Cervical length after cerclage: comparison between laparoscopic and vaginal approach

Efficacy of transabdominal cerclage by open laparotomy relative to existing risk factors

INTRODUCTION

To prevent extreme preterm birth, women with cervical insufficiency are eligible for transabdominal cerclage in case of prior failure or technical impossibility for transvaginal cerclage. This study aimed to identify patient characteristics that affect the success rate of transabdominal cerclage to prevent extreme preterm birth in women with cervical insufficiency.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Single-center retrospective cohort study in 87 women who underwent transabdominal cerclage by open laparotomy during first and early second trimester of pregnancy over a 20-year period. Participants were divided into subgroups according to indication for the intervention. Linear regression and meta-regression-analyses were performed to assess the effect of mean cervical length (before and after transabdominal cerclage placement) and gestational age of previous preterm birth, on gestational age at delivery. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to evaluate treatment effects on gestational age at delivery.

RESULTS

Of 87 women, 62 women underwent a history-indicated and 25 an ultrasound-indicated transabdominal cerclage. Fetal survival was 92%: 91% in the history-indicated and 96% in the ultrasound-indicated group. Median gestational age at delivery was 37.3 weeks, with a median pregnancy prolongation of 163.0 days and with 92% of deliveries ≥34 weeks. Between groups, irrespective of singleton and twin pregnancies, outcomes were comparable. Gestational age at delivery was neither affected by cervical length before transabdominal cerclage, distance between transabdominal cerclage and external os, gestational age of previous preterm birth nor additional progesterone treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of transvaginal cerclage placement via open laparotomy during high-risk pregnancy is favorable and relates to fetal survival of 92%. Regardless of indication, pregnancy outcomes after transabdominal cerclage are similar, and independent of gestational age at previous preterm birth, cervical length before transabdominal cerclage placement, distance between transabdominal cerclage and external os, and additional progesterone administration.

Comparison between vaginal and laparoscopic cerclage in women with mid-trimester pregnancy loss or history of spontaneous preterm delivery

BACKGROUND

Women with unfavorable obstetric history can benefit from prophylactic cerclage ("history indicated") which can be performed vaginally or transabdominally with laparoscopic techniques. The aim of our study is to evaluate the effectiveness in the prevention of preterm birth of the vaginal technique and of the minimally invasive laparoscopic technique in women with an unfavorable obstetric history.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study examining elective cerclages performed in women with adverse obstetrics history. The primary outcome was rate of early preterm and second trimester deliveries while other outcomes analyzed were surgical complications, the time needed for cerclage procedures, live birth rate, gestational age at delivery, birth weight, Apgar score.

RESULTS

Data from 64 women were analyzed; among them, 14 underwent a laparoscopic procedure (22%) while 50 a vaginal cerclage (78%). The two groups were homogeneous in terms of demographic characteristics, but of course differed significantly in terms of obstetrics history, as well as for the surgical indications of cerclage procedures. The rate of early preterm deliveries and second trimester miscarriage were the same in the vaginal and laparoscopic group (8%), comparable to what was reported in literature. The operative time was longer in the laparoscopic group, but with similar duration of the hospital stay. We reported no intraoperative complications in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

As the laparoscopic procedure, usually reserved for women with a previous failed vaginal cerclage, has been proved to be equally safe and effective, it may could be proposed to a wider group of women. Prospective randomized studies are needed to provide new and conclusive data about this topic.

Effect of different surgical routes on pregnancy outcome of history-indicated cervical cerclage

OBJECTIVE

To study the guiding significance of medical history on laparoscopic and vaginal cervical cerclage in the treatment of cervical incompetence and its influence on pregnancy outcome.

METHODS

A total of 53 cases by laparoscopic abdominal cervical cerclage (LAC group) before pregnancy and 73 cases by transvaginal cervix cerclage (TVC group) at 12-14 weeks of pregnancy were collected. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed on the influencing factors of delivery gestational weeks. Furthermore, the gestational weeks after cervical cerclage were compared between the two groups with high- and low-risk grades.

RESULTS

The number of previous uterine cavity operations in LAC group was more than that TVC group, and the costs of operation were more than TVC group. At the same time, the hospitalization days and operation time were longer than those in TVC group, and the delivery rate of cesarean section was higher than TVC group, but the total hospitalization times were less than TVC group (P < 0.05). The rate of delivery before 34 weeks of pregnancy and the incidence of premature rupture of membranes or premature labor in LAC group were lower than those in TVC group (P < 0.05). In TVC group, the increased number of prior PTB or STL and the history of cervical cerclage failure would increase the risk of premature delivery before 34 weeks of pregnancy. There was no increased risk of preterm delivery before 34 weeks of pregnancy in LAC group (P > 0.05). According to the risk level, in the high-risk group, the delivery rate of LAC group at gestational weeks < 37 weeks, < 34 weeks and < 28 weeks was lower than that of TVC group.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic cervical cerclage might be more effective in preventing premature delivery before 34 weeks of gestation, and its influence on delivery gestational weeks was not affected by related medical history. For high-risk patients with the history of prior PTB or STL and failed cerclage, laparoscopic cervical cerclage might be more effective than vaginal cervical cerclage in preventing extremely preterm before 28 weeks, premature delivery before 34 weeks and premature delivery before 37 weeks. Therefore, our limited experience suggested that LAC can be a recommended option for patients with high-risk history.

Updates on laparoscopic cervical cerclage: obstetric outcomes and surgical techniques

Aim

Preterm birth is a worldwide health problem. After unsuccessful transvaginal cerclage, the transabdominal isthmo-cervical cerclage can be indicated. A laparoscopic approach has been described.

Methods

A search was performed including the combination of: "((cerclage) AND (laparoscopy)) AND (pregnancy)". A systematic review was performed to compare indications, outcomes, techniques, and safety.

Results & discussion

42 articles were found through database search. 30 articles were included for review. By reviewing the literature, the transabdominal cervico-isthmic laparoscopic cerclage is highly effective in selected patients with a history of refractory cervical insufficiency. This technique has a high neonatal survival rate when placed in preconceptional or post conceptional patients. Moreover, laparoscopic cervical cerclage is a safe procedure when laparoscopic expertise is present.

The effectiveness of transabdominal cerclage placement via laparoscopy or laparotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Failure or technical impossibility to place a prophylactic transvaginal cerclage in women with cervical insufficiency justifies the need for an abdominal cerclage. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we studied the obstetrical and surgical outcomes of laparoscopic and open laparotomy abdominal cerclage approaches performed before (interval) or during pregnancy.

DATA SOURCES

We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies on laparoscopic and open laparotomy abdominal cerclage placement in February 2022.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

All studies on laparoscopic or open laparotomy placement of an abdominal cerclage with at least 2 patients that reported on our primary outcomes were included.

METHODS

All included studies were assessed for quality and risk of bias with an adjusted Quality in Prognosis Study tool. Random effects meta-analyses were performed for the primary outcomes, namely fetal survival and gestational age at delivery.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 83 studies with a total of 3398 patients; 1869 of those underwent laparoscopic cerclage placement and 1529 underwent open laparotomy placements. No studies directly compared the 2 cerclage approaches. The survival (overall, 91.2%) and gestational age at delivery (overall, 36.6 weeks) were not statistically different between the approaches. For the procedure during pregnancy, the laparoscopic group showed significantly less blood loss >400 mL (0% vs 3%), a slightly lower procedure-related fetal loss (0% vs 1%), a shorter hospital stay but a longer operation duration than the open laparotomy group. For the interval cerclages, the laparoscopic group showed significantly fewer wound infections (0% vs 3%) and a shorter hospital stay than the open laparotomy group, but showed comparable offspring preterm birth and survival rates.

CONCLUSION

Based on indirect comparisons, the laparoscopic and open laparotomy abdominal cerclage placements at interval or during pregnancy produced similar outcomes in terms of survival and gestational age at delivery. There are some small differences in perioperative care, surgical complications, interventions, and complications during pregnancy. This implies that both methods of abdominal cerclage placement have high success rates and thus we cannot conclude that one of the methods is superior for the placement of an abdominal cerclage.

Comparison of transvaginal cervical cerclage versus laparoscopic abdominal cervical cerclage in cervical insufficiency: a retrospective study from a single centre

Background

Cervical cerclage has been proposed as an effective treatment for cervical insufficiency, but there has been controversy regarding the surgical options of cervical cerclage in singleton and twin pregnancies. This study aimed to compare the pregnancy outcomes between transvaginal cervical cerclage (TVC) and laparoscopic abdominal cervical cerclage (LAC) in patients with cervical insufficiency. We also aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety, and provide more evidence to support the application of cervical cerclage in twin pregnancies.

Methods

A retrospective study was carried out from January 2015 to December 2021. The primary outcomes were the incidence of spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) < 24 weeks, < 28, < 32, < 34 weeks, and < 37weeks, gestational age at delivery, and the incidence of admission for threatened abortion or preterm birth after cervical cerclage. The secondary outcomes included admission to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, adverse neonatal outcomes and neonatal death. We also analysed the pregnancy outcomes of twin pregnancies after cervical cerclage.

Results

A total of 289 patients were identified as eligible for inclusion. The LAC group (n = 56) had a very low incidence of sPTB ˂ 34 weeks, and it was associated with a significant decrease in sPTB < 28 weeks, ˂32 weeks, ˂34 and < 37 weeks, and admission to the hospital during pregnancy for threatened abortion or preterm birth after cervical cerclage (0 vs.27%; 1.8% vs. 40.3%; 7.1% vs. 46.8%; 14% vs. 63.5%, 8.9% vs. 62.2%, respectively; P < 0.001), and high in gestational age at delivery compared with the TVC group (n = 233) (38.3 weeks vs.34.4 weeks,P < 0.001). Neonatal outcomes in the LAC group were significantly better than those in the TVC group. The mean gestational age at delivery was 34.3 ± 1.8 weeks, with a total foetal survival rate of 100% without serious neonatal complications in twin pregnancies with LAC.

Conclusion

In patients with cervical insufficiency, LAC appears to have better pregnancy outcomes than TVC. For some patients, LAC is a recommended option and may be selected as the first choice. Even in twin pregnancies, cervical cerclage can improve pregnancy outcomes with a longer latency period, especially in the LAC group.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-05108-w.

The comparative analysis of laparoscopic or transvaginal cerclage in pregnancies with cervical insufficiency: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic cervical cerclage by laparoscopy in pregnant women versus transvaginal way.

DESIGN

Retrospective, monocentric cohort study was performed.

SETTING

The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University.

PATIENTS

Cases with cervical insufficiency (defined by previous history of painless second or early third trimester pregnancy loss/losses) were selected.

INTERVENTIONS

Laparoscopic or transvaginal cerclage were conducted. The maternal information and the neonatal data were collected and compared. The pregnancy outcomes including the incidence of full-term labor and gestational weeks at delivery were defined as the primary outcomes. Neonatal survival and birth weight, neonatal complications were evaluated as the secondary outcomes.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Totally 36 twin pregnant cases and 82 singleton pregnant cases were managed with cerclage, either trans-laparoscopy (totally 78 cases) or transvaginal (totally 40 cases). Demographic characteristics showed no significant differences. Cases in laparoscopic group had a prolonged gestational age at delivery (36.43 ± 0.93 weeks and 33.60 ± 2.78 weeks, respectively, P < 0.001), a higher incidence of full-term labor (60.26% vs 42.50%, P = 0.05) with no significant difference of perinatal mortality (P = 0.661). Meanwhile, higher incidence of normal birth weight infants (88.46% vs 67.50%, P = 0.007) was shown in laparoscopic group with no more complications such as the cases of neonatal with Apgar < 7 (P = 0.296), and the incidence of NICU admission (P = 0.237). Besides, LTC showed good efficiency on VTC in the incidence of full-term labor: HR 0.24 (95% CI 0.070-0.85), P < 0.001. While LSC showed the similar efficiency on VSC: HR 0.734 (95% CI 0.36-1.49), P = 0.857, showing that cases with twin pregnancy may benefit more from laparoscopic cerclage.

CONCLUSIONS

The comparative effect between laparoscopic and transvaginal cerclage in pregnant women showed that laparoscopic cerclage may be a relatively effective and safety prophylactic way for cervical insufficiency. This would be an acceptable and safe replace for traditional transvaginal cervical cerclage.

Cervical Cerclage: A Review and Rethinking of Current Practice

Importance

Cervical insufficiency (CI) is a serious complication of pregnancy, which can cause preterm birth. Identifying how to most effectively treat CI has the potential to maximize neonatal survival in this population of women.

Objective

To determine whether transabdominal cervical cerclage should be offered as a first-line treatment option in high-risk women.

Evidence Acquisition

An electronic literature search for relevant studies was conducted using keywords (CI, cervical cerclage) on the MEDLINE database.

Results

Although transabdominal cerclage (TAC) is reserved as a second-line treatment option over transvaginal cerclage (TVC), it has some advantages over TVC: a higher placement of the suture at the level of the cervicoisthmic junction; avoidance of placement of foreign material in the vagina, in turn, reducing risk of infection and inflammation, which can propagate preterm labor; and the option to leave the suture in place for future pregnancies. Systematic review evidence offers TAC as a more effective procedure to TVC in reducing preterm birth and maximizing neonatal survival. Although TAC is a slightly more complex procedure compared with TVC, advances in minimally invasive surgery now allow gynecologists to perform this more effective procedure laparoscopically and therefore without the added morbidity of open surgery but with the same if not better outcomes.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic TAC can provide a more effective treatment option for CI without the added burdens of open abdominal surgery.

Relevance

Our article highlights future directions for study in the area of cervical cerclage and refinement of existing practices.

Comparison of laparoscopic abdominal cerclage and transvaginal cerclage for the treatment of cervical insufficiency: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

To compare the pregnancy outcome of patients with cervical insufficiency (CI) underwent prophylactic laparoscopic abdominal cervical cerclage (LAC) and transvaginal cervical cerclage (TVC).

METHODS

A retrospective trial was carried out in the Department of Gynecology, Qingdao Women and Children's Hospital, Shandong Province, China. A total of 217 women with cervical insufficiency underwent the prophylactic cerclage, and the surgical approach was decided by the patients or depended on doctors' advice. The primary outcome measure was the fetal outcome. Secondary outcome measures were delivery of an infant at ≥ 34th gestational weeks, newborn birth weight, neonatal intensive care center (NICU) occupancy, and postoperative complications. Nonparametric variables were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney (U) test, and categorical type outcomes were analyzed with the Chi-square test or the Fisher's exact test. A P value < 0.05 was considered significant. Data analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics Version 19.

RESULTS

As of follow-up date, 154 eligible patients were included in this study, with 74 (48.1%) women in the LAC group and 80 (51.9%) in the TVC group. The total fetal survival rate in the two groups was 90.3% (139/154), of which the rate significantly higher in the LAC group compared to the TVC group (97.3% vs. 83.8%, P < 0.01). The delivery of an infant at ≥ 34th gestational weeks was significantly higher in the LAC group compared to the TVC group (94.6% vs. 71.3%, P < 0.01). Compared to the TVC group, the mean newborn birth weight was higher, and the NICU occupancy rate was less in the LAC group (3293.4 ± 542.8 g vs. 2953.6 ± 704.4 g, P = 0.002; 2.8% vs. 17.9%, P = 0.003).

COMPLICATIONS

No fatal surgical complications occurred in both groups.

CONCLUSION

In patients with cervical insufficiency, the history-indicated conception of prophylactic LAC appears to have a better pregnancy outcome than TVC.

Laparoscopic transabdominal cerclage in pregnancy: A single centre experience

BACKGROUND

Transabdominal cerclage can reduce the risk of preterm birth in women with cervical insufficiency.

AIMS

This study evaluated outcomes following insertion of a laparoscopic transabdominal cerclage in pregnant women.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective observational study.

PATIENTS

pregnant women who underwent laparoscopic transabdominal cerclage from 2011 to 2017. Eligible women had cervical insufficiency and were not suitable for a transvaginal cerclage.

INTERVENTION

the insertion of a laparoscopic transabdominal cerclage in the pregnancy.

MEASUREMENTS

neonatal survival, delivery of an infant at ≥34 weeks gestation and surgical morbidity were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 19 women who underwent laparoscopic transabdominal cerclage in pregnancy, at 6-11 weeks gestation, the perinatal survival rate was 100%. There were no complications. The average gestational age at delivery was 37.1 weeks. Sixteen women delivered after 34 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic transabdominal cerclage is a safe and effective procedure in women with poor obstetric histories. It requires the correct skill, expertise and patient selection.