1
|
Hayes R, Hartnett J, Semova G, Murray C, Murphy K, Carroll L, Plapp H, Hession L, O'Toole J, McCollum D, Roche E, Jenkins E, Mockler D, Hurley T, McGovern M, Allen J, Meehan J, Plötz FB, Strunk T, de Boode WP, Polin R, Wynn JL, Degtyareva M, Küster H, Janota J, Giannoni E, Schlapbach LJ, Keij FM, Reiss IKM, Bliss J, Koenig JM, Turner MA, Gale C, Molloy EJ. Neonatal sepsis definitions from randomised clinical trials. Pediatr Res 2023; 93:1141-1148. [PMID: 34743180 PMCID: PMC10132965 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-021-01749-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Revised: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Neonatal sepsis is a leading cause of infant mortality worldwide with non-specific and varied presentation. We aimed to catalogue the current definitions of neonatal sepsis in published randomised controlled trials (RCTs). METHOD A systematic search of the Embase and Cochrane databases was performed for RCTs which explicitly stated a definition for neonatal sepsis. Definitions were sub-divided into five primary criteria for infection (culture, laboratory findings, clinical signs, radiological evidence and risk factors) and stratified by qualifiers (early/late-onset and likelihood of sepsis). RESULTS Of 668 papers screened, 80 RCTs were included and 128 individual definitions identified. The single most common definition was neonatal sepsis defined by blood culture alone (n = 35), followed by culture and clinical signs (n = 29), and then laboratory tests/clinical signs (n = 25). Blood culture featured in 83 definitions, laboratory testing featured in 48 definitions while clinical signs and radiology featured in 80 and 8 definitions, respectively. DISCUSSION A diverse range of definitions of neonatal sepsis are used and based on microbiological culture, laboratory tests and clinical signs in contrast to adult and paediatric sepsis which use organ dysfunction. An international consensus-based definition of neonatal sepsis could allow meta-analysis and translate results to improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rían Hayes
- Discipline of Paediatrics, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin & Children's Hospital Ireland (CHI) at Tallaght, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jack Hartnett
- Discipline of Paediatrics, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin & Children's Hospital Ireland (CHI) at Tallaght, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Gergana Semova
- Discipline of Paediatrics, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin & Children's Hospital Ireland (CHI) at Tallaght, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Cian Murray
- Discipline of Paediatrics, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin & Children's Hospital Ireland (CHI) at Tallaght, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Katherine Murphy
- Discipline of Paediatrics, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin & Children's Hospital Ireland (CHI) at Tallaght, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Leah Carroll
- Discipline of Paediatrics, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin & Children's Hospital Ireland (CHI) at Tallaght, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Helena Plapp
- Discipline of Paediatrics, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin & Children's Hospital Ireland (CHI) at Tallaght, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Louise Hession
- Discipline of Paediatrics, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin & Children's Hospital Ireland (CHI) at Tallaght, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jonathan O'Toole
- Discipline of Paediatrics, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin & Children's Hospital Ireland (CHI) at Tallaght, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Danielle McCollum
- Discipline of Paediatrics, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin & Children's Hospital Ireland (CHI) at Tallaght, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Edna Roche
- Discipline of Paediatrics, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin & Children's Hospital Ireland (CHI) at Tallaght, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Elinor Jenkins
- Discipline of Paediatrics, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin & Children's Hospital Ireland (CHI) at Tallaght, Dublin, Ireland
| | - David Mockler
- John Stearne Medical Library, Trinity College Dublin, St. James' Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Tim Hurley
- Discipline of Paediatrics, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin & Children's Hospital Ireland (CHI) at Tallaght, Dublin, Ireland
- Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St James Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Matthew McGovern
- Discipline of Paediatrics, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin & Children's Hospital Ireland (CHI) at Tallaght, Dublin, Ireland
- Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St James Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - John Allen
- Discipline of Paediatrics, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin & Children's Hospital Ireland (CHI) at Tallaght, Dublin, Ireland
- Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St James Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Trinity Research in Childhood Centre (TRiCC), Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Judith Meehan
- Discipline of Paediatrics, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin & Children's Hospital Ireland (CHI) at Tallaght, Dublin, Ireland
- Trinity Research in Childhood Centre (TRiCC), Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Frans B Plötz
- Department of Paediatrics, Tergooi Hospital, Blaricum, The Netherlands
- Department of Paediatrics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tobias Strunk
- Neonatal Health and Development, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, WA, Australia
- Neonatal Directorate, King Edward Memorial Hospital for Women, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Willem P de Boode
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Neonatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Richard Polin
- Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - James L Wynn
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Department of Pathology, Immunology, and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Marina Degtyareva
- Department of Neonatology, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Helmut Küster
- Neonatology, Clinic for Paediatric Cardiology, Intensive Care and Neonatology, University Medical Centre Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Jan Janota
- Neonatal Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Motol University Hospital and Second Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
- Institute of Pathological Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Eric Giannoni
- Clinic of Neonatology, Department Mother-Woman-Child, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Luregn J Schlapbach
- Paediatric Critical Care Research Group, Child Health Research Centre, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Pediatrics, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Fleur M Keij
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Irwin K M Reiss
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph Bliss
- Department of Pediatrics, Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, USA
| | - Joyce M Koenig
- Division of Neonatology, Saint Louis University, Edward Doisy Research Center, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Mark A Turner
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Centre for Women's Health Research, Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Christopher Gale
- Neonatal Medicine, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster campus, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Eleanor J Molloy
- Discipline of Paediatrics, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin & Children's Hospital Ireland (CHI) at Tallaght, Dublin, Ireland.
- Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St James Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
- Trinity Research in Childhood Centre (TRiCC), Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
- Paediatrics, Coombe Women's and Infant's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
- Neonatology, CHI at Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schilling AL, Rody A, Bossung V. Antibiotic Use During Pregnancy and Childbirth: Prospective Observational Study on Prevalence, Indications, and Prescribing Patterns in a German Tertiary Center. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2023; 83:192-200. [PMID: 37151734 PMCID: PMC10155238 DOI: 10.1055/a-1934-1761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Antibiotics are powerful drugs to prevent and treat perinatal infections. Overuse of antibiotics leads to antibiotic resistance, has potential side effects and influences the maternal and neonatal microbiome. Patients and Methods We performed a prospective observational study on the prevalence, indications, and prescribing patterns of antibiotics during pregnancy and childbirth. We included women who had given birth after 23+0 weeks of gestation at a single tertiary center in Germany from January 2020 to March 2021. Descriptive statistics and binomial regression were performed to analyze the factors influencing the prescription of antibiotics. Results We included 522 postpartum women into our study. 337 (64.6%) were exposed to antibiotics during pregnancy and/or childbirth. 115 women received antibiotics during pregnancy, 291 during birth. Most antibiotics during pregnancy were prescribed for urinary tract infections (UTIs) (56.0%). Most prescriptions were issued by obstetrics and gynecology physicians (65.8%), followed by hospitals (16.7%) and family medicine physicians (8.8%). Most antibiotics during childbirth were given for a cesarean section (64.3%), followed by preterm rupture of membranes (41.2%). 95.3% of women who had a preterm birth were exposed to antibiotics. In logistic regression models, lower gestational age at birth, higher maternal body-mass-index and smoking were independently associated with antibiotic use during pregnancy and childbirth. Conclusion We found a high rate of antibiotic exposure during pregnancy and childbirth. Our results imply an urgent need for antibiotic stewardship programs in perinatal medicine as well as further research on the effects of perinatal antibiotic exposure on microbiome development and childhood health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna-Lara Schilling
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of
Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Achim Rody
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of
Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Verena Bossung
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of
Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
- Department of Obstetrics, University Hospital of Zürich, Zürich,
Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sentilhes L, Schmitz T, Madar H, Bouchghoul H, Fuchs F, Garabédian C, Korb D, Nouette-Gaulain K, Pécheux O, Sananès N, Sibiude J, Sénat MV, Goffinet F. [The cesarean procedure: Guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists]. GYNECOLOGIE, OBSTETRIQUE, FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE 2023; 51:7-34. [PMID: 36228999 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2022.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify procedures to reduce maternal morbidity during cesarean. MATERIAL AND METHODS The quality of evidence of the literature was assessed following the GRADE® method with questions formulated in the PICO format (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) and outcomes defined a priori and classified according to their importance. An extensive bibliographic search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE databases. The quality of the evidence was assessed (high, moderate, low, very low) and a (i) strong or (ii) weak recommendations or (iii) no recommendation were formulated. The recommendations were reviewed in two rounds with external reviewers (Delphi survey) to select the consensus recommendations. RESULTS Of the 27 questions, there was agreement between the working group and the external reviewers on 26. The level of evidence of the literature was insufficient to provide a recommendation on 15 questions. Preventing hypothermia is recommended to increase maternal satisfaction and comfort (weak recommendation) and to reduce neonatal hypothermia (strong recommendation). The quality of the evidence of the literature did not allow to recommend the skin disinfectant to be used nor the relevance of a preoperative vaginal disinfection nor the choice between the use or nonuse of an indwelling bladder catheterization (if micturition takes place 1 hour before the cesarean section). The Misgav-Ladach technique or its analogues should be considered rather than the Pfannenstiel technique to reduce maternal morbidity (weak recommendation) bladder flap before uterine incision should not be performed routinely (weak recommendation), but a blunt (weak recommendation) and cephalad-caudad extension of uterine incision (weak recommendation) should be considered to reduce maternal morbidity. Antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended to reduce maternal infectious morbidity (strong recommendation) without recommendation on its type or the timing of administration (before incision or after cord clamping). The administration of carbetocin after cord clamping does not significantly decrease the incidence of blood loss>1000 ml, anemia, or blood transfusion compared with the administration of oxytocin. Thus, it is not recommended to use carbetocin rather than oxytocin in cesarean. It is recommended that systematic manual removal of the placenta not to be performed (weak recommendation). An antiemetic should be administered after cord clamping in women having a planned cesarean under locoregional anaesthesia to reduce intraoperative and postoperative nausea and vomiting (strong recommendation) with no recommendation regarding choice of use one or two antiemetics. The level of evidence of the literature was insufficient to provide any recommendation concerning single or double-layer closure of the uterine incision, or the uterine exteriorization. Closing the peritoneum (visceral or parietal) should not be considered (weak recommendation). The quality of the evidence of the literature was not sufficient to provide recommendation on systematic subcutaneous closure, including in obese or overweight patients, or the use of subcuticular suture in obese or overweight patients. The use of subcuticular suture in comparison with skin closure by staples was not considered as a recommendation due to the absence of a consensus in the external review rounds. CONCLUSION In case of cesarean, preventing hypothermia, administering antiemetic and antibiotic prophylaxis after cord clamping are the only strong recommendations. The Misgav-Ladach technique, the way of performing uterine incision (no systematic bladder flap, blunt cephalad-caudad extension), not performing routine manual removal of the placenta nor closure of the peritoneum are weak recommendations and may reduce maternal morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Sentilhes
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, centre hospitalier universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
| | - T Schmitz
- Service de gynécologie obstétrique, hôpital Robert-Debré, université Paris Diderot, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - H Madar
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, centre hospitalier universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - H Bouchghoul
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, centre hospitalier universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - F Fuchs
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, centre hospitalier universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - C Garabédian
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, centre hospitalier universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - D Korb
- Service de gynécologie obstétrique, hôpital Robert-Debré, université Paris Diderot, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - K Nouette-Gaulain
- Service d'anesthésie, centre hospitalier universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - O Pécheux
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, centre hospitalier universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - N Sananès
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, centre hospitalier universitaire de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - J Sibiude
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital Louis-Mourier, AP-HP Louis-Mourier, Colombes, France
| | - M-V Sénat
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital Bicêtre, AP-HP Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, Paris, France
| | - F Goffinet
- Maternité Port-Royal, groupe hospitalier Cochin Broca, Hôtel-Dieu, université Paris-Descartes, AP-HP, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jawad MJ, Hassan SM, Obaid AK, Hadi NR. ROLE OF PRE-CESAREAN SECTION CEFOTAXIME IN AMELIORATED POST-CESAREAN COMPLICATION. WIADOMOSCI LEKARSKIE (WARSAW, POLAND : 1960) 2022; 75:818-823. [PMID: 35633354 DOI: 10.36740/wlek202204113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim: The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of cefotaxime before and after skin incision in avoiding post-operative infection complications in caesarean section women, also evaluation the efficacy of cefotaxime in reducing post-caesarean section complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS Materials and methods: We conducted 150 women who undergoing caesarean section in the Obstetrics & Gynecological Department, Babylon government from January, 2021 to March, 2021. The caesarean operations were done by using standard protocols. Each patient was examined daily and post-operative infectious. Women were randomly divided into three groups; each group contains 50 women; Group 1: (control) given normal saline 12 hr. before and after skin incision. Group 2 (pre-operation antibiotic): given single dose of cefotaxime 1 g intravenously 12 hr. before skin incision, and Group 3 (post-operation antibiotic): given single dose of cefotaxime 1 g intravenously 12 hr after operation. RESULTS Results: The outcome measures were post-operative febrile morbidity, healing period and urinary tract infections, in addition to socioeconomic state of each woman. CONCLUSION Conclusions: cefotaxime pre-cesarean section could ameliorate post-operative problems such as infection of surgical wound, febrile, and urinary tract infections.
Collapse
|
5
|
Bossung V, Lupatsii M, Dashdorj L, Tassiello O, Jonassen S, Pagel J, Demmert M, Wolf EA, Rody A, Waschina S, Graspeuntner S, Rupp J, Härtel C. Timing of antimicrobial prophylaxis for cesarean section is critical for gut microbiome development in term born infants. Gut Microbes 2022; 14:2038855. [PMID: 35184691 PMCID: PMC8865290 DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2038855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Animal models imply that the perinatal exposure to antibiotics has a substantial impact on microbiome establishment of the offspring. We aimed to evaluate the effect of timing of antimicrobial prophylaxis for cesarean section before versus after cord clamping on gut microbiome composition of term born infants. We performed an exploratory, single center randomized controlled clinical trial. We included forty pregnant women with elective cesarean section at term. The intervention group received single dose intravenous cefuroxime after cord clamping (n = 19), the control group single dose intravenous cefuroxime 30 minutes before skin incision (n = 21). The primary endpoint was microbiome signature of infants and metabolic prediction in the first days of life as determined in meconium samples by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Secondary endpoints were microbiome composition at one month and 1 year of life. In meconium samples of the intervention group, the genus Staphylococcus pre-dominated. In the control group, the placental cross-over of cefuroxime was confirmed in cord blood. A higher amino acid and nitrogen metabolism as well as increased abundance of the genera Cutibacterium, Corynebacterium and Streptophyta were noted (indicator families: Cytophagaceae, Lactobacilaceae, Oxalobacteraceae). Predictive models of metabolic function revealed higher 2'fucosyllactose utilization in control group samples. In the follow-up visits, a higher abundance of the genus Clostridium was evident in the intervention group. Our exploratory randomized controlled trial suggests that timing of antimicrobial prophylaxis is critical for early microbiome engraftment but not antimicrobial resistance emergence in term born infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verena Bossung
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Mariia Lupatsii
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Hamburg-Lübeck-Borstel-Riems, Lübeck, Germany
| | | | - Oronzo Tassiello
- Institute for Human Nutrition and Food Science, Nutriinformatics, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Sinje Jonassen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Julia Pagel
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Hamburg-Lübeck-Borstel-Riems, Lübeck, Germany
- Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Martin Demmert
- Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Ellinor Anna Wolf
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Achim Rody
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Silvio Waschina
- Institute for Human Nutrition and Food Science, Nutriinformatics, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Simon Graspeuntner
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Hamburg-Lübeck-Borstel-Riems, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Jan Rupp
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Hamburg-Lübeck-Borstel-Riems, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Christoph Härtel
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Hamburg-Lübeck-Borstel-Riems, Lübeck, Germany
- Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus, Lübeck, Germany
- Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital of Würzburg, Wurzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Martin C, Auboyer C, Boisson M, Dupont H, Gauzit R, Kitzis M, Leone M, Lepape A, Mimoz O, Montravers P, Pourriat JL. Antibioprophylaxie en chirurgie et médecine interventionnelle (patients adultes). Actualisation 2017. ANESTHÉSIE & RÉANIMATION 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.anrea.2019.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
7
|
Martin C, Auboyer C, Boisson M, Dupont H, Gauzit R, Kitzis M, Leone M, Lepape A, Mimoz O, Montravers P, Pourriat J. Antibioprophylaxis in surgery and interventional medicine (adult patients). Update 2017. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2019; 38:549-562. [DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2019.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
8
|
Keskin M, Pabuccu EG, Sahin O, Cakmak D, Oral S, Kiseli M, Yarcı Gursoy A, Dincer Cengiz S. Oral antibiotic prophylaxis in elective cesarean deliveries: pilot analysis in tertiary Care Hospital. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2019; 34:920-924. [PMID: 31113268 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1622670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Puerperal infection remains a significant cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Those infections occur more likely after cesarean delivery (CD). Prophylactic antibiotics are administered at the time of CD to prevent complications. In addition to intraoperative prophylaxis; prescription of antibiotics during hospital discharge to prevent surgical site infections (SSI) is quite common. Purpose of this study is to determine the utility of prophylactic oral antibiotic prescription in a cohort of low-risk women undergoing CD. MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospective observational study was conducted between 2014 and 2018 at Ufuk University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Total of 389 low risk elective cesarean deliveries were selected. All cases received intraoperative prophylaxis. In group I (157 subjects), no further antibiotics were given and in group II (232 cases), oral cephuroxime 500 mg was given during hospital discharge. Primary outcome was SSI. Secondary outcomes were endometritis and other infectious conditions. RESULTS Overall SSI rate was 2.5%. Only 2 SSIs were noted in group 1 (1.2%) compared to eight in group II (3.4%). There was no statistical difference in SSI rate between two groups. Secondary outcomes were also comparable. CONCLUSION In this study, we failed to reveal any beneficial effect of oral antibiotic prescription during hospital discharge in low risk elective CDs. Therefore, use of oral antibiotics in addition to intraoperative prophylaxis should be questioned in terms of increased costs, emergence of bacterial resistance and long term effects on new born as a consequence of changes in gut microbiome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muge Keskin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ufuk University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Emre Goksan Pabuccu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ufuk University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ozgur Sahin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ufuk University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Didem Cakmak
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ufuk University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sezin Oral
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ufuk University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mine Kiseli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ufuk University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Asli Yarcı Gursoy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ufuk University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sevim Dincer Cengiz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ufuk University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bollig C, Nothacker M, Lehane C, Motschall E, Lang B, Meerpohl JJ, Schmucker CM. Prophylactic antibiotics before cord clamping in cesarean delivery: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2017; 97:521-535. [PMID: 29215155 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2017] [Accepted: 11/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The number of clinical trials investigating the optimal timing of prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section has increased rapidly over the last few years. We conducted a systematic review to inform up-to-date evidence-based guidelines to prevent postpartum infectious morbidity in the mother and rule out any safety issues related to antepartum antibiotic exposure in infants. MATERIAL AND METHODS Four bibliographic databases were searched for published reports of trials. Ongoing or unpublished studies were searched in Clinicaltrials.gov and the World Health Organization registry platform. Randomized controlled trials comparing antibiotic prophylaxis before and after cord clamping in cesarean section were eligible. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were assessed, and certainty of evidence graded. RESULTS In total, 18 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Those women who received antibiotics preoperatively were 28% (relative risk 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.56-0.92, nine studies, 4342 women, high quality of evidence) less likely to show infectious morbidity as compared with those who received antibiotics after cord clamping. The risk of endomyometritis and/or endometritis was reduced by 43% (relative risk 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.40-0.82, 13 studies, 6250 women, high quality of evidence) and the risk of wound infection by 38% (relative risk 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.47-0.81, 14 studies, 6450 women, high quality of evidence) in those who received antibiotics preoperatively as compared to those who received antibiotics after cord clamping. For other maternal infections no significant differences were identified. The risk for neonatal outcomes, such as deaths attributed to infection, sepsis, neonatal antibiotic treatment, intensive care unit admission or antibiotic-related adverse events, was not found to be different, either clinically or statistically, when antibiotics were given before or after cord clamping (moderate to low quality of evidence). CONCLUSIONS The evidence in favor of prophylactic antibiotic administration before, in comparison with after, cord clamping for major maternal infections was of high quality, meaning that further research would be unlikely to change the confidence in these findings. However, we recommend additional research reflecting the precision of the effect estimates for neonatal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Bollig
- Cochrane Germany, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Monika Nothacker
- AWMF-Institute for Medical Knowledge Management (IMWi), Marburg, Germany
| | - Cornelius Lehane
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Edith Motschall
- Institute for Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Britta Lang
- Cochrane Germany, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Joerg J Meerpohl
- Cochrane Germany, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christine M Schmucker
- Cochrane Germany, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhang C, Zhang L, Liu X, Zhang L, Zeng Z, Li L, Liu G, Jiang H. Timing of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Elective Caesarean Delivery: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0129434. [PMID: 26148063 PMCID: PMC4492889 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2014] [Accepted: 04/26/2015] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis before skin incision with that after umbilical cord clamping in elective caesarean delivery. METHODS We conducted a randomized open-label controlled trial with two parallel arms at three hospitals in western China. Participants meeting the inclusion criteria received antibiotics 30-60 minutes before skin incision while others received antibiotics after umbilical cords clamping. For the meta-analysis, studies were identified from the database of PUBMED, Cochrane Library and EMbase and assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. RESULTS Four hundred and ten patients were randomized to receive antibiotics before skin incision (n = 205) or after umbilical cords clamping (n = 205). There was no difference in the incidence of postpartum endometritis (RR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.24), wound infection (RR = 3.06, 95% CI 0.13 to 74.69) and total puerperal morbidity (RR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.47 to 2.22). No increase in the incidence of neonatal sepsis (RR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.24), septic workup (RR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.08 to 2.07), or intermediate NICU admission (RR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.24 to 2.26) was observed. The meta-analysis involving nine RCTs showed that no statistically significant difference was found in terms of the risk of postpartum endometritis (RR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.39, 1.36), wound infection (RR = 0.80, 95%CI 0.55, 1.17), or puerperal morbidity (RR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.70, 1.13). No increase in the incidence of neonatal sepsis (RR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.20), septic workup (RR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.54), or intermediate NICU admission (RR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.18) was observed. CONCLUSION For elective caesarean delivery, the effects of antibiotic prophylaxis before skin incision and after umbilical cord clamping were equal. Both antibiotic prophylaxis before skin incision and that after umbilical cord clamping were recommended for elective caesarean delivery. The outcome of further studies should address both maternal and neonatal infectious morbidity as well as long-term neonatal follow up. TRIAL REGISTRATION Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR-TRC-11001853.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chuan Zhang
- Department of Pharmacy, Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Lingli Zhang
- Department of Pharmacy, Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Xinghui Liu
- Department of Obstetric & Gynecologic, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Li Zhang
- Department of Obstetric & Gynecologic, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Zhiyou Zeng
- Department of Pharmacy, Nanchong Central Hospital, Nanchong, Sichuan, China
| | - Lin Li
- Department of Pharmacy, Nanchong Central Hospital, Nanchong, Sichuan, China
| | - Guanjian Liu
- The Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Hong Jiang
- Department of Obstetric & Gynecologic, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mackeen AD, Packard RE, Ota E, Berghella V, Baxter JK. Timing of intravenous prophylactic antibiotics for preventing postpartum infectious morbidity in women undergoing cesarean delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 2014:CD009516. [PMID: 25479008 PMCID: PMC11227345 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009516.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given the continued rise in cesarean birth rate and the increased risk of surgical site infections after cesarean birth compared with vaginal birth, effective interventions must be established for prevention of surgical site infections. Prophylactic intravenous (IV) antibiotic administration 60 minutes prior to skin incision is recommended for abdominal gynecologic surgery; however, administration of prophylactic antibiotics has traditionally been withheld until after neonatal umbilical cord clamping during cesarean delivery due to the concern for potential transfer of antibiotics to the neonate. OBJECTIVES To compare the effects of cesarean antibiotic prophylaxis administered preoperatively versus after neonatal cord clamp on postoperative infectious complications for both the mother and the neonate. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (1 March 2014) and reference lists of retrieved papers. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing maternal and neonatal outcomes following prophylactic antibiotics administered prior to skin incision versus after neonatal cord clamping during cesarean delivery. Cluster-RCTs were eligible for inclusion but none were identified. Quasi-RCT and trials using a cross-over design were not eligible for inclusion in this review. Studies published in abstract form only were eligible for inclusion if sufficient information was available in the report. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS At least two review authors independently assessed the studies for inclusion, assessed risk of bias, abstracted data and checked entries for accuracy. We assessed the quality of evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS We included 10 studies (12 trial reports) from which 5041 women contributed data for the primary outcome. The overall risk of bias was low.When comparing prophylactic intravenous (IV) antibiotic administration in women undergoing cesarean delivery, there was a reduction in composite maternal infectious morbidity (risk ratio (RR) 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45 to 0.72, high quality evidence), which was specifically due to the reduction in endometritis (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.79, high quality evidence) and wound infection (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.81, high quality evidence) in those that received antibiotics preoperatively as compared to those who received antibiotics after neonatal cord clamping. There were no clear differences in neonatal sepsis (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.13, moderate quality evidence).There were no clear differences for other maternal outcomes such as urinary tract infection (UTI), cystitis and pyelonephritis (moderate quality evidence), respiratory infection (low quality evidence), or any neonatal outcomes. Maternal side effects were not reported in the included studies.The quality of the evidence using GRADE was high for composite morbidity, endomyometritis, wound infection and neonatal intensive care unit admission, moderate for UTI/cystitis/pyelonephritis and neonatal sepsis, and low for maternal respiratory infection. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Based on high quality evidence from studies whose overall risk of bias is low, intravenous prophylactic antibiotics for cesarean administered preoperatively significantly decreases the incidence of composite maternal postpartum infectious morbidity as compared with administration after cord clamp. There were no clear differences in adverse neonatal outcomes reported. Women undergoing cesarean delivery should receive antibiotic prophylaxis preoperatively to reduce maternal infectious morbidities. Further research may be needed to elucidate short- and long-term adverse effects for neonates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Dhanya Mackeen
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Women’s Health Service Line, Geisinger Health System, 100 N Academy Ave, Danville, PA, 17822, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|