Substitution of tibial bony defects with allogeneic and autogeneic cancellous bone: encouraging preliminary results in 18 knee replacements

Finite element analysis of the tibial bone graft in cementless total knee arthroplasty

Background

Achieving stability of the tibial implant is essential following cementless total knee arthroplasty with bone grafting. We investigated the effects of bone grafting on the relative micromotion of the tibial implant and stress between the tibial implant and adjacent bone in the immediate postoperative period.

Methods

Tibial implant models were developed using a nonlinear, three-dimensional, finite element method. On the basis of a preprepared template, several bone graft models of varying sizes and material properties were prepared.

Results

Micromotion was larger in the bone graft models than in the intact model. Maximum micromotion and excessive stress in the area adjacent to the bone graft were observed for the soft and large graft models. With hard bone grafting, increased load transfer and decreased micromotion were observed.

Conclusions

Avoidance of large soft bone grafts and use of hard bone grafting effectively reduced micromotion and undue stress in the adjacent area.

The influence of different tibial stem designs in load sharing and stability at the cement-bone interface in revision TKA

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) changes mechanical loading of the knee joint. Bone loss in the tibia is commonly encountered at the time of the revision TKA. Restoration of lost bone support and joint stability are the primary challenges in revision TKA. Normally, these defects are treated with non-living structures like metallic augments or bone grafts (autografts or allografts). Alone, neither of these structures can provide the initial support and stability for revision implants. In the latter, the use of intramedullary stems can provide the necessary load sharing and protect the remaining host bone and graft from excessive stress, increasing component stability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate comparatively load sharing (cortical rim, cancellous bone and stem) and stability at the cement-bone interface under the tibial tray induced by the use of cemented and press-fit tibial component stem extensions. Furthermore the study of the desirable option in cases where the bone defect is cavitary (cancellous bone defect contained by an intact cortical rim) or uncontained bone defect (bone loss involving the supporting cortical rim) was carried out. Because in vitro evaluation of these biomechanical parameters is difficult we used finite element (FE) models to overcome this. The biomechanical results suggest an identical behaviour in case of cavitary defects for both types of stems assessed. In the case of uncontained defect treated with bulk allografts the cemented stem may be a prudent clinical option.

Management of bone loss: augments, cones, offset stems

Trabecular metal augmentation has added new treatment options for severe proximal tibial bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty. Porous tantalum tibial cones provide mechanical support for the tibial component and have the potential for long-term biologic fixation. These cones facilitate restoration of the proximal tibia metaphysis in Type 2 and 3 defects. Ten tantalum tibial cones were press-fit into the prepared cavitary defect of a series of revision knee arthroplasties. Voids between the cone and host bone were filled with morselized grafting material. The core tibial component was cemented into the implanted tibial cone; fixation was enhanced with stem extensions, which were press-fit in four knees and cemented in six knees. Extensions ranged from 75-200 mm with length dependent upon the residual bone quality. Offset stems were used in 3 tibias. At follow-up (average 10 months), radiographic evaluation revealed no evidence of loosening or change in position. Strength, range of motion, and stability were comparable to previously reported series of revision arthroplasties. Trabecular metal cones can help reconstruct large cavitary defects and, along with stem extensions and offset stems, may eliminate the need for extensive bone grafting or structural allograft in revision knee arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, level V (expert opinion). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty: graft options and adjuncts

The treatment of small bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty should make immediate full weight bearing and full therapy possible, provide long-term stability for the implants, and restore bone stock. These objectives are achieved with bone grafts if the defects are cavitary or small (involving less than one fourth of the cortical rim) segmental defects. These objectives are achieved with porous metal augments if the defects are segmental and involve more than one fourth of the cortical rim. The treatment of bone loss on the femur must allow the re-establishment of the distal and posterior joint lines as well as provide a firm fixation base for the implants.