Immediate versus secondary DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a multicenter outcome study

Postoperative complications in breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: Looking for evidence

INTRODUCTION

This study investigated patient- and surgery-related risk factors of postoperative complications in microvascular breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps.

METHODS

We reviewed the retrospective charts of 212 patients who underwent 250 DIEP flap breast reconstructions between 2018 and 2023. Patient-related factors included demographic characteristics, comorbidities, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. Surgery-related factors included reconstructive timing and laterality, perforator choice, venous anastomosis technique, and postoperative acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). Early flap complications (first postoperative week) included flap loss, venous congestion, and hematoma. Late flap complications (after the first postoperative week) included wound dehiscence, skin necrosis, fat necrosis, and infection. Donor-site complications (all late) included wound dehiscence, skin necrosis, infection, seroma, and bulging.

RESULTS

The overall complication rate was 31.1%, and flap loss was 1.9%. Obesity and diabetes were significantly associated with late flap complications and donor-site complications (dehiscence, infection, fat necrosis, and seroma). Radiation therapy showed trends toward greater total flap loss, take back, and flap skin necrosis. Age, hypertension, smoking, and chemotherapy were not associated with higher complications. Harvesting multiple versus a single perforator was associated with significantly more donor-site complications. There were significantly more early flap complications and a trend toward more bulging with lateral versus medial row perforators. Venous anastomosis with a coupler versus a suture showed significantly lower flap complications. Reconstruction timing, laterality, vein number, and ASA use did not impact outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Complications increased by obesity, diabetes, radiation therapy, and the use of multiple and lateral row perforators, as well as sutured venous anastomoses. Conversely, outcomes were not affected by age, hypertension, chemotherapy, reconstructive laterality and timing, vein number, coupler size, or postoperative ASA use.

Impact of Immediate Unilateral Breast Reconstruction with Abdominal Flaps on Quality of Life: A Single-Center Prospective Interventional Study in Egypt

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer is a significant global health challenge, particularly in Egypt, where mastectomy rates have risen due to increased awareness and advancements in breast imaging. This study investigated the impact of immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy on quality of life (QoL) in Egyptian women during the COVID-19 pandemic. The research examined three abdominal flap techniques and their effect on patient QoL. Recognizing the scarcity of prior research in Egypt on advanced breast reconstruction and the limited implementation of multidisciplinary care models, this study aimed to address this gap in the literature.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This single-center, prospective, non-randomized interventional study, conducted in Egypt between August 2020 and August 2022, involved 36 female patients who underwent breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Participants were classified into three groups (pedicled MS-TRAM flap, free DIEP flap, and delayed free DIEP flap) based on flap selection, guided by surgeon and patient counseling. While surgical techniques varied, preoperative assessments and postoperative care were standardized across all groups. QoL was assessed using the BREAST-Q assessment tool, with one assessment occurring 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

This study showed that the three surgical groups demonstrated similar QoL outcomes, as assessed by the BREAST-Q. There were no significant differences in satisfaction with breast appearance, psychological well-being, sexual well-being, physical well-being of the abdomen, or physical well-being of the chest and upper body (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). Operative time was significantly longer for the free DIEP flap group compared to the MS-TRAM and delayed free DIEP groups (P = 0.001). Postoperative complications were infrequent and comparable across the groups, with no significant differences in total flap necrosis, partial flap loss, or fat necrosis (P =1.0 for all comparisons). The use of mesh support varied significantly among the groups, with 100% utilization in the MS-TRAM group compared to 34% in the free DIEP group and 16.7% in the delayed free DIEP group (P = 0.015 and P = 0.06, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In this Egyptian study, immediate unilateral ABR using different abdominal flap techniques resulted in similar QoL outcomes using BREAST-Q. This suggests that flap choice does not significantly impact patient well-being and satisfaction. Despite the limitations of this study, it emphasizes the importance of individualized surgical approaches based on patient needs and surgeon experience, particularly in resource-constrained settings. Further research is needed to validate these findings and explore long-term outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors at www.springer.com/00266 .

Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction in Patients with Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

Breast reconstruction after mastectomy improves the quality of life for many patients with breast cancer. There is uncertainty regarding eligibility criteria for reconstruction, timing (immediate or delayed-with or without radiotherapy), outcomes of nipple-sparing compared to skin-sparing mastectomy, selection criteria and surgical factors influencing outcomes of nipple-sparing mastectomy, prepectoral versus subpectoral implants, use of acellular dermal matrix, and use of autologous fat grafting. We conducted a systematic review of these topics to be used as the evidence base for an updated clinical practice guideline on breast reconstruction for Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario). The protocol was registered on PROSPERO, CRD42023409083. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched until August 2024, and 229 primary studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were retrospective non-randomized comparative studies; 5 randomized controlled trials were included. Results suggest nipple-sparing mastectomy is oncologically safe, provided there is no clinical, radiological, or pathological indication of nipple-areolar complex involvement. Surgical factors, including incision location, may affect rates of complications such as necrosis. Both immediate and delayed reconstruction have similar long-term outcomes; however, immediate reconstruction may result in better short to medium-term quality of life. Evidence on whether radiotherapy should modify the timing of initial reconstruction or expander-implant exchange was very limited; studies delayed reconstruction after radiotherapy by at least 3 months and, more commonly, at least 6 months to avoid the period of acute radiation injury. Radiation after immediate reconstruction is a reasonable option. Surgical complications are similar between prepectoral and dual-plane or subpectoral reconstruction; prepectoral placement may give a better quality of life due to lower rates of long-term complications such as pain and animation deformity. Autologous fat grafting was found to be oncologically safe; its use may improve quality of life and aesthetic results.

Outcomes and Current State of Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Surgery in Peru and Mexico

Background

In developing countries, breast reconstruction has multiple barriers, especially related to microsurgical procedures. Our aim was to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap in 2 Latin American countries (Peru and Mexico) performed by recent postgraduate microsurgery fellows.

Methods

A retrospective study of a case series of breast cancer patients who underwent DIEP flap surgery in 5 surgery centers in 2 different countries, Peru and Mexico, was conducted.

Results

A total of 45 female patients were included, the mean age was 47.62 years with a median body mass index of 24.91 kg/m2. The majority of patients had a presurgical diagnosis of mastectomy (91.1%), whereas 8.9% had chronic radiodermatitis. Moreover, the most common reason for surgical intervention was breast reconstruction after breast cancer surgery (88.9%). The median operative time and length of hospital stay were 8 hours (range 3-14 h) and 6 days (range 3-21 d), respectively. Twenty percent of patients required blood transfusions, 24.4% had venous congestion, and 15.6% presented wound dehiscence. Moreover, 9 (33.3%) patients required reoperation and 6 required salvage procedures (15.6%).

Conclusions

Due to the multiple healthcare barriers in these countries, a very low number of DIEP flaps are performed in Peru and Mexico. Outcomes were worse in Peru compared with Mexico, with complication rates similar to those of other Latin American countries but higher than those of interventions performed in more experienced hands in the United States and Europe.

An Algorithmic Approach to Dual-System Venous Drainage for DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Few studies compared the use of the deep venous system alone versus combined superficial and deep venous drainage in deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps. The objective of this study was to compare DIEP flap breast reconstruction using either the deep venous system alone versus dual-system venous drainage and to propose an algorithm for flap design and orientation and vein selection to facilitate consistent use of dual-system venous drainage.

METHODS

Patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction between March of 2017 and April of 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. Flaps were divided into 2 groups: deep venous system only (group 1) or dual system (group 2). Outcomes included take-back to the operating room, flap loss and thrombosis, and operative time.

RESULTS

A total of 244 DIEP flaps in 162 patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 130 flaps were included in group 1 (53.3%) and 114 flaps were included in group 2 (46.7%). Sixteen flaps (6.6%) required immediate take-back to the operating room, and take-back rates were not significantly different between groups ( P = 0.606). The flap loss rate was significantly higher in group 1 at 2.5% versus group 2 at 0% ( P = 0.031). Flap thrombosis occurred in 8 flaps (3.3%) and tended to occur more frequently in group 1, but this finding did not reach significance (group 1, 5.4%; group 2, 0.9%; P = 0.071).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of dual-system venous drainage in DIEP flap breast reconstruction decreases the rate of flap loss. The authors' algorithm can be used to guide selection of flap laterality, rotation, and veins and recipient vessels to facilitate routine use of dual-system venous drainage.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Abdominal donor-site complications following autologous breast reconstruction: A multi-institutional multisurgeon study

BACKGROUND

The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flap is the gold standard procedure for autologous breast reconstruction. Although breast-related complications have been well described, donor-site complications and contributing patient risk factors are poorly understood.

METHODS

We examined a multi-institutional, prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing DIEP free flap breast reconstruction between 2015 and 2020. We evaluated patient demographics, operative details, and abdominal donor-site complications. Logistic regression modeling was used to predict donor-site outcomes based on patient characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 661 patients were identified who underwent DIEP free flap breast reconstruction across multiple institutions. Using logistic regression modeling, we found that body mass index (BMI) was an independent risk factor for umbilical complications (odds ratio [OR] 1.11, confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.18, p = 0.001), seroma (OR 1.07, CI 1.01-1.13, p = 0.003), wound dehiscence (OR 1.10, CI 1.06-1.15, p = 0.001), and surgical site infection (OR 1.10, CI 1.05-1.15, p = 0.001) following DIEP free flap breast reconstruction. Further, immediate reconstruction decreases the risk of abdominal bulge formation (OR 0.22, CI 0.108-0.429, p = 0.001). Perforator selection was not associated with abdominal morbidity in our study population.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher BMI is associated with increased abdominal donor-site complications following DIEP free flap breast reconstruction. Efforts to lower preoperative BMI may help decrease donor-site complications.

"Spin" in Observational Studies in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is widely used in autologous breast reconstruction. However, the technique relies heavily on nonrandomized observational research, which has been found to have high risk of bias. "Spin" can be used to inappropriately present study findings to exaggerate benefits or minimize harms. The primary objective was to assess the prevalence of spin in nonrandomized observational studies on DIEP reconstruction. The secondary objectives were to determine the prevalence of each spin category and strategy.

Methods

MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched from January 1, 2015, to November 15, 2022. Spin was assessed in abstracts and full-texts of included studies according to criteria proposed by Lazarus et al.

Results

There were 77 studies included for review. The overall prevalence of spin was 87.0%. Studies used a median of two spin strategies (interquartile range: 1-3). The most common strategies identified were causal language or claims (n = 41/77, 53.2%), inadequate extrapolation to larger population, intervention, or outcome (n = 27/77, 35.1%), inadequate implication for clinical practice (n = 25/77, 32.5%), use of linguistic spin (n = 22/77, 28.6%), and no consideration of the limitations (n = 21/77, 27.3%). There were no significant associations between selected study characteristics and the presence of spin.

Conclusions

The prevalence of spin is high in nonrandomized observational studies on DIEP reconstruction. Causal language or claims are the most common strategy. Investigators, reviewers, and readers should familiarize themselves with spin strategies to avoid misinterpretation of research in DIEP reconstruction.

Current trends in postmastectomy breast reconstruction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Breast reconstruction is established as integral part of the treatment. New materials, indications and surgical techniques are subject to rapid modification to further improve safety, quality and longevity.

RECENT FINDINGS

Skin-sparing-mastectomy is accepted as an appropriate alternative in risk-reducing and many breast cancer patients, further reducing conventional mastectomy patterns.Radiation in combination with reconstruction is still challenging with no clear advances reducing skin-toxicity.Autologous reconstructions, not only in radiation settings, are turning to a first line approach. A trend driven by improved techniques to minimize morbidity and flap-variations.Breast implant surfaces associated with a high risk of Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) are now withdrawn. The residual risk for the remaining implant styles is not known, but can be expected considerably lower than estimations published presently.In order to reduce local complications, supplemental material often in combination with prepectoral implant placement is advertised. The present evidence on long-term outcome is limited.Super-microsurgery treating lymphedema is evolving rapidly. Refinements of various techniques and their differential indication are under evaluation to standardize the procedures.

SUMMARY

Breast reconstruction evolved to a complex, specialized field with a multitude of options. A multidisciplinary team is required to fully utilize todays potential and offer optimal individual treatments.

Complications of Immediate versus Delayed DIEP Reconstruction: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies

Simple Summary

Although the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) has become the most frequent autologous flap in breast reconstruction, it remains unclear whether reconstruction should be performed at the same time as the mastectomy or delayed. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to offer an overview of recipient site postoperative complications and help guide practicians toward the ideal timing for breast reconstruction. A pooled analysis using the Mantel and Haenszel methods with a fixed effect model provided results as an odd ratio with a 95% confidence interval. Among most complications including hematoma, infection, fat necrosis, and flap loss, no significant differences were observed. However, delayed wound healing was significantly higher for patients who underwent delayed breast reconstruction. This paper offers evidence that both surgical timings offer similar outcomes and are, therefore, valid surgical strategies.

Abstract

Purpose: The setting regarding the ideal timing for deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) reconstruction remains unclear. Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is performed at the same time as mastectomy, while delayed breast reconstruction (DBR) is performed at any time after mastectomy except immediately. We compared both strategies to assess whether IBR or DBR should be performed to reduce postoperative adverse events. Methods: A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane, and Web of Science was conducted, aiming at articles comparing the recipient site outcomes of IBR versus DBR with DIEP. We used the Mantel–Haenszel method with a fixed effects model. Results were expressed as the OR with a 95% CI. Results: Two retrospective and two prospective studies were identified involving 5784 DIEPs (1744 immediate and 4040 delayed). We showed a significant difference in favor of IBR for wound healing issues (OR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.41, 0.77; p = 0.0003). However, no significant differences for hematoma, infection, fat necrosis, partial flap loss, and total flap loss rate were seen. Conclusions: Despite variability in the choice of the ideal time for breast reconstruction and outcomes reported among studies, immediate DIEP surgery appears to be a reliable setting with less delayed healing issues.

[Change of Gaze Pattern depending on the Stage of DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: a Preliminary Eye-Tracking Investigation]

BACKGROUND

Breast reconstruction using autologous tissue is an integral part of breast cancer treatment. While many studies have elucidated the impact of breast reconstruction on patients' quality of life, self-esteem, sexuality and more, there is a lack of objective data regarding the effects on external observers. Aim of this study was to investigate the change in gaze pattern of independent observers depending on the stage of DIEP-flap breast reconstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eye-tracking technology was utilized to analyze the eye movements of 58 study participants while viewing 2 D photographs of a patient after mastectomy and different stages of DIEP-flap breast reconstruction. Time until first fixation and total time of fixation were recorded and con- secutively analyzed for the right and left breast on each image.

RESULTS

Overall, the total time of fixation of the operated breast decreased significantly over the different stages of breast reconstruction, with p<0.001. At the same time, there was no statistically significant change in total time of fixation of the non-operated breast, with p=0.174. The time until first fixation showed a significant increase over the different stages of reconstruction for the reconstructed breast, with p<0.001, while no significant differences were found for the opposite breast, with p=0.344.

CONCLUSION

Mastectomy and the individual steps of breast reconstruction alter the perception of breast cancer patients. Over the course of breast reconstruction, the deviation of gaze in the direction of the affected breast is reversed.

A Comparison Between Immediate and Babysitter Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction in Postoperative Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Delayed-immediate, or "babysitter," deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction, defined as immediate tissue expander or implant placement at the time of mastectomy followed by eventual exchange for DIEP flap, is becoming increasingly popular in breast cancer patients anticipated to receive adjuvant radiotherapy. In this study, we aim to compare delayed-immediate to immediate DIEP flap patients in postoperative outcomes including major complications and surgical site morbidity.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study between immediate and delayed-immediate DIEP flap patients was performed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and preoperative cancer treatment were compared between the 2 cohorts. Clinical outcomes of interest included dehiscence, necrosis, and infection of the breast, abdomen, and umbilicus in the 90-day postoperative period as well as breast hematoma, anastomotic failure, flap loss, and venous thromboembolism.

RESULTS

Of the 248 patients (443 breasts) included in this study, 193 women (344 breasts) and 55 women (99 breasts) were in the immediate and delayed-immediate cohorts, respectively. The 2 cohorts were comparable in age, body mass index, and comorbidities (P > 0.05). Despite significantly higher rates of preoperative cancer treatment (P < 0.05), delayed-immediate patients were not at an elevated risk for major complications. The 2 cohorts were also comparable in surgical site outcomes, with the exception of breast skin necrosis, which was significantly higher in incidence in the immediate cohort (16.0% vs 2.0%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to directly compare delayed-immediate to immediate DIEP flap reconstruction in postoperative outcomes. Our findings show that babysitter DIEP flaps are a safe option for patients, even in those expected to undergo breast irradiation preoperatively.

Effect of Radiation Therapy on Microsurgical Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstructions: A Matched Cohort Analysis of 4577 Cases

INTRODUCTION

Breast reconstruction with autologous tissue is a state-of-the art procedure. Several patient-related factors have been identified with regard to the safety and efficacy of these reconstructions. The presented study investigates the impact of prereconstruction radiation on outcomes of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free-flap breast reconstructions using largest database available in Europe.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2011 and 2019, 3926 female patients underwent 4577 DIEP flap breast reconstructions in 22 different German breast cancer centers. The cases were divided into a no-radiation (NR) and a radiation (R) group, according to radiation status before reconstruction. Groups were compared with regard to surgical complications and free-flap outcome.

RESULTS

Overall, there was no significant difference between the groups regarding the rate of total flap loss [1.9% (NR) vs 2.1% (R), P = 0.743], partial flap loss [0.9% (NR) vs 1.5 (R), P = 0.069], and revision surgery [vascular revision: 4.4% (NR) vs 4.1% (R), P = 0.686; wound revision: 7.6% (NR) vs 9.4% (R), P = 0.122]. However, the patients had a significantly higher risk of developing wound healing disturbances at the recipient site [1.2% (NR) vs 2.1% (R), P = 0.035] and showed significantly longer hospitalization {8 [SD, 8.4 (NR)] vs 9 [SD, 15.4 {R}] days, P = 0.006} after prereconstruction radiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that DIEP flap reconstruction after radiation therapy is feasible. Women with a history of radiation therapy should, however, be informed in detail about the higher risk for wound healing disturbances at the recipient site.

Uni-vs. bilateral DIEP flap reconstruction - A multicenter outcome analysis

OBJECTIVE

Over the past decade numbers of bilateral mastectomy have increased steadily. As a result, bilateral breast reconstruction is gaining popularity. The presented study compares complications and outcomes of unilateral and bilateral DIEP free-flap breast reconstructions using the largest database available in Europe.

METHODS

Female breast cancer patients (n = 3926) receiving DIEP flap breast reconstructions (n = 4577 free flaps) at 22 different centers were included in this study. Free flaps were stratified into two groups: a unilateral- (UL) and a bilateral- (BL) breast reconstruction group. Groups were compared with regard to surgical complications and free flap outcome.

RESULTS

Mean operative time was significantly longer in the BL group (UL: 285.2 ± 107.7 vs. BL: 399.1 ± 136.8 min; p < 0.001). Mean ischemia time was comparable between groups (p = 0.741). There was no significant difference with regard to total (UL 1.8% vs. BL 2.6%, p = 0.081) or partial flap loss (UL 1.2% vs. BL 0.9%, p = 0.45) between both groups. Rates of venous or arterial thrombosis were comparable between both groups (venous: UL 2.9% vs. BL 2.2%, p = 0.189; arterial: UL 1.8% vs. BL 1.2%, p = 0.182). However, significantly higher rates of hematoma at the donor and recipient site were observed in the UL group (donor site: UL 1.1% vs. BL 0.1%, p = 0.001; recipient site UL 3.9% vs. BL 1.7%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The data underline the feasibility of bilateral DIEP flap reconstruction, when performed in a setting of specialized centers.

ESPRAS Survey on Breast Reconstruction in Europe

BACKGROUND

 The European Leadership Forum (ELF) of the European Society of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery (ESPRAS) previously identified the need for harmonisation of breast reconstruction standards in Europe, in order to strengthen the role of plastic surgeons. This study aims to survey the status, current trends and potential regional differences in the practice of breast reconstruction in Europe, with emphasis on equity and access.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 A largescale web-based questionnaire was sent to consultant plastic and reconstructive surgeons, who are experienced in breast reconstruction and with understanding of the national situation in their country. Suitable participants were identified via the Executive Committee (ExCo) of ESPRAS and national delegates of ESPRAS. The results were evaluated and related to evidence-based literature.

RESULTS

 A total of 33 participants from 29 European countries participated in this study. Overall, the incidence of breast reconstruction was reported to be relatively low across Europe, comparable to other large geographic regions, such as North America. Equity of provision and access to breast reconstruction was distributed evenly within Europe, with geographic regions potentially affecting the type of reconstruction offered. Standard practices with regard to radiotherapy differed between countries and a clear demand for European guidelines on breast reconstruction was reported.

CONCLUSION

 This study identified distinct lack of consistency in international practice patterns across European countries and a strong demand for consistent European guidance. Large-scale and multi-centre European clinical trials are required to further elucidate the presented areas of interest and to define European standard operating procedures.

Overall Complication Rates of DIEP Flap Breast Reconstructions in Germany-A Multi-Center Analysis Based on the DGPRÄC Prospective National Online Registry for Microsurgical Breast Reconstructions

While autologous breast reconstruction has gained momentum over recent years, there is limited data on the structure and quality of care of microsurgical breast reconstruction in Germany. Using the breast reconstruction database established by the German Society of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (DGPRÄC), the presented study investigated the overall outcomes of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstructions in Germany. Data of 3926 patients and 4577 DIEP flaps performed by 22 centers were included in this study. Demographics, patient characteristics, perioperative details and postoperative outcomes were accounted for. Centers performing < Ø 40 (low-volume (LV)) vs. ≥ Ø 40 (high-volume (HV)) annual DIEP flaps were analyzed separately. Overall, total and partial flap loss rates were as low as 2.0% and 1.1% respectively, and emergent vascular revision surgery was performed in 4.3% of cases. Revision surgery due to wound complications was conducted in 8.3% of all cases. Mean operative time and length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the HV group (LV: 385.82 min vs. HV: 287.14 min; LV: 9.04 (18.87) days vs. HV: 8.21 (5.04) days; both p < 0.05). The outcome and complication rates deduced from the national registry underline the high standard of microsurgical breast reconstruction on a national level in Germany.

A multidisciplinary approach for autologous breast reconstruction: A narrative (re)view for better management

Breast reconstruction and oncoplastic surgery have become an important part of breast cancer care. The use of autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) has evolved significantly with advances in microsurgery, aiming to reduce donor site complications and improve cosmesis. For years, immediate-ABR was considered a contraindication if postmastectomy irradiation (PMRT) was planned. As a result of de-escalation of axillary surgery the indication of PMRT are increasing along-side with observations that PMRT in the setting of ABR is not contraindicated. Surgical techniques may result in different amount and areas of breast residual glandular tissue and patient selection is important to reduce potential residual disease. Meticulus radiation planning is important to potentially reduce complications without compromising oncologic outcomes. Surgical techniques change constantly in aim to improve aesthetic results but should most importantly maintain priority to the oncological indications. By multidisciplinary team work with a comprehensive understanding of each discipline, we can preserve the accomplishments of breast surgery in the setting of PMRT, without compromising disease control.

Impact of body mass index on free DIEP flap breast reconstruction: A multicenter cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Several patient-related factors have been identified with regard to the safety and efficacy of breast reconstructions. This study analyzed the largest series of microsurgical breast reconstructions in Germany using deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps, with a focus on the impact of patient body mass index (BMI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 3911 female patients underwent 4561 free DIEP flap breast reconstructions across 22 different centers. The cases were divided into five groups using World Health Organization BMI criteria: underweight group (BMI <18.5 kg/m²), normal weight/ control group (BMI: 18.5-24.9 kg/m²), overweight group (BMI: 25-29.9 kg/m²), moderately obese group (BMI: 30-34.9 kg/m²), and severely obese group (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m²). Surgical complications were accounted for and the five BMI groups were then compared.

RESULTS

Overall, there was no significant difference regarding the rate of partial- and total flap loss between all BMI groups (p > 0.05). However, overweight and obese patients showed significantly higher rates of postoperative infections at the donor and recipient sites than the control group (donor site infections: overweight 0.6%; moderately obese 0.9%; severely obese 2.4% vs control 0.1%; all p<0.01; recipient site infections: overweight 0.5%; moderately obese 0.8%; severely obese 1.4% vs control 0.1%; all p < 0.05). The rate of medical complications also differed significantly between groups, with the highest rates in moderately and severely obese women (moderately obese: 8.4%; severely obese: 13.0% vs. control: 5.1%; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that successful free tissue transfer can be achieved even in an underweight and severely obese population with acceptable risk for complications.

Comparison of venous couplers versus hand-sewn technique in 4577 cases of DIEP-flap breast reconstructions - A multicenter study

INTRODUCTION

Venous anastomosis remains to be a challenging step in microsurgical tissue transfer and venous complications constitute to a common reason for free flap failure. While several studies have compared mechanical vs. hand-sewn venous anastomoses, there is no large-series study comparing the type of anastomosis exclusively in DIEP flap breast reconstructions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2011 and 2019, 3926 female patients underwent 4577 free DIEP-flap breast reconstructions in 22 different breast cancer centers. Patient data was collected via an online database, files were screened and cases were divided into a hand- (HA) and a coupler-anastomosis (CA) group. Complications were accounted for and the two groups were then compared.

RESULTS

Mean ischemia time was significantly shorter in the CA group (46.88 ± 26.17 vs. 55.48 ± 24.70 min; p < .001), whereas mean operative time was comparable (316 ± 134.01 vs. 320.77 ± 120.29 minutes; p = .294). We found no significant difference between both groups regarding the rate of partial (CA: 1.0% vs. HA: 1.3%) and total flap loss (CA: 2.2% vs. HA: 1.8%). However, revision rates were significantly higher in the CA group (CA: 10.5% vs. HA: 7.9%; p = .003), with higher numbers of arterial (2.3 vs. 0.9%; p < .001) and venous thromboses (3.4 vs. 1.8%; p = .001) accounting for this finding.

CONCLUSIONS

All taken into account, our findings do support the feasibility of venous coupler anastomoses in principle, however the inflationary use of coupler devices should be evaluated critically.