Is homecare management associated with longer latency in preterm premature rupture of membranes?

Outpatient versus inpatient management of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

To compare neonatal, obstetrical, and maternal outcomes associated with outpatient versus inpatient management of pregnancies with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database and Central Register from January 1, 1990 to July 31, 2023 identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing outpatient with inpatient management for pregnant persons diagnosed with PPROM before 37 weeks' gestation. No language restriction was applied. We applied a random effects model for meta-analysis. Trustworthiness was assessed using recently published guidance and Risk of bias using the RoB 2.0 tool for RCTs and ROBINS-I tool for cohort studies. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence (COE). Outcomes of interest included perinatal mortality, neonatal morbidities, latency and gestational age at delivery, and maternal morbidities. RCTs and cohort studies were analyzed separately. This study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviewsr: CRD42022295275.

RESULTS

From 2825 records, two RCTs and 10 cohort studies involving 1876 patients were included in the review and meta-analysis. Outpatient management protocols varied but generally included brief initial hospitalization, strict eligibility criteria, and surveillance with laboratory and ultrasound investigations. Outpatient management showed lower rates of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (cohort: RR 0.63 [0.52-0.77, very low COE]), longer latency to delivery (RCT: MD 7.43 days [1.14-13.72 days, moderate COE], cohort: MD 8.78 days [2.29-15.26 days, low COE]), higher gestational age at birth (cohort: MD 7.70 days [2.02-13.38 days, low COE]), lower rates of Apgar scores <7 at 5 min of life (cohort: RR 0.66 [0.50-0.89, very low COE]), and lower rates of histological chorioamnionitis (cohort: RR 0.74 [0.62-0.89, low COE]) without increased risks of adverse neonatal, obstetrical, or maternal outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Meta-analysis of data from RCTs and cohort studies with very low-to-moderate certainty of evidence indicates that further high-quality research is needed to evaluate the safety and potential benefits of outpatient management for selected PPROM cases, given the moderate-to-high risk of bias in the included studies.

[Impact of the mode of follow-up of preterm premature rupture of membranes before 36 weeks of gestation on the latency period]

INTRODUCTION

Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) is the main cause of premature delivery, complicating 1-3% of all pregnancies. Conventional hospitalization (CH) is the most frequent mode of follow-up, but homecare (HC) seems to be an alternative.

OBJECTIVES

Study of the impact of the monitoring mode on the duration of the latency period and on the latency ratio after PPROM, and analysis of the risk factors modifying this ratio.

METHODS

This was a bicentric retrospective cohort study here-abouts including patients who presented a PPROM between 24 and 36weeks of gestation from 2016 to 2018. Patients had a follow-up in HC at Lille University Hospital center (UHC) and in CH at Nantes UHC according to two different follow-up protocols. The latency ratio corresponded to the real latency period divided by the latency period to theoretical term.

RESULTS

We included 154 patients: 102 in HC and 52 in CH. The mean latency period was significantly higher in HC: 36.9±21.8 days, corresponding to an 85.5±23.7% latency ratio versus 20.2±12 days, corresponding to an 66.9±29.8% latency ratio in CH (P<0.001). The latency ratio in CH was correlated with term at PPROM (P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The duration of the latency period seems prolonged for PPROM followed by HC management versus CH in selected populations. This study suggests a benefit to HC in stable patients.

Statement of the Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine Working Group (AGG - Preterm Birth Section) on "Outpatient Management for Pregnant Women with Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes (PPROM)"

Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) is one of the leading causes of perinatal morbidity and mortality. After a PPROM, more than 50% of pregnant women are delivered within 7 days. Fetal and maternal risks are primarily due to infection and inflammation, placental abruption, umbilical cord complications and preterm birth. Standard care usually consists of an expectant approach. Management includes the administration of antenatal steroids and antibiotic therapy. Patients with PPROM require close monitoring. The management of pregnant women with PPROM (inpatient vs. outpatient) is still the subject of controversial debate. The international guidelines also do not offer a clear stance. The statement presented here discusses the current state of knowledge.

Conservative management of preterm premature rupture of membranes < 30 weeks of gestational age: Effectiveness of clinical guidelines implementation strategies

Objective

To compare obstetrical and neonatal outcomes in patients with p-PROM (preterm premature rupture of membranes) at less than 30 weeks of gestational age before and after the application of protocols developed on the basis of international guidelines and to identify local barriers and strategies for their implementation.

Study design

Single and twin pregnancies with p-PROM < 30 weeks of gestation without signs of infection were retrospectively collected. The population was divided in two groups. Group A contained patients treated before the introduction of the protocol, hospitalized from the day of the p-PROM to delivery and treated according to clinicians' practice. Group B included patients managed according to a standardized protocol, treated with home care management under strict surveillance, after 48 h of hospitalization.

Results

19 women with 21 newborns in group A and 22 women with 26 newborns in group B were enrolled. Maternal characteristics and p-PROM gestational age were comparable. In group A we observed minor latency time from diagnosis to delivery (1.6 vs 6.5 weeks, p < 0.001) with lower gestational age at delivery (25.8 ± 2 vs 30.7 ± 4.2 weeks, p = 0.00) and lower newborn weight (859 ± 268 vs 1511 ± 917 g, p = 0.002). Concerning neonatal outcomes, in group A there were lower Apgar score at 1 min (4.0 ± 2.1vs 6.3 ± 2, p = 004), longer hospitalization (42 ± 38 vs 68 ± 38 days, p = 0.05) and, even if non statistically significant, major rate of neonatal mortality (11,5% vs 19%, p = 1.00) and of neonatal complications (need of neonatal intensive care unit, sepsis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity, mechanical ventilation). Postnatal follow-up showed comparable outcomes at 24 months of correct age.

Conclusions

Educational and interdisciplinary meetings, along with group performance audit and standardization of procedures are successful strategies to implement guidelines application. Applying this strategy, we developed a protocol according to international guidelines for the treatment of early onset p-PROM based on a standardized conservative management at home, achieving better results compared to hospital management in terms of latency, gestational age at delivery, neonatal weight and neonatal hospitalization.

Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes – Inpatient Versus Outpatient Management: an Evidence-Based Review

According to current guidelines, inpatient management until birth is considered standard in pregnant women with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). With the increasing burden on obstetric departments and the growing importance of satisfaction and right to self-determination in pregnant women, outpatient management in PPROM is a possible alternative to inpatient monitoring. The most important criterion for this approach is to ensure the safety of both the mother and the child. Due to the small number of cases (n = 116), two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing inpatient and outpatient management were unable to draw any conclusions. By 2020, eight retrospective comparative studies (cohort/observational studies) yielded the following outcomes: no significant differences in the rate of maternal complications (e.g., chorioamnionitis, premature placental abruption, umbilical cord prolapse) and in neonatal morbidity, significantly prolonged latency period with higher gestational age at birth, higher birth weight of neonates, and significantly shorter length of stay of preterm infants in neonatal intensive care, shorter hospital stay of pregnant women, and lower treatment costs with outpatient management. Concerns regarding this approach are mainly related to unpredictable complications with the need for rapid obstetric interventions, which cannot be performed in time in an outpatient setting. Prerequisites for outpatient management are the compliance of the expectant mother, the adherence to strict selection criteria and the assurance of adequate monitoring at home. Future research should aim at more accurate risk assessment of obstetric complications through studies with higher case numbers and standardisation of outpatient management under evidence-based criteria.

Risk factors associated with shortened latency before delivery in outpatients managed for preterm prelabor rupture of membranes

INTRODUCTION

Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) occurs in 3% of pregnancies and is the main cause (~30%) of premature delivery. Home care seems to be a safe alternative for the management of patients with PPROM, who have a longer latency than those with PPROM managed with conventional hospitalization. We aimed to identify the risk factors associated with a shortened latency before delivery in women with PPROM managed as outpatients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The design was a retrospective cohort study and the setting was a Monocentric Tertiary centre (Lille University Hospital, France) from 2009 to 2018. All consecutive patients in home care after PPROM at 24-36 weeks were included. For the main outcome measure we calculated the latency ratio for each patient as the ratio of the real latency period to the expected latency period, expressed as a percentage. The risk factors influencing this latency ratio were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 234 patients were managed at home after PPROM. Mean latency was 35.5 ± 20.7 days, corresponding to an 80% latency ratio. In 196 (83.8%) patients the length of home care was more than 7 days. A lower latency ratio was significantly associated with oligohydramnios (p < 0.001), gestational age at PPROM (p = 0.006), leukocyte count at PPROM more than 12 × 10⁹ /L (p = 0.025), and C-reactive protein concentration more than 5 mg/L at 7 days after PPROM (p = 0.046). Cervical length was not associated with a lower latency ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with PPROM managed with home care are stable. The main risk factor associated with a reduced latency is oligohydramnios. Outpatients with oligohydramnios should be informed of the probability of a shortened latency period.

Factors associated with a latency < 7 days after preterm premature rupture of membranes between 22 and 32 weeks of gestation in singleton pregnancies

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors at admission associated with a latency < 7 days after Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) between 22 and 32 weeks of gestation in singleton pregnancies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective comparative study of all women with singleton pregnancies admitted for PPROM to an academic tertiary center during the 5-year period of 2015-2019. Women who gave birth < 7 days and ≥ 7 day after PPROM were compared. We determined risk at admission associated with a latency < 7 days after PPROM by logistic regression and identified high-risk subgroups by classification and regression tree (CART) analysis.

RESULTS

Among 174 eligible births, 76 (44%) women gave birth < 7 days after PPROM and 98 (56%) later. The two groups had similar maternal baseline and obstetric characteristics. In multivariate analysis, the following variables reported at admission were independently associated with a latency < 7 days: painful uterine contractions (aOR 3.9, 95%CI 1.1-7.4), cervical length < 20 mm (aOR 2.4, 95%CI 1.2-4.8), and C reactive protein ≥ 10 mg/L (aOR 2.4, 95% CI 1.3-4.8). Women with painful uterine contractions and cervical length at admission < 20 mm were at highest risk of latency < 7 days (rate: 91%). Conversely, the women at lowest risk were those without uterine contractions, with a cervical length ≥ 20 mm, and C-reactive protein < 10 mg/L at admission (rate: 22%).

CONCLUSION

Our results may be helpful in determining criteria at admission for selecting women eligible for outpatient care after an initial hospitalization.

Predictors of Short Latency Period Exceeding 48 h after Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes

BACKGROUND

Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) is a complication responsible for a third of preterm births. Clinical management is initially hospital based, but homecare management is possible if patients are clinically stable 48 h after PPROM. This study set out to determine factors that are predictive of short latency (delivery ≤ 7 days) exceeding 48 h after PPROM, enabling estimation of the prevalence of maternal and neonatal complications and comparison of maternal and fetal outcomes between inpatient and outpatient management.

METHOD

This was a monocentric retrospective study conducted between 1 January 2010 and 28 February 2017 on all patients experiencing PPROM at 24 to 34 weeks + 6 days and who gave birth after 48 h. Maternal, obstetric, fetal, and neonatal variables were included in the data collected. The primary endpoint was latency, defined as the number of days between rupture of membranes and delivery.

RESULTS

170 consecutive patients were analyzed. Short latency could be predicted by the need for tocolysis, a cervical length less than 25 mm at admission and the existence of anamnios. Outpatient follow-up was not found to lead to increased maternal morbidity or neonatal mortality.

CONCLUSION

Our study highlights predictive factors of short latency exceeding 48 h after PPROM. Knowledge of these factors may provide justification for outpatient monitoring of patients presenting with a long cervix, absence of need for tocolysis and persistence of amniotic fluid and, thus, no risk factors after 48 h of admission.