCLUSION

The LSI of at least 76.9% for knee flexor strength at 3 months after ACL reconstruction was an indicator for achieving the 6 months postoperatively. This is a criterion to aim for, considering the stress on the graft and the regeneration process of the semitendinosus tendon.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Predicting the Recovery of Isokinetic Knee Strength 6 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background

The limb symmetry index (LSI) is a metric of strength restoration. It is key to successfully return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The threshold for return to sports is generally considered an LSI of ≥85%.

Purpose

To develop a statistical model for predicting the recovery of knee extension and flexion strength (with LSI ≥85%) at 6 months after ACL reconstruction.

Study Design

Case-control study; Level of evidence: 3.

Methods

Patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction between November 2015 and December 2020 were included. The patients were classified into 2 groups: "pass" if the LSI at 6 months postoperatively was ≥85% and "fail" if the LSI was <85%. Factors in 25 categories with 74 levels, including patient characteristics, periarticular procedures, intra-articular lesions and treatment, and perioperative management, were collected. A multivariable logistic regression combined with backward variable elimination was used to determine the predictive parameters for recovery of knee extension and flexion strength.

Results

A total of 948 patients were included. Graft site, preoperative isokinetic strength, treatment of meniscal injury, and injured side (left vs right) were identified as general predictors for both knee extension and flexion strength. For knee extension strength, age at injury and partial weightbearing duration were identified as additional predictors. For knee flexion strength, type of meniscal injury, surgeon volume, cartilage procedures, and periarticular procedures were identified as additional predictors. The Nagelkerke R 2 of the final model was 0.178, and the c-statistic was 0.716 (95% CI, 0.676-0.754). The Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated good calibration (P = .879).

Conclusion

Several factors including preoperative isokinetic strength, treatment of meniscal injuries, left vs. right side and graft site were found to predict recovery of ≥85% LSI in knee extension and flexion strength. Despite the numerous factors that were analyzed, the predictive power was moderate (c-statistic = 0.716), indicating there were other nonincluded factors that significantly influence strength performance at 6 months postoperatively.

Surgical management of tibial eminence avulsion fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The ideal surgical management for tibial eminence avulsion fractures remains controversial with varying approach, methods of fixation and post-operative regimes reported throughout literature. The current systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare between the different approaches, methods of fixation and post-operative regimes for tibial eminence fractures.

METHODS

The systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. A search was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE and CINAHL databases. The keywords used were "anterior cruciate ligament", "tibial spine" or "tibial eminence" and "fracture" or "avulsion". All original human studies that reported the surgical outcomes of tibial eminence fractures were included. Individual patient data meta-analysis was performed.

RESULTS

48 studies with 1367 patients were included. Arthroscopic fixation resulted in significantly greater stability in terms of anterior drawer test (p = 0.018) and Lachman's test (p = 0.042), as compared to open fixation, though there was no significant difference for pivot shift test. There was no significant difference identified in functional scores and activity, including Lysholm score, IKDC subjective score, Tegner score and return to sports. Suture fixation had significantly increased stability compared to screw fixation, in terms of anterior drawer test (p = 0.001) and Lachman's test (p = 0.001), though no significant difference was identified for pivot shift test. Significantly better subjective scores and return to activity were also noted for suture fixation, in terms of Lysholm score (p = 0.008), IKDC subjective score (p = 0.001) and Tegner score (p = 0.001), though no significant difference was identified for return to sports.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic and suture fixation had significantly superior outcomes when compared to open and screw fixation. Arthroscopic fixation resulted in significantly improved stability of the knee as compared to open fixation, though no significant difference was identified in terms of functional knee scores and return to activity. Suture fixation resulted in significantly improved stability of the knee and functional knee screws as compared to screw fixation.

Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Performed Within 10 Days of Injury Does Not Increase Risk of Postoperative Arthrofibrosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal timing of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) remains a controversial topic. Previous reviews have demonstrated that there are no differences between early and delayed ACLR; however, these studies have been limited by heterogeneous definitions of acute ACL injury.

PURPOSE

To evaluate postoperative patient functional outcomes and risk for arthrofibrosis after acute arthroscopic ACLR performed ≤10 days after injury.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using multiple medical databases. Inclusion criteria were studies that evaluated postoperative range of motion outcomes for patients undergoing ACLR ≤10 days after initial ACL injury. For included comparative studies comparing patient groups undergoing ACLR ≤10 days and patients undergoing "delayed" ACLR after ≥3 weeks of initial injury, quantitative analysis was performed to assess for differences in postoperative arthrofibrosis, reoperation rates, and patient-reported outcomes between groups. DerSimonian-Laird binary random-effects models were constructed to quantitatively describe the association between the ACLR time period and patient outcomes by generating effect estimates in the form of odds ratios with 95% CIs. Qualitative analysis was performed to describe variably reported patient outcomes and the risk of arthrofibrosis after ACLR for noncomparative studies.

RESULTS

Screening yielded 6 full-text articles with 448 patients who underwent ACLR (296 ACLR <10 days, 152 ACLR >3 weeks), with a pooled mean age of 28.1 years. For studies amenable to quantitative analysis, there were no significant differences between ACLR performed ≤10 days and ACLR performed at the 3-week point or after in terms of postoperative stiffness (3 studies; odds ratio, 1.27; P = .508), Tegner scores (2 studies; mean difference, -0.056; P = .155), or reoperation for stiffness (3 studies; odds ratio, 0.869; P = .462). The overall incidence of postoperative arthrofibrosis after 12 months of follow-up was 11 of 296 (3.7%) for ACLRs performed ≤10 days versus 6 of 152 (3.9%) for those performed at the 3-week point or after.

CONCLUSION

ACLR performed ≤10 days after the inciting injury does not increase the risk of postoperative arthrofibrosis and demonstrates similar patient-reported outcomes compared with ACLR performed at the 3-week point or after.

Combining age, sex, body mass index, sport level, and preoperative quadriceps strength improves the predictive ability of quadriceps strength recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

This study compared the predictive ability of each independent predictor with that of a combination of predictors for quadriceps strength recovery one year after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction using hamstring autografts were enrolled. Quadriceps strength, hamstring strength, and anterior tibial translation were measured, and the limb symmetry index (LSI) of the quadriceps and the hamstrings was calculated preoperatively and one year after surgery. Patients were classified into two groups according to the LSI of the quadriceps strength at one year postoperatively (≥ 80% or < 80%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified the independent predictors of quadriceps strength recovery, and the cut-off value was calculated using the receiver operating characteristic curve. A model assessing predictive ability of the combination of independent predictors was created, and the area under the curve (AUC) for each independent predictor was calculated by using the receiver-operating characteristic curves and the DeLong method.

RESULTS

Of the 646 patients, 414 (64.1%) had an LSI of at least 80% for quadriceps strength one year after surgery, and 232 patients (35.9%) had an LSI of < 80%. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), preinjury sport level, and LSI of preoperative quadriceps strength were independently associated with quadriceps strength recovery one year after ACL reconstruction. The cut-off values were age: 22.5 years; sex: female; BMI: 24.3 kg/m2; preinjury sport level: no sport; and LSI of preoperative quadriceps strength: 63.3%. The AUC of the model assessing the predictive ability of the combination of age, sex, BMI, preinjury sport level, and LSI of preoperative quadriceps strength was significantly higher (0.73) than that of similar factors of preoperative quadriceps strength (AUC: 0.63, 0.53, 0.56, 0.61, and 0.68, p < 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The combination of age, sex, BMI, preinjury sport level, and LSI of preoperative quadriceps strength had a superior predictive ability for quadriceps strength recovery at one year after ACL reconstruction than these predictors alone. Multiple factors, including patient characteristics and preoperative quadriceps strength, should be considered when planning rehabilitation programs to improve quadriceps strength recovery after ACL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.