Outcome of fetuses with gastroschisis after modification of prenatal management strategies

National Practice Patterns for Prenatal Monitoring in Gastroschisis: Gastroschisis Outcomes of Delivery (GOOD) Provider Survey

BACKGROUND

Gastroschisis is an abdominal wall defect with increasing incidence. Given the lack of surveillance guidelines among maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) specialists, this study describes current practices in gastroschisis management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An online survey was administered to MFM specialists from institutions affiliated with the North American Fetal Therapy Network (NAFTNet). Questions focused on surveillance timing, testing, findings that changed clinical management, and delivery plan.

RESULTS

Responses were obtained from 29/29 (100%) NAFTNet centers, comprising 143/371 (39%) providers. The majority had a regimen for antenatal surveillance in patients with stable gastroschisis (94%; 134/141). Antenatal testing began at 32 weeks for 68% (89/131) of MFM specialists. The nonstress test (55%; 72/129), biophysical profile (50%; 63/126), and amniotic fluid index (64%; 84/131) were used weekly. Estimated fetal weight (EFW) was performed monthly by 79% (103/131) of providers. At 28 weeks, abnormal EFW (77%; 97/126) and Doppler ultrasound (78%; 99/127) most frequently altered management. In stable gastroschisis, 43% (60/140) of providers delivered at 37 weeks, and 29% (40/ 140) at 39 weeks.

DISCUSSION

Gastroschisis management differs among NAFTNet centers, although the majority initiate surveillance at 32 weeks. Timing of delivery still requires consensus. Prospective studies are necessary to further optimize practice guidelines and patient care.

Thorax-to-head ratio and defect diameter-to-head ratio in giant omphaloceles as predictor for fetal outcome

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship between the thorax diameter and defect diameter of giant omphaloceles as a predictor for fetal outcome.

METHODS

In a retrospective study, 17 fetuses with isolated giant omphaloceles were included for evaluation. The anterior-posterior thorax diameter and the defect diameter were measured from ultrasound images. For analysis, the thorax-to-head ratio (T/HC), the defect diameter-to-head ratio (DD/HC), and the quotient of the defect diameter and the thorax diameter (DD/T) were calculated. The days of ventilation (t _ventilation), the duration until hospital discharge (t _hospital), and the type of treatment were recorded as outcome parameters.

RESULTS

No relationship was found between the calculated ratios (T/HC, DD/HC, or DD/T) and neither t _hospital (r = -0.418, p = 0.095; r = -0.153, p = 0.556; and r = -0.023, p = 0.929; respectively) nor t _ventilation (r = -0.391, p = 0.121; r = 0.041, p = 0.875; and r = 0.121, p = 0.645, respectively). The type of postnatal treatment was not associated with the three calculated ratios or t _hospital (r = 0.155, p = 0.553; r = 0.019, p = 0.942; and r = 0.012, p = 0.965; r = -0.009, p = 0.973, respectively). In 53% of cases, t _hospital was delayed due to additional and independent postnatal complications.

CONCLUSION

Thorax diameter or defect diameter of giant omphaloceles is not predictive for fetal outcome. The perinatal care of these abdominal wall defects still remains a multidisciplinary challenge, but the outcome of giant omphaloceles is favorable at experienced centers.